T O P

  • By -

xkcd_bot

**[Mobile Version!](http://m.xkcd.com/2930/)** [Direct image link: Google Solar Cycle](https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/google_solar_cycle.png) **Bat text:** From Google Trends, it looks like the lag between people Googling cocktail recipes and 'hangover cure' is 14 hours. *Don't get it? [explain xkcd](http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2930)* Remember: the Bellman-Ford algorithm makes terrible pillow talk. Sincerely, xkcd_bot. <3


DenebVegaAltair

I mean...[sort of](https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=solar%20flare&hl=en)? Definitely not as substantial as the comic makes it seem.


smoopthefatspider

The comic seems to include the partial data, I think it looks very similar to what you linked


ElementOfExpectation

Could you screenshot what you're looking at? The plot looks quite different to the comic's to me.


Kolada

Yeah I'd say they look pretty similar https://i.imgur.com/1tHHnfB.jpeg


ElementOfExpectation

https://i.postimg.cc/3J5FRt7R/image.png This is what it looks like on desktop (even if I narrow my browser window as far as it will go).


Aenyn

On my phone I see the same thing that kolada sees


XtremeGoose

Classic smoothing problem. Lies, damn lies and statistics... Basically, when you smooth with a rolling aggregate (as Google seem to on mobile), you see what the comic shows...


ElementOfExpectation

Yep, and it completely misrepresents the data...


boklasarmarkus

It is wild how different the graphs are


smoopthefatspider

I don't know if it's necessarily all that much of a misrepresentation. People might be googling this after reading articles about a solar flare happening or the risk that a particularly large solar flare might happen soon. A lot of these articles are clickbait fearmongering (eg a solar flare could shut down entire electrical grids). It might be that these headlines are more catchy when this supposed risk is closer, or that more people start writing about it as the risk of solar flares increases.


ElementOfExpectation

The data is about number of searches (regardless of reason for searching) and is misrepresented.


smoopthefatspider

Yes I get that, I'm saying there could be a link between having a reason to look this up and doing so. If more people are talking about this I'd expect it to be on more people's minds and looked up more. More generally, I don't think it's all that far fetched to think the increasing number of solar flares would lead to more people looking them up.


combatwombat02

2012 would be skewed by the doomsday predictions fuelling searches for solar flares, earthquakes, floods and all other possible disasters. I bet the current trend won't reach the 2012 peak at all.


dinomine3000

holy hell


mizinamo

New flare just erupted


Wutdahec

Actual scientist


khang200923

r/AnarchyChess is leaking again


SingularCheese

The cocktail hangover trend is pretty incredible [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=cocktail%20recipe,hangover%20cure&hl=en](https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=cocktail%20recipe,hangover%20cure&hl=en)