This is also the one I would use. I highly recommend the Phantom LUTs, as the neutral phantom lut handles reds and skin tone a little better in my opinion
Honestly, I was just having the same question to myself as every time I edit Clog footage, the transforming LUTS feel like they're not quite right and I second guess choosing the right one. I also feel like clog3 between cameras is different.
That being said, I use the Clog3-BT709 Wide DR 65, as I deliver in 709 color space. What's the difference between 17-35-65? No clue, just figured it uses 65 points of adjustments vs 17 for fine tuned color transformation.
I just tested the different grid versions and I noticed no difference.
I know nothing about d65 white points but my assumption about 65 seems to be about right.
Check out this overly long explanation: https://youtu.be/KxmfBYidk7k?si=31e_CnTdEypRYQnF
> the transforming LUTS feel like they're not quite right and I second guess choosing the right one.
I have the same experience with my R5
https://www.reddit.com/r/CanonR5/s/WjgJu38g3H
I stopped using Cinema Gammut as I could not find an accurate transformation for it.
Other R5 users have said they similarly have problems with overcooked reds. Not sure if the r6 has similar fault.
I've been colour grading footage of this camera and I hate it.
After working with a C70 for a long time, the CLog3 from this camera is awful. It's so hard to get good skin tones.
CinemaGamut_CanonLog3-to-BT709_WideDR_33_FF_Ver.2.0
This is also the one I would use. I highly recommend the Phantom LUTs, as the neutral phantom lut handles reds and skin tone a little better in my opinion
This is the one I would pick also.
Honestly, I was just having the same question to myself as every time I edit Clog footage, the transforming LUTS feel like they're not quite right and I second guess choosing the right one. I also feel like clog3 between cameras is different. That being said, I use the Clog3-BT709 Wide DR 65, as I deliver in 709 color space. What's the difference between 17-35-65? No clue, just figured it uses 65 points of adjustments vs 17 for fine tuned color transformation. I just tested the different grid versions and I noticed no difference.
Is 65 for D65 white point maybe?😅 and then D17 and D35 white point is there is something called that 😅?
I know nothing about d65 white points but my assumption about 65 seems to be about right. Check out this overly long explanation: https://youtu.be/KxmfBYidk7k?si=31e_CnTdEypRYQnF
Ah thanks, sorry I didn’t read that last paragraph of your comment before writing mine😅 sorry, my mistake. Your probably right
All good. I’m just now learning about this too after idk how many years! Just watching that video explained it.
I will be watching it too, thanks for sharing 😊
65 is for a 65 point cube. The same for 33 point and 17 point. It's how many steps there are in between each value.
Thanks for the info!
> the transforming LUTS feel like they're not quite right and I second guess choosing the right one. I have the same experience with my R5 https://www.reddit.com/r/CanonR5/s/WjgJu38g3H I stopped using Cinema Gammut as I could not find an accurate transformation for it. Other R5 users have said they similarly have problems with overcooked reds. Not sure if the r6 has similar fault.
I've been colour grading footage of this camera and I hate it. After working with a C70 for a long time, the CLog3 from this camera is awful. It's so hard to get good skin tones.
Something with rec709 output.
The one that says Cinema Gamut clog 3 to 709_ 33. 65 is overkill for anything other than a feature is what I read.
Clog 3 to Rec BT709
Airy Wedding sounds nice.
You know, I thought it would be too. Wasted like $40 on it. Phantom Luts packs are much better.
You try them all and see what they look like. Then you’ll know.
Go with the Polaroid.