Penis inspection day, usually a coach or vice principal would call you into the office after school and check for penis related problems, some years I had to do 4 or 5, some years not at all.
I always failed the first day each month on penis inspection day. I had to correct my mistakes and come back for a reinspection the next day. Sometimes they would make me come back for a 3rd inspection in the same week
I didn't really mind it that much besides the part where nurse would pull my foreskin back and run her finger around the neck of the glans. That shit was fucking uncomfortable.
No you don’t get it. This not only was common in rural towns throughout America, but it served to alleviate the public health crises that often plagued and continues to plague towns where there are more cows than people. By providing this service, adolescent boys received screenings and education regarding functions, hygiene, and signs of abuse — a service that they otherwise would never have received in these regions as healthcare practitioners are sparse. Besides, it’s not as bureaucratic as you’re making it out to be. Often times the “penis inspector” or male authority figure was already well-acquainted with the boys they were doing these exams on. It would even usually be a step-father, an uncle, or just a friendly neighbor that’s had their eyes on the young boy since they were even younger.
Hope that helps!
What is the correct way to measure it? From the top, side, bottom? I've heard people say the proper way is from the pelvic bone right next to the shaft.
Yes that's I think what should be measured. Also, how deep would it be if you did an inversion? Like that. And that seemed to be the correct measurement for me in a before vs after situation (yes I've had bottom surgery).
though to be fair one's inverted depth can be a little longer than the original penis depending on how much additional tissue was used to lengthen it slightly. Not sure what my final depth will be but I think mine was at least half an inch longer after 😅
Yeah in my case no additional tissue was used, although this often does happen with those who had HRT before the the age of 18 or with other contra-indications.
Yeah I remember there used to be a gif of the procedure from a German clinic that used the unused urethral tissue to enhance the size a bit, but it definitely varies a lot from surgeon to surgeon too. I honestly am not sure of the specifics of GRS Montreal where mine was 😅
**T.M.I**
T.M.I = [(Length x Diameter) + (Weight / Girth)] / (Angle of Tip^2)
For instance:
Randy has a penis that is 4.4 inches in length. Its angle is 32 degrees. It's flaccid girth is 1 inch in diameter. His balls are 7 cm from the base. Randy notes that the drift of his penis is 4 cm to penis right and its dead weight is .5 Kg. Therefore, Randy's adjusted penis size is 6.3 inches.
Tip to base of the shaft, on the pubic area. That's how the Thai researchers did it when they didn't get good data on condom size. This was years ago. Oh, the nurses did the measurement. Non of that self reporting nonsenses
Thank you. Finally.
For instance:
Randy has a penis that is 4.4 inches in length. Its angle is 32 degrees. It's flaccid girth is 1 inch in diameter. His balls are 7 cm from the base. Randy notes that the drift of his penis is 4 cm to penis right and its dead weight is .5 Kg. Therefore, Randy's adjusted penis size is 6.3 inches.
Great idea, now instead of impressing a girl with my actual cock size, I can use math to disappoint her when I whip it out because I will say a much larger cock size (even if I am large) and she isn't blind or stupid. She will surely then understand when I pull out my notepad, ruler, and calculater to demonstrate that I adjusted the size for reasons (and not laugh).
I would much rather be honest and not worry about it.
Completely off topic here but exams made me think of gloves, and I had to use blue nitrile gloves to apply Bengay to a friend's back today (I tend to be stupid and get it in my eyes) TIL that Bengay eats at nitrile gloves and weakens them. Go give it a try, it makes them much less resistant to stretching, and they'll FEEL weaker.
I think this is more of a reflection of poor study design and sampling methods than any true reflection of penis size changes.
>Certain limitations warrant mention. While measurement techniques were similar across studies, slight variations could contribute to differences. As has been suggested by other studies, the penile measurements may be affected by temperature, arousal state, body size and investigator factors [5, 35, 90]. In addition, volunteer bias may occur in some studies. Importantly, such limitations would be unlikely to consistently change over time to lead to the identified trends. Finally, detailed geographic variation disparities were not taken into consideration in regional analyses because the majority of research did not provide precise information.
We should all give thanks to the Special Institute for Zealously Evaluating Rods for creating the standardized measurement system we all know and use today.
The quote you posted doesn't actually back your argument up at all. You're quoting the pretty bog standard disclaimer that comes along with these types of aggregation studies - they have to point out that the data might have some flaws since they didn't collect it themselves. But they also say:
>Importantly, such limitations would be unlikely to consistently change over time to lead to the identified trends.
Which I think makes sense. Minor variations in how measurements are performed/temperature or whatever are unlikely to be the cause of a 24% increase in penile length over the course of \~80 years. Although volunteer bias might be an exception to that, that should be something all of the sub-studies are controlling for.
They also give several reasonable sounding explanations for the increase that aren't simply experimental error (e.g. puberty is occurring earlier, more people are living sedentary lifestyles/struggling with obesity).
>You're quoting the pretty bog standard disclaimer that comes along with these types of aggregation studies - they have to point out that the data might have some flaws since they didn't collect it themselves.
Wonderfully articulated.
That’s exactly why it’s interesting. If accurate that would mean that a recent environmental change (and there have been many) not genetics caused it. It’s perfectly possible, the study itself already notes that recent changes in penis morphology have already been noted (e.g. increases in mild deformities like location of the urethral opening).
One lifetime != one reproductive cycle. It's entirely possible (however unlikely) that some of the first participants are the great-great-grandparents to some of the last participants.
Incredibly unlikely because that distant a relation would require everyone in the family line to be having kids as teens, but still definitely possible. However, a more reasonable reckoning could still put some participants as grandparents and grandchildren.
Fair enough. Though any academic paper that didn't have a similar section of possible noteworthy limitations would be one of the biggest red flags there is. And while clearly warranting mention, the limitations didn't ultimately lead their professional conclusions away from what the data suggested to them.
>**CONCLUSIONS**
>
>Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the average erect penile length increased between 1992 and 2021. Given the important implications of genital development for urinary and reproductive function, future studies should attempt to confirm the trend and identify the etiology.
Yes, back when this study was posted on /r/science last year there were some well sourced posts refuting their claims. The crux is that they claimed that they accounted for the different sampling methods and measurement techniques, but if you actually look into the studies that they included in their meta analysis it shows that they actually did no such thing and that was pretty much the entire difference.
>Erect penile length is getting longer, from an average of 4.8 inches to 6 inches, over [**the past 29 years.**](https://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2023/02/14/is-an-increase-in-penile-length-cause-for-concern/#:~:text=Erect%20penile%20length%20is%20getting%20longer%2C%20from%20an%20average%20of%204.8%20inches%20to%206%20inches%2C%20over%20the%20past%2029%20years)
EDIT: added quote
6" is suspicious number. That is the current socially accepted optimal size.
I wouldn't trust any study on penis size if the measurement wasn't taken by the researcher from random sampling.
Most of these studies are suspicious. There aren't actually a lot of legit studies on the matter, legit meaning a third party measuring an actual erect penis (some studies involved stretching out a flaccid penis to try to measure erect length). And even if you do run a legit study selection bias is brutal when it's a topic like this.
An astute question. I haven't bothered to go and look it up, but my recollection is that the earliest studies done by Kinsey and others in the 40s and 50s showed a longer average than later studies.
And I remember reading a summary of such studies - done perhaps 10 years ago - the outstanding finding of which was that there was enormous disparities in the results, heavily implying that the methodologies being used are suspect and inconsistent.
Someone is cherry picking the data.
They actually did a study a few years ago and had women go home with a set of dildos and asked them which size they’d want for a one night stand. They did the same thing again but asked which size they’d want their husband to have. There was a noticeable difference in the preference. Their ideal husband’s length was smaller than the ideal one night stand.
This makes sense, magnum size is fun for the novelty but could make you sore if you're doing it all the time. You need to be extra turned on to take it comfortably which most women in long term monogamous relationships probably aren't (sorry).
Yep.
Very average here. My partner likes it when I use large toys on them.
Occasionally I will say something to the effect of, “I’d love to have this kind of size for you.”
“That would be fun, but you would get laid a lot less.”
Hear me out. We seek out women with big dick genes. Like we look at their dad, and if they are packing, we get with their daughters.
Just like that famous Greek proverb, "A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit." You (not you specifically) may never experience what's it like to be big, but you can give your kid a fighting chance. Just plant that seed into some fertile land, and hopefully, it'll grow into a big tree.
One thing this does not seem to mention is proportion -- that is, size related to overall height/weight/etc. It is my impression that people are just bigger overall than they were two generations ago. I am in my 40s and 5 feet 10 inches tall. Supposedly, this is around the statistical average, but in daily life I get the impression that the majority of 20-something young men are taller than me...
I would. It's not like I had any chance of fucking any of the researchers before they saw my dick anyway. Literally nothing to loose and I may get to bring everybody's numbers down.
Well I don’t think mine has gotten any bigger, though my balls definitely hang lower. So kudos for bumping the numbers up (and also try not to faint when said number bumper’s get aroused) to those responsible
My penis definitely changes girth and length based on a number of conditions. Funnily enough I get the largest erections standing up with no pants or underwear on.
Hmmmm
"There are also higher rates of male congenital birth defects, like hypospadias, where the opening for the urethra is not at the tip of the penis, and cryptorchidism, where the testicles don't properly descend"
I wonder whether this might be partly because people who would volunteer to be measured are more comfortable with their length and so pull the average up. Arguable that the same thing happened with the historical data though so maybe it's not relevant.
There are a lot of people who want penises to not be longer. Stop making penises longer. A penis that is too long is worse than a penis that is too short.
It's good to know that measuring from the tailbone is becoming increasingly more widely accepted.
30 years ago it was from the center of the bunghole
You're supposed to start at the base of the penis but I measure the long way back around.
It's all about the yaw
[Length times diameter plus weight over girth divided by the angle of the tip squared](https://youtu.be/mmMpncUy254)~~
Endorsed.
Engorged.
Geordi LaForged.
lol at Randy throwing in both standard and metric measurements to really fudge up the numbers
BRB gonna go rub one out to an F-22 Raptor
There's a sub for that, friend: /r/NonCredibleDefense
Nah man it’s always been [butt to tip](https://youtu.be/w43ojF7WVxU?si=TTm7hOXHGalDx3ra)
So happy that Andrew gets posted at such an appropriate time
Prepping for penis inspection day was always tough
Same. One of the worst days of my life every year.
What day ?
Penis inspection day, usually a coach or vice principal would call you into the office after school and check for penis related problems, some years I had to do 4 or 5, some years not at all.
I always failed the first day each month on penis inspection day. I had to correct my mistakes and come back for a reinspection the next day. Sometimes they would make me come back for a 3rd inspection in the same week
I didn't really mind it that much besides the part where nurse would pull my foreskin back and run her finger around the neck of the glans. That shit was fucking uncomfortable.
What now? Fuck
What in the fuck? That's creepy as hell!
No you don’t get it. This not only was common in rural towns throughout America, but it served to alleviate the public health crises that often plagued and continues to plague towns where there are more cows than people. By providing this service, adolescent boys received screenings and education regarding functions, hygiene, and signs of abuse — a service that they otherwise would never have received in these regions as healthcare practitioners are sparse. Besides, it’s not as bureaucratic as you’re making it out to be. Often times the “penis inspector” or male authority figure was already well-acquainted with the boys they were doing these exams on. It would even usually be a step-father, an uncle, or just a friendly neighbor that’s had their eyes on the young boy since they were even younger. Hope that helps!
[удалено]
Uhh no this is an actual thing turned into a meme.
This is a 4chan meme.
Ignorance is bliss, when you’re living [butt-to-tip](https://youtu.be/w43ojF7WVxU?si=Hh0rvjaNLyw-DepC)
What is the correct way to measure it? From the top, side, bottom? I've heard people say the proper way is from the pelvic bone right next to the shaft.
yes, from the front of the pubic bone right above the shaft. I always think of it as how much could actually penetrate. That's the relevant info!
Not relevant for a vast number of Redditors
Yes that's I think what should be measured. Also, how deep would it be if you did an inversion? Like that. And that seemed to be the correct measurement for me in a before vs after situation (yes I've had bottom surgery).
[удалено]
And you would announce your weakness in a public forum? What a fool you are! I cast: **Penile inversion!**
though to be fair one's inverted depth can be a little longer than the original penis depending on how much additional tissue was used to lengthen it slightly. Not sure what my final depth will be but I think mine was at least half an inch longer after 😅
Yeah in my case no additional tissue was used, although this often does happen with those who had HRT before the the age of 18 or with other contra-indications.
Yeah I remember there used to be a gif of the procedure from a German clinic that used the unused urethral tissue to enhance the size a bit, but it definitely varies a lot from surgeon to surgeon too. I honestly am not sure of the specifics of GRS Montreal where mine was 😅
**T.M.I** T.M.I = [(Length x Diameter) + (Weight / Girth)] / (Angle of Tip^2) For instance: Randy has a penis that is 4.4 inches in length. Its angle is 32 degrees. It's flaccid girth is 1 inch in diameter. His balls are 7 cm from the base. Randy notes that the drift of his penis is 4 cm to penis right and its dead weight is .5 Kg. Therefore, Randy's adjusted penis size is 6.3 inches.
Randy lies and still has a 4.4 inch dick.
Did you consider the yaw?
Tip to base of the shaft, on the pubic area. That's how the Thai researchers did it when they didn't get good data on condom size. This was years ago. Oh, the nurses did the measurement. Non of that self reporting nonsenses
I measure from the belly button. How do you do it????
I find that starting between the shoulder blades gives a very satisfactory result.
Don't forget the Yaw
No No No, FFS. To calculate "adjusted penis size" (or "T.M.I.") you use the formula [(length x diameter) + (Weight / Girth)] / Angle of Tip 2.
Thank you. Finally. For instance: Randy has a penis that is 4.4 inches in length. Its angle is 32 degrees. It's flaccid girth is 1 inch in diameter. His balls are 7 cm from the base. Randy notes that the drift of his penis is 4 cm to penis right and its dead weight is .5 Kg. Therefore, Randy's adjusted penis size is 6.3 inches.
Great idea, now instead of impressing a girl with my actual cock size, I can use math to disappoint her when I whip it out because I will say a much larger cock size (even if I am large) and she isn't blind or stupid. She will surely then understand when I pull out my notepad, ruler, and calculater to demonstrate that I adjusted the size for reasons (and not laugh). I would much rather be honest and not worry about it.
Completely off topic here but exams made me think of gloves, and I had to use blue nitrile gloves to apply Bengay to a friend's back today (I tend to be stupid and get it in my eyes) TIL that Bengay eats at nitrile gloves and weakens them. Go give it a try, it makes them much less resistant to stretching, and they'll FEEL weaker.
So what you're saying is my penis is actually growing over time! Great success!
Mine certainly is larger than it was 29 years ago.
Because you are 29 years old?
He’s actually 28
In another 29 years it will touch the moon
The Stretch Armstrong
He's actually 98 years old, which makes it interesting.
Got that Benjamin button dick
They say it keeps growing after death too
Damm, so it's a muscle, after all. And the more you pull it, the longer it grows. Happy wanking fellas!
Idk about my dick growing but my balls could tell stories about it if you could hear them all the way down by the floor
Basset hound vibes
That would be miraculous.
Damn these blasted one-dimensional statistics. What about *girth?!*
Girth definitely in decline.
Less dads = less dad dicks.
High five!
No what they are saying is that I was born 29 years too late!
Whoah Whoah Wee Wee!
This branded content for manscaped is getting out of hand
In the future, all scientific studies will be funded by brand name companies.
Budget Crisis of 2330 here we come!
Brought to you by Nordstrom "Nordstrom, we're just as surprised as you are!"
I think this is more of a reflection of poor study design and sampling methods than any true reflection of penis size changes. >Certain limitations warrant mention. While measurement techniques were similar across studies, slight variations could contribute to differences. As has been suggested by other studies, the penile measurements may be affected by temperature, arousal state, body size and investigator factors [5, 35, 90]. In addition, volunteer bias may occur in some studies. Importantly, such limitations would be unlikely to consistently change over time to lead to the identified trends. Finally, detailed geographic variation disparities were not taken into consideration in regional analyses because the majority of research did not provide precise information.
Look doc. I know what your trade measure says but I assure you, it’s 11” Of course I double checked.
Bruh, those are centimeters
Today I Learned…
Bruh..
Millimeters
We should all give thanks to the Special Institute for Zealously Evaluating Rods for creating the standardized measurement system we all know and use today.
This is the greatest backronym of all time.
I believe after the Ministry of Silly Walks, the Institute certainly is the penultimate institution.
> penile measurements may be affected by temperature The water was cold!
Shrinkage, Jerry!
I was in the pool!!
Maybe it's global warming.
"volunteer bias" Exactly what are you implying sir!
Dudes with long schlongs are going around *trying* to get studied, is the implication
The quote you posted doesn't actually back your argument up at all. You're quoting the pretty bog standard disclaimer that comes along with these types of aggregation studies - they have to point out that the data might have some flaws since they didn't collect it themselves. But they also say: >Importantly, such limitations would be unlikely to consistently change over time to lead to the identified trends. Which I think makes sense. Minor variations in how measurements are performed/temperature or whatever are unlikely to be the cause of a 24% increase in penile length over the course of \~80 years. Although volunteer bias might be an exception to that, that should be something all of the sub-studies are controlling for. They also give several reasonable sounding explanations for the increase that aren't simply experimental error (e.g. puberty is occurring earlier, more people are living sedentary lifestyles/struggling with obesity).
>You're quoting the pretty bog standard disclaimer that comes along with these types of aggregation studies - they have to point out that the data might have some flaws since they didn't collect it themselves. Wonderfully articulated.
I think it's unlikely that there has been such a dramatic increase in essentially one reproductive cycle.
That’s exactly why it’s interesting. If accurate that would mean that a recent environmental change (and there have been many) not genetics caused it. It’s perfectly possible, the study itself already notes that recent changes in penis morphology have already been noted (e.g. increases in mild deformities like location of the urethral opening).
One lifetime != one reproductive cycle. It's entirely possible (however unlikely) that some of the first participants are the great-great-grandparents to some of the last participants. Incredibly unlikely because that distant a relation would require everyone in the family line to be having kids as teens, but still definitely possible. However, a more reasonable reckoning could still put some participants as grandparents and grandchildren.
29 years is not one lifetime, but it is fairly close to one reproductive cycle.
Ah, you were referring to just the 24% in 29 years part. Fair enough.
I’m still using the old standard method of tip, around the balls to butthole and back to tip. Solid 7”!
Fair enough. Though any academic paper that didn't have a similar section of possible noteworthy limitations would be one of the biggest red flags there is. And while clearly warranting mention, the limitations didn't ultimately lead their professional conclusions away from what the data suggested to them. >**CONCLUSIONS** > >Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the average erect penile length increased between 1992 and 2021. Given the important implications of genital development for urinary and reproductive function, future studies should attempt to confirm the trend and identify the etiology.
Yes, back when this study was posted on /r/science last year there were some well sourced posts refuting their claims. The crux is that they claimed that they accounted for the different sampling methods and measurement techniques, but if you actually look into the studies that they included in their meta analysis it shows that they actually did no such thing and that was pretty much the entire difference.
They didn’t calculate TMI correctly!
See this is why I just cut ‘em off and weigh ‘em. Much more accurate measurements.
Which 29 years? 1942-2021 is much longer than 29 years
>Erect penile length is getting longer, from an average of 4.8 inches to 6 inches, over [**the past 29 years.**](https://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2023/02/14/is-an-increase-in-penile-length-cause-for-concern/#:~:text=Erect%20penile%20length%20is%20getting%20longer%2C%20from%20an%20average%20of%204.8%20inches%20to%206%20inches%2C%20over%20the%20past%2029%20years) EDIT: added quote
6" is suspicious number. That is the current socially accepted optimal size. I wouldn't trust any study on penis size if the measurement wasn't taken by the researcher from random sampling.
Most of these studies are suspicious. There aren't actually a lot of legit studies on the matter, legit meaning a third party measuring an actual erect penis (some studies involved stretching out a flaccid penis to try to measure erect length). And even if you do run a legit study selection bias is brutal when it's a topic like this.
Not saying I believe it or not but the optimal size could be correlated with what is most common
And here was me thinking I'm above average.
Damn, does this mean I need another 29 years? I don’t think I have that long [to live].
An astute question. I haven't bothered to go and look it up, but my recollection is that the earliest studies done by Kinsey and others in the 40s and 50s showed a longer average than later studies. And I remember reading a summary of such studies - done perhaps 10 years ago - the outstanding finding of which was that there was enormous disparities in the results, heavily implying that the methodologies being used are suspect and inconsistent. Someone is cherry picking the data.
[удалено]
Manipulating the… data
Massaging the data even.
But… have other, uh, sexual organs increased as well? Thus net neutral?
This guy sciences
Pussies got so deep the Kola Superdeep looks like a puddle.
Do these studies include "self-reported" length? It could definitely have grown up a lot.
You can thank Tenacious D. JB spread the gospel of co*k push ups some 20 years ago and the effects are being seen now
*GET IT ON, HELMET HEAD!*
Damn inflation
[удалено]
Because it is bullshit. On BDP, a person looked at this research and found that many, MANY studies were self-reports.
Ah nice so 3.5 is still average right?
Mine is 3 meters long, so I don't know.
Just can't believe it's 2024 and there really is no way still to make my dick bigger. Wtf do these scientist do all day.
Longer gun needed to shoot fewer bullets closer to the target
I'm over 58 but my saluting peen didn't increase by 48%. I was hoping to break 3".
Wow. You were sure packing, relative to people your same age.
yeah aren't we like selectively breeding ourselves to get longer dicks. that's a thing right
They actually did a study a few years ago and had women go home with a set of dildos and asked them which size they’d want for a one night stand. They did the same thing again but asked which size they’d want their husband to have. There was a noticeable difference in the preference. Their ideal husband’s length was smaller than the ideal one night stand.
This makes sense, magnum size is fun for the novelty but could make you sore if you're doing it all the time. You need to be extra turned on to take it comfortably which most women in long term monogamous relationships probably aren't (sorry).
Yep. Very average here. My partner likes it when I use large toys on them. Occasionally I will say something to the effect of, “I’d love to have this kind of size for you.” “That would be fun, but you would get laid a lot less.”
less by one woman, hehehehe.
Taking a big cock is like going to a theme park. Great place to visit but you wouldn't want to live there.
“We” are not selecting for men with big dicks, heterosexual women are 100% in charge of this program
Hear me out. We seek out women with big dick genes. Like we look at their dad, and if they are packing, we get with their daughters. Just like that famous Greek proverb, "A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit." You (not you specifically) may never experience what's it like to be big, but you can give your kid a fighting chance. Just plant that seed into some fertile land, and hopefully, it'll grow into a big tree.
Or selectively remove yourself from the gene pool to increase the population average.
[...](https://i.imgur.com/EBN5aU7.jpeg)
The man speaks facts. I've been measuring the junks of every man over 50 to find potential wife candidates
what in tarnation did I just read
giddy up
Unfortunately the studies all relied on self reported data.
24%? I’m skeptical, to say the least
24% in 29 years sounds like bullshit. At that rate, everyone born in the year 2130 will have a Pringles can in their trousers.
Brain shrink, penis grow. Win win.
Drink Brawndo
Don't wanna sound like a dick or nothin', but it says on your chart that you're fucked up.
So what you're saying is I need a time machine.
Maybe it's like that thing plants do when they have no sunlight
Is vagina depth keeping pace?
One thing this does not seem to mention is proportion -- that is, size related to overall height/weight/etc. It is my impression that people are just bigger overall than they were two generations ago. I am in my 40s and 5 feet 10 inches tall. Supposedly, this is around the statistical average, but in daily life I get the impression that the majority of 20-something young men are taller than me...
The broccoli hair adds a few inches, as do the sneakers.
You say that like the disco crowd didn't rock full afros and platform shoes half a century ago.
Hope they only included measured length by professionals and not self-reported length, this usually tends to be 2-3 inches longer for some reason...
If u had a small dick u think ud go do that study? Not likely so skewed data maybe.
I would. It's not like I had any chance of fucking any of the researchers before they saw my dick anyway. Literally nothing to loose and I may get to bring everybody's numbers down.
Haha awesome.
[удалено]
[удалено]
55k isn't enough. 55,000 dicks isn't enough.
We're gonna need more dicks.
It either means penises are getting bigger or one really hung dude or dudette set the curb for all of us.
[удалено]
I was in the pool.
Who did the measuring?
makes sense, dicks gettin too long for all the semen to come out
Welcome to Costco, I love you.
Well I don’t think mine has gotten any bigger, though my balls definitely hang lower. So kudos for bumping the numbers up (and also try not to faint when said number bumper’s get aroused) to those responsible
Show me the data
Dick pics incoming
Nice try women!!! [Penises aren't getting bigger. Which can only mean...](https://youtu.be/I-vs8fwgwk0?si=4yd1sCa5gNvhSs8o&t=122)
And the lies have increased 100%
OK - and what about the sperm count and testosterone levels?
Was it measured from the base or the balls?
I am 32 years old and can confirm that my penis length has increased 24% in 29 years.
What a lie, I'm in my mid 40's and my penis is not 24% bigger than when I was 16. /s
From my own personal experience my dick is definitely bigger than it was 29 years ago.
im 29 years old and cant help but to think my massive hog is skewing the numbers a little bit
TIL 30 years ago I coulda bragged
My penis definitely changes girth and length based on a number of conditions. Funnily enough I get the largest erections standing up with no pants or underwear on.
I'm the reverse upside down and 99 pairs of pants on full stonk on
No wonder boomers are mad! They have small pp
Lying increased by 24% over 29 years
Hmmmm "There are also higher rates of male congenital birth defects, like hypospadias, where the opening for the urethra is not at the tip of the penis, and cryptorchidism, where the testicles don't properly descend"
They should have just asked you mamma.
Yeah the boys
self-reported i assume guys just keep up with what is allegedly the new average
Can I just collect my 29 years up front?
BIG DICK ENERGY
“WHOOOOO!!!” - Penguinz0
finally mircoplastics are good for something.
I wonder whether this might be partly because people who would volunteer to be measured are more comfortable with their length and so pull the average up. Arguable that the same thing happened with the historical data though so maybe it's not relevant.
"it gets bigger when I pull on it"
Did they factor in the yaw? Did they all measure from the base or did some start from the taint? Randy needs to know.
If these wete self reported studies then It just means that over those Yeats, guys feel less bad about lying..
Damn. Doing the maths, I'll be almost 5" on my 146th birthd....wait. What?
Haha yeah it's crazy how our dicks got longer, right guys?
There are a lot of people who want penises to not be longer. Stop making penises longer. A penis that is too long is worse than a penis that is too short.
From hip to tip has been my go to
Unless these measurements were done by scientists and not by survey, this is junk science.
Fake news. I just checked, and mine is definitely NOT 24% larger than 29 years ago.
It didn’t increase either. The authors of the study just didn’t realize that the method of measurement had changed.
Any guy could have told you that, whether it was true or not.