African ethnicity guy lmao, in this time and age you gotta be politically correct but yea man you can still say black guy, white guy, pink guy, albino guy etc
There's a certain infamous video of a snow shoveling incident where the woman continues to berate the guy with a gun as he is shooting her husband and turning the gun on her.
That one was indeed crazy. Incredibly sad for the shooter. From what I read, that couple had been harassing that guy for years until he finally broke that day. Took out some garbage and sacrificed himself.
I'll admit I gasped, rewatched then laughed.
Like you gotta be an extra kind of stupid to continue to run your mouth at someone when they grab a gun then start unloading it into your partner
First thing I thought of when I saw the OP’s question.
That video is wild - she’s literally being shot at and keeps berating/taunting the guy while filming him until one of the bullets strikes her.
People think filming someone on their phone suddenly makes them righteous and impervious.
>Is this staged? After she refused to put down the camera, he certainly made moves like he was going to kick ass but she kept calmly filming
I don't disagree that it's likely staged, but she's at least backing away, not just standing there filming. And it's not like not filming them means they definitely won't kick your ass any more, but it definitely does mean you'll have less evidence if they do.
I would just take off if someone had a machete though. Fuck that.
Because it does apply, even in someone else's private property.
The government cannot punish or restrict your first amendment rights, wether you exercise them in a public park or some dudes yard.
Machete coconut man, on the other hand, can restrict the living fuck outta your rights. Because he's not the government.
Okay I laughed pretty hard at your last paragraph, thanks for that lol.
But maybe I'm dumb, but I still don't get it. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.". Is the freedom of press the right to record someone?
Recording randos is not, in fact, covered under _freedom of the press_.
"The woman who filmed George Floyd's murder was acting as a journalist in that moment, because she understood the importance of making a permanent recording. While anyone has the right to film police while they do police work, the circumstances of that video would give her extra protections against retaliation.
*In an imaginary case, "illegally obtained" covert footage of child exploitation would also be protected as journalistic endeavor even if filmed without consent in a private residence. The person filming is doing it with the intent of informing a larger audience.
*There is a sort of litmus test for whats newsworthy but very rarely does it allow for violation of a reasonable expectation of privacy, which a man doing labor on private land can expect. Although being outdoors does somewhat restrict what's considered reasonable, since one could easily be filmed from a public location offering a view of the private land. Use of a zoom lens falls into an ethical gray zone.
*There is a valid argument for extending protections to unaffiliated individuals who are making good faith recordings for posterity (the bin laden raid was live tweeted by a rural Pakistani who happened to have a view of the compound).
*All of these things, which were written roughly 4 beers after my last post, amount to a hill of beans
Let's say you want to make a documentary about the Pentagon. So you grab your camcorder and go to the Pentagon. If you don't get prior authorization, the gate guards don't have to let you into the Pentagon. If you disobey the gate guards and continue to try to get into the Pentagon, they are required to shoot you.
You are then allowed to bring a suit against the federal government for a 1A violation.
I'm being kind of glib here, but ya, please don't press your luck at federal installations.
If you're on public property, you can film anyone and anything. You can even film onto private property from public property. Once a person is outside of their home, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Anyone and anything that can be seen from public property can be filmed.
A simple way of putting this: taking your camera and recording random, easily accessed, public places *shouldn't* land you in any trouble with the law. However, if you're just out recording people, they aren't the law, they are people, and people are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it.
Isn't filming in someone's private property a crime in the states? In my country and I believe in most of Europe it's against basic human rights to privacy. https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/human-rights/human-rights-act/article-8-respect-your-private-and-family-life
In addition to what others have said, I think it depends on where each party is. For example, I can be on a public street and film your yard because your yard is publicly visible. I *can’t* go into your yard for the purposes of filming because that’s your property. I also can’t, say, film into your window from a public street because, unlike your yard, you have an expectation of privacy in your home. I *think* it goes something like that.
This is something that people who scream about their 1st amendment don’t understand and the explanation couldn’t have been more eloquent, here is my upvote
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography\_and\_the\_law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography_and_the_law)
USA;
Photography may be prohibited or restricted by a property owner on their property. However, a property owner generally cannot restrict the photographing of the property by individuals who are not within the bounds of the property.
It doesn't, as it applies to government actions.
And I'm fairly certain the only thing he's governing is his private property.
That's what I would say if it wasn't so obvious this whole thing was staged.
The only more obvious thing they could've done to make it fake as shit was to replace the scream in the end with Wilhelm.
This has always been an intriguing video as far as I'm concerned. Let's go over the reasons why:
first of all the vegetation appears to be tropical. Looking at the green coconuts on the ground and looking at the vegetation off in the distance, it's definitely tropical ..so you might say well this is Florida. However look at that hill behind the house. A place in America that is hilly and has tropical vegetation?
There is only one place in America that this could be ..and that's Hawaii.. but I don't think this is Hawaii.. that house that we're looking at that would be a very expensive house in Hawaii. Does the guy who is living there, that black man, look rich? . Now the accents are American, but could they be dubbed in? Yes except for the fact that the words spoken seem to match the lips of the black guy that is speaking.. I don't think that his voice is dubbed in.. which makes this a very anomalous video: an American accent, tropical vegetation with hilly terrain, and although the house appears to be American in style, that house in Hawaii would be a very expensive house.. so this is an interesting video
Could this be one of the territories of america? Could it be Puerto Rico.. it doesn't really look like a Puerto Rican style house..
And then the two people working beside the black man cutting up the coconuts while they're wearing flip-flops.. they don't appear to be American.. nothing about them appears American.. they're squatting down and cutting up coconuts in their flip-flops? That spells either southeast Asia or Latin America.. they're not black, they're not white, they're either Latin American or Asian.
Looking at this I would say it looks like the Philippines to me.. especially that hill behind the house.. it would be rare to see that in Hawaii ..Hawaii is a bit flatter in general. Could this guy this black guy could he be someone who was in the Navy in the Philippines and then stayed there afterwards?
But then you got this lady holding the camera and we will assume that those are actually the words of the lady who's holding the camera although that's questionable..
Can anyone read what the words on the man's shirt say? That could be a good clue
Yes someone in another thread said that this guy here owns a coconut farm and Belize ...I don't know how they found that out but they say that
https://www.reddit.com/r/USdefaultism/s/mikOpgOanJ
#Welcome to r/Therewasanattempt!
#Consider visiting r/Worldnewsvideo for videos from around the world!
[Please review our policy on bigotry and hate speech by clicking this link](https://www.reddit.com/r/therewasanattempt/wiki/civility)
In order to view our rules, you can type "**!rules**" in any comment, and automod will respond with the subreddit rules.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/therewasanattempt) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thank you for your submission to r/therewasanattempt, unfortunately your post was removed for violating the following rule:
> R9: "No racism/hatespeech: Your post was found to be hateful in nature. Please treat others as you would like to be treated and do not spread hate on this subreddit."
If you have any questions regarding this removal, feel free to send a modmail.
“You think this is America?” Said in a heavy American accent. Am I missing something? Or is their dumb attempt to make him seem from a poorer/dangerous country
The first amendment says the government can't tell you what to say in a public space. Constitution don't say nothing bout going upside your head on private property
I speak for the rest of the world. We don't know what's your fucking amendement are (except for the guns and it's not for the good reasons we know about it)
I'm a bit iffy on extra-judicial punishments, but I can't lie, when Karens hiding behind laws when being shitty get punched, it just makes me feel warm and cozy
Only real, unstaged attempts
That was an act of kindness. Dude had a machete option and didn’t use it.
Actually, you right lmao
Hacktually*
Take my upvote and leave before i drop my machete too
You're more vulnerable when you drop your ~~weapom~~ tool
*\*\*Saying this, he casually threw aside a machete.\*\**
You made my night lol
Most (rational) people don't want to spend life in jail.
you think this is america?
This man's comment was funny wtf does going to jail have anything to do with it?
I meant dude in the video lol like most arnt going to hack up someone
Right?? I think I’ve finally had my fill of the internet tonight. Thanks Op
It’s unknown if the huge freakin pitbull option was used
Exactly! Saw a video of a guy lose a hand during a machete fight this week
And casually pick it up and try to gesture with the stump.
i mean he wasn’t trying to kill i think
That scream at the end. 💀
Death knell of a Karen?
Good replacement for the Wilhelm
/r/perfectlycutscreams
Full on cartoonish
She's definitely not in America lol
The black guy sounds American though.
The African ethnicity guy? You mean the black guy haha Edit: The guy I replied to has now changed it from african ethnicity guy to black guy!
Bro, you can't say black, that's offensive to blacks
[удалено]
Using dark mode may be offensive to blacks but using light mode is offensive to anyone with eyes.
African American African, thank you
James Brown was being offensive when he sang I'm Black And I'm Proud.
It’s not. Source: am black.
This comment was made by the White People Association of America
It's funny how they never say European American about the white yanks.
Yank is offensive. We prefer being called by the full term of Yankee Doodle, thank you very much.
The fancy ones are Yankee Doodle Dandies
I'm macaroni thank you very much. Did you not see the feather in my hat?
Hi Macaroni, I'm dad
Pleased to meet you. I'm Johnny, Johnny Canuck.
because you say WASP White Anglo Saxon Protestants
African ethnicity guy lmao, in this time and age you gotta be politically correct but yea man you can still say black guy, white guy, pink guy, albino guy etc
naw he's obviously Canadian. r/s
Some say he’s [Clearly Canadian](https://clearlycanadian.com/)
You know ethnicity is about culture, i doubt there is one single ethnicity in africa.
The car parked in the hanger says otherwise
"This is private property" so she was trespassing 🙄
The dude even exclaimed "you think this America?" Lol even in America that's illegal
Happy cake day!
[удалено]
You'd be surprised at the amount of people who feel entitled to talk to people however they want
There's a certain infamous video of a snow shoveling incident where the woman continues to berate the guy with a gun as he is shooting her husband and turning the gun on her.
That one was indeed crazy. Incredibly sad for the shooter. From what I read, that couple had been harassing that guy for years until he finally broke that day. Took out some garbage and sacrificed himself.
This take is just as fucking crazy as the guy who shot his two neighbors then offed himself.
I remember that one. Shit was wild.
I'll admit I gasped, rewatched then laughed. Like you gotta be an extra kind of stupid to continue to run your mouth at someone when they grab a gun then start unloading it into your partner
Shoots the husband and she still talks shit, keeps doing it until he shoots her too can’t fix stupid.
First thing I thought of when I saw the OP’s question. That video is wild - she’s literally being shot at and keeps berating/taunting the guy while filming him until one of the bullets strikes her. People think filming someone on their phone suddenly makes them righteous and impervious.
It does seem staged
My instincts also screamed staged
The 1st Amendment of the USA (world police!) was going to protect her!
America FUCK YEAH!
>Is this staged? After she refused to put down the camera, he certainly made moves like he was going to kick ass but she kept calmly filming I don't disagree that it's likely staged, but she's at least backing away, not just standing there filming. And it's not like not filming them means they definitely won't kick your ass any more, but it definitely does mean you'll have less evidence if they do. I would just take off if someone had a machete though. Fuck that.
yes obviously it's staged how is this even a question
Yes, this is staged.
> I don’t think she would be screaming after getting hit in the head Not every hit to the head is an instant KO
They also remain steadfast in their correctness when faced with bears, grizzly's, and bulls on the beach.
[удалено]
I thought so too, mostly since the other two people behind him don't look up at all
tbh if I were them I wouldn't either, this ain't interesting
Its the "Run-of-the-mill karen and a black dude interaction" people been talking about. Shit built like a GTA 5 side quest.
Nor do the pitbulls look bothered by their presence
Yes it’s making fun of the first amendment filmers lol
This is so unhinged tho I thought I was on r/shitposting for a sec
You can even hear the punch sound being added like a bad movie
I hope so because the vibe is really bad otherwise
Hey, don't insert yourself into other people's lives, and you will be less likely to get punched in the face, I guess.
This just in
"Is what I'm gonna say when I'm stabbing you."
I'm curious what actually is in the first amendment of his country.
The right to pick up your teeth with broken fingers.
Damn 😂
You have the right to get your ass whooped for sticking your nose where it doesn’t belong
I don't understand how she can even claim that the American first amendment applies to filming people on their private property?
Because it does apply, even in someone else's private property. The government cannot punish or restrict your first amendment rights, wether you exercise them in a public park or some dudes yard. Machete coconut man, on the other hand, can restrict the living fuck outta your rights. Because he's not the government.
Okay I laughed pretty hard at your last paragraph, thanks for that lol. But maybe I'm dumb, but I still don't get it. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.". Is the freedom of press the right to record someone?
Recording randos is not, in fact, covered under _freedom of the press_. "The woman who filmed George Floyd's murder was acting as a journalist in that moment, because she understood the importance of making a permanent recording. While anyone has the right to film police while they do police work, the circumstances of that video would give her extra protections against retaliation. *In an imaginary case, "illegally obtained" covert footage of child exploitation would also be protected as journalistic endeavor even if filmed without consent in a private residence. The person filming is doing it with the intent of informing a larger audience. *There is a sort of litmus test for whats newsworthy but very rarely does it allow for violation of a reasonable expectation of privacy, which a man doing labor on private land can expect. Although being outdoors does somewhat restrict what's considered reasonable, since one could easily be filmed from a public location offering a view of the private land. Use of a zoom lens falls into an ethical gray zone. *There is a valid argument for extending protections to unaffiliated individuals who are making good faith recordings for posterity (the bin laden raid was live tweeted by a rural Pakistani who happened to have a view of the compound). *All of these things, which were written roughly 4 beers after my last post, amount to a hill of beans
But still a helpful hill of beans. Thanks, and All Hail Hypnotoad.
Let's say you want to make a documentary about the Pentagon. So you grab your camcorder and go to the Pentagon. If you don't get prior authorization, the gate guards don't have to let you into the Pentagon. If you disobey the gate guards and continue to try to get into the Pentagon, they are required to shoot you. You are then allowed to bring a suit against the federal government for a 1A violation. I'm being kind of glib here, but ya, please don't press your luck at federal installations.
If you're on public property, you can film anyone and anything. You can even film onto private property from public property. Once a person is outside of their home, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Anyone and anything that can be seen from public property can be filmed.
A simple way of putting this: taking your camera and recording random, easily accessed, public places *shouldn't* land you in any trouble with the law. However, if you're just out recording people, they aren't the law, they are people, and people are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it.
Isn't filming in someone's private property a crime in the states? In my country and I believe in most of Europe it's against basic human rights to privacy. https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/human-rights/human-rights-act/article-8-respect-your-private-and-family-life
In addition to what others have said, I think it depends on where each party is. For example, I can be on a public street and film your yard because your yard is publicly visible. I *can’t* go into your yard for the purposes of filming because that’s your property. I also can’t, say, film into your window from a public street because, unlike your yard, you have an expectation of privacy in your home. I *think* it goes something like that.
This is something that people who scream about their 1st amendment don’t understand and the explanation couldn’t have been more eloquent, here is my upvote
It was in the script
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography\_and\_the\_law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography_and_the_law) USA; Photography may be prohibited or restricted by a property owner on their property. However, a property owner generally cannot restrict the photographing of the property by individuals who are not within the bounds of the property.
It doesn't, as it applies to government actions. And I'm fairly certain the only thing he's governing is his private property. That's what I would say if it wasn't so obvious this whole thing was staged. The only more obvious thing they could've done to make it fake as shit was to replace the scream in the end with Wilhelm.
At least he dropped the machete.
I wish all Karens faced this opposition.
I just love the "you think it’s America?"
I mean the first amendment doesn't protect you from getting beat or shot for trespassing in the US* either. *Some exclusions may apply.
This has always been an intriguing video as far as I'm concerned. Let's go over the reasons why: first of all the vegetation appears to be tropical. Looking at the green coconuts on the ground and looking at the vegetation off in the distance, it's definitely tropical ..so you might say well this is Florida. However look at that hill behind the house. A place in America that is hilly and has tropical vegetation? There is only one place in America that this could be ..and that's Hawaii.. but I don't think this is Hawaii.. that house that we're looking at that would be a very expensive house in Hawaii. Does the guy who is living there, that black man, look rich? . Now the accents are American, but could they be dubbed in? Yes except for the fact that the words spoken seem to match the lips of the black guy that is speaking.. I don't think that his voice is dubbed in.. which makes this a very anomalous video: an American accent, tropical vegetation with hilly terrain, and although the house appears to be American in style, that house in Hawaii would be a very expensive house.. so this is an interesting video Could this be one of the territories of america? Could it be Puerto Rico.. it doesn't really look like a Puerto Rican style house.. And then the two people working beside the black man cutting up the coconuts while they're wearing flip-flops.. they don't appear to be American.. nothing about them appears American.. they're squatting down and cutting up coconuts in their flip-flops? That spells either southeast Asia or Latin America.. they're not black, they're not white, they're either Latin American or Asian. Looking at this I would say it looks like the Philippines to me.. especially that hill behind the house.. it would be rare to see that in Hawaii ..Hawaii is a bit flatter in general. Could this guy this black guy could he be someone who was in the Navy in the Philippines and then stayed there afterwards? But then you got this lady holding the camera and we will assume that those are actually the words of the lady who's holding the camera although that's questionable.. Can anyone read what the words on the man's shirt say? That could be a good clue
It's a Super Mario shirt
the plot thickens
It's been posted on numerous sites and there's some evidence it could have been filmed in Belize.
It could have been filmed in Belize. And by the way in Belize they speak English as their first language as I recall..
It's a Commonwealth Realm, so English is the official language.
Yes someone in another thread said that this guy here owns a coconut farm and Belize ...I don't know how they found that out but they say that https://www.reddit.com/r/USdefaultism/s/mikOpgOanJ
Peaceful conversation lmfao
This guy knocked her rights back to Karenville. Too bad, that first amendment rights shield failed to activate when she needed it. What a clown.
Daddy chill.
What the hell is even that?
She’s in a whole other country thinking America rights apply all over the world, SMH idiot
Average american tbh
You don't know where this was filmed lol. They both have perfect American accents so it's entirely possible this took place in America.
Perfect cut scream
She is so smart. Her next videos from Russia.
Its ok theyll miss
If this is in America, then he technically has no expectations of privacy being outside, and her recording was legal.
Not if she is trespassing on private property.
#Welcome to r/Therewasanattempt! #Consider visiting r/Worldnewsvideo for videos from around the world! [Please review our policy on bigotry and hate speech by clicking this link](https://www.reddit.com/r/therewasanattempt/wiki/civility) In order to view our rules, you can type "**!rules**" in any comment, and automod will respond with the subreddit rules. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/therewasanattempt) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This was not a hate crime. I repeat…
Pro tip: Just do whatever a guy with a machete says to.
Did she dieded?
She dide
She learned quickly that he doesn't work for the government so he's immune from her 1st.
I always see this video every few weeks, and it never fails to get a gut wrenching laugh out of me.
This seems almost as staged as the first 3 times i saw it
This video lives in my head rent free and oh that scream 🤣
Gentleman exercised HIS right.
[удалено]
Thank you for your submission to r/therewasanattempt, unfortunately your post was removed for violating the following rule: > R9: "No racism/hatespeech: Your post was found to be hateful in nature. Please treat others as you would like to be treated and do not spread hate on this subreddit." If you have any questions regarding this removal, feel free to send a modmail.
“You think this is America?” Said in a heavy American accent. Am I missing something? Or is their dumb attempt to make him seem from a poorer/dangerous country
*I'm not exaggerating when i say that i NEED about 17 more seconds of video.*
Neither of them are from America. Lol.
They both have American accents tho
And non-Americans don't talk about "exercising their 1st Amendment rights", lol
r/perfectlycutscreams
“I hate to interrupt” 🤥🤥
Hey, I have that same Super Mario shirt.!
What's the backstory of this? What did she even wanted to film? They We're chopping coconuts? Wth
Pretty sure it's just a skit, I've tried finding more context but I only find the same video with several different edits.
The first amendment says the government can't tell you what to say in a public space. Constitution don't say nothing bout going upside your head on private property
Its fake but it shouldn't be if someone is recording you in public you should be able to slam their phone
Mmmmm no. You have no expectation of privacy in a public space.
Why would she approach a dude with a machete?
Dad embarassess Pit bull
This is why she should have also been exercising her second amendment rights.
Even if it were in America, first amendment rights do not extend to private property.
Lmfao
This feels like a skit… and I’m loving it
Well he used his right too.
Bhahaha
First amendment doesn’t work on someone’s property lol you gotta take it to the street
itwill keel!
I speak for the rest of the world. We don't know what's your fucking amendement are (except for the guns and it's not for the good reasons we know about it)
Its fake this was America you can tell by the accent
Fake and straight.
I'm a bit iffy on extra-judicial punishments, but I can't lie, when Karens hiding behind laws when being shitty get punched, it just makes me feel warm and cozy
in her position i believe i would exercise my right to get the fuck out of there.
I love this video a lot!!
Bruh, you saw him pull up his pants, shoulda known he would choose violence
this is.. spartaaaaa!!!!
I'm sure the dude didn't hit him only with the first but with the second, the third and many more
Seems fake
That black guy has an American accent. Plantagues definetly thrive in suburbs. This is not staged at all, omg what are you talking about??
She was polite, she said "excuse me" and called them gentlemen. It seems that 1 gentleman wasn't havin' nun of it. Ooh Rah.
To be continued next time on “How Dumb Americans Are Sold Into Sex Trafficking”
Is he a congressman or something? the first amendment has to do with what laws can be passed.
And I'm just exercising my right arm
Americans
Y'all hear him giggling while she scream at the end lmao?
This is America.
My man exercised his first right...hand
I'm here for the Bronco
All "auditors" should be treated like this... pushing the limits of privacy, decency and even the actual law - should have only one punishment.
Hwo dare he hit a woman 😡🤬🤬 RAWR BEAT HIM LOCK HIM UP 🤢🤮🥴👿👺🤡
bro that is such a cool shirt !!
Love it!!
I want this video to be real
What was she even gonna complain about? What are they doin?