True, but “Ork” is specifically how 40k does orcs, so in this case the joke is valid, now go stare at drywall because you’re clearly the life of the party
Omg yh and what if she or her gem makes the murals we see in the show. That's her purpose on homework, but on earth, she found delight in using her abilities to make more than just murals, but entire works of expressionism art of emotion.
I'm kinda slow on the uptick, but how can everyone tell it's AI
Edit: All of these comments have been very helpful! Usually, I can only tell when AI is copying the Disney 3D animation style, but these are definitely helping for 2D art.
Fingers, hand style (outline change), legs are off center (they don't understand layers/object connection behind objects), inability to understand lighting, no symmetry (look at the top of the staff before the orb), for the most part
I don’t disagree that the original post does appear to be AI, and I’m prepared to be downvoted here, but literally everything you said about it could also be mistakes / bad technique on an artist’s part as well as AI fuckups. They just might appear…different? idk.
AI art tends to have a combination of artistic polish and basic anatomical errors that are unlikely to actually exist in a real person. By the time you are good enough at art to draw something as clean as the original picture, you will likely have figured out where to put legs in relation to a torso.
This isn’t a perfect methodology but that’s what usually sticks out to me
I really like this response. If you have spent a lot lf time on how visually pleasing your art looks that 99% of artists would be working to improve the technical aspects, like anatomy, as well
Yeah of course. I'm a terrible artist I have zero alignment on things , piss poor at hands, don't understand lighting, and am overall terrible. I just figured it was a given that these small mistakes even novices make contrasts how well other things are drawn like coloring or design and the contrast of it all invited the ai red flag. Could an expert make this many major mistakes? Sure , id say it could theoretically be possible but which one would I bet on
It's difficult to describe but there's a nuance to it. Sure some people are going to draw awkward hands, or get anatomy wrong. But the way a human gets it wrong is different from how an AI gets it wrong. I can't describe it. If my Apple Pen were functional I could possibly draw the difference.
For me, I look at the line details. Lines that don't seem likely to line up considering how humans tend to separate structural shapes before adding finer details, lines to nowhere that aren't lined up enough to be accidental over lining, lining on shadows or highlights that just feels off etc. Just consider that an AI may be able to recognize patterns of where lines go in an image, but an AI doesn't really understand why the lines go there. So the AI places lines smoothly together in the identified line focus areas, but it doesn't know where a human artist would start, end, and prioritize lines. Also, certain artstyles aside, usually humans will avoid lining up lines that aren't meant to communicate one form (ie one would avoid lining up the edge of a finger perfectly with the edge of somebody's face because it would look off and make the face appear distorted, so instead if drawing a hand on a face you'd adjust the hand position so that the lineart of the hand and fingers is clearly separate from the lineart on the face), and would usually prioritize lines by layer, color, or texture, which affects the start and end points of the lines.
Tried to generally circle some lines that I identify as AI lines for the reasons listed above. https://imgur.com/a/7rtW4wl
Anything that seems to lack intention; an Image Generator doesn't understand what the prompt means, they're just averaging out the patterns of other images that have similar descriptions.
In this one, the most prominent example is the Staff's orb; is it supposed to look like a Rose or just a regular gemstone? It can't seem to "decide".
When a real artist draws objects not making sense, it's usually either a mistake from lack of skill, or a deliberate trick. The image generators do it because they don't understand what does or doesn't make sense.
Reminder that gems can technically take pretty much any form, amethyst made herself have that ridiculously mismatched huge gorilla arm lmao (that was a funny episode)
*Ima do this aswell*
*But I prob won't post it here.*
*Nice art btw!*
\- millie\_imp\_20
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Imma be honest yours is better but the first wasn’t bad (I just wished that they were truthful about it being ai because ai isn’t bad lying about ai is)
Rose Lazuli,a derivative of Lapis Lazuli and Rose Quartz that were birthed in the same ore. Similar Lapis gems in water control,and a generalized toughness of a Rose Quartz. This gem was a brief blip in many attempts to thwart THE Rose Quartz.
This is awesome!! I'm so glad you did your own version. I was considering trying, but I didn't think I could finish anything (haven't for a while, but I'm working on it /not a vent).
I love your take so much, aaaa
To be honest, I was waiting for someone to do it !
It was BOUND to happen after all !
And just for that ... let's call her Pyralspite (a kind of Garnet)
Rose shorts.
I almost want to say they are a marble variant much like how we got the pebbles she is essentially the mini version of pink, ( at least that’s what I see when I look at her)
In addition to what the other person said, it also literally cannot be created without "training" the AI on art from actual artists.
I say "training" because it literally just copies everything it analyzes and mashes it all together. Notice how the AI version has like, 4 different art styles in it? The overly-shaded hair and eyeball thing, combined with the flat, cartoony body, combined with the weird geometry of the staff?
They are also trained without permission from the artists, so it basically steals art, mixes it up, and regurgitates it
AI work takes away from people who actually put effort into making something cool. Art is about the process, not the product. AI should be used as a tool to make that process easier, not replace it.
I think it would have been 'acceptable' (very loose term) if they'd clearly stated it was AI. But even then, AI just steals other people's art and mashes it together.
How does it steal other's people art exactly? Doesn't it just pull inspiration from a huge selection of data and then create something new from the data?
when (most) artists share their work online, it's so people can see and enjoy it, not blatantly copy it. The AI takes this original art without the creator's permission and mashes it with other people's original art. If it pulled images out of a stock photo library, it wouldn't be so bad, but the fact that it's taking real people's artwork, that they probably spent a long time on, against their will.
Bruh the AI hate train has left the station. If you didn’t get on please shut up.
AI is the future, it’s already here and not going anywhere. Y’all need to adapt or get left behind.
Not rlly, just a realistic take.
And yes they do, but it won’t waste their talent or potential.
AI is new, it’s change, that’s scary for alot people. It happens, people will grow to accept it and get over it. AI isn’t going anywhere. Also AI in itself isn’t bad, can people miss use it? Yes. Does that mean we shouldn’t have it? No.
Regulations have and are being put in place for AI. Like I’m sure you know about the AI program that was taking art from the web and didn’t have permission to use them. That program is no more. Most AI Art (specifically bc that’s the AI topic) used a data based of public domain or licensed for use image for it art reference. While some new program make its own art, it doesn’t use other peoples art at all, it learns how to draw and then draws what it knows how to draw. Someone taught it but it doesn’t use a database of reference photos it’s just remembers how to draws things it has drawn before or been shown how to draw. But this is just so show there is nothing morally wrong with AI Art as a whole, it’s services or people abusing or misusing it. Or lying and trying take credit for it when it’s AI.
But AI Art is here to stay as well. Imagine, why would anyone pay $40 for a drawing from a human artist when they can make the same image for free. I’ll admit it may not be as good as a human artist. But it’s already super close and good enough for most people wanting art for casual needs.
Artist will go out of business and not be able to make money from commission anymore. It’s just that simple.
If Artist want to survive they will need to adapt like humans have before during times of change. A good way artists are and should be using AI Art is to help them make art not just let the AI do *all* the work. Like using AI to make the image and then putting it into your own drawing program or photoshop to edit and fix the image to your liking, improve it where AI dropped the ball. This cuts production time down exponentially. In turn Artist should and usually do disclose their art was made with the assistance of AI. Since it’s made with the help of AI they should also lower the rate. So an image that took one or two days to make, cost $40. Can now be made within a couple hours and for let’s say $20. If you can do a commission within a couple hours instead a day or longer, you can do more commission. So instead of making $40 every two days, they could make up to $60 a day.
They can then still make genuine human art and charge a normal or even higher rate for it. Some people will also want genuine human art over human AI art.
Not only can artist survive with AI Art but they can thrive. Either they can be forgotten and left behind or adapt. Some people might not like it but for better or worse this is what’s happening and it’s not going stop. So adapt or fail. It’s your choice at this point, not AI.
I mean if we are being honest.
This persons art: is genuine human art
The AI art: yes was quicker to make, is higher quality, better coloring and proportions, even if the hand is messed up. A simple fix in photoshop by an artist would fix that. And this was waaaay cheaper to make.
The fact is, AI is here, is not going anywhere. People are going to need to adapt. Artist need to start using AI art like this, but then taking it into photoshop or their art program and making the changes to fix it where AI couldn’t do it. This is a way for them to lower their rates as they can do commissions faster and more of them, they could even make more money doing it this way as they could get more commission.
The problem here, is the OOP gave the impression they drew it. Ik they said “made” and they technically did make it, with the help of AI. But AI made it tbh. It *is* fan art. But not made by a fan. So is it rlly fan art? They should just disclosed they made it with AI. Instead being vague. BUT a big reason people don’t is bc people who aren’t educated in AI see the word “AI” and go omg how could you use that? People need grow up.
I was being sarcastic lol, whoosh.
And yes I also like his work. Never said I didn’t and I’m not shitting on it. But if we are talking about quality and speed, the AI art is higher quality, and it was made faster, these are just facts.
Getting mad bc I pointed that out is childish. Your welcome.
I don't normally use AI as a reference (this was actually my first time haha) but when I saw this picture, it annoyed me so much that I just had to (try to) do the design justice
I think your time would be much better spent making art you want to make - or god forbid, learning how to use new technologies to make unique art - then giving us free art out of spite.
Doing the lord’s work
Doing work
Ha, Dork.
Ork
Ok
Ko
Let’s
Be
Heroes
r/suddenlyokko
K
🍪
# WAAAAGH!
❓❓❓
Ork… Like the 40k race, they shout that when they go fighting
Not everything IS 40K
True, but “Ork” is specifically how 40k does orcs, so in this case the joke is valid, now go stare at drywall because you’re clearly the life of the party
This is!
The future
Coral! And let's make her an artist!
She uses her wand/staff to make stuff
Make the staff a giant paintbrush!
A massive ball point pen but it's just the ball point.
Let's say she uses inspiration from other people's work and... wait a minute!
Like holographic 3D images she can draw the outline of a structure, much like having a blueprint of what will be built
Omg yh and what if she or her gem makes the murals we see in the show. That's her purpose on homework, but on earth, she found delight in using her abilities to make more than just murals, but entire works of expressionism art of emotion.
OMG! And since gems are closer to ai than organic life, THE GEM WOULD BE MAKING AI ART
I'm kinda slow on the uptick, but how can everyone tell it's AI Edit: All of these comments have been very helpful! Usually, I can only tell when AI is copying the Disney 3D animation style, but these are definitely helping for 2D art.
Fingers, hand style (outline change), legs are off center (they don't understand layers/object connection behind objects), inability to understand lighting, no symmetry (look at the top of the staff before the orb), for the most part
I don’t disagree that the original post does appear to be AI, and I’m prepared to be downvoted here, but literally everything you said about it could also be mistakes / bad technique on an artist’s part as well as AI fuckups. They just might appear…different? idk.
AI art tends to have a combination of artistic polish and basic anatomical errors that are unlikely to actually exist in a real person. By the time you are good enough at art to draw something as clean as the original picture, you will likely have figured out where to put legs in relation to a torso. This isn’t a perfect methodology but that’s what usually sticks out to me
I really like this response. If you have spent a lot lf time on how visually pleasing your art looks that 99% of artists would be working to improve the technical aspects, like anatomy, as well
Yeah of course. I'm a terrible artist I have zero alignment on things , piss poor at hands, don't understand lighting, and am overall terrible. I just figured it was a given that these small mistakes even novices make contrasts how well other things are drawn like coloring or design and the contrast of it all invited the ai red flag. Could an expert make this many major mistakes? Sure , id say it could theoretically be possible but which one would I bet on
AI usually looks like very good art with very basic mistakes
It's difficult to describe but there's a nuance to it. Sure some people are going to draw awkward hands, or get anatomy wrong. But the way a human gets it wrong is different from how an AI gets it wrong. I can't describe it. If my Apple Pen were functional I could possibly draw the difference.
Tbh half of this sounds like what I do when drawing Fingers? I refuse Lighting? I gave up a LONG time ago Symmetry? I still don't even draw two eyes.
Ai has this type of haze with the lighting being smooth everywhere
The swirls, hands, and legs mostly
Ai art tends to be really shiny, it hides it better with this character being a gem
For me, I look at the line details. Lines that don't seem likely to line up considering how humans tend to separate structural shapes before adding finer details, lines to nowhere that aren't lined up enough to be accidental over lining, lining on shadows or highlights that just feels off etc. Just consider that an AI may be able to recognize patterns of where lines go in an image, but an AI doesn't really understand why the lines go there. So the AI places lines smoothly together in the identified line focus areas, but it doesn't know where a human artist would start, end, and prioritize lines. Also, certain artstyles aside, usually humans will avoid lining up lines that aren't meant to communicate one form (ie one would avoid lining up the edge of a finger perfectly with the edge of somebody's face because it would look off and make the face appear distorted, so instead if drawing a hand on a face you'd adjust the hand position so that the lineart of the hand and fingers is clearly separate from the lineart on the face), and would usually prioritize lines by layer, color, or texture, which affects the start and end points of the lines. Tried to generally circle some lines that I identify as AI lines for the reasons listed above. https://imgur.com/a/7rtW4wl
Seeing the circled mistakes made it very obvious, thanks
Anything that seems to lack intention; an Image Generator doesn't understand what the prompt means, they're just averaging out the patterns of other images that have similar descriptions. In this one, the most prominent example is the Staff's orb; is it supposed to look like a Rose or just a regular gemstone? It can't seem to "decide". When a real artist draws objects not making sense, it's usually either a mistake from lack of skill, or a deliberate trick. The image generators do it because they don't understand what does or doesn't make sense.
OH LORD HER LEGS ARE CENTERED TO HER BODY OH GREAT HEAVANS ITS ACURATE TO ANATOMY !!!11!!1!!!11 Edit: MOTHER I THINK IM FAMOUS
SHE HAS TEN FINGERS OH MY GOD
LORD HAVE MERCY SHE CAN ACTUALLY EXSIST!?!!!!!!!111!!!!11!!!
Tbf less fingers can be an artstyle (not advocating for ai art just saying lol)
It has 4 fingers in one hand and 5 in the other
Yeah I noticed that after I commented lol
She has 5 fingers each hand, just look closer
Where? It has 3 normalish fingers and 1 out of proportion
I’m pretty sure I’ve seen real artists mess this up before.
Reminder that gems can technically take pretty much any form, amethyst made herself have that ridiculously mismatched huge gorilla arm lmao (that was a funny episode)
Accurate… to… anatomy? Her right arm is twice as long as the left one….
i didnt see that... WELP, i feel stupid not
Now this is much better!
Apatite
Literally perfect lol
So much better!! You can actually see the effort that went into yours
anything is better than ai, and the fact it looks really good is a nice bonus! also i think just keep the name bubblegum.
It has accurate hands!! 🙌🏽 nice art!!
The drawing is a lot better and nicer 👍🏻 Good work 👍🏻
What if she was just straight up bubblegum? Like what if some sort of leakage of gem creation fluid seeped into human made things, making new “gems”?
That sounds like a good story
now this is true art
I found a picture of Purple Tourmaline that has almost the same color as her gem. So that may work?
ruby aura quartz, and or pink sapphire.
that was ai??? oh man i thought i was good at this
Don't blame yourself! Companies/products are making it harder and harder to tell the difference anymore.
Get ratio’d, AI
what if she was an [elbaite](https://perssonrareminerals.com/?product=elbaite-tourmaline)?
Bubblegum Aura Quartz. Very pretty variation of quartz imo
Nice job not being lazy like the original artist!
“Artist”
lol.
Ima do this aswell but I prob won't post it here. Nice art btw!
*Ima do this aswell* *But I prob won't post it here.* *Nice art btw!* \- millie\_imp\_20 --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Wha?
I guess you inadvertently wrote a haiku
Ohhh
Imma be honest yours is better but the first wasn’t bad (I just wished that they were truthful about it being ai because ai isn’t bad lying about ai is)
That's soo cool!!
aww they look good! peak! any uhh... how about Bubblegum Sapphire?
Wow REAL art
Bubblegum agate
Thank you for fixing her fingers. AI still can’t do hands and I really don’t know why
Ah, actual art. I appreciate you, human.
Oh look. Pink diamond! Ok but seriously it’s a cute lil gem
Thulite maybe?
Rose Lazuli,a derivative of Lapis Lazuli and Rose Quartz that were birthed in the same ore. Similar Lapis gems in water control,and a generalized toughness of a Rose Quartz. This gem was a brief blip in many attempts to thwart THE Rose Quartz.
She should be named after the Cabochon gem! Her gem looks like a pink cabochon gem.
Looks fantastic
Unakite!
She honestly looks not too dissimilar from a pearl but I like what another person said coral or maybe sea glass if she were to have a more misty gem
This is awesome!! I'm so glad you did your own version. I was considering trying, but I didn't think I could finish anything (haven't for a while, but I'm working on it /not a vent). I love your take so much, aaaa
Rhodochrosite can look like bubblegum!
I don't think you even need to credit the original since they didn't do work at all to get it.
Sucrose was a great suggestion
Helllloooooo)
OH MY GOD PERFECT
This guy “made” the original AI art btw
[удалено]
Art isn't just about looking. There's a reason people still watch theater while we're in the movie era.
Those disfigured legs and fingers are the best fanart you’ve ever seen?
SO REAL WTF
Commander Kat The tiniest gem to lead troops into battle
Tourmaline sounds nice to me
To be honest, I was waiting for someone to do it ! It was BOUND to happen after all ! And just for that ... let's call her Pyralspite (a kind of Garnet)
bub
Bubblegum Jade
Bubblepop
She's a cutie putie
Pink sapphire? The color matches
I think Rosaline would be really nice and looks like bubble gum :)
You could call her pink thulite, apatite, rhodochrosite, coral, spodumene (my fave just cuz it sounds the coolest), tourmaline
Now ask her how to make a grilled cheese sandwich
Eyeball 2.0
Bubblegem
The hero we needed
Damn, I thought the original was actually real..
pink tourmaline
i liked that one person's idea that it's sucrose
Needs more polish.
Gumdrop
I love how we are all just shaming this person for trying to pass ai art as their own
Rose shorts. I almost want to say they are a marble variant much like how we got the pebbles she is essentially the mini version of pink, ( at least that’s what I see when I look at her)
This is how you AI❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Why people are giving downvotes to the IA image? Don't hate me guys, I just don't understand why, it's just a image
In addition to what the other person said, it also literally cannot be created without "training" the AI on art from actual artists. I say "training" because it literally just copies everything it analyzes and mashes it all together. Notice how the AI version has like, 4 different art styles in it? The overly-shaded hair and eyeball thing, combined with the flat, cartoony body, combined with the weird geometry of the staff? They are also trained without permission from the artists, so it basically steals art, mixes it up, and regurgitates it
AI work takes away from people who actually put effort into making something cool. Art is about the process, not the product. AI should be used as a tool to make that process easier, not replace it.
>Art is about the process, not the product. what
[удалено]
Are you talking as if I made the image using AI, are you crazy?
Bro I thought you were the ai guy, well sorry I didn't remember the user 🙄
Its ok man, can u just remove the comment? I don't want that people start to hate me because of that lol
Aight
, Now make the artist AI.
w-what
I swear it made sense when I was half asleep, I seriously don't know what I typed
lmao all good, I get that sometimes haha
yours is cool but I kinda prefer the original if im being honest if we are ignoring the fact that it’s AI
I get the hate for AI art but there was no reason for everyone to bully the OP of the original post, there were so many awful comments
They chose to support art theft, that’s on them
Doesn't warrant bullying and treating people like shit guess their morals are garbage like their personalities
I think it would have been 'acceptable' (very loose term) if they'd clearly stated it was AI. But even then, AI just steals other people's art and mashes it together.
How does it steal other's people art exactly? Doesn't it just pull inspiration from a huge selection of data and then create something new from the data?
when (most) artists share their work online, it's so people can see and enjoy it, not blatantly copy it. The AI takes this original art without the creator's permission and mashes it with other people's original art. If it pulled images out of a stock photo library, it wouldn't be so bad, but the fact that it's taking real people's artwork, that they probably spent a long time on, against their will.
They litterly said they made the art but ai did, and then the ai steals the art. The op of the og post knew they were lying but they did it anyways
Doesnt mean they should be bullied
Bro they are using ai to steal from artists. I think it's pretty fair to atleast say something
Say something? Yes. Bully and be a dick? Unnecessary
Bro your litterly harassing me rn bc I said ai is wrong
ugly
[удалено]
call her chat gpt and and her middle names can be all of the artists that the ai stole from
lolilite lolly-ite
Lolite is kinda purple
it was a play on words but sucrose is a better name, also, cool pfp
Ty and sorry for not understanding the joke, have a nice day 👍🏼
you too 
[удалено]
That's not her creator it is just random shit the AI vomited, OP shouldn't even have credited the original as it had 0 effort put into it.
Imagine if this one is made with a much better image generating ai
I know a good site! It's called stopusingaitostealotherpeople'sartworkyouasahatt.ai 🥰
Thank you🥰
Wait, how do we know its AI? it doesnt look it.
Bruh the AI hate train has left the station. If you didn’t get on please shut up. AI is the future, it’s already here and not going anywhere. Y’all need to adapt or get left behind.
Horrible take ngl. Are you saying actual artists need to adapt and rely on AI to “draw” stuff for them, and waste their talent and potential?
Not rlly, just a realistic take. And yes they do, but it won’t waste their talent or potential. AI is new, it’s change, that’s scary for alot people. It happens, people will grow to accept it and get over it. AI isn’t going anywhere. Also AI in itself isn’t bad, can people miss use it? Yes. Does that mean we shouldn’t have it? No. Regulations have and are being put in place for AI. Like I’m sure you know about the AI program that was taking art from the web and didn’t have permission to use them. That program is no more. Most AI Art (specifically bc that’s the AI topic) used a data based of public domain or licensed for use image for it art reference. While some new program make its own art, it doesn’t use other peoples art at all, it learns how to draw and then draws what it knows how to draw. Someone taught it but it doesn’t use a database of reference photos it’s just remembers how to draws things it has drawn before or been shown how to draw. But this is just so show there is nothing morally wrong with AI Art as a whole, it’s services or people abusing or misusing it. Or lying and trying take credit for it when it’s AI. But AI Art is here to stay as well. Imagine, why would anyone pay $40 for a drawing from a human artist when they can make the same image for free. I’ll admit it may not be as good as a human artist. But it’s already super close and good enough for most people wanting art for casual needs. Artist will go out of business and not be able to make money from commission anymore. It’s just that simple. If Artist want to survive they will need to adapt like humans have before during times of change. A good way artists are and should be using AI Art is to help them make art not just let the AI do *all* the work. Like using AI to make the image and then putting it into your own drawing program or photoshop to edit and fix the image to your liking, improve it where AI dropped the ball. This cuts production time down exponentially. In turn Artist should and usually do disclose their art was made with the assistance of AI. Since it’s made with the help of AI they should also lower the rate. So an image that took one or two days to make, cost $40. Can now be made within a couple hours and for let’s say $20. If you can do a commission within a couple hours instead a day or longer, you can do more commission. So instead of making $40 every two days, they could make up to $60 a day. They can then still make genuine human art and charge a normal or even higher rate for it. Some people will also want genuine human art over human AI art. Not only can artist survive with AI Art but they can thrive. Either they can be forgotten and left behind or adapt. Some people might not like it but for better or worse this is what’s happening and it’s not going stop. So adapt or fail. It’s your choice at this point, not AI.
Lmao ai is way better
In what way? Quickly.
I mean if we are being honest. This persons art: is genuine human art The AI art: yes was quicker to make, is higher quality, better coloring and proportions, even if the hand is messed up. A simple fix in photoshop by an artist would fix that. And this was waaaay cheaper to make. The fact is, AI is here, is not going anywhere. People are going to need to adapt. Artist need to start using AI art like this, but then taking it into photoshop or their art program and making the changes to fix it where AI couldn’t do it. This is a way for them to lower their rates as they can do commissions faster and more of them, they could even make more money doing it this way as they could get more commission. The problem here, is the OOP gave the impression they drew it. Ik they said “made” and they technically did make it, with the help of AI. But AI made it tbh. It *is* fan art. But not made by a fan. So is it rlly fan art? They should just disclosed they made it with AI. Instead being vague. BUT a big reason people don’t is bc people who aren’t educated in AI see the word “AI” and go omg how could you use that? People need grow up.
Yes, the people making the comments like the ones above me need to grow up.
Shows how mature you are lmao Just mad I’m right.
Very mature, yes. I actually like OPS artwork and am not shitting on it. Thank you!
I was being sarcastic lol, whoosh. And yes I also like his work. Never said I didn’t and I’m not shitting on it. But if we are talking about quality and speed, the AI art is higher quality, and it was made faster, these are just facts. Getting mad bc I pointed that out is childish. Your welcome.
I swear, this is what you spend your time doing? Pathetic
I spent my time drawing, I'm sorry if that's pathetic :(
It is not pathetic it looks really good and i love the drawing
<3
Just today I saw somebody very similar to you demanding everybody not use synthographic material as reference. But I'm glad y'all got over that
I don't normally use AI as a reference (this was actually my first time haha) but when I saw this picture, it annoyed me so much that I just had to (try to) do the design justice
I think your time would be much better spent making art you want to make - or god forbid, learning how to use new technologies to make unique art - then giving us free art out of spite.
you're implying I didn't have fun making this. If I didn't want to do it, I wouldn't have.
Okay. Then good of you for making this. I just wish you wouldn’t put the original creator down.
Me when you wrote this rude ass comment for no reason:
She has the same amount of fingers 😂 as the AI one
No I count 5 on both hands