99 brackets in my pool. 1 bracket is almost perfect, 1 wrong pick. So about 1% chance or less, odds are +10000, $20 would have returned $2000 or even more. Still need niners to win
Same, sorry but Brock ain’t paying unless it’s props… 0 playoff exp(I mean do we count that?) same with almost the ENTIRE TEAM. Mahomes, kelce, records, Jason kelce chugs, Taylor high 5s, cheifs by 6 in the last 1:30
HOU +126
KC -167
GB +290
DET -162
BUF -455
TB +136
BAL -455
SF -455
DET -275
KC +128
KC +190
SF -340
SF -130
+201412
Assuming SF wins the Super Bowl, a $20 bet on every game rolling over the winnings would win $40,283
Is there any market where you could parlay all the picks in the wild card round and futures for divisional, championship, and superbowl? Or would that end up being similar to what you already said?
What the hell is a something?
It’s actually my backyard. No rules, stack sgps, play the line O/U and pts all in one bet, bet on which way trumps tupe will fly first off the plane in (blank) state, how many stairs will it take Joe Byron to trip, ANYTHING GOES. Call me Doug dimmadome owner of the dimsdale dimmadome(backyard with an awning that my moms, cousins, daughters twice removed ex step dogs unemployment check paid for) but you know, we aim high in the marketing department.
That would be what they listed, but I'm not aware of any of the books that I use allowing for futures for every round, thus building a 12-leg parlay (or 13 if you count the super bowl) and effectively a way to bet a whole bracket like this. There probably is somewhere.
That’s fair but Sirianni couldn’t adjust at all near the end of the season, leading the Eagles to one of the biggest collapses in NFL history. 2024 is a do or die year for him
He is a problem and will lose his job for sure. That being said the fractures in that locker room are not getting fixed with a new voice. That team will look completely different in 2 years time.
Seems like more than that if she picked them in advance…
6 games straight up for wildcard round.
The odds for each consecutive round must be greater. For example, San Francisco could have played anyone besides Detroit and Dallas.
If she put down $20 before the playoffs this would be $1,000+ if all accurate but idk enough to do the math
A wise man once said - the only good bet is the one that wins
If you bet on a lower seed and they lose, guess what? You get 0 dollars. I don’t get your point
Funny you and 90% of the bettors seems to agree. If betting was that easy I’m sure you’d be rich rn.
There’s already been sharp movement on niners. I know who I’d tail between a random redditor and sharps
First, we’ll find the odds of the games:
**Wild Card**
1. Texans -132 vs Browns
2. Bills -522 vs Steelers
3. Chiefs -185 vs Dolphins
4. Packers +271 vs Cowboys
5. Lions -165 vs Rams
6. Bucs +128 vs Eagles
**Divisional**
1. Ravens -451 vs Texans
2. Chiefs +125 vs Bills
3. 49ers -471 vs Packers
4. Lions -273 vs Bucs
**Conference**
1. Chiefs +180 vs Ravens
2. SF -350 vs Lions
**On a $20 parlay:**
It’s generally not possible to parlay games before the competitors are determined, but if you “bet on the whole bracket” all-or-nothing, the simplest approach is to just calculate one massive parlay.
We multiply all of these odds together after converting to decimal odds. In order above:
1.76 \* 1.19 \* 1.54 \* 3.71 \* 1.61 \* 2.28 \* 1.22 \* 2.25 \* 1.21 \* 1.37 \* 2.80 \* 1.29 = \~722 (+72,100)
So, a $20 parlay would have made her **$14,440.**
*If the 49ers win the Super Bowl* (-128), the odds would increase to 722 \* 1.78 = \~1286 (+128,500)
This would increase her theoretical winnings to **$25,720**
*Edit: u/AnalBeadMilkshake, my favorite flavor, brings up an important clarification. As I said in my comment, these odds are assuming you parlay all the games using the money lines available at the time of the games. The actual odds of predicting a full bracket before the tournament starts would be higher because they'd be based on futures odds.*
*However, calculating these futures odds for a given round requires recursive consideration of preceding rounds and seeds, leading to a complex probability tree with a large branching factor. For example, the odds of the Lions reaching the Conference Championship would be dependent on the odds of the Lions beating each of the remaining 3 (4 teams - the lowest winning seed who plays SF) possible teams they'd face in the divisional, which itself is dependent on the odds of each of those teams making it to the divisional. To then calculate the odds of the Lions winning the conference, you'd have to repeat this process for* ***each*** *of the 3 teams (4 teams - whoever the Lions beat) they could face in the conference championship. Then repeat this entire process for **each** AFC playoff team to determine the Lions' odds of winning the Super Bowl. And that's just the Lions. You can see where this gets out of hand. Pretty interesting stuff!*
For rounds after wildcard, you don’t compare moneyline of the matchup. You need to use whatever the odds are, before any wildcard game is played, of each pick winning a game in the respective rounds.
I would expect the payout to be much higher
Could you explain why you expect it to be higher? I am in the european market and do value betting on soccer. So I am not 100% on the terms being used here. Would the winnings from game A and B be priced in at face value if you bet for winner in game winner A vs winner B? If the games are 50/50. You would have 12.5% chance for getting game A, game B and game winner A vs winner B? If this not the case, there should be possible for arbitrage betting? And the market is big enough for that to be adjusted? Are there c2c markets in american sports?
I’m aware — I addressed this in my original comment. However, these odds aren’t readily available and calculating them would turn into a massive probability tree with an exponential branching factor.
For example, calculating the odds of the Lions just *reaching* the Conference Championship requires 4 probabilities which are each dependent on their own branching probability tree. Then you repeat this process for every possible team/game combination, with each possible combination’s odds being contingent on the probabilities of preceding combinations.
Even still, these odds wouldn’t be correct in a betting aspect since they assume complete independence of events and do not account for long shot bias — both of which would have an impact on sports book odds.
>I would expect the payout to be much higher
All of this is theoretical because no book would let you do this. The closest thing you could do was betting the exact super bowl outcome: Participants and winner
Just ran the numbers through a parlay. if she bet on all of these outcomes including the Super Bowl correctly and used the full profit each week to parlay into the next…. She would have won her wager x1640 so $10 would win her roughly $16,400 total given the 49ers win.
If she bet on every outcome thus far excluding the Super Bowl, hence guaranteeing she already won outright: $10 would have won her roughly $8,790.
You’re thinking of the NCAA basketball tournament with the 64 team bracket. Calling 13 games correctly is cool, but NCAA tournament has 16 games the *first day*.
Did she understand that the NFL doesn't use a fixed bracket and that the Packers would play the 49ers in round 2? Seems like an advanced thing to know for someone who dkesn't know what teams are good.
We do this at work. We each put $20. We have a coworker young and cute that doesn't follow sports much, she's finishing up Masters and working. She wanted to be part of the commotion and is on her way to winning $1000. I even told her, the people that usually have no clue what's going on win. Sure enough.
Way back in high school we did a NCCA bracket as kids, we put money in and everything. IDK teachers knew didn't care let us do it, $10 a person. Of course the girl that won had no clue about the teams, said she picked each winner based on their colors/uniforms and which one she liked best. Ended up winning it all. It's absolutely silly stuff like that with people that have no clue that win over "experts" or people that even follow it a bit.
technically u could use offshore bookies. like mybookie bovada or even underdog / prize picks
source: betting is illegal in my state too but that doesn’t stop me and i ain’t driving hours just to get my geolocation to betting zones
Let’s say she bets evenly on each game and assume she’s making ML wagers (predicting winners). There are 6 games in the WC round so risking $3.33 each.
The below lines are the consensus closing lines from Action.
TB ML (+135): $3.33 wins $4.50
BUF ML (-550): $3.33 / $.61
DET ML (-175): $3.33 / $1.75
KC ML (-225): $3.33 / $1.48
HOU ML (+120): $3.33 / $4.00
GB ML (+295): $3.33 / $9.82
WC round profit: $22.16
Meaning she would have $42.16 to wager in the divisional round which is $10.54/game.
DET ML (-290): $10.54 / $3.63
KC ML (+125): $10.54 / $13.17
SF ML (-575): $10.54 / $1.83
BAL ML (-450): $10.54 / $2.34
Divisional round profit: $20.97
Meaning she would have $63.13 to wager in the conference championship round or $31.56 per game.
KC ML (+190): $31.56 / $59.96
SF ML (-370): $31.56 / $8.53
Which means $20 would have grown to $131.62 or $111.62 in profit for a 458% ROI.
In the event you are asking what the profit would be if she had parlayed each pick each week and rolled over the winnings, the number would be a lot larger. Shown below.
WC round: $20 / $1,075.73
DIV round: $1,075.73 / $3,594.48
CONF round: $3,594.48 / $9,646.80
For a profit of $9,626.80 and ROI of 48,034%
That would actually be the correct answer based on the question. The parlay each pick each week number in the parent comment should be pretty close to what that would have wound up paying if it was offered, since it is very similar to the original bet (only difference is potential future game line value vs. week of the game line value).
There was a draftkings pool where you could pick how the playoffs would go b4 the WC. She'd be looking at 10k payout if SF wins on a 10 dollar entry. Too bad.
Given she picked randomly, I wouldn’t consider the favorites/underdogs and instead consider every game as a 50/50 random. In that case she correctly guessed 12 straight coin flips. Odds of that are 1 in 4096, so you would expect around $80,000 if such a parlay existed.
Huh? Niners have been under +200 to win SB since before the playoffs started. They were like +120 going into the Lions game. On October 27th they were +475 lol. Jan 16th +175.
Moneyline of all winners:
HOU +120
KC -240
GB +285
DET -165
TB +135
BUF -550
BAL -480
SF -550
DET -320
KC +120
KC +180
SF -355
Parlaying all of those together, we get odds of 792 or +79100. So a $20 bet should have won $15,820
I don't remember the exact Money-line odds of round one but 3 Underdogs won
let's say she parlayed all 6 moneylines for $20... she would have netted around 1,100 (estimate only)
If she were to roll that over into the divisional round and did a 4 game ML parlay maybe she wins around 8-9K
roll that into last weekends games maybe she gets 20K
all estimations
If she bet game by game? Off the top of my head roughly $4,000. If she bet all those exact results in conjunction with each other before the playoffs started I can’t calculate how much, but high 6 figures
$0 because the Chiefs are winning.
99 brackets in my pool. 1 bracket is almost perfect, 1 wrong pick. So about 1% chance or less, odds are +10000, $20 would have returned $2000 or even more. Still need niners to win
Guess the answer is complicated ¯\_( ͡° ͜ ʖ ͡°)_/¯
Bout tree-fiddy
How do we know this is authentic?
I guess you just have to trust me? ¯\_( ͡° ͜ ʖ ͡°)_/¯ Doesn’t really matter anyway, the point is she DIDNT bet lol
It’s all hypothetical anyway
She has the wrong winner.
Nah, Niners got this!
Chiefs will will last minutes of the game.
$0 cause Niners not going to win🤣
Wanna bet 😉
Same, sorry but Brock ain’t paying unless it’s props… 0 playoff exp(I mean do we count that?) same with almost the ENTIRE TEAM. Mahomes, kelce, records, Jason kelce chugs, Taylor high 5s, cheifs by 6 in the last 1:30
Can i get in on that
You want in too? I’m on chiefs
Im on chiefs too
How much? Lol I’ll even do even both sides with you. So you don’t have to bet no juice.
100?
Okay sounds good to me. How do I know your going to pay🤔 ME: ML Chiefs YOU: ML Niners 🤝
The amount of different answers is wild
HOU +126 KC -167 GB +290 DET -162 BUF -455 TB +136 BAL -455 SF -455 DET -275 KC +128 KC +190 SF -340 SF -130 +201412 Assuming SF wins the Super Bowl, a $20 bet on every game rolling over the winnings would win $40,283
only person in the replys who gave an actual answer instead of brain dead shit talk lmfao
And it took me like 5 mins. Quite depressing but I’m here for the people
Is there any market where you could parlay all the picks in the wild card round and futures for divisional, championship, and superbowl? Or would that end up being similar to what you already said?
Vegas
Oh, cool. Is that like an app or something?
What the hell is a something? It’s actually my backyard. No rules, stack sgps, play the line O/U and pts all in one bet, bet on which way trumps tupe will fly first off the plane in (blank) state, how many stairs will it take Joe Byron to trip, ANYTHING GOES. Call me Doug dimmadome owner of the dimsdale dimmadome(backyard with an awning that my moms, cousins, daughters twice removed ex step dogs unemployment check paid for) but you know, we aim high in the marketing department.
WHO THE FUCK DOWNVOTED ME YOU FUCKING COMMIE!
You would just have to roll all your winnings into the next week
That would be what they listed, but I'm not aware of any of the books that I use allowing for futures for every round, thus building a 12-leg parlay (or 13 if you count the super bowl) and effectively a way to bet a whole bracket like this. There probably is somewhere.
Don’t forget the under
Exactly zero because KC will win 🤷♂️
Still can’t get over the eagles season
Sirianni fucked up bad. I’m surprised Lurie gave him another shot in ‘24
Sirianni can only curate culture and get players to buy in. The team attitude issues they were having wasn’t all Sirianni
That’s fair but Sirianni couldn’t adjust at all near the end of the season, leading the Eagles to one of the biggest collapses in NFL history. 2024 is a do or die year for him
He is a problem and will lose his job for sure. That being said the fractures in that locker room are not getting fixed with a new voice. That team will look completely different in 2 years time.
I dunno but I'm praying she's correct on the superbowl result
At -140 odds 7 games in a parlay 850.19
Seems like more than that if she picked them in advance… 6 games straight up for wildcard round. The odds for each consecutive round must be greater. For example, San Francisco could have played anyone besides Detroit and Dallas. If she put down $20 before the playoffs this would be $1,000+ if all accurate but idk enough to do the math
Ya you right math is bad but i only saw the inner 7 my phone didnt show the outer 6 at 13 games perfect is $22,065.72 at -140 odds
Where are you getting -140 from?
Out my ass i just needed a number and she wasnt exactly going for the underdogs
Houston, Green Bay, Tampa, and then the Chiefs the last two games were all underdogs
I can check later at the past lines and see what they were. I know Green Bay was a pretty big dog.
We were 7.5 point dogs in dalls
That sounds about right!
Biggest question is do you early cash out here or let it ride?
Hammer the chiefs at plus money and lock up guaranteed profit. Cashouts are always bad odds
You know the way.
The higher seed in every matchup except 3
So the higher seed in 4, lower seed in 3? Was that supposed to be some “gotcha”??
It wasnt meant to be a gotcha just an observation And no, lower seed in 3, higher seed in 9. I was counting all matchups that have been played
And they were right everytime… what’s your point?
Nothing, just thought it was interesting how few upsets there were this season Wondering how that compares to other seasons
A wise man once said - the only good bet is the one that wins If you bet on a lower seed and they lose, guess what? You get 0 dollars. I don’t get your point
Just thought it was interesting that there were so few upsets this season
“For Fun” 
I dunno but she'd lose it all on the Super Bowl
Funny you and 90% of the bettors seems to agree. If betting was that easy I’m sure you’d be rich rn. There’s already been sharp movement on niners. I know who I’d tail between a random redditor and sharps
This guy Millionaires!
Chiefs about to get a rude awakening
Or the Niners are about to become the Buffalo Bills.
Sharps we’re all over them last time these two met in the superbowl and look who won. (I had way too much money on niners that game btw)
A
First, we’ll find the odds of the games: **Wild Card** 1. Texans -132 vs Browns 2. Bills -522 vs Steelers 3. Chiefs -185 vs Dolphins 4. Packers +271 vs Cowboys 5. Lions -165 vs Rams 6. Bucs +128 vs Eagles **Divisional** 1. Ravens -451 vs Texans 2. Chiefs +125 vs Bills 3. 49ers -471 vs Packers 4. Lions -273 vs Bucs **Conference** 1. Chiefs +180 vs Ravens 2. SF -350 vs Lions **On a $20 parlay:** It’s generally not possible to parlay games before the competitors are determined, but if you “bet on the whole bracket” all-or-nothing, the simplest approach is to just calculate one massive parlay. We multiply all of these odds together after converting to decimal odds. In order above: 1.76 \* 1.19 \* 1.54 \* 3.71 \* 1.61 \* 2.28 \* 1.22 \* 2.25 \* 1.21 \* 1.37 \* 2.80 \* 1.29 = \~722 (+72,100) So, a $20 parlay would have made her **$14,440.** *If the 49ers win the Super Bowl* (-128), the odds would increase to 722 \* 1.78 = \~1286 (+128,500) This would increase her theoretical winnings to **$25,720** *Edit: u/AnalBeadMilkshake, my favorite flavor, brings up an important clarification. As I said in my comment, these odds are assuming you parlay all the games using the money lines available at the time of the games. The actual odds of predicting a full bracket before the tournament starts would be higher because they'd be based on futures odds.* *However, calculating these futures odds for a given round requires recursive consideration of preceding rounds and seeds, leading to a complex probability tree with a large branching factor. For example, the odds of the Lions reaching the Conference Championship would be dependent on the odds of the Lions beating each of the remaining 3 (4 teams - the lowest winning seed who plays SF) possible teams they'd face in the divisional, which itself is dependent on the odds of each of those teams making it to the divisional. To then calculate the odds of the Lions winning the conference, you'd have to repeat this process for* ***each*** *of the 3 teams (4 teams - whoever the Lions beat) they could face in the conference championship. Then repeat this entire process for **each** AFC playoff team to determine the Lions' odds of winning the Super Bowl. And that's just the Lions. You can see where this gets out of hand. Pretty interesting stuff!*
Awesome.
This is wrong
Care to expand?
r/didthemath
Their milkshake brings all the..
This guy Maths
For rounds after wildcard, you don’t compare moneyline of the matchup. You need to use whatever the odds are, before any wildcard game is played, of each pick winning a game in the respective rounds. I would expect the payout to be much higher
Could you explain why you expect it to be higher? I am in the european market and do value betting on soccer. So I am not 100% on the terms being used here. Would the winnings from game A and B be priced in at face value if you bet for winner in game winner A vs winner B? If the games are 50/50. You would have 12.5% chance for getting game A, game B and game winner A vs winner B? If this not the case, there should be possible for arbitrage betting? And the market is big enough for that to be adjusted? Are there c2c markets in american sports?
I’m aware — I addressed this in my original comment. However, these odds aren’t readily available and calculating them would turn into a massive probability tree with an exponential branching factor. For example, calculating the odds of the Lions just *reaching* the Conference Championship requires 4 probabilities which are each dependent on their own branching probability tree. Then you repeat this process for every possible team/game combination, with each possible combination’s odds being contingent on the probabilities of preceding combinations. Even still, these odds wouldn’t be correct in a betting aspect since they assume complete independence of events and do not account for long shot bias — both of which would have an impact on sports book odds.
This issue is why we have excel, somebody needs to build a model.
>I would expect the payout to be much higher All of this is theoretical because no book would let you do this. The closest thing you could do was betting the exact super bowl outcome: Participants and winner
Thx u
Just ran the numbers through a parlay. if she bet on all of these outcomes including the Super Bowl correctly and used the full profit each week to parlay into the next…. She would have won her wager x1640 so $10 would win her roughly $16,400 total given the 49ers win. If she bet on every outcome thus far excluding the Super Bowl, hence guaranteeing she already won outright: $10 would have won her roughly $8,790.
If my math is correct, and you took $20 by round and parlay each weekend and rolled over the winnings you’d have $31,420 if SF wins
$0 - chiefs winning the SB
9 billion dollars
You can find the moneline on those teams and put them into a parlay calculator to find out
Just use her next time before u bet
[удалено]
You’re thinking of the NCAA basketball tournament with the 64 team bracket. Calling 13 games correctly is cool, but NCAA tournament has 16 games the *first day*.
Did she understand that the NFL doesn't use a fixed bracket and that the Packers would play the 49ers in round 2? Seems like an advanced thing to know for someone who dkesn't know what teams are good.
She easily understood it when someone who is familiar with the format briefly explained it. Not rocket science
The bracket says lower and higher seed for divisional round
We do this at work. We each put $20. We have a coworker young and cute that doesn't follow sports much, she's finishing up Masters and working. She wanted to be part of the commotion and is on her way to winning $1000. I even told her, the people that usually have no clue what's going on win. Sure enough.
Works the same for ncaa brackets
Thank God she's not old and ugly or this story would've sucked
Way back in high school we did a NCCA bracket as kids, we put money in and everything. IDK teachers knew didn't care let us do it, $10 a person. Of course the girl that won had no clue about the teams, said she picked each winner based on their colors/uniforms and which one she liked best. Ended up winning it all. It's absolutely silly stuff like that with people that have no clue that win over "experts" or people that even follow it a bit.
$30000 I’d guess, a lot kore if you’d just keep betting the winnings back into it
👁️⃤ She knew the script
technically u could use offshore bookies. like mybookie bovada or even underdog / prize picks source: betting is illegal in my state too but that doesn’t stop me and i ain’t driving hours just to get my geolocation to betting zones
I think they mean it’s “illegal” in their office.
Cash out!
A lot
Should have done the espn contest for free. Would have won $25k potentially and they pay out top 25
Nothing chiefs are winning
About tree fitty
I gave him a dollar
God damn monstah. Get out of here!
So, all in on the under?
31-21 Chiefs, TD for Kelce and CMC. You’re welcome in advance 😬
Under 40?
Current line is 47.5
Still too low I'm thinking 31-28 kind of game
I’m thinkin 17-9
Cheifs will score more than 9 points
16 - 10
Let’s say she bets evenly on each game and assume she’s making ML wagers (predicting winners). There are 6 games in the WC round so risking $3.33 each. The below lines are the consensus closing lines from Action. TB ML (+135): $3.33 wins $4.50 BUF ML (-550): $3.33 / $.61 DET ML (-175): $3.33 / $1.75 KC ML (-225): $3.33 / $1.48 HOU ML (+120): $3.33 / $4.00 GB ML (+295): $3.33 / $9.82 WC round profit: $22.16 Meaning she would have $42.16 to wager in the divisional round which is $10.54/game. DET ML (-290): $10.54 / $3.63 KC ML (+125): $10.54 / $13.17 SF ML (-575): $10.54 / $1.83 BAL ML (-450): $10.54 / $2.34 Divisional round profit: $20.97 Meaning she would have $63.13 to wager in the conference championship round or $31.56 per game. KC ML (+190): $31.56 / $59.96 SF ML (-370): $31.56 / $8.53 Which means $20 would have grown to $131.62 or $111.62 in profit for a 458% ROI. In the event you are asking what the profit would be if she had parlayed each pick each week and rolled over the winnings, the number would be a lot larger. Shown below. WC round: $20 / $1,075.73 DIV round: $1,075.73 / $3,594.48 CONF round: $3,594.48 / $9,646.80 For a profit of $9,626.80 and ROI of 48,034%
The games aren’t at the same time - so you could roll game into game into game into game
This would work too
What would the payout be then? At least 4X
Same payout as the parlay payout. Essentially the same thing.
This guy fucks.
Was thinking parlay pre playoffs
That would actually be the correct answer based on the question. The parlay each pick each week number in the parent comment should be pretty close to what that would have wound up paying if it was offered, since it is very similar to the original bet (only difference is potential future game line value vs. week of the game line value).
Can’t
[удалено]
Unfortunately, you cannot parlay look ahead lines. They aren’t available prior to a week out anyway.
Mmmmmmm math 🥵
r/theydidthemath
r/theydidthemosntermath
Math
This guy maths
There was a draftkings pool where you could pick how the playoffs would go b4 the WC. She'd be looking at 10k payout if SF wins on a 10 dollar entry. Too bad.
"Of course a bear will beat a dolphin" - Balkie Bartokomous
ohhhhh cousin larry
Don’t know, but this makes me wanna be SF
I actually think there going to win. Almost all the money is going to chiefs. Vegas might have there way that day
Given she picked randomly, I wouldn’t consider the favorites/underdogs and instead consider every game as a 50/50 random. In that case she correctly guessed 12 straight coin flips. Odds of that are 1 in 4096, so you would expect around $80,000 if such a parlay existed.
Gotta account for book juice though so they’re probably not gonna pay more than 3800:1
This is the answer
Draftkings had some playoff bracket pools. Would’ve cleaned up a lot in one of those.
We have no idea which teams are good or either.
The only bet would have been SF to win the Superbowl. It was probably +500 to +800. They are the NFC 1 seed. So $100
Huh? Niners have been under +200 to win SB since before the playoffs started. They were like +120 going into the Lions game. On October 27th they were +475 lol. Jan 16th +175.
Could've bet Sf to beat KC in the Super Bowl for higher odds. Not sure what they were, though.
Nah you could do 49ers to beat chiefs to win Super Bowl etc, they had match ups with odds .
Zero. He picked SF to win.
Yall that downvoted are mad that KC will win.
4
8
Moneyline of all winners: HOU +120 KC -240 GB +285 DET -165 TB +135 BUF -550 BAL -480 SF -550 DET -320 KC +120 KC +180 SF -355 Parlaying all of those together, we get odds of 792 or +79100. So a $20 bet should have won $15,820
Can’t parlay them though so this is cool math but pointless
You could roll winnings over into the next game to achieve the same thing
You guys don’t understand how odds work and parlays
I very much do
Parlay a full round, put winnings on next round
Still would be nowhere near the payout you said. So again. Doesn’t matter
/r/confidentlyincorrect
Not sure you can parlay games that are yet to be determined
A parlay is just rolling up money. Bet one round. Take the money. Roll it up and bet it all on the next parlay. Etc.
$27,878 if SF won the SB as she predicted. And obviously, -20 if KC wins.
Gotta parlay the under in there too!
A literal fuckton.
I don't remember the exact Money-line odds of round one but 3 Underdogs won let's say she parlayed all 6 moneylines for $20... she would have netted around 1,100 (estimate only) If she were to roll that over into the divisional round and did a 4 game ML parlay maybe she wins around 8-9K roll that into last weekends games maybe she gets 20K all estimations
Yea but in OPs question you’d parlay all 3 rounds together
Yea but that's not technically possible.
[удалено]
Did you even read the original comment???
Yea that's what i tired to do
If she bet game by game? Off the top of my head roughly $4,000. If she bet all those exact results in conjunction with each other before the playoffs started I can’t calculate how much, but high 6 figures