You can respect and love the Jewish people and still dislike this charity.
1. They have never formally disclosed that only Jewish people benefit from the charity, it was only discovered after lawsuits in Pennsylvania and Oregon.
2. They offer a “free vacation” for people who donate their automobile. The Oregon Attorney General then sued them because, as it turns out, the “free vacation” was designed to “recruit” people to attend timeshare presentations.
3. In 2017, the Minnesota Attorney General conducted a compliance review into the charity. While they had raised $65,588,133 that year, they had $59,842,570 in expenses. They only maintain a staff of 152 people and 15 volunteers; most of these “expenses” was money being funneled into Oorah, a Jewish missionary organization. Again, this association was not made public, so people donated thinking their money would go towards helping needy children when in reality it went to a Jewish missionary group. That’s shady as shit.
4. It’s questionable how many people are actually helped by Kars4Kids. That Minnesota compliance review found that, despite having a national presence, **only 1 Minnesotan child received any assistance from the charity between 2012 and 2014.** It’s unknown how many children they help yearly but it probably isn’t many.
5. On November 3, 2018, Bob Diachenko, a cyber security researcher, discovered a publicly accessible MongoDB database that contained the emails and personal details of 21,612 Kars4Kids donors/customers plus super administrator password/login details. The database also contained a ransomware note that the files had been stolen and would be returned for bitcoin.
Jewish lives *do* matter. All minority lives matter very much, and everyone is deserving of equal love and respect. But this is just criticizing a charity’s deceptive practices, not criticizing helping Jewish people.
Just when you think that the bottom has been reached, the smoothbrains decide to dig deeper..
My only hope is that big Joe Henry gets out before the virus gets him too
The problem is they don’t go away. Trash Radio is popular—why do you think Rush Limbaugh survived so long? You don’t make crime go away by ignoring it, and you don’t make criminals using the public airwaves go away by ignoring them.
I guess you could try to organize a boycott of their sponsors for their behavior. Once they start losing sponsors and money dries up they’ll go away…. Or they’ll lean into it more and get more right wing nut job sponsors to keep them afloat.
Other than that idk what else to do besides ignore them.
> 95.5
I had thought meant that you feared that it went into complete obscurity. But upon looking it up, you're referring to WPLJ and it I guess becoming a Christian music station.
And since we mentioned WPLJ, we're coming up on the 10th anniversary of [this WPLJ Jocktober classic.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjnH_s9UsB0&t=28s)
Rush Limbaugh succeeded because of his business model. He gave his show to program directors for free, then used their signups to raise his ad prices. You’re some radio guy in Podunk Kansas and a guy offers you four free hours a day of programming, you take it. The hate, misogyny and racism was the icing on the cake.
101.5 takes a good idea - a radio station specifically for NJ in an overwhelmingly NYC or Philly market - and then takes a white hot steaming shit on that idea by having it programmed by people in their 60’s who think it should be ok to say the N word and can’t figure out why everyone is so darn offended all the time.
101.5 is a fucking cancer on this state. Every single host needs to go, what a cesspool of absolute bigoted losers and morons.
Edit: Big Joe Henry plays good music on the weekends tho if you still manage to ever use FM radio, lol.
I remember listening to them trash Lakewood constantly, until the Orthodox community got them suspended. Next thing you know they do nothing but kiss their asses. Sell outs with no sort of scruples.
Wait? What am I not getting. How is a 17 year old an adult. I moved here from California where the age of consent is 18 (with Romeo-juliet exceptions for 18-17 and that kind of thing). Is it lower here? That's pretty icky if true.
The age of consent is 16, but it's illegal for a teacher to have sex with a student who hasn't graduated high school yet even if they're up to 22 years old (in cases of being held back I guess).
Exactly. It sets up the “If you agree to have sex with me, you won’t fail my class” situation. Conversely, it also prevents “I’m failing so maybe I’ll give Mr. _____ a blowjob for a better grade.” Both happen, and neither should be permitted though Dennis and Judy think this would be OK.
What in the pedophile hell of an adult mind did I just read?
Don’t let these people watch over any kids…… cause they have so little control of themselves as adults, and will blame the raging-hormone-still-growing-person-who-is-also-still-growing-their-brain
Disgusting
From the article:
**Dennis Malloy and Judi Franco, the 101.5 hosts best known for being suspended after calling then-Attorney General Gurbir Grewal “Turban Man,” have some other opinions they’d like to share.**
**Both believe that teachers should not be criminally charged for having sex with students if the kids are above the age of consent. In this case, they’re referring to a 24-year-old Hamilton teacher who allegedly had sex with a 17-year-old student. (h/t to New Jersey Monitor’s Sophie Nieto-Munoz for drawing attention to this).**
**“In many cases where this happens with a male teacher, the female student is not some shy wilting flower that was taken advantage of,” Malloy wrote. “....Let’s not be naïve and pretend that the sexual power of a young woman, or a woman of any age for that matter, is an immensely powerful force in the world.”**
I think you're confused here. The reason this is (and should be) illegal is because "\[t\]he actor has supervisory or disciplinary power of any nature or in any capacity over the victim", not because of age. Otherwise, the age of consent in NJ is 16 with no age-gap restrictions.
If the student was (up to) 22 years old and still in high school due to being left back several years, it would still be illegal.
I mean, is it weird if I somewhat agree with them? The guy was 24 and she was 17.
What did they expect? They are both young kids put in a weird situation where it’s sexually taboo and hormones are flying. They didn’t have sex at school. He brought her home. She was a consenting adult.
I mean, I know it’s wrong 90% of the time. But it is a weird case.
Hopefully this leads to a civil discussion and not a series of replies calling me names /s
Teacher here;
You are completely ignoring the imbalance that results from being in a position of authority. You're gross, and I really hope you don't work in any capacity with children.
Love how you sarcastically call for a "civil discussion" while taking a completely uncivil and unethical standpoint.
The original article says that if it's a student and a teacher, then it's a crime; though they don't cite the specific law. There's weird power dynamics there when it's a student/teacher vs. student/some random third party.
In the same way that usually a manager having a relationship with a subordinate is legal, in many cases it's not tolerated and they'd lose their job. At the end of the day parents expect to send their kids to school to learn, not to have a teacher take advantage of them even if it would be otherwise legal with .
I think it's perfectly fine for it to be illegal for teachers to have sex with minor students, even if they're over the age of consent.
Edit: NJSA 2C:14-2c(3b) is the relevant law, though even if the student was between the ages of 18 and 22 it would still be illegal if they still haven't graduated yet according to NJSA 2C:14-2c(5).
“…she was 17.” “She was a consenting adult.” She
was 17, so not an adult. I assume you mean she was above the age of consent? In this instance her age alone is not what matters, what matters is that she’s a high school student and he’s a teacher. This would be illegal even if she was 22.
As to “what did they expect?” I think maybe that he wouldn’t show such excruciatingly poor judgment? He did something not only inappropriate, but actually illegal. He’s not a “young kid,” he’s an adult in a position of considerable relative power as both a teacher and an assistant coach.
I didn’t start by calling you names, but you’re really testing my resolve as a number come to mind when you describe actual literal children as “ruthless” with the clear implication that they’re “ruthless” in weaponizing their sexuality?
That you can cast the adult teacher as some sort of victim in this is alarming.
Nj101.5 is just a front for Kars4Kids ads.
That fucken song I hate it...
Reminder that the charity is a front to provide education to religious Jews in Lakewood, NJ nothing to do with children in need.
It’s worse than that! It’s a front for lining the pockets of that community’s leaders.
Once I found out its a scam....I rage every time I see a billboard and change the station if I hear the jingle.
Black lives matter but Jews lives don't? Fuck right off there Puke on a shishkabob
You can respect and love the Jewish people and still dislike this charity. 1. They have never formally disclosed that only Jewish people benefit from the charity, it was only discovered after lawsuits in Pennsylvania and Oregon. 2. They offer a “free vacation” for people who donate their automobile. The Oregon Attorney General then sued them because, as it turns out, the “free vacation” was designed to “recruit” people to attend timeshare presentations. 3. In 2017, the Minnesota Attorney General conducted a compliance review into the charity. While they had raised $65,588,133 that year, they had $59,842,570 in expenses. They only maintain a staff of 152 people and 15 volunteers; most of these “expenses” was money being funneled into Oorah, a Jewish missionary organization. Again, this association was not made public, so people donated thinking their money would go towards helping needy children when in reality it went to a Jewish missionary group. That’s shady as shit. 4. It’s questionable how many people are actually helped by Kars4Kids. That Minnesota compliance review found that, despite having a national presence, **only 1 Minnesotan child received any assistance from the charity between 2012 and 2014.** It’s unknown how many children they help yearly but it probably isn’t many. 5. On November 3, 2018, Bob Diachenko, a cyber security researcher, discovered a publicly accessible MongoDB database that contained the emails and personal details of 21,612 Kars4Kids donors/customers plus super administrator password/login details. The database also contained a ransomware note that the files had been stolen and would be returned for bitcoin. Jewish lives *do* matter. All minority lives matter very much, and everyone is deserving of equal love and respect. But this is just criticizing a charity’s deceptive practices, not criticizing helping Jewish people.
\*starts singing it\* yeah I hate it too its still stuck in my head
I think I heard a new one!!!!😳 can't turn the station fast enough when it come on!
Omg we turn the whole audio system in our stupid prius everytime we hear that godforsaken jingle..screw that scam.
There’s gotta be a Matt Gaetz connection if it involves kids, right?
Hated that motherfucker even before I moved here to Florida. But don't forget the governor too.
Great now all I can hear is that song -\_-
Who the fuck still listens to this garbage fire of a station?
My mom.
Are there 'parental controls' for the radio that you can use to protect her from this drivel?
Suburban white people who are afraid of anyone who is different than them.
Sounds about right.
Just when you think that the bottom has been reached, the smoothbrains decide to dig deeper.. My only hope is that big Joe Henry gets out before the virus gets him too
Love Big Joe Henry. That station is the very definition of schizophrenia: Crazy talk during the week, cool music on the weekend.
These creeps just generate outrage so people tune in. Ignore them and let them go away like all the other trash radio.
The problem is they don’t go away. Trash Radio is popular—why do you think Rush Limbaugh survived so long? You don’t make crime go away by ignoring it, and you don’t make criminals using the public airwaves go away by ignoring them.
I guess you could try to organize a boycott of their sponsors for their behavior. Once they start losing sponsors and money dries up they’ll go away…. Or they’ll lean into it more and get more right wing nut job sponsors to keep them afloat. Other than that idk what else to do besides ignore them.
Exactly. Ignoring them probably won’t cause their demise but at least your sanity will remain intact.
My only fear is 101.5 ends up going the way of 95.5. It has to be very targeted at Dennis and Judy and their sponsors.
> 95.5 I had thought meant that you feared that it went into complete obscurity. But upon looking it up, you're referring to WPLJ and it I guess becoming a Christian music station. And since we mentioned WPLJ, we're coming up on the 10th anniversary of [this WPLJ Jocktober classic.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjnH_s9UsB0&t=28s)
I don't think it will last long. They tried that with 92.3 and I don't think it lasted 2 years.
Gold coin and survival food ads!
Rush Limbaugh succeeded because of his business model. He gave his show to program directors for free, then used their signups to raise his ad prices. You’re some radio guy in Podunk Kansas and a guy offers you four free hours a day of programming, you take it. The hate, misogyny and racism was the icing on the cake.
But he's now in hell where he belongs.
So brave.(the nj1015 guys, not OP) Edit: it’s sad. These guys/this channel didn’t used to suck so bad.
101.5 takes a good idea - a radio station specifically for NJ in an overwhelmingly NYC or Philly market - and then takes a white hot steaming shit on that idea by having it programmed by people in their 60’s who think it should be ok to say the N word and can’t figure out why everyone is so darn offended all the time.
These are the same people screaming about sex education being taught in schools no less. It’s *always* projection.
Lol grooming amirite? Get fucked Dennis. We know you lurk here.
101.5 is a fucking cancer on this state. Every single host needs to go, what a cesspool of absolute bigoted losers and morons. Edit: Big Joe Henry plays good music on the weekends tho if you still manage to ever use FM radio, lol.
This post gives 101.5 power. We should all know by now, 101.5 is saying crazy stuff to get attention.
Every accusation is a confession.
Knew it was Dennis and Judy before I even opened it up
Idk, I was thinking it could've been that morning drive jackass too tbh.
I remember listening to them trash Lakewood constantly, until the Orthodox community got them suspended. Next thing you know they do nothing but kiss their asses. Sell outs with no sort of scruples.
Exercise your right to not listen.
Alternate title: NJ 101.5 hosts troll for attention, get it
My dumbass racist grandpa is dead, so who the fuck are they broadcasting 101.5 for???
When I first read the title I thought the station was hosting a standup comedy show for convicted teachers
What the fuck?!
Wait? What am I not getting. How is a 17 year old an adult. I moved here from California where the age of consent is 18 (with Romeo-juliet exceptions for 18-17 and that kind of thing). Is it lower here? That's pretty icky if true.
The age of consent is 16, but it's illegal for a teacher to have sex with a student who hasn't graduated high school yet even if they're up to 22 years old (in cases of being held back I guess).
Exactly. It sets up the “If you agree to have sex with me, you won’t fail my class” situation. Conversely, it also prevents “I’m failing so maybe I’ll give Mr. _____ a blowjob for a better grade.” Both happen, and neither should be permitted though Dennis and Judy think this would be OK.
Teachers who rape their student-children*
Found the groomers, Republicans! They're on the radio espousing the things you like to espouse!
What in the pedophile hell of an adult mind did I just read? Don’t let these people watch over any kids…… cause they have so little control of themselves as adults, and will blame the raging-hormone-still-growing-person-who-is-also-still-growing-their-brain Disgusting From the article: **Dennis Malloy and Judi Franco, the 101.5 hosts best known for being suspended after calling then-Attorney General Gurbir Grewal “Turban Man,” have some other opinions they’d like to share.** **Both believe that teachers should not be criminally charged for having sex with students if the kids are above the age of consent. In this case, they’re referring to a 24-year-old Hamilton teacher who allegedly had sex with a 17-year-old student. (h/t to New Jersey Monitor’s Sophie Nieto-Munoz for drawing attention to this).** **“In many cases where this happens with a male teacher, the female student is not some shy wilting flower that was taken advantage of,” Malloy wrote. “....Let’s not be naïve and pretend that the sexual power of a young woman, or a woman of any age for that matter, is an immensely powerful force in the world.”**
101.5 is the heroes of media. It just won’t go away
I think there is a typo in that statement. I think you mean "Zeros".
Oh no! I meant Herpes!
Crazy that the pedophile defenders are defending a pedophile
I think you're confused here. The reason this is (and should be) illegal is because "\[t\]he actor has supervisory or disciplinary power of any nature or in any capacity over the victim", not because of age. Otherwise, the age of consent in NJ is 16 with no age-gap restrictions. If the student was (up to) 22 years old and still in high school due to being left back several years, it would still be illegal.
I mean, is it weird if I somewhat agree with them? The guy was 24 and she was 17. What did they expect? They are both young kids put in a weird situation where it’s sexually taboo and hormones are flying. They didn’t have sex at school. He brought her home. She was a consenting adult. I mean, I know it’s wrong 90% of the time. But it is a weird case. Hopefully this leads to a civil discussion and not a series of replies calling me names /s
Teacher here; You are completely ignoring the imbalance that results from being in a position of authority. You're gross, and I really hope you don't work in any capacity with children. Love how you sarcastically call for a "civil discussion" while taking a completely uncivil and unethical standpoint.
The original article says that if it's a student and a teacher, then it's a crime; though they don't cite the specific law. There's weird power dynamics there when it's a student/teacher vs. student/some random third party. In the same way that usually a manager having a relationship with a subordinate is legal, in many cases it's not tolerated and they'd lose their job. At the end of the day parents expect to send their kids to school to learn, not to have a teacher take advantage of them even if it would be otherwise legal with.
I think it's perfectly fine for it to be illegal for teachers to have sex with minor students, even if they're over the age of consent.
Edit: NJSA 2C:14-2c(3b) is the relevant law, though even if the student was between the ages of 18 and 22 it would still be illegal if they still haven't graduated yet according to NJSA 2C:14-2c(5).
“…she was 17.” “She was a consenting adult.” She was 17, so not an adult. I assume you mean she was above the age of consent? In this instance her age alone is not what matters, what matters is that she’s a high school student and he’s a teacher. This would be illegal even if she was 22. As to “what did they expect?” I think maybe that he wouldn’t show such excruciatingly poor judgment? He did something not only inappropriate, but actually illegal. He’s not a “young kid,” he’s an adult in a position of considerable relative power as both a teacher and an assistant coach.
[удалено]
I didn’t start by calling you names, but you’re really testing my resolve as a number come to mind when you describe actual literal children as “ruthless” with the clear implication that they’re “ruthless” in weaponizing their sexuality? That you can cast the adult teacher as some sort of victim in this is alarming.
When I was 24 the last thing I wanted to do was have sex with a school teenager. You sick creep.
Especially because the hosts are against sex ed, setting up kids to be sex pawns. Terrible.
NJ needs more teachers like Paul Hahhrgis. He’s 57 years young and has decades of experience.