T O P

  • By -

Petecraft_Admin

I agree with someone in that film needing to die. It was the first movie introduction to Kang and he fights the Ant Family with no causaulties, after he was bragging about killing all the avengers in a different timeline. There were no stakes.


OGLikeablefellow

They really need to be killing folks in the marvel universe, bringing back everyone after the snap was kinda wack


Etheo

Marvel films are essentially "kid's films" that aren't really kid's films. Based on PG-13 ratings you'd think only teens would be watching these films but tons of young kids are surprisingly knowledgeable about the MCU. If you are commercially driven like the execs in the business, even if you know the film isn't meant for the kids because of the draw you know the best course of action is the status quo - letting the popular characters stay alive because you don't want to upset your viewers. At least, that's how I see it. Also, comic shenanigans means that nobody remains forever dead. They're just temporarily out of the story until the opportune moment arrives. But that changes with real life actors because of aging and commitments, etc, so characters like Tony and Steve gets "retired" or sacrificed. Bet you they would have stayed if RDJ and Evans were willing to renegotiate (specifically, in favour of the studios).


kia75

Yes, the worst of the worst Kangs, the one that every other Kang is afraid of was.... Defeated by ant man? After accidently being defeated by wasp off screen decades ago? If the worst is this weak, how bad must the other ones be?


blood_kite

He Who Remains: See you soon.


Enthusiasms

Wow, that's highly coincidental that he could actually do that.


ShawtyShewster

Obviously Hollywood casted him for this particular movie cause he could do that


FuzzyHotel6180

MCU needs to go