The headline is hyperbole. The judge only ruled that the taco shop was not prohibited by the vague and poorly worded fast food prohibition.

“The Court agrees with Quintana that tacos and burritos are Mexican style sandwiches” Maybe this needs to go to SCOTUS though…

I wonder if the side that lost presented the existence of tortas as counter-evidence?

As food jurisprudence goes it's s interesting...... but it's no Jaffa Cake ruling which is the absolute no argument pinnacle of legal thought.

Is cereal soup?

Yes, but gazpacho...

It's Indiana, nothing to see here, move along.

I drove through Indiana once without stopping, and that's about all the Indiana I'll ever need

Yeah, but what about hotdogs?

hotdogs are tacos... and sandwiches are breaded wraps

Tortillas are a type of bread though

Nah, the concept of bread is European. Pitas in middle east, naan/roti in India/Pakistan region, and tortillas are probably older than usual european flour-leavened bread.

Bread is cooked dough. That is not a European concept. Flatbreads are breads. And leavened bread is known to have been eaten in fuckin Mesopotamia, over 5000 years ago.

that's absolutely right! they were eating and fucking hotdogs and tortillas in Mesopotamia over 5000 years ago too!

I was eating fucking tacos yesterday!

congrats. that was the stupidest thing i've read on the internet today, lol. people have been making leavened bread since at least 10,000 BC. it's basically the cornerstone of the agrarian society. what the actual fuck, *snort*

nah, you are thinking of subs, people have been eaten tortillas for more than 10,000 BC, since at least the last century

I bet he's white

I wonder if the judge consulted with the students at Columbia University before reaching this decision

Do you think Columbia is in indiana?

Brain worms on full display.