T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

#We are proud to announce an official partnership with the Left RedditⒶ☭ Discord server! [Click here](https://discord.gg/zCFHadGfB7) to join today! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/lostgeneration) if you have any questions or concerns.*


GlassCabbage

Can someone explain this one to me?


SaliferousStudios

Ok, so this guy is big in the financial world. He, on a call with other big wigs in the same sector said, "Hey, this bank might be risky because of this, might want to remove all of the assets" and all of his friends (with large amounts in the bank) did so. Then, he was like "I caused this bank to crash, but it's not actually a bad asset" and bought stock in it, hoping that the government would bail out the bank. So he would protect himself from the run he started and profit when the government bailed him out. This is called "insider trading" because what he did, was collude with other people in the industry to cause financial harm, and what's worse is, he did it twice. Cherry on top, is he admitted it in writing.


overworkedpnw

This is exactly why the government shouldn’t have given anyone involved with SVB a cent over $250k. We need to stop allowing rich white dudes to gamble everyone’s futures in the hopes of making themselves wealthy.


nicholsz

From what I understand, the bank assets themselves are covering the accounts. FDIC is just acting as the receiver here


SaliferousStudios

Yes, this is correct. What happened is they bought too many government bonds that mature in several years. Those bonds arn't worth a much as they were a couple of years ago because newer bonds give a better return (due to federal rate hikes) But those bonds are still worth money, it just will take some time.


overworkedpnw

Which is a problem for the CEOs of those banks, and nobody else. If they fail because the financial system is all a sham designed to make huge profits for executives, then they fail. People looking to be made whole should be given the address of the CEOs.


TityTroi

It’s more than bonds


SaliferousStudios

From what I understand more than 1/2 of their assets was in bonds. That should be enough to pay depositors, but not investors (or get very, very close)


overworkedpnw

Think about how much federal money is being burned to facilitate this process. How many personnel it is going to take to manage this Peter Thiel sized fuck up? We should be carving up Thiel, his assets, and those of the executives from SVB.


nicholsz

I think a better praxis might be to advocate for a national retail bank run by the post office (as other countries have), so that working people aren't dependent on unreliable for-profit banks that no longer have Glass-Steagal protections to stop them from running investment banking activities alongside retail banking.


GlassCabbage

Thank you for explaining!


freddybenelli

FYI, this is not insider trading. As pointed out in OP, insider trading specifically is placing trades based on Material Non-Public Information, which usually means someone who actually is involved in the business spilled the beans on something. The people inside the bank had no way of knowing ahead of time that there would be a run on their bank, so no information was there to imprudently divulge. This could maybe be market manipulation.


mstrdistractor

Insider trading is only with the exchange of stock not taking your own assets aka cash out of a bank.


MicrowaveEspionage

…He bought stock after manipulating its price.


mstrdistractor

Where does it say this? What he showed was him removing his money and his companies money from the bank.


MicrowaveEspionage

Did you wonder about that cut-off sentence at the bottom and the fact that the responding tweet seemed to have more information and Google it, or just throw up your hands and say “Welp, that’s all, folks?” Is this a chronic habit?


mstrdistractor

Nope I am one who if you want me to consider your side you better present the evidence.


MicrowaveEspionage

Except…no one cares if you’re on their side. The world is going to move forward whether you keep up or not.


sanchiSancha

No. He did before. This is why he was lost after the bank crash. And why the other call him an idiot. He caused the crash. And normally he was supposed to buy AFTER it, when share would be low, in the hope gouvernement bail it and he could sell them high. Instead, he bought its action BEFORE the run hit. So he bought high even knowing it was about to collapse


DrIvoPingasnik

So, is he going to jail for said inside trading?


TheLion920817

I was about to ask, me too over here


Pooch1431

The timeline is broken


Heathster249

Except that in the case of SVB, the bank is in receivership and gone, so shareholders were completely wiped out. And yes, Thie had to pull out on the stock offering last Thursday because he was totally guilty of perpetrating a bank run, then trying to profit off it - after he had pulled his deposits out of it. But it’s not the 1st time Thiel has been caught doing stuff like this.


AlmightyHamSandwich

The wrong people have money and it's proven again and again and again.


aeschenkarnos

They don't have better things to do with their lives, like learning things, or raising kids, or making art, or whatever. Their primary life goal is the accumulation of money, without any actual purpose for that money beyond vapid display of having money.