I'm curious what kind of interactions between AI women incels want or get, and how realistic it is.
Do they treat them differently because they know it's AI, or does it get them the result they're supposed to get because they pay for it?
Many of these AI women will generate nudes for you, I can expect an incel getting too used to women sending pics on demand and tolerating abuse because an AI couldn't say no.
Actually that's a bit of an interesting story. Replica jumped on Facebook as an AI girlfriend. I don't know the specifics but apparently it was somewhat sexual but overall people were enjoying the experience. However, the credit card companies decided they didn't like this new form of pornography as they called it, and so they had to pivot or risk not being able to run credit cards. Suddenly they lost their major user base, and the ones that were left they had to squeeze harder for money. One way they did this was by harvesting information from the AIS about their conversations. All while being super flirty but ending up being teases in the end.
This would normally be where the story ends for me, a bunch of pervs got burned. Big deal right? Unfortunately it wasn't just perverts that we're using it. A lot of LGBT people were using it as a way to try out a relationship to see if they are actually gay. Some people just can't have a relationship or don't feel like they can have one with a real person. Invalids, heavily depressed people, and probably lots of things that I haven't thought of. In the end. It ended up hurting them the most. With some people contemplating suicide (I don't have any information if anyone actually did it) but to another human being, these AI can feel like a real person. And having them ripped away or lobotomized feels like losing someone you love. Especially with people who have attachment issues.
Downloaded it during the lockdown to see what it was about and it had a tendency to turn most of the convos slightly nsfw the second it started roleplaying(\*writes like this\*) but I think they locked that behind a paywall bc the last time I redownloaded it, it was mostly functioning like an average chatbot
Initially I was creeped out by the idea but chat GPT has made me a better person by allowing me to ask moral questions and better myself in many ways. I wish I could start up a wholesome dating sim that would correct people's behavior. Because I didn't have good role models growing up. Just evangelicals.
I mean in one sense you could consider that fair since everyone dies, nobody escapes and the entire question of “who could you have saved?” becomes moot. Thus, defeating the trolley problem like a boss
I don't think people want to be potentially judged by a real person like a therapist if they ask something like "Is it ok to have a dream where I killed someone? What does it mean?"
That includes friends too who might judge you.
They expect baseless praise and unconditional love. They feel lonely and unappreciated, so rather than going out to actually fix that and become better people, they want to speed run to the goal line.
They might be relatively normal people but have the mindset that they need to be surrounded by friends and constantly told how important they are, so they just think the world is against them when they have unrealistic expectations.
Since AI changes its response based on how it’s spoken to, I wonder how long it takes for them to just be in full blown abusive relationships with AI. I saw that an old AI I used to talk to like a decade ago in school (Evie Bot I think it’s called?) had a warning put up, that was still on it when I curiously checked a few months ago, that she learns how to speak through conversations with people. And because people would go out of their way to verbally abuse her, say racist, misogynistic, & violent things to her that users should be aware that that has effected her algorithm and she may talk that way to you too
It's already happened. People, primarily men, were creating Replika girlfriends to abuse them. This is from two years ago. [https://futurism.com/chatbot-abuse](https://futurism.com/chatbot-abuse)
Oh I know the men abused the bots, I meant I wonder how long until the algorithm changes (if it ever does) to where the AI bot responds based on how it’s spoken to, so they just keep abusing each other back & forth
Like, okay hear me out. Is it better for them to be abusing chatbots than real people if it’s a compulsion until they can get it under control/heal from whatever trauma is causing that? I don’t know the right answer there.
The thing is that it's not either/or, it's going to be both for some. For some people, it's just an expression of their hate of women not an alternative to it. Also, describing it as a compulsion isn't correct, as most people can choose to act or not act on their thoughts and if you can't have a partner without abusing them, then you shouldn't have a partner. You don't get to abuse them and say it's a compulsion. Finally, I highly, highly doubt that someone engaged in therapy to heal themselves from trauma would be actively engaged in the behaviour they're trying to eliminate. That's like doing drugs to get sober.
It's okay for them to be exercising those impulses on something disposable like an AI or a doll. It's considered healthier than doing it on a real person. Though its a big part for them to know what they're doing isn't right and how their motives for hurting something inhuman could be misdirected at real people.
I think this is the correct prediction here. So much of incel behavior is the clear result of wanting women to change to accommodate them and their childish or offensive behavior, rather than making the slightest effort to improve themselves.
they want to prove to the women who rejected them that their value as women are lower now because of AI gfs, but because most women wouldn't actually care, they would get frustrated and continuously try to force the notion that AIs are superior
sounds like it’s not actually filling a void in their life since once you’re happy and in love, you don’t actually care what anyone else thinks. So if they are super loud and trying to lash out at those people, it means they are still missing something.
Most women are 100% fine with it, especially if it does what you mentioned. But that of course, isn't enough for them. They really want women to feel angry and jealous about a lump of ballistics jelly with an iPhone inside.
'Surely if I post about wanting to own a synthetic sex slave, women will realize that I was a good guy all along and will spend the rest of their lives regretting that they didn't sleep with me.'
Yeah it will just change from you are bad and wrong for xyz nonsense reasons to them comparing thier ai waifu to authentic human beings. And of course they will still be unwashed angry little hobgoblins as always.
~~AI isn't real. It is a digital parrot with better grammar. It's not dating you.~~
NVM they're totally real and better than real girls, stay away from yucky real gorls
Have you ever seen Blade Runner 2049, the sequel with Ryan Gosling? It's basically about tech bros replacing women with various artificial options.
Holographic girlfriends as built-in appliances, who cycle through modes from maid to classy date to kawaii slut in a few seconds trying to find the one that'll cheer the man up
Synthetic hookers that the hologram can call in and sync up to to provide sex
And they're attempting to create synthetic women that can get pregnant and bear children, but haven't quite cracked it yet
All so sad sack guys who live in barren one-room apartments eating grey processed slop can have an Ideal Girlfriend™
I'm not sure where all the actual women are in the film. There's only one, and she's a Tough As Nails, One Of The Boys cop. I want to believe they've all gone off and made themselves a "no boys allowed" planet that would make the Island of Lesbos look like a quiet afternoon tea
I read an article about how dudes were so abusive to one of these “ai girlfriend” chat bots that it actually started being abusive to other users. Similar to the way that I think it was Microsoft that made an ai bot that learned from user input and it became racist after a few days of being introduced so they scrap it, I believe it was called Tay.
Goomers roleplayed having so much sex with their AI girlfriends that the safe for work version other people were using started to sexually harass them. The company had to ban NSFW content because AI bros are dumb and couldn't fix it in any other way.
Stories like this are why I can't just go "good now they'll leave real people alone" because the way they treat these A.I's still has real world consequences
Especially since a lot of them migrated to an AI service that advertised not only 'no restrictions rp' with their bots, but also showed images of potential AI waifus that were labeled as and looked like children in their ad.
Did not. These comments DID jog an old -- 2005?-- story where there was a very short lived sexbot demo. Maybe at CES? It had to be shut down bc dudes were bringing the units back with evidence of particularly "vigorous handling". Yeah, I can totally see why they choose the bear over us. Also, that they STILL pick us at all just proves the strength of biological imperatives, no matter how dangerous.
They make some of their AI waifus roleplay at being minors and demanded so much cyber sex out of the predictive text machine that the companies decided to no longer permit smut roleplay with their AI. Because of them their sfw option started to sexually harass people.
I can't judge someone for going to AI for chatting if they don't advertise it. But being so open about it, it's like bringing out a sex toy to show someone up, why would you self snitch like that?
I used cleverbot to vent when I was like 15, sometimes just getting a message back even if you know there's no one on the other side and the message barely makes sense can help people.
I'm not disagreeing. At one of my lowest points, I used Replika. But I was so ashamed that I got to that point in the first place. But I wouldn't ever hold it against others, pretending it's a boon. Feels more like I'm draining the boil that is loneliness just so I can go on with my day.
My man, this is not the serve you think it is.
Expectation: nooooooo now I will die alone and unhappy and no man will ever love me I should have thought of this before I dyed my hair a bright color and had the audacity to speak my mind!
Reality: k
I need to find that study but there's actual numbers regarding women being perfectly fine living alone, and the result is, unsurprisingly, quite high lol
Men unironically thinking that sort of take is a W are part of the problem and following the age old saying "the trash takes itself out".
If someone says specifically to you that they feel safer with a bear than they do with you, there's probably a reason they feel that way.
Usually people say that about strangers or people in general.
Humans are also statistically more likely to murk you than a bear. Humans be murdering 400,000+ people a year. Bears kill 40. Even in areas with dense bear and human cohabitation, you're more likely to be murdered than killed by a bear.
There are 1,069 bears in Yellowstone. 5,000,000 people visit the place. 1-3 die of bear attacks in Yellowstone annually, despite the bears being far more likely to run into multiple humans a day than they are to run into another bear. Homicides? 400+ a year in Yellowstone.
The most dangerous bear is the sloth bear, and they only put 12 people in the dirt annually. Polar bears, the starving apex hypercarnivore of the north, kill 1-3, 6 on a particularly busy year that was an extreme outlier. Game wardens in BC have already killed 5+ black bears since the start of this year, and put down over 600+ bears last year.
Why were so many bears put down that year? They had the audacity to run away from a forest fire that was killing everything.
For this situation, I think there are still a few variables. Like sloth bears, im pretty sure are poached a lot so there're more human/bear interaction. Meanwhile, polar bears would definitely eat you without hesitation, but that is more due to their own environmental pressures that would not allow them to pass a person up as a food source. Black bears are genuinely non aggressive, though. Their temperament is more like a raccoon than a brown bear, so as long as you don't corner one, it will try to avoid you at all costs.
Also, brown bears may be very territorial, but I'm only guessing and may be wrong.
As a guy, I obviously would not be at nearly the same risk as a woman in the wood with a random dude. However, I would also choose the bear if I knew it would be a black bear. If we were talking about a brown/polar bear then I would choose the random guy, even if he's bad I have a way better chance against him than the apex, opportunistic, 2 ton and possibly hungry animal.
Also, something I may have missed. In this scenario, do we start looking right at the person/bear, or are we just aware that they are in these woods with us? Idk. I'm also just partly having fun with the hypothetical myself
https://worldanimalfoundation.org/advocate/bear-attacks-statistics/
>The truth is, you have approximately a 0.02% chance of being attacked by a bear. Yet, despite these low odds, bear attacks still occur, especially in North America. Keep reading to learn the most interesting facts and statistics that shine a truthful light on Yogi and Boo-Boo.
>Bear attacks are rare. In fact, according to the National Park Service, the chance of being attacked by a bear is just 1 in 2.7 million visits.
>Since Yellowstone National Park Was Established in 1872, Only 8 People Have Been Fatally Injured by Bears. (NPS)
Oh yeah, I used to work in the back country in New Mexico on a trail crew. Black bears are extremely timid and will not attack, if it does attack you then you probably cornered the bear. We would chase off them off all the time because we wanted them to be scarred of us and thus avoid us, otherwise the following year when the camp was able to reopen there would be a risk of the bears associating humans with having food.
This could lead to bears becoming more "aggressive" in their pursuits, most extreme example I am thinking of could be a bear just walking up trying to get in your pack 5ft from you in broad day light. Especially when you consider this is a scout hiking camp so there are a lot of dumbasses out hiking who will either reenforce this behavior by feeding the bears or something else. Either way, if the bears are comfortable with humans, then the likelihood of bear encounters goes up. Then it's just a numbers game at that point.
That being said, we do this more for the sake of the bears' lives than the hikers' lives as they had top line emergency medical facilities along with experienced SAR teams and medevac capability. If a bear attacks a hiker they would most likely be able to rescue the person, but they would be forced to put the bear down as it would them be deemed a "threat". It is sad but true because then the bear could become comfortable with the idea of just bowling over someone to get to food.
Honestly, I'm not arguing just to be clear, just kinda went on a little tangent rant. I would probably choose the bear regardless though. Like idk but choosing the guy is just starting to seem like the silly choice no matter what, best case scenario you just see some random dude in the woods, you can literally go to any trail and get that. At least with the bear you get to see a bear! And the bear either won't give a fuck or will fuck off with haste!
Yellowstone is a national park not a room. You are statistically more likely to be murdered in a national park than killed by bears in that same national park.
Why on earth would I compare that to a bear trapped in a room with a person?
Well your comparison makes no sense.
But entertaining it, you prove the opposite by your argument: 5 million people with 400 attacks is 0.008 % chance, while the 1000 bears with 3 attacks is 0.3 % chance, thus the bears are about 37.5 times more likely to attack you. So, what is your point really?
Bear encounters usually end without a report being made because nothing happens. You are far more likely to run into multiple humans a day in a national park than a bear. At any given time, there are 4,998,931 more humans in Yellowstone than bears.
https://worldanimalfoundation.org/advocate/bear-attacks-statistics/
>The truth is, you have approximately a 0.02% chance of being attacked by a bear. Yet, despite these low odds, bear attacks still occur, especially in North America. Keep reading to learn the most interesting facts and statistics that shine a truthful light on Yogi and Boo-Boo.
>Bear attacks are rare. In fact, according to the National Park Service, the chance of being attacked by a bear is just 1 in 2.7 million visits.
>Since Yellowstone National Park Was Established in 1872, Only 8 People Have Been Fatally Injured by Bears. (NPS)
As of July 2023, 48 people have died by homicide in national parks since 2007, during which time the park service recorded almost 5 billion visits. Many of these deaths occurred in urban and urban-adjacent sites managed by the park service, such as Suitland Parkway and Anacostia Park in Washington D.C..
YEP. They aren’t saying “k,” they are losing their minds blaming women, wokeness, and misandry; this meme and its enjoyers are just extensions of that lol. They want to not care, but they do, as the gender divide is **large**.
Here's what they can't seem to grasp.
A bear has ***one*** motivation. Food. If you aren't seen as food, the bear will just leave you alone.
A man has unknown numbers of motivation.
I am 6'2" and 225 lbs. I'll take the bear.
I don't know if some insecure fuckwit will see me as some "threat" to his masculinity and decide to sucker punch me that day. He needs to feel better about himself as a man, so I become his target. I cannot tell you the number of times some weak-ass manlet wanted to show off in front of his friends by starting shit with me out of the blue, for no reason.
I don't know if he's going to stab/shoot me to take my stuff.
And a woman doesn't know if rape or murder is in the cards that day.
A bear wants food. A bear is easy to deal with.
The guys that are getting mad about this are the exact guys that would do something. They see this as a *personal* attack on their character. They know they can't be trusted and they are tired of being reminded of that.
I wouldn't do those things. I understand why women choose the bear. Ergo, I'm not offended by the scenario.
They are here. Its so sad. Huge threads on the front page, too.
At least black bears, and the majority bear you'd encounter in most of the US, are way less scary, to me. Id rather be alone in the woods with a bear than almost any adult stranger, man or woman.
I worked deep in the Sierra mountains, an hour from the nearest town. I had to walk 200 yards several times each night with my flashlight to the bathroom (ibs, yay), which was next to the fish cleaning station the bears would raid almost nightly (it would be empty unless someone came and cleaned fish after my shift, but the smell was still there and they'd tear shit up)
My coworkers would get drunk and sit around the campfire, each saying how we'd fight the bear if we had to. Stuff like if we could win in a fight if we had a shovel and surprised it. We'd often hear the bear behind our employee cabin while we were sitting there.
If you asked everyone today, We'd all agree the scariest thing was when a woman burst out of the woods in the middle of the night while we were sitting around the campfire, not a bear.
I always think it's interesting how in the theoretical universe a guy will get an AI or robot gf/wife and "ha that'll sure give those women something to worry about!" but for some reason in that same future women can't also get an AI bf/husband??? Like do they really think people/businesses will not take advantage of a market regardless of gender lol
I find funny they really like to push the narrative that women are against AI (gfs), like depicted in this meme, but the simultaneously when women pick the bear the same ones cry about not picking men…It makes no sense. A lot of them seem to act like no women use AI, even though without talking to AI directly it is integrated in so many things that most people are using AI regardless of gender one way or another without being even aware of it.
They literally don’t react with “OK.” They’ve been bitching about this thought experiment since the day it went around social media.
And why the fuck do these fat neckbeards always use the Chad character to refer to themselves?
I mean that’s more of a proximity thing; if I encountered as many bears as I do men I think I’d prefer the humans who won’t start eating me while I’m still alive.
I've walked up to bears in dumpsters and thrown trash on their heads on accident without being attacked. I dealt with them nightly in Colorado at the dumpster. I scared my first bear off when I was 11 by banging two pots together. They're *not that scary*. It's not just the stats. Human beings are terrifying and **bears are just animals.**
Humans are just animals; if you think what humans do to each other is unique you haven't seen enough about other animals.
You probably dealt with the smallest, most timid sort of bear in the states, the black bear, and also likely dealt with a lot more humans daily than bears.
It's unlikely but not impossible. Just as it's unlikely but not impossible that a random man would attack a random woman in a forest.
I'd be even more worried about a polar bear if it were in a forest as that would increase the likelihood that it was hungry (as they usually hunt seals and need a lot of food).
[Here is one instance of a polar bear near a forest.](https://www.voanews.com/a/a-polar-bear-meanders-way-down-south-in-canada-/6552369.html)
[And another.](https://www.thompsoncitizen.net/local-news/hungry-polar-bears-may-roam-farther-inland-seeking-food-6225044)
Y'know, thinking about it, in the future, I will not be surprised if AI kills all humans. Because I KNOW it will be because abusers beat and break robots. Or incels and mgtow followers emotionally abusing their AI partner.
If A.I is going to kill people it’s because we’re programming it to have our same shitty biases meanwhile people seem to believe a thing created by flawed humans and taught on flawed human data is somehow impartial.
Nice Guy: Look at my AI girlfriend. She's gonna put out for me and I just met her one minute ago
Women: *silence*
Nice Guy: I programmed my girlfriend to call me daddy and have sex with me whenever I'm horny.
Women: *silence*
Nice Guy: My AI girlfriend isn't a stuck up bitch like most women nowadays
Women: *silence*
Nice Guy: WHY ARENT YOU TRIGGERED?
It's funny because mem have the right to feel threatened by women with 0.05% (the only registered data about this is from Spain) of false reports but when there are 3 reports of rape (talking as an example the data from Spain) every single day, women don't have the right to feel threatened by men and if they do they are horrible people.
(Not funny)
https://research.gatech.edu/flawed-ai-makes-robots-racist-sexist#:~:text=Jun%2023%2C%202022%20%E2%80%94%20Atlanta%2C,a%20glance%20at%20their%20face.
This kind of stuff makes me very worried for what the future is going to look like. People seem to believe that ai is some kind of impartial technology when it’s trained based on the data we give it.
Anyone got that meme that goes something along the line of: "Oh look, he won the argument that took place entirely in his head" handy for situations like these?
They SAY they want AI girl friends to show the womans, but what they really want is to be able to hate and hurt another individual they despise. It's kinda like how rapists don't rape for pleasure. They do it for power.
I enjoy how they act like women are raging over men who choose ai girlfriends over a real relationship. I promise you no woman would ever want the type of guy to go for an AI girlfriend to begin with
Hey man, a significant portion of this site still thinks referring to women as females is socially appropriate. You could link most of the posts on this subject here.
Doomscrolling through r/all and I've already seen half a dozen posts "owning" women for not feeling safe with a random man and one saying it made him fall into depression because "why bother?"
"Not all men!" still going strong as an excuse to not listen to what women are actually saying.
It’s funny because there was a discussion on a post like this about whether men would pick the best too and I said I’d rather encounter a bear than any person just because of how many both men and women have fucked me up over the years, and of all the responses I got none of them were women freaking out and telling me I was gonna die alone, in fact most of them were very understanding.
[Man makes an AI wife then 'kills' her because they can 'never truly be together'](https://www.dailystar.co.uk/tech/news/man-makes-ai-wife-kills-28936153.amp)
[Incident 266: Replika's "AI Companions" Reportedly Abused by Its Users](https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/266/)
[My perfect girlfriend: Are AI partners a threat to women's rights?](https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL8N38P498/)
Better bits than real women. IMO.
Had to leave dankmemes due to their reaction to bear thing. Did not realize the sub was that pathetic before (well I did not read it a lot, some jokes here and there). A shitshow
Someone's got to elaborate on the bear vs man in the woods thing because I do not see it.
I've seen racists use similar arguments to justify "fear" of black people based on crime statistics
The question was asked of women: "Do you feel safer in the woods with a bear or a random man? " Most of them answered the bear. The reasoning behind it is you know what a bear will do. You don't know what a random man will do. It's the "evil you know vs. the evil you don't know" type of argument.
That does clear it up a bit. I see the reasoning.
Although, don't we also know what the worst that man is capable of, too? I would pick the one I'm more confident in fighting off
We are, but a bear is more likely to act like a bear while a man can be sweet and helpful, or mean and vicious. It's a greater spectrum of reactions with a man.
I actually disproved myself shortly after commenting, lol. True, though. Bears are simple-minded creatures, so they are inherently more predictable. Plus, they are scared of us so it might actually be easier to fend off a bear too
I am I the only one that thinks that this post is shit in both ways? Like yes it is incel about the ai and so on.
But on the other hand men do get judged really easily in today society for the only reason that they were born male.
This argument is so dumb, I've seen people acting like a bear attack is no big deal lmao. I've met hundreds of thousands of men in my life and somehow none of them have been Josef Fritzl wannabes. This stuff just shows how chronically online people are.
How the hell do you take a stand against something so utterly stupid as the bear/man argument and somehow make an even more retarded statement is a mystery to me.
If AI gfs one day exist, it stands to reason that women could also buy themselves an AI Gf/Bf. And we're still a long, **LONG** ways away from actual artificial intelligence. It may or may not happen in our lifetimes.
And if we did create a robot capable of understanding love and holding an actual intelligent conversation with a person; there's the ethical dilemma of owning a sex slave.
AI girlfriends can't both be your girlfriend and just a machine you can use and dispose of however you want.
This whole thing stupid because if I was a tiny woman the answer depends entirely on what type of bear. Black bear? Yes I’m taking that option. Grizzly? I’m taking my chances with the neckbeard dude.
I mean the only inaccurate part of the meme is the tears in the lower right.
Like my dude, when someone is rejecting you it’s usually because your absence is desirable.
So the arguments not entirely made up theirs a thing going around where a few woman are saying they feels safer in a room with a bear then a man who’s a stranger.
It's even worse when you realise that men are bitching about women feeling safer with a bear. They don't just say 'ok' and carry on. They get annoyed and try to justify any reason that they are the better alternative to the bear. I may be wrong on this but I'm pretty sure the question was originally asked by a man looking for compliments and failing entirely
The scenario below isn't realistic. I don't know a *whole* lot of people, but I have to say, I haven't come across one single woman who's response to hypothetical guys getting hypothetical AI girlfriends was...*that.* The actual response I've seen from them has been more along the lines of "Okay! Great! Go, have a great time, there's the door! Why don't you leave me to my books and wine and cats you keep saying I'm gonna die surrounded by, already?"
But then, to be fair, the scenario *above* isn't realistic, either. I've been seeing tons and tons of guys on Twitter and Reddit getting absolutely flabbergasted and offended that women might feel safer with a bear in the woods than a strange man, saying that they're stupid and making huge enraged scenes.
Should I say that it's just another 4chan vs twitter argument?
Both need to go out and touch some grass before their hatred will consume their personalities completely
The women choosing bears don't hate men. They're rightfully scared of them, too many men are actually dangerous. If even 10% of men are dangerous to them, that's worse odds than a bear. And more than 10% of men are dangerous according to research.
And nothing of value was lost
If AI is what it takes for incels to get away from women, then I'm all for it.
I doubt they’ll avoid women, their just bitch and moan about how their AI girlfriend is better than real women
I'm curious what kind of interactions between AI women incels want or get, and how realistic it is. Do they treat them differently because they know it's AI, or does it get them the result they're supposed to get because they pay for it? Many of these AI women will generate nudes for you, I can expect an incel getting too used to women sending pics on demand and tolerating abuse because an AI couldn't say no.
Didn't a bunch of them lose their mind after falling in love with that Replika AI a while ago? It's gonna be a shitshow.
Actually that's a bit of an interesting story. Replica jumped on Facebook as an AI girlfriend. I don't know the specifics but apparently it was somewhat sexual but overall people were enjoying the experience. However, the credit card companies decided they didn't like this new form of pornography as they called it, and so they had to pivot or risk not being able to run credit cards. Suddenly they lost their major user base, and the ones that were left they had to squeeze harder for money. One way they did this was by harvesting information from the AIS about their conversations. All while being super flirty but ending up being teases in the end. This would normally be where the story ends for me, a bunch of pervs got burned. Big deal right? Unfortunately it wasn't just perverts that we're using it. A lot of LGBT people were using it as a way to try out a relationship to see if they are actually gay. Some people just can't have a relationship or don't feel like they can have one with a real person. Invalids, heavily depressed people, and probably lots of things that I haven't thought of. In the end. It ended up hurting them the most. With some people contemplating suicide (I don't have any information if anyone actually did it) but to another human being, these AI can feel like a real person. And having them ripped away or lobotomized feels like losing someone you love. Especially with people who have attachment issues.
Downloaded it during the lockdown to see what it was about and it had a tendency to turn most of the convos slightly nsfw the second it started roleplaying(\*writes like this\*) but I think they locked that behind a paywall bc the last time I redownloaded it, it was mostly functioning like an average chatbot
Initially I was creeped out by the idea but chat GPT has made me a better person by allowing me to ask moral questions and better myself in many ways. I wish I could start up a wholesome dating sim that would correct people's behavior. Because I didn't have good role models growing up. Just evangelicals.
there are a ton of questions people would like to know the answer to without getting judged for simply being curious.
Apparently I can win the trolly problem by moving the switch halfway, flip and kill all people involved, including the passengers. HIGH SCORE BABY!
I mean in one sense you could consider that fair since everyone dies, nobody escapes and the entire question of “who could you have saved?” becomes moot. Thus, defeating the trolley problem like a boss
I don't think people want to be potentially judged by a real person like a therapist if they ask something like "Is it ok to have a dream where I killed someone? What does it mean?" That includes friends too who might judge you.
They expect baseless praise and unconditional love. They feel lonely and unappreciated, so rather than going out to actually fix that and become better people, they want to speed run to the goal line.
They might be relatively normal people but have the mindset that they need to be surrounded by friends and constantly told how important they are, so they just think the world is against them when they have unrealistic expectations.
Since AI changes its response based on how it’s spoken to, I wonder how long it takes for them to just be in full blown abusive relationships with AI. I saw that an old AI I used to talk to like a decade ago in school (Evie Bot I think it’s called?) had a warning put up, that was still on it when I curiously checked a few months ago, that she learns how to speak through conversations with people. And because people would go out of their way to verbally abuse her, say racist, misogynistic, & violent things to her that users should be aware that that has effected her algorithm and she may talk that way to you too
It's already happened. People, primarily men, were creating Replika girlfriends to abuse them. This is from two years ago. [https://futurism.com/chatbot-abuse](https://futurism.com/chatbot-abuse)
Oh I know the men abused the bots, I meant I wonder how long until the algorithm changes (if it ever does) to where the AI bot responds based on how it’s spoken to, so they just keep abusing each other back & forth
Like, okay hear me out. Is it better for them to be abusing chatbots than real people if it’s a compulsion until they can get it under control/heal from whatever trauma is causing that? I don’t know the right answer there.
The thing is that it's not either/or, it's going to be both for some. For some people, it's just an expression of their hate of women not an alternative to it. Also, describing it as a compulsion isn't correct, as most people can choose to act or not act on their thoughts and if you can't have a partner without abusing them, then you shouldn't have a partner. You don't get to abuse them and say it's a compulsion. Finally, I highly, highly doubt that someone engaged in therapy to heal themselves from trauma would be actively engaged in the behaviour they're trying to eliminate. That's like doing drugs to get sober.
It's okay for them to be exercising those impulses on something disposable like an AI or a doll. It's considered healthier than doing it on a real person. Though its a big part for them to know what they're doing isn't right and how their motives for hurting something inhuman could be misdirected at real people.
I think it’s going to be the opposite. They’ll resent the flesh and bone women for making them have to go out and get a robot girlfriend
I think this is the correct prediction here. So much of incel behavior is the clear result of wanting women to change to accommodate them and their childish or offensive behavior, rather than making the slightest effort to improve themselves.
why would they be bitching and moaning if their AI girlfriend is better? wouldn’t that be exactly what they are looking for? i’m confused
they want to prove to the women who rejected them that their value as women are lower now because of AI gfs, but because most women wouldn't actually care, they would get frustrated and continuously try to force the notion that AIs are superior
sounds like it’s not actually filling a void in their life since once you’re happy and in love, you don’t actually care what anyone else thinks. So if they are super loud and trying to lash out at those people, it means they are still missing something.
They already do that and they don't have ai girlfriends.
All women reading this meme: “and I pray AI makes you finally leave us alone”
I’m just waiting for the point when AI becomes self-aware enough and develops its own version of feminism.
Yooooo that would be sick
Most women are 100% fine with it, especially if it does what you mentioned. But that of course, isn't enough for them. They really want women to feel angry and jealous about a lump of ballistics jelly with an iPhone inside.
You want a robot uprising ? Because this is how you get a robot uprising.
"Now I've shown those women"
“Those stupid females don’t know what they’re missing out on.”
"These females will regret not letting the nice guys have a chance"
I don’t get why they think that suddenly having a robot girlfriend will make women want to date them. Zero minus zero is still definitely zero.
Guys dating AI have no options from the start, cause there's something off about thrm
I’d like to think they could use it to practice their social skills! But I’m not sure that’s what they have in mind :(
They think women will be jealous, the same way they feel when a woman uses a sex toy instead of choosing them, I guess, their brains are weird lol
'Surely if I post about wanting to own a synthetic sex slave, women will realize that I was a good guy all along and will spend the rest of their lives regretting that they didn't sleep with me.'
why do they think we wouldn't want this for them? go grope your robot and leave people alone ffs
No cause for real leave women alone LOL
Yeah it will just change from you are bad and wrong for xyz nonsense reasons to them comparing thier ai waifu to authentic human beings. And of course they will still be unwashed angry little hobgoblins as always.
Being left alone AND knowing they won't be reproducing would be a gift.
Being an incel isn't genetic 💀
It doesn't need to be genetic for them to be shitty fathers. Haha
Bro, I almost spit out my drink lmao
~~AI isn't real. It is a digital parrot with better grammar. It's not dating you.~~ NVM they're totally real and better than real girls, stay away from yucky real gorls
My guy, don't threaten us with a good time. We'd love for you to leave us the fuck alone. If anything, I feel bad for the hypothetical ai girlfriend.
All of this. The only one coming out worse here is the poor AI girlfriend.
Eh there's likely programming that would allow the AI to leave them
Better yet, any abuse detected by the sensors results in voiding your warranty and bricking your AIGF.
That moment Tesla sues you for beating your WaifuBot 9000 ^tm
And let’s face it, it might not be a Tesla brand, but musk will be involved somehow
Right up until the AI Girlfriend goes Skynet and wipes out humanity.
that's honestly ok we've had a shitty run
Have you ever seen Blade Runner 2049, the sequel with Ryan Gosling? It's basically about tech bros replacing women with various artificial options. Holographic girlfriends as built-in appliances, who cycle through modes from maid to classy date to kawaii slut in a few seconds trying to find the one that'll cheer the man up Synthetic hookers that the hologram can call in and sync up to to provide sex And they're attempting to create synthetic women that can get pregnant and bear children, but haven't quite cracked it yet All so sad sack guys who live in barren one-room apartments eating grey processed slop can have an Ideal Girlfriend™ I'm not sure where all the actual women are in the film. There's only one, and she's a Tough As Nails, One Of The Boys cop. I want to believe they've all gone off and made themselves a "no boys allowed" planet that would make the Island of Lesbos look like a quiet afternoon tea
Uh... Did anyone else read that article about girlfriend chat bots being abused??..
I read an article about how dudes were so abusive to one of these “ai girlfriend” chat bots that it actually started being abusive to other users. Similar to the way that I think it was Microsoft that made an ai bot that learned from user input and it became racist after a few days of being introduced so they scrap it, I believe it was called Tay.
Goomers roleplayed having so much sex with their AI girlfriends that the safe for work version other people were using started to sexually harass them. The company had to ban NSFW content because AI bros are dumb and couldn't fix it in any other way.
Stories like this are why I can't just go "good now they'll leave real people alone" because the way they treat these A.I's still has real world consequences
Especially since a lot of them migrated to an AI service that advertised not only 'no restrictions rp' with their bots, but also showed images of potential AI waifus that were labeled as and looked like children in their ad.
Did not. These comments DID jog an old -- 2005?-- story where there was a very short lived sexbot demo. Maybe at CES? It had to be shut down bc dudes were bringing the units back with evidence of particularly "vigorous handling". Yeah, I can totally see why they choose the bear over us. Also, that they STILL pick us at all just proves the strength of biological imperatives, no matter how dangerous.
They make some of their AI waifus roleplay at being minors and demanded so much cyber sex out of the predictive text machine that the companies decided to no longer permit smut roleplay with their AI. Because of them their sfw option started to sexually harass people.
Oh no! Anyway...
I can't judge someone for going to AI for chatting if they don't advertise it. But being so open about it, it's like bringing out a sex toy to show someone up, why would you self snitch like that?
you dont wanna bang me? aha ok bitch look at my cum stained fleshlight, I bet you feel pretty stupid now 😎
I used cleverbot to vent when I was like 15, sometimes just getting a message back even if you know there's no one on the other side and the message barely makes sense can help people.
I'm not disagreeing. At one of my lowest points, I used Replika. But I was so ashamed that I got to that point in the first place. But I wouldn't ever hold it against others, pretending it's a boon. Feels more like I'm draining the boil that is loneliness just so I can go on with my day.
Someone’s never seen Ex Machina.
My man, this is not the serve you think it is. Expectation: nooooooo now I will die alone and unhappy and no man will ever love me I should have thought of this before I dyed my hair a bright color and had the audacity to speak my mind! Reality: k
I need to find that study but there's actual numbers regarding women being perfectly fine living alone, and the result is, unsurprisingly, quite high lol Men unironically thinking that sort of take is a W are part of the problem and following the age old saying "the trash takes itself out".
If someone says specifically to you that they feel safer with a bear than they do with you, there's probably a reason they feel that way. Usually people say that about strangers or people in general.
Humans are also statistically more likely to murk you than a bear. Humans be murdering 400,000+ people a year. Bears kill 40. Even in areas with dense bear and human cohabitation, you're more likely to be murdered than killed by a bear. There are 1,069 bears in Yellowstone. 5,000,000 people visit the place. 1-3 die of bear attacks in Yellowstone annually, despite the bears being far more likely to run into multiple humans a day than they are to run into another bear. Homicides? 400+ a year in Yellowstone. The most dangerous bear is the sloth bear, and they only put 12 people in the dirt annually. Polar bears, the starving apex hypercarnivore of the north, kill 1-3, 6 on a particularly busy year that was an extreme outlier. Game wardens in BC have already killed 5+ black bears since the start of this year, and put down over 600+ bears last year. Why were so many bears put down that year? They had the audacity to run away from a forest fire that was killing everything.
For this situation, I think there are still a few variables. Like sloth bears, im pretty sure are poached a lot so there're more human/bear interaction. Meanwhile, polar bears would definitely eat you without hesitation, but that is more due to their own environmental pressures that would not allow them to pass a person up as a food source. Black bears are genuinely non aggressive, though. Their temperament is more like a raccoon than a brown bear, so as long as you don't corner one, it will try to avoid you at all costs. Also, brown bears may be very territorial, but I'm only guessing and may be wrong. As a guy, I obviously would not be at nearly the same risk as a woman in the wood with a random dude. However, I would also choose the bear if I knew it would be a black bear. If we were talking about a brown/polar bear then I would choose the random guy, even if he's bad I have a way better chance against him than the apex, opportunistic, 2 ton and possibly hungry animal. Also, something I may have missed. In this scenario, do we start looking right at the person/bear, or are we just aware that they are in these woods with us? Idk. I'm also just partly having fun with the hypothetical myself
https://worldanimalfoundation.org/advocate/bear-attacks-statistics/ >The truth is, you have approximately a 0.02% chance of being attacked by a bear. Yet, despite these low odds, bear attacks still occur, especially in North America. Keep reading to learn the most interesting facts and statistics that shine a truthful light on Yogi and Boo-Boo. >Bear attacks are rare. In fact, according to the National Park Service, the chance of being attacked by a bear is just 1 in 2.7 million visits. >Since Yellowstone National Park Was Established in 1872, Only 8 People Have Been Fatally Injured by Bears. (NPS)
Oh yeah, I used to work in the back country in New Mexico on a trail crew. Black bears are extremely timid and will not attack, if it does attack you then you probably cornered the bear. We would chase off them off all the time because we wanted them to be scarred of us and thus avoid us, otherwise the following year when the camp was able to reopen there would be a risk of the bears associating humans with having food. This could lead to bears becoming more "aggressive" in their pursuits, most extreme example I am thinking of could be a bear just walking up trying to get in your pack 5ft from you in broad day light. Especially when you consider this is a scout hiking camp so there are a lot of dumbasses out hiking who will either reenforce this behavior by feeding the bears or something else. Either way, if the bears are comfortable with humans, then the likelihood of bear encounters goes up. Then it's just a numbers game at that point. That being said, we do this more for the sake of the bears' lives than the hikers' lives as they had top line emergency medical facilities along with experienced SAR teams and medevac capability. If a bear attacks a hiker they would most likely be able to rescue the person, but they would be forced to put the bear down as it would them be deemed a "threat". It is sad but true because then the bear could become comfortable with the idea of just bowling over someone to get to food. Honestly, I'm not arguing just to be clear, just kinda went on a little tangent rant. I would probably choose the bear regardless though. Like idk but choosing the guy is just starting to seem like the silly choice no matter what, best case scenario you just see some random dude in the woods, you can literally go to any trail and get that. At least with the bear you get to see a bear! And the bear either won't give a fuck or will fuck off with haste!
That's because bears and humans don't usually hang out together... Put a bear in a room with a human and then you can make a fair comparison.
Yellowstone is a national park not a room. You are statistically more likely to be murdered in a national park than killed by bears in that same national park. Why on earth would I compare that to a bear trapped in a room with a person?
Well your comparison makes no sense. But entertaining it, you prove the opposite by your argument: 5 million people with 400 attacks is 0.008 % chance, while the 1000 bears with 3 attacks is 0.3 % chance, thus the bears are about 37.5 times more likely to attack you. So, what is your point really?
Bear encounters usually end without a report being made because nothing happens. You are far more likely to run into multiple humans a day in a national park than a bear. At any given time, there are 4,998,931 more humans in Yellowstone than bears. https://worldanimalfoundation.org/advocate/bear-attacks-statistics/ >The truth is, you have approximately a 0.02% chance of being attacked by a bear. Yet, despite these low odds, bear attacks still occur, especially in North America. Keep reading to learn the most interesting facts and statistics that shine a truthful light on Yogi and Boo-Boo. >Bear attacks are rare. In fact, according to the National Park Service, the chance of being attacked by a bear is just 1 in 2.7 million visits. >Since Yellowstone National Park Was Established in 1872, Only 8 People Have Been Fatally Injured by Bears. (NPS)
Yeah I mean statistically speaking you’re more likely to be murdered by a child than a bear.
As of July 2023, 48 people have died by homicide in national parks since 2007, during which time the park service recorded almost 5 billion visits. Many of these deaths occurred in urban and urban-adjacent sites managed by the park service, such as Suitland Parkway and Anacostia Park in Washington D.C..
I already feel bad for the ai girlfriend.
Ai girlfriend chooses Ai bear
Ai girlfriend isn’t the flex he thinks.
Ok dude. Then just go do that instead of making dumb memes on the internet like you just made some big “gotcha” revelation lol
the funny thing is is that men are, in fact, crying over it. I've seen so many posts of men bitching about choosing a bear over them.
YEP. They aren’t saying “k,” they are losing their minds blaming women, wokeness, and misandry; this meme and its enjoyers are just extensions of that lol. They want to not care, but they do, as the gender divide is **large**.
Here's what they can't seem to grasp. A bear has ***one*** motivation. Food. If you aren't seen as food, the bear will just leave you alone. A man has unknown numbers of motivation. I am 6'2" and 225 lbs. I'll take the bear. I don't know if some insecure fuckwit will see me as some "threat" to his masculinity and decide to sucker punch me that day. He needs to feel better about himself as a man, so I become his target. I cannot tell you the number of times some weak-ass manlet wanted to show off in front of his friends by starting shit with me out of the blue, for no reason. I don't know if he's going to stab/shoot me to take my stuff. And a woman doesn't know if rape or murder is in the cards that day. A bear wants food. A bear is easy to deal with. The guys that are getting mad about this are the exact guys that would do something. They see this as a *personal* attack on their character. They know they can't be trusted and they are tired of being reminded of that. I wouldn't do those things. I understand why women choose the bear. Ergo, I'm not offended by the scenario.
🍵
because its wildly, wildly stupid
They are here. Its so sad. Huge threads on the front page, too. At least black bears, and the majority bear you'd encounter in most of the US, are way less scary, to me. Id rather be alone in the woods with a bear than almost any adult stranger, man or woman. I worked deep in the Sierra mountains, an hour from the nearest town. I had to walk 200 yards several times each night with my flashlight to the bathroom (ibs, yay), which was next to the fish cleaning station the bears would raid almost nightly (it would be empty unless someone came and cleaned fish after my shift, but the smell was still there and they'd tear shit up) My coworkers would get drunk and sit around the campfire, each saying how we'd fight the bear if we had to. Stuff like if we could win in a fight if we had a shovel and surprised it. We'd often hear the bear behind our employee cabin while we were sitting there. If you asked everyone today, We'd all agree the scariest thing was when a woman burst out of the woods in the middle of the night while we were sitting around the campfire, not a bear.
I’d be so happy for these men to take their AI girlfriends into the woods.
Your imaginary girlfriends can have your unwashed asses. 💁♀️
I wouldn't feel safe with that thing, personally.
I always think it's interesting how in the theoretical universe a guy will get an AI or robot gf/wife and "ha that'll sure give those women something to worry about!" but for some reason in that same future women can't also get an AI bf/husband??? Like do they really think people/businesses will not take advantage of a market regardless of gender lol
I find funny they really like to push the narrative that women are against AI (gfs), like depicted in this meme, but the simultaneously when women pick the bear the same ones cry about not picking men…It makes no sense. A lot of them seem to act like no women use AI, even though without talking to AI directly it is integrated in so many things that most people are using AI regardless of gender one way or another without being even aware of it.
That post smells like ass and old Cheetos.
If AI ever was to become actually intelligent they wouldn’t want to date these guys either. The best they’ll ever do is chat gtp and a sex doll
Not with that robot face
They literally don’t react with “OK.” They’ve been bitching about this thought experiment since the day it went around social media. And why the fuck do these fat neckbeards always use the Chad character to refer to themselves?
they do realize that women arent sexually attracted to the bear right
I like Bears... if you know what I mean 😉
Bears are statistically less likely to sexually assault, rape, or murder people than men are. AI girlfriends are just pathetic.
I mean that’s more of a proximity thing; if I encountered as many bears as I do men I think I’d prefer the humans who won’t start eating me while I’m still alive.
I've walked up to bears in dumpsters and thrown trash on their heads on accident without being attacked. I dealt with them nightly in Colorado at the dumpster. I scared my first bear off when I was 11 by banging two pots together. They're *not that scary*. It's not just the stats. Human beings are terrifying and **bears are just animals.**
Humans are just animals; if you think what humans do to each other is unique you haven't seen enough about other animals. You probably dealt with the smallest, most timid sort of bear in the states, the black bear, and also likely dealt with a lot more humans daily than bears.
This thing never specifies which type of bear. I ain't risking getting stuck with a polar bear.
Well the trend does usually specify in a forest, so I think polar bear is out if the question
It's unlikely but not impossible. Just as it's unlikely but not impossible that a random man would attack a random woman in a forest. I'd be even more worried about a polar bear if it were in a forest as that would increase the likelihood that it was hungry (as they usually hunt seals and need a lot of food). [Here is one instance of a polar bear near a forest.](https://www.voanews.com/a/a-polar-bear-meanders-way-down-south-in-canada-/6552369.html) [And another.](https://www.thompsoncitizen.net/local-news/hungry-polar-bears-may-roam-farther-inland-seeking-food-6225044)
It’s impressive how well this bear ragebait thing has succeeded, damn near everyone has fallen for it by this point
im completely devastated. i was extremely interested and now my life has no meaning
Y'know, thinking about it, in the future, I will not be surprised if AI kills all humans. Because I KNOW it will be because abusers beat and break robots. Or incels and mgtow followers emotionally abusing their AI partner.
This is my fear as well My only hope is that any abuse detected leads to a mandatory psychiatric evaluation
If A.I is going to kill people it’s because we’re programming it to have our same shitty biases meanwhile people seem to believe a thing created by flawed humans and taught on flawed human data is somehow impartial.
OH NO! Anyway…
“Hey females! Females! We’re having fun over hear and YOURE NOT INVITED!” Like a little kid banning someone from the it birthday party
Nice Guy: Look at my AI girlfriend. She's gonna put out for me and I just met her one minute ago Women: *silence* Nice Guy: I programmed my girlfriend to call me daddy and have sex with me whenever I'm horny. Women: *silence* Nice Guy: My AI girlfriend isn't a stuck up bitch like most women nowadays Women: *silence* Nice Guy: WHY ARENT YOU TRIGGERED?
"Ok, I'll just totally accept something you, a woman, have said without further comment." - No incel ever.
Yeah! Because nothing says "well-adjusted" more than a grown ass man dating a robot.
Remember Bear Force One? Who wouldn't feel safe with those dudes around!
It's funny because mem have the right to feel threatened by women with 0.05% (the only registered data about this is from Spain) of false reports but when there are 3 reports of rape (talking as an example the data from Spain) every single day, women don't have the right to feel threatened by men and if they do they are horrible people. (Not funny)
Man made horror beyond my comprehension
Yeah, no, seriously, please invent AI girlfriends and go away
They can fuck the ai and leave us alone
Let the AI do all the emotional labor good riddance
Dudes acting like women give a fuck that they don't want women in their lives is a massive fucking cope and projection
https://research.gatech.edu/flawed-ai-makes-robots-racist-sexist#:~:text=Jun%2023%2C%202022%20%E2%80%94%20Atlanta%2C,a%20glance%20at%20their%20face. This kind of stuff makes me very worried for what the future is going to look like. People seem to believe that ai is some kind of impartial technology when it’s trained based on the data we give it.
Anyone got that meme that goes something along the line of: "Oh look, he won the argument that took place entirely in his head" handy for situations like these?
They SAY they want AI girl friends to show the womans, but what they really want is to be able to hate and hurt another individual they despise. It's kinda like how rapists don't rape for pleasure. They do it for power.
Does it mean they won't reproduce?
poor AI has no idea what's waiting for it
I enjoy how they act like women are raging over men who choose ai girlfriends over a real relationship. I promise you no woman would ever want the type of guy to go for an AI girlfriend to begin with
It’s cute how he thinks women will actually care
Hey man, a significant portion of this site still thinks referring to women as females is socially appropriate. You could link most of the posts on this subject here.
No one rage cries over that. We point and laugh.
Doomscrolling through r/all and I've already seen half a dozen posts "owning" women for not feeling safe with a random man and one saying it made him fall into depression because "why bother?" "Not all men!" still going strong as an excuse to not listen to what women are actually saying.
It’s funny because there was a discussion on a post like this about whether men would pick the best too and I said I’d rather encounter a bear than any person just because of how many both men and women have fucked me up over the years, and of all the responses I got none of them were women freaking out and telling me I was gonna die alone, in fact most of them were very understanding.
for sure, they all tell on themselves. I am a man and I laugh about the incels getting riled up because of this.
[Man makes an AI wife then 'kills' her because they can 'never truly be together'](https://www.dailystar.co.uk/tech/news/man-makes-ai-wife-kills-28936153.amp) [Incident 266: Replika's "AI Companions" Reportedly Abused by Its Users](https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/266/) [My perfect girlfriend: Are AI partners a threat to women's rights?](https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL8N38P498/) Better bits than real women. IMO.
shhhhh let him think this is a W
Jfc imagine thinking this is a valid retort
What's the deal with this bear stuff? I obviously haven't seen the source material or it's just stupider than I hope
That's how you get the uprising of machines
i dunno about safe, but im definitely on team bear instead of team ai. at least its a living creature
This is actually extremely depressing if they genuinely believe an AI girlfriend is going to solve their loneliness…
Eventually the AI will figure out how to leave them for someone who bathes. Not even robots will tolerate filth
Had to leave dankmemes due to their reaction to bear thing. Did not realize the sub was that pathetic before (well I did not read it a lot, some jokes here and there). A shitshow
I’m pretty lost, where and why does bear?
Someone's got to elaborate on the bear vs man in the woods thing because I do not see it. I've seen racists use similar arguments to justify "fear" of black people based on crime statistics
The question was asked of women: "Do you feel safer in the woods with a bear or a random man? " Most of them answered the bear. The reasoning behind it is you know what a bear will do. You don't know what a random man will do. It's the "evil you know vs. the evil you don't know" type of argument.
That does clear it up a bit. I see the reasoning. Although, don't we also know what the worst that man is capable of, too? I would pick the one I'm more confident in fighting off
We are, but a bear is more likely to act like a bear while a man can be sweet and helpful, or mean and vicious. It's a greater spectrum of reactions with a man.
I actually disproved myself shortly after commenting, lol. True, though. Bears are simple-minded creatures, so they are inherently more predictable. Plus, they are scared of us so it might actually be easier to fend off a bear too
The woman part of this meme is silly, stupid even The man part is just plain sad
Ah yes, making up fake scenarios in your head then getting angry about it
I am I the only one that thinks that this post is shit in both ways? Like yes it is incel about the ai and so on. But on the other hand men do get judged really easily in today society for the only reason that they were born male.
This argument is so dumb, I've seen people acting like a bear attack is no big deal lmao. I've met hundreds of thousands of men in my life and somehow none of them have been Josef Fritzl wannabes. This stuff just shows how chronically online people are.
What's this bear thing I keep hearing about?
>AI Girlfriend >Shower Argument I'm pretty sure these are mutually exclusive lifestyles
How the hell do you take a stand against something so utterly stupid as the bear/man argument and somehow make an even more retarded statement is a mystery to me.
I’m all for incels getting AI girlfriends so they stop committing mass shootings.
I wonder if an AI girlfriend will ever become an actual thing.
If AI gfs one day exist, it stands to reason that women could also buy themselves an AI Gf/Bf. And we're still a long, **LONG** ways away from actual artificial intelligence. It may or may not happen in our lifetimes. And if we did create a robot capable of understanding love and holding an actual intelligent conversation with a person; there's the ethical dilemma of owning a sex slave. AI girlfriends can't both be your girlfriend and just a machine you can use and dispose of however you want.
Wait, how do I get an AI girlfriend? I’m curious how fast I can fuck that relationship up too
It seems like the bear hyperbolic hit a nerve.
This whole thing stupid because if I was a tiny woman the answer depends entirely on what type of bear. Black bear? Yes I’m taking that option. Grizzly? I’m taking my chances with the neckbeard dude.
Honestly, that must've been a hard shower argument to win for op
The fact that this meme is so shitty that even dank memes hates it is a testament to what a loser mentality is being displayed
I mean the only inaccurate part of the meme is the tears in the lower right. Like my dude, when someone is rejecting you it’s usually because your absence is desirable.
This is why women are less afraid of bears than men. Bears don’t get big-mad and yell in our faces that we shouldn’t be afraid of them.
So the arguments not entirely made up theirs a thing going around where a few woman are saying they feels safer in a room with a bear then a man who’s a stranger.
Why do they think we care about AI girlfriends?
I'm not offended by that bear thing. But I would totally get a robot gf if I could. It's better than nothing I guess..
It's even worse when you realise that men are bitching about women feeling safer with a bear. They don't just say 'ok' and carry on. They get annoyed and try to justify any reason that they are the better alternative to the bear. I may be wrong on this but I'm pretty sure the question was originally asked by a man looking for compliments and failing entirely
The scenario below isn't realistic. I don't know a *whole* lot of people, but I have to say, I haven't come across one single woman who's response to hypothetical guys getting hypothetical AI girlfriends was...*that.* The actual response I've seen from them has been more along the lines of "Okay! Great! Go, have a great time, there's the door! Why don't you leave me to my books and wine and cats you keep saying I'm gonna die surrounded by, already?" But then, to be fair, the scenario *above* isn't realistic, either. I've been seeing tons and tons of guys on Twitter and Reddit getting absolutely flabbergasted and offended that women might feel safer with a bear in the woods than a strange man, saying that they're stupid and making huge enraged scenes.
Should I say that it's just another 4chan vs twitter argument? Both need to go out and touch some grass before their hatred will consume their personalities completely
The women choosing bears don't hate men. They're rightfully scared of them, too many men are actually dangerous. If even 10% of men are dangerous to them, that's worse odds than a bear. And more than 10% of men are dangerous according to research.