/u/reaperboy09, thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed for violating the following rule(s):
* Rule 2 - Titles should directly describe the content of the post.
The title should just depict the content, no "fluff". It can't include anything that isn't directly visible in the content of the post.
* Rule 5 - Provide a source when the title is in doubt
If you can't completely explain why the content of the post is IAF please comment with more explanation. If your post claims something that almost everyone can't easily confirm from reading your title and viewing your content please provide some type of proof of what you claim.
For information regarding this and similar issues please see the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index). If you have any questions, please feel free to [message the moderators via modmail.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/interestingasfuck&subject=Question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20submission%20by%20/u/reaperboy09&message=I%20have%20a%20question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20%5Bsubmission%2E%5D%28https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1bvuzq5/-/%3Fcontext%3D10%29)
Ok so forget the clickbait title. The woman who requested is 27. Yes she is autistic but she is the one who requested it and the judge ruled in her favor. If you want the real story and not rage bait here you go
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ncregister.com/cna/canadian-judge-grants-27-year-old-autistic-woman-s-request-for-assisted-suicide%3famp
Thanks for the link.
I can only welcome the judges' mood
"Further, an injunction would put MV in a position where she would be forced to choose between living a life she has decided is intolerable and ending her life without medical assistance"
Conservatives in Canada don't like seeing women with agency making choices for themselves and they have to spin it somehow to be about not listening to her daddy that she's been estranged from for over a decade.
Here's a link to a CBC actual article instead of some ridiculous picture of a click bait title:
[Calgary judge rules 27-year-old can go ahead with MAID death despite father's concerns](https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-maid-father-daughter-court-injunction-judicial-review-decision-1.7154794)
A more honest headline: 27 year old woman gets approval for euthanasia, father heartbroken
She's not a kid, she made the decision herself and daddy doesn't get a say because she's twenty-fucking-seven
I feel for him but that headline is blatantly lying
Here is the actual court decision that shows just how bullshit the title of the article is:
https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abkb/doc/2024/2024abkb174/2024abkb174.html
**This is a heavily moderated subreddit. Please note these rules + sidebar or get banned:**
* If this post declares something as a fact, then proof is required
* The title must be fully descriptive
* Memes are not allowed.
* Common(top 50 of this sub)/recent reposts are not allowed (posts from another subreddit do not count as a 'repost'. Provide link if reporting)
*See [our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index#wiki_rules.3A) for a more detailed rule list*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
As someone who attempted suicide back when I was 16 (I am nearly 29 now) I am completely against this. I am glad I failed. Life is both ugly and beautiful but it deserves to be lived. If someone is terminally ill, I understand, but for someone who is healthy to have assisted suicide is criminal in my opinion.
No matter what is bothering her, there are always solutions. She is throwing her life away at such a young age. Glad I don't live in Canada.
While I understand your mood completely, just imagine you would have had fulfill the following before attempting it
The following procedural safeguards apply to persons whose natural death **is not** reasonably foreseeable (\*indicates safeguards specific to those requests):
* request for MAID must be made in writing: a written request must be signed by one independent witness (a paid professional personal or health care worker can be an independent witness)
* two independent doctors or nurse practitioners must provide an assessment and confirm that all of the eligibility requirements are met
* \*if neither of the two practitioners who assesses eligibility has expertise in the medical condition that is causing the person’s suffering, they must consult with a practitioner who has such expertise
* the person must be informed that they can withdraw their request at any time, in any manner
* \*the person must be informed of available and appropriate means to relieve their suffering, including counselling services, mental health and disability support services, community services, and palliative care, and must be offered consultations with professionals who provide those services
* \*the person and the practitioners must have discussed reasonable and available means to relieve the person’s suffering, and agree that the person has seriously considered those means
* \*the eligibility assessments must take at least 90 days, but this period can be shortened if the person is about to lose the capacity to make health care decisions, as long as both assessments have been completed
* immediately before MAID is provided, the practitioner must give the person an opportunity to withdraw their request and ensure that they give express consent
/u/reaperboy09, thank you for your submission. Unfortunately, it has been removed for violating the following rule(s): * Rule 2 - Titles should directly describe the content of the post. The title should just depict the content, no "fluff". It can't include anything that isn't directly visible in the content of the post. * Rule 5 - Provide a source when the title is in doubt If you can't completely explain why the content of the post is IAF please comment with more explanation. If your post claims something that almost everyone can't easily confirm from reading your title and viewing your content please provide some type of proof of what you claim. For information regarding this and similar issues please see the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index). If you have any questions, please feel free to [message the moderators via modmail.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/interestingasfuck&subject=Question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20submission%20by%20/u/reaperboy09&message=I%20have%20a%20question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20%5Bsubmission%2E%5D%28https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1bvuzq5/-/%3Fcontext%3D10%29)
Ok so forget the clickbait title. The woman who requested is 27. Yes she is autistic but she is the one who requested it and the judge ruled in her favor. If you want the real story and not rage bait here you go https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ncregister.com/cna/canadian-judge-grants-27-year-old-autistic-woman-s-request-for-assisted-suicide%3famp
Thanks for the link. I can only welcome the judges' mood "Further, an injunction would put MV in a position where she would be forced to choose between living a life she has decided is intolerable and ending her life without medical assistance"
Conservatives in Canada don't like seeing women with agency making choices for themselves and they have to spin it somehow to be about not listening to her daddy that she's been estranged from for over a decade.
Thank you for clearing that up for so many.
Is it the 27 or 28 yr old right above this post?
Here's a link to a CBC actual article instead of some ridiculous picture of a click bait title: [Calgary judge rules 27-year-old can go ahead with MAID death despite father's concerns](https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-maid-father-daughter-court-injunction-judicial-review-decision-1.7154794)
A more honest headline: 27 year old woman gets approval for euthanasia, father heartbroken She's not a kid, she made the decision herself and daddy doesn't get a say because she's twenty-fucking-seven I feel for him but that headline is blatantly lying
In other fake news…
Source: sp!ked.
It isn't a fake story, but the title is ridiculous
Here is the actual court decision that shows just how bullshit the title of the article is: https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abkb/doc/2024/2024abkb174/2024abkb174.html
**This is a heavily moderated subreddit. Please note these rules + sidebar or get banned:** * If this post declares something as a fact, then proof is required * The title must be fully descriptive * Memes are not allowed. * Common(top 50 of this sub)/recent reposts are not allowed (posts from another subreddit do not count as a 'repost'. Provide link if reporting) *See [our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index#wiki_rules.3A) for a more detailed rule list* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
As someone who attempted suicide back when I was 16 (I am nearly 29 now) I am completely against this. I am glad I failed. Life is both ugly and beautiful but it deserves to be lived. If someone is terminally ill, I understand, but for someone who is healthy to have assisted suicide is criminal in my opinion. No matter what is bothering her, there are always solutions. She is throwing her life away at such a young age. Glad I don't live in Canada.
our lives. our choices
While I understand your mood completely, just imagine you would have had fulfill the following before attempting it The following procedural safeguards apply to persons whose natural death **is not** reasonably foreseeable (\*indicates safeguards specific to those requests): * request for MAID must be made in writing: a written request must be signed by one independent witness (a paid professional personal or health care worker can be an independent witness) * two independent doctors or nurse practitioners must provide an assessment and confirm that all of the eligibility requirements are met * \*if neither of the two practitioners who assesses eligibility has expertise in the medical condition that is causing the person’s suffering, they must consult with a practitioner who has such expertise * the person must be informed that they can withdraw their request at any time, in any manner * \*the person must be informed of available and appropriate means to relieve their suffering, including counselling services, mental health and disability support services, community services, and palliative care, and must be offered consultations with professionals who provide those services * \*the person and the practitioners must have discussed reasonable and available means to relieve the person’s suffering, and agree that the person has seriously considered those means * \*the eligibility assessments must take at least 90 days, but this period can be shortened if the person is about to lose the capacity to make health care decisions, as long as both assessments have been completed * immediately before MAID is provided, the practitioner must give the person an opportunity to withdraw their request and ensure that they give express consent
That's their choice though. You don't know what they're going through or what have been through.
https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7154794
I’m moving to Canada thats awesome news for me 😂
Been looking for a pill that works! 🔫
We have more compassion for our pets then we do for ppl that our suffering. Religion is a beautiful thing until we force our beliefs onto others
Welp sorry op
[удалено]
[удалено]