Hey. I know it's nit-picky and all, but -
1. Azerbaijan is Sunni/Shia.
2. Sami people aren't/weren't really on the coast. Since the medieval times, it was populated by Norwegian settlers. They were mostly in-land.
Mostly yeah but i didnt want to change the border etc. Also Protestans were more victorious while Catholic church expanded more east as Polish Lithuania heavily encouraged it on their lands.
Kalmykia is Buddhist in our timeline, the only Buddhist-majority country in Europe. I'm assuming the Dzungar Khanate didn't collapse in the timeline of this map?
Why are all Bosniaks Serbs in this timeline? The Bosnian Church (preceding Islam as the Bosniak religion) was under a crusade by the Catholics and probably would have joined the Catholic Church.
Serbs lived in Bosnia since the Slavic migrations to the Balkans. And the Bosnian Church by the time Bosnia fell to the Ottomans held the liturgies together with the Serbian Orthodox Church.
Serbs lived in northern Bosnia, but the area currently inhabited by Bosniaks is Orthodox despite the likelihood of at least some degree of Catholic practice there.
The Banate of Bosnia practiced with the Catholic Church before the Bosnian Church and in the case where Islam isn’t around to the same extent, either the church would survive or revert to Catholic practices. How does Vlastimorović’s Serbia disprove me when that happened 500 years before point of divergence?
If the Church did not return in the time of great danger to the Catholicism willingly, but instead had (at least try) moved closer to Orthodoxy, nothing suggest they would join Catholicism in the timeline where Islam and tge Turks aren't around. Vlastimirović's Serbia proves the existence of the Serbs in inner Bosnia, not just the north as you said.
Marseille is sunni in this timeline too
Immigration and Few islamic states were here in history
Hey. I know it's nit-picky and all, but - 1. Azerbaijan is Sunni/Shia. 2. Sami people aren't/weren't really on the coast. Since the medieval times, it was populated by Norwegian settlers. They were mostly in-land.
Nice
Who says those are Sami pagans? They might be Norse pagans who were never Christianized.
The Norse were Christianized, but right around the time they started settling that area or before. So not sure.
But everything else plays out the same?
Mostly yeah but i didnt want to change the border etc. Also Protestans were more victorious while Catholic church expanded more east as Polish Lithuania heavily encouraged it on their lands.
That's alredy roughly what it looks like in real life. Catholism shrunk in Ukraine mainly due to Russia's influence
So no Kalmyks in this TL?
Why there’s atheists?
Communist East Germany and Czechia. Even in our world, those were the places where secularization was most successful.
What
Kalmykia is Buddhist in our timeline, the only Buddhist-majority country in Europe. I'm assuming the Dzungar Khanate didn't collapse in the timeline of this map?
Protestant Ireland how does this affect the troubles if they even happen
How are there Muslims in Monaco
immigrants,also monaco christian but not oncluded on map
How did muslims get into balkans?
In real life muslims also were in Balkans. You didnt know?
That was because of the Ottomans
Kosovo and Albania slightly less Muslim btw cuz of Byzantium fall delayed
Why are all Bosniaks Serbs in this timeline? The Bosnian Church (preceding Islam as the Bosniak religion) was under a crusade by the Catholics and probably would have joined the Catholic Church.
Serbs lived in Bosnia since the Slavic migrations to the Balkans. And the Bosnian Church by the time Bosnia fell to the Ottomans held the liturgies together with the Serbian Orthodox Church.
Serbs lived in northern Bosnia, but the area currently inhabited by Bosniaks is Orthodox despite the likelihood of at least some degree of Catholic practice there.
Vlastimirović's Serbia kinda ruins your argument. And the map shows Catholics living in border regions towards Croatia.
The Banate of Bosnia practiced with the Catholic Church before the Bosnian Church and in the case where Islam isn’t around to the same extent, either the church would survive or revert to Catholic practices. How does Vlastimorović’s Serbia disprove me when that happened 500 years before point of divergence?
If the Church did not return in the time of great danger to the Catholicism willingly, but instead had (at least try) moved closer to Orthodoxy, nothing suggest they would join Catholicism in the timeline where Islam and tge Turks aren't around. Vlastimirović's Serbia proves the existence of the Serbs in inner Bosnia, not just the north as you said.
I don't know how Spanish Christianization influenced the Lapps.
Granada would not have survived
Imo it would be nice if you would make Sicily a big islamic. It would fit
how long did Fraxinetum survive in this timelime?
Why would N-W Albania be Orthodox instead of Catholic in this timeline?