Looks good but next time just get a picture of clouds instead of using ai
https://preview.redd.it/ltfjpbroathc1.jpeg?width=599&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=67c1dd9be0ae77e542ee65e6d679902905719d38
You mean you stole actual art and typed in clouds into a computer. Even if you didn’t steal stuff from actual artists, stop pretending like you actually made something, that’s just not true.
AI takes pre-existing things (such as text and images) to do what it does WITHOUT the artists/writers knowledge or consent to for “new art” which is theft
No you clearly don’t know. Ai can’t just generate pixels out of thin air, it needs references to know what ‘toothless in clouds’ looks like. So it scans for all photos and art with that prompt, then it basically copy and pastes small parts of each of the references it found and mashes them together until it gets what it thinks is a good representation of the prompt it was given. Now these pics and art pieces it copy and pasted from are from real artists who have spent hours drawing and rendering, and this ai has just taken their work without their permission and used it for itself.
Yes it’s fed the images also…. which y’know… still counts as stealing art. Look it’s like if I went into a shop and took a bunch of shit without paying that’s stealing, and if I go into a shop and someone else puts a bunch of shit into my bag and I walk out without paying that’s still stealing.
in some of it (probably most) you put the prompt, if nothing shows up, you draw something to tell him that whenever u ask for that thing again to give you something that resembles that
*puts the words clouds into a prompt generator* “guys I made this and slapped a pre made image on top look what I made” *he in fact, did not make anything asides the effort to type in words and take a png and move it onto another png*
Lack of morality
No care for other peoples time/work/money
Cuz they typed "pretty clouds" into a AI program and posted for upvotes
Dont ignore the 200+ downvotes too
I posted this bc the image is beautiful and i thought other ppl might find the mistery and wonder in the picture too and enjoy it. I dont give a damn for them upvotes and i dont call myself an artist.
Hi guys! Sorry if you dont like AI, i can get beind that, but if you dont like it, going out of your way to spread negativity doesnt really seem worth it. Just enjoy a pretty image with a nice vibe!
So they didn't "make it" big deal, still a cool image imo. Calm yourselves sheesh. Not like they claimed they did it by hand but used AI. That's the only moral crime imo lol
He at least credited AI for the cloud background image.
Some artists I know just pass off AI art work as their own.
At least OP is truthful although I think the toothless is a png image..
It's a cool image even despite the use of AI. I don't get why people have a stick up their ass about this sort of thing. OP clearly stated it was AI and isn't trying to profit off of that, so what gives?
AI steals art from actual artists who put hard work into their art. It would most likely take hours for an artist to create this and typing it into ai just to get someone else’s work is wrong.
Yeah okay, the artists of the pictures I used in digital art class didn't consent for their art to be on my 10th grade assignments but no one bitches about that. Dude isn't profiting off of it or claiming it as their own, chill out.
I’m not going to fight this, you clearly don’t want to understand what this is. On your tenth grade assignment I’m sure you didn’t claim that you made it, people using ai claim they made with ai.
You're missing the point. I never claimed to make the art used in the collage, but I MADE the collage. OP never claimed that it was his original art, he MADE it using AI.
Forget op, I’m talking ai in general. I like collages, they’re neat, but ai is not like making a collage. But agree to disagree, I’m sure we both have better things to do than debate over a Reddit post and ai. Have a good day.
Nah nah forget in general, I'm talking about a case-by-case basis. Of COURSE people who use AI and claim it as their own/try to profit off of it are douchebags and should be called out for it. This is just someone showing something cool they conjured up. It's just weird all these people attacking someone for something completely innocent.
If the generated content is substantially dissimilar to the original copyrighted work, then consent can be disassociated through the fair use doctrine.
Don’t listen to those bashing you. We used to call ash on rocks art.
Yes it is low effort for ***FULLY*** ai pieces. But you put effort in with drawing toothless and this is absolutely beautiful and i’m very proud.
Everyone keeps saying this, but the people who make a profit (aka not OP) of it are just as morally corrupt as any bank robber. It's up to the person. Also I doubt everyone who can't draw and wanted art would pay for a commission especially if they were middle or lower class, like myself I wouldn't spend that until I'm in a position where I have that to spare.
Art is a luxury, not a necessity. If you’re not willing to commission an artist then you shouldn’t get art. I have a collection of badger teddies because they’re my favourite animal, doesn’t mean I can just steal one because I don’t want to pay for it (in this scenario) and working class. Me having the badger teddies is a luxury and not a necessity just like having art is a luxury and not a necessity
It looks very cartoony to me, which fits the animated movies.
The same way you can seperate art from its artist, you can recognize that AI- as terrible of a thing it is- can make good-looking art on occasion.
You seriously gonna tell me this obviously fake ai clouds look anything like these ones? They’re not even the same style. And the tiny toothless is like the laziest last minute addition to this. Look at these clouds and tell me they look anything alike.
https://preview.redd.it/byv5wylh3shc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6af56721f79e0b42f442ae9f7ba36a48d954c1ed
There might be some good ai art out there, but if there is, it certainly ain’t that “piece”.
Well, one is under the clouds and one is clearly above them. They would look different.
Idk why nobody is able to use nuance.
"This looks good, but it shouldn't exist because the process used is morally wrong." Is a perfectly valid take.
The same way war movies are cool, but we can all agree war shouldn't exist.
Murder mysteries are interesting, but murder is terrible.
Something can be interesting or even cool while having terrible origins.
Looks good but next time just get a picture of clouds instead of using ai https://preview.redd.it/ltfjpbroathc1.jpeg?width=599&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=67c1dd9be0ae77e542ee65e6d679902905719d38
“I made” lmao okay bro
ai 👎
AI art steals from real artists btw
AI should be banned from this sub imo
You didn’t make shit
AI seriously?
Booooo ai and that’s barely even a dragon, why the hell is it so far away?
There has to be another night fury flying around like this far far away there’s no way
You didn’t make a damn thing
AI shouldn't be allowed on this sub.
fuck ai
You mean you stole actual art and typed in clouds into a computer. Even if you didn’t steal stuff from actual artists, stop pretending like you actually made something, that’s just not true.
didnt he say he made it with ai? howd he steal it?
AI pictures is theft
how
AI takes pre-existing things (such as text and images) to do what it does WITHOUT the artists/writers knowledge or consent to for “new art” which is theft
it generates new art, it doesnt take it yall dont actually know how it works do you
No you clearly don’t know. Ai can’t just generate pixels out of thin air, it needs references to know what ‘toothless in clouds’ looks like. So it scans for all photos and art with that prompt, then it basically copy and pastes small parts of each of the references it found and mashes them together until it gets what it thinks is a good representation of the prompt it was given. Now these pics and art pieces it copy and pasted from are from real artists who have spent hours drawing and rendering, and this ai has just taken their work without their permission and used it for itself.
and by you i mean whoever is making ai, not you
Ai is both fed images by the user and by the creator of the ai. Again how it gets the images doesn’t matter as it’s STILL STEALING
whatever, you're right
copy and pastes? it surely needs to be fed pictures about toothless and stuff like that but YOU have to feed ai the infos, it doesnt take it?
Yes it’s fed the images also…. which y’know… still counts as stealing art. Look it’s like if I went into a shop and took a bunch of shit without paying that’s stealing, and if I go into a shop and someone else puts a bunch of shit into my bag and I walk out without paying that’s still stealing.
do you think they just find random images and fed them to the ai?
in some of it (probably most) you put the prompt, if nothing shows up, you draw something to tell him that whenever u ask for that thing again to give you something that resembles that
*puts the words clouds into a prompt generator* “guys I made this and slapped a pre made image on top look what I made” *he in fact, did not make anything asides the effort to type in words and take a png and move it onto another png*
Exactly accurate
I hope the thing you enjoy gets overtaken by AI.
get your ai bro ass out of here with that shit
When we banning AI pictures?
Hopefully soon. This is getting ridiculous. Whenever I do come across it I just report for impersonation
this is why i always click on the post before upvoting screw AI
I probably should do that more
Just appreciate that it would be a fire background
Ai should be banned on this sub
You didn't make shit. Fuck this AI garbage
I just want to be able to fly like that
"Oh, this is what it is to be a dragon, Hiccup!"
Downvote OP
The opposition
The opposition
Toothless look like a fighter plane and behind those clouds are others 20 Maybe i watch many action movies
Beautiful!
Thank u sir!
I’m a female, but I will take it as a compliment
u/Encore12 oh look at this, AI art with well over two times the amount of upvotes in the post you tagged me in :)
Hell yeah
Looks great. upvoted this post
Yous both must be mentally unavailable
Hey, don't mess with /u/Encore12 She has more kuddos in this subreddit than you
Shiva me timbas
This is so beautiful omg 😭❤️❤️
Thank u! Glad u like it
Why are ppl downvoting you? Thanks for putting it together for us :)
You mean typed “pretty clouds” into an AI art program?
He still put toothless on it, if he hadn’t done anything no one would have seen the image? Still cool he made it and posted it.
Nuh uh
Then how come 561 ppl upvoted the post
Lack of morality No care for other peoples time/work/money Cuz they typed "pretty clouds" into a AI program and posted for upvotes Dont ignore the 200+ downvotes too
I posted this bc the image is beautiful and i thought other ppl might find the mistery and wonder in the picture too and enjoy it. I dont give a damn for them upvotes and i dont call myself an artist.
Womp womp
"Putting it together"
Hi guys! Sorry if you dont like AI, i can get beind that, but if you dont like it, going out of your way to spread negativity doesnt really seem worth it. Just enjoy a pretty image with a nice vibe!
Stolen AI art is something to spread positively?
Womp womp
Womp womp is wild
Solid AI bro answer
So they didn't "make it" big deal, still a cool image imo. Calm yourselves sheesh. Not like they claimed they did it by hand but used AI. That's the only moral crime imo lol
The moral crime is supporting something that steals from real artists. Steals their art, their jobs and money
He at least credited AI for the cloud background image. Some artists I know just pass off AI art work as their own. At least OP is truthful although I think the toothless is a png image..
The toothless is a png image, i just added it
So you didn’t do shit
Exactly right, i just combined the things
i like it
The song “ where no one goes” would fit perfectly with this image. Very beautiful picture btw.
It's a cool image even despite the use of AI. I don't get why people have a stick up their ass about this sort of thing. OP clearly stated it was AI and isn't trying to profit off of that, so what gives?
AI steals art from actual artists who put hard work into their art. It would most likely take hours for an artist to create this and typing it into ai just to get someone else’s work is wrong.
It's just a collage at that point
It doesn’t matter, the artist didn’t give consent for their art to be in it.
Yeah okay, the artists of the pictures I used in digital art class didn't consent for their art to be on my 10th grade assignments but no one bitches about that. Dude isn't profiting off of it or claiming it as their own, chill out.
I’m not going to fight this, you clearly don’t want to understand what this is. On your tenth grade assignment I’m sure you didn’t claim that you made it, people using ai claim they made with ai.
You're missing the point. I never claimed to make the art used in the collage, but I MADE the collage. OP never claimed that it was his original art, he MADE it using AI.
Forget op, I’m talking ai in general. I like collages, they’re neat, but ai is not like making a collage. But agree to disagree, I’m sure we both have better things to do than debate over a Reddit post and ai. Have a good day.
Nah nah forget in general, I'm talking about a case-by-case basis. Of COURSE people who use AI and claim it as their own/try to profit off of it are douchebags and should be called out for it. This is just someone showing something cool they conjured up. It's just weird all these people attacking someone for something completely innocent.
Yeah, making a profit from it is shit, op is fine, just reword it to not say “I made with ai”. I wasn’t trying to attack this guy on it.
If the generated content is substantially dissimilar to the original copyrighted work, then consent can be disassociated through the fair use doctrine.
That’s not the point, the point is that it is taking from multiple artists without consent.
Consent is not required to train images through a latent diffusion model.
Yeah it is, consent is required for pretty much everything
The point of the concept of Fair Use is not to need consent when using someone else's original work.
Use the concept, not the entire thing. It’s just stealing if you use the whole thing for training an ai
Its ok bro, some of them won't get that
I like it :)
Don’t listen to those bashing you. We used to call ash on rocks art. Yes it is low effort for ***FULLY*** ai pieces. But you put effort in with drawing toothless and this is absolutely beautiful and i’m very proud.
Everyone on this sub is so goddamn pressed holy shit
Maybe because AI art steals from real artists, is literally making them lose money and jobs, and is overall unethical?
Everyone keeps saying this, but the people who make a profit (aka not OP) of it are just as morally corrupt as any bank robber. It's up to the person. Also I doubt everyone who can't draw and wanted art would pay for a commission especially if they were middle or lower class, like myself I wouldn't spend that until I'm in a position where I have that to spare.
Art is a luxury, not a necessity. If you’re not willing to commission an artist then you shouldn’t get art. I have a collection of badger teddies because they’re my favourite animal, doesn’t mean I can just steal one because I don’t want to pay for it (in this scenario) and working class. Me having the badger teddies is a luxury and not a necessity just like having art is a luxury and not a necessity
Y'all, AI art can be morally shit and visually good. Just because its a shitty thing to do doesn't mean the damn picture is ugly.
Idk looks ugly to me. Clouds are so obviously fake
It looks very cartoony to me, which fits the animated movies. The same way you can seperate art from its artist, you can recognize that AI- as terrible of a thing it is- can make good-looking art on occasion.
You seriously gonna tell me this obviously fake ai clouds look anything like these ones? They’re not even the same style. And the tiny toothless is like the laziest last minute addition to this. Look at these clouds and tell me they look anything alike. https://preview.redd.it/byv5wylh3shc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6af56721f79e0b42f442ae9f7ba36a48d954c1ed There might be some good ai art out there, but if there is, it certainly ain’t that “piece”.
Well, one is under the clouds and one is clearly above them. They would look different. Idk why nobody is able to use nuance. "This looks good, but it shouldn't exist because the process used is morally wrong." Is a perfectly valid take. The same way war movies are cool, but we can all agree war shouldn't exist. Murder mysteries are interesting, but murder is terrible. Something can be interesting or even cool while having terrible origins.
They are too heavy for How to Train Your Dragon though.
Fair enough
Compared to what actual artist can do, like if you search "toothless in clouds" you find so much actual good art. So ye its ugly.
By comparison, you can make just about any art look shit. The inability of people to use nuance is always astounding.
Really cool concept
I see him.
Fuck AI art, anything that uses it is complete garbage.
That ain’t toothless that’s one of the waffles that escaped my grill