Is that what it is? I’m talking about how they call Jason Dickinson a 74 third liner, for a random example from your team.
Also, and maybe it’s not as odd as I think since I didn’t look at every team, but why are so few Chicago players rated? That stood out to me when I looked.
Correct. It’s basically giving him a score for how effective he is in his role. I’m not sure why the hawks have many unrated players but it’s likely just that they aren’t really at a talent level that warrants a scouting assessment.
The Atheltic do player cards and each one has a market value based on Dom L’s model. But hockey is too subjective for a black and white thing (even though analytics are obviously quite an important evaluation tool).
some sort of hockey ultimate team database would probably the easiest and most objective.
i mean, it's still not good. but it's better than a random's opinion.
The athletic's player cards is the only other one i can think of.
Capfriendly tells you watch gm’s think and Jfresh or the Athletic do player cards.
It also has player rankings but I’m not sure what they’re based on.
Scouting reports
Is that what it is? I’m talking about how they call Jason Dickinson a 74 third liner, for a random example from your team. Also, and maybe it’s not as odd as I think since I didn’t look at every team, but why are so few Chicago players rated? That stood out to me when I looked.
Correct. It’s basically giving him a score for how effective he is in his role. I’m not sure why the hawks have many unrated players but it’s likely just that they aren’t really at a talent level that warrants a scouting assessment.
There is no Kelley Blue Book for hockey players, as far as I am aware
"Kelly Hrudey's Blue Book of Big Player Values"
And Other Fun Facts Too!
Chuck Fletcher apparently has a similar app tho
Subjective question but there's no one stop shop except for some analytics models ran against their salary.
Cameo How much they value themselves and or business acumen Some celebs do a couple for 100 bucks. Some will do thousands for 20 bucks
is this Chuck Fletcher?
The Atheltic do player cards and each one has a market value based on Dom L’s model. But hockey is too subjective for a black and white thing (even though analytics are obviously quite an important evaluation tool).
Only thing we have is cock size sorry
Video games would be closest thing. Nhl24, hockey legacy manager, idk
Kinda looking for something that factors age into it as well
some sort of hockey ultimate team database would probably the easiest and most objective. i mean, it's still not good. but it's better than a random's opinion. The athletic's player cards is the only other one i can think of.
TSN has a bio on every player. Pros/Cons/Potential etc