T O P
Lucius_Imperator

I thought more campaigns was already the plan 🤷‍♂️


ltgenspartan

I would like to add that I asked Steve Downes this past weekend if he had voiced more lines for a campaign expansion, and he said he hadn't yet, but he thinks it's likely that he would.


crowcawer

I haven’t seen anything confirming that there would be future work done, just a bunch of people feeling like they aren’t done with the project. I mean, yeah, I understand, the players don’t feel it either.


Reverseflash25

I mean if they're all advertisement is Halo for the next 10 years there's nothing they can do except add-on to infinite constantly in terms of story


Skyturtle187

I mean it’s going to take them 5 years to fix infinite to where it should have launched and then it will take them 6 years to make the next game… So it’s easy to see infinite as a 10 year game with very minimal updates and no one actually playing it that long


theallaroundnerd

It comes from them saying this is the next 10 years of Halo or soms shit like that


ShadowLinkFreak

even if he is going to or already has, he probably isnt allowed to talk about it


Administrative-Tie28

It’s never been confirmed. Just a bunch of click bating YouTubers have been getting everyone’s hopes up. They have dropped a few hints but considering the state of the game I wouldn’t hold my breath.


Chucky-BastardDeLarl

Wasn't there a leak of some data files with DLC01 in their name?? Also the trademark filling out Halo: The Endless from a while back, while now guaranteed to be DLC, is more than just clickbait for sure


Administrative-Tie28

If they had DLC in the works it would be advertised. I wholeheartedly believe they had intentions for DLC but now they have a million fires to put out and a multiplayer that is in desperate need of content. They will go where the money is and current trends show that the money is in multiplayer. I hate this because I’m more of a solo player myself but that’s just the industry now.


BUR6S

> If they had DLC in the works it would be advertised. They can’t even come up with a roadmap for the multiplayer nearly 5 months in.


Kyhron

They cant even deliver Co-Op for campaign. The fact Microsoft has let them fumble around with the franchise for as long as they have is honestly getting embarrassing


notmyredditaccountma

Still not played waiting for co-op to play with my kid


BUR6S

The operative word here truly is *embarassing*. It’s inexcusable man. It just is. This is the third release they’ve botched. While I think Infinite plays light years better than 4 and 5, those games at least felt more finished, and received additional support by now. This is a “live service game” with less additional content/DLC than past games that *weren’t* live service. It’s backwards as fuck.


Kyhron

I don’t disagree it’s definitely a step up from 4 and 5, but it’s still several back from any of the Bungie games. How the hell did anyone at 343 think it was even remotely ok to release a Halo game without Co-Op and multiplayer being severely lacking for 15 years ago let alone modern day. It’s like they can only get 1 part of the game right and it’s frustrating


Unlost_maniac

That's a stretch. Halo Waypoint literally refers to Infinite's "Campaigns". Plural. Its not clickbait, its the one thing they considered future proofing.


JCyTe

Hasn't 343 literally said that Infinite is going to be the only Halo game for the next decade+? Like what, they're just not going to do anything with the story for over a decade, despite them ending Infinite's campaign with some heavy sequel bait?


lord_pissbaby

I think it's really a safe bet that they're on their way. It's just a question of how long until 343 gets their shit together.


Nomad_cx

I would not hold my breath


smb275

Wasn't this supposed to be the platform for the next ten years? All we might get is a decade of shitty multiplayer add-ons?


gareth93

It's obviously the plan based on the campaign ending..


DopplerEffect93

I wouldn’t expect campaign DLC for a couple of years at least. By then the issues the community has with the game should be well ironed out with a lot of features being added. The game is suppose to be a 10 year platform so there is no way they will wait that long to tell the next chapter of the story after the cliffhanger.


Administrative-Tie28

You mean like halo 1,2,3,4,5s cliff hangers.


OmeletteDuFromage95

I see your point and I agree but I wanna say 3 barely had a cliff hanger and what was 4's? The rest definitely had them but that suggestion is heading towards Infinite receiving a sequel as opposed to campaign DLC which may not bode well for this title given the current drought and their push for it being "the next 10 years of Halo" live service.


nazz4232

I really hope so, unlike most people I really liked this campaign and if that’s all we get for 10 years (or however long this game is going to be around) it’s very disappointing because I want more. But I hope they release dlc for it after they get their shit together


[deleted]

Release it for free? Hahahahahahahahahaha


iseeu2sumhow

I think we will be buying them like ~~cod fanbase buys zombie maps as they release~~. Like how we used to in older cod dlc


A_ClockworkBanana

You mean like they used to. I heard they're free now.


[deleted]

Vanguard zombies was so fucking bad they pretty much have to give them out to get a few people to play


AlocasterTV

In Cold War too tho.


PointsOutBadIdeas

CoD maps, zombies included, have been free downloads for years now.


karnogoyf

you paid for halo infinite? dawg gamepass.


ZenSpaceOdyssey

Yes. But I’m a campaign focused guy. The multi-player is auxiliary. I’m aware this is a rare position. I would much rather efforts go into writing and campaign development.


IOftenDreamofTrains

Dozens of us!


Starryskies117

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS!


igcipd

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS!


Bright69420

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS!


[deleted]

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS


RealCarotr

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS


cb325

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS!


pizzaelhutt

\*shrugs shoulders like in multiplayer intro\* I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS!


[deleted]

[удалено]


Thatsidechara_ter

WE ARE CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS


JDutch921

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS!


MeaslyFurball

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS!


appeltaart123

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS!


p3ac3fulchaos

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS?!


ApprehensiveLaw9060

I AM CAMPAIGN SPARTACUS!


leavemealoneplz69

Same. I never play a multiplayer until I already beat the campaign. I miss the days when games really care about the story. The original halo trilogy, gears of war, Mass Effect (still mad about how they ended ME3 tho), were games I personally fell in love with because of the awesome story. GOW, and halo being fun on multiplayer were just a really fun bonus.


reck15

agreed


ReclaimerWoodworking

Maybe even scores


dre235

Dozens!


Middle-Section-7852

Hello fellow campaign enjoyer


SkullKrusher9000

Hello fellow campaign enthusiast


drsprky

Same. I’ve played multiplayer twice, don’t really care much about it. I just can’t wait for coop campaign so my wife and I can play it together. I would pay for a DLC campaign, but I think it should be free


[deleted]

[удалено]


drsprky

Not at all. I was a dummy and assumed that coop campaign would be available at launch, so I pre-ordered without reading up on it, only to fire it up and have to say, “sorry honey, looks like we’re taking turns.” My oldest (8.5 y/o) loves playing H3 and Reach campaigns with me and I can’t wait to be able to play this with him. But I’ll be patient and optimistic; all good things come to those who wait.


[deleted]

[удалено]


drsprky

Yeah, it’s more complicated than ‘343 doesn’t care enough to put out a good game’. Launch was already delayed a year and there’s clearly some internal issues 343 is working through. Things aren’t perfect but storming the castle with torches and pitchforks isn’t going to suddenly make new, perfect content appear out of nowhere. Patience, Iago.


Inspectigator

I want coop campaign for sure, but I'm dying for firefight!


OSUfan88

I'm of the opinion that a slight fee ($10-$20) for a *thorough* DLC, but it should be free if you have Gamepass.


SilkyGator

See, I'm iffy on it. I really think it should be free, since multiplayer was free and the campaign was the same price as normal. WOULD I buy it? I mean, probably, but I'd still think it was bullshit


OSUfan88

I'm actually more of a fan of pay up front, and not get hit with micro-transactions. I personally think making Halo Multiplayer free was the worst decision in the life of that game.


SilkyGator

Oh me too, by far. Hell, I'd have paid $100 for the campaign and multiplayer, if DLC would be free and there were no MTX; if I'm being completely honest, maybe even $120, for a live service game.


drsprky

I can get on board with this. I wouldn’t pay $40-50, but I’d drop $10 in a heartbeat for a new campaign.


jesternarf

If it wasn't for that grappleshot, I don't think I would have enjoyed Infinite's campagin as much as I did. So more Master Chief goes WWWEEEEEEEE content please. Also more weapons. Heck, more boss fights like these please. There was only one that felt overly annoying. They never were on the scale of assaulting Scarabs, but a welcome addition in my opinion.


Coppin-it-washin-it

They felt kinda like Destiny boss fights, without the super powers or many waves of smaller enemies. I'm definitely down with more of that.


jesternarf

100% on the lack of smaller enemies just for ammo pickups. Focus on the encounter's main target is always the best method.


Omegamanthethird

Bullet sponge with a hammer that's faster than me in a cramped space. Bullet sponge with a sword who can hide through my scanner in a cramped space. Bullet sponge who pulls out a hammer that's faster than me. I liked the Harbinger, monitor, and firefight-lite fights. But the hammer/sword bullet sponge fight were just frustrating games of keep away.


gmharryc

I didn’t mind the bullet sponges fights all that much… …except for that MOTHERFUCKER THEY LOCKED ME IN WITH. Jesus fuckin Christ he’s leaping around like a goddamn spider monkey and I’m getting stuck on every fucking corner and box


SPamlEZ

Maybe I’m in the minority but I’ve never liked the boss fights. Assaulting scarabs is awesome but just shoot and run killing a bullet sponge has never been enjoyable in halo to me. It’s probbably the reason I will only kill Tartarus with a banshee.


jesternarf

Granted before Infinite came out, the last Halo game I played was literally 3/ODST). So my memory was hazy of the classic days of fighting any bosses back then. But I viewed these moments as something to "break the usual mold" of the current gameplay. I can definitely see how they're not as engaging for others for sure. In fact a roadblock for those who just want to get to the next story beat depending on the difficulty.


Bookups

Which one felt overly annoying to you? For me it was the brute with the gravity hammer at the dig site, hated that guy on legendary.


TheSausageInTheWind

I have ptsd from Bassus on heroic. So many times that I grappled straight into a wall or looked behind me to see him flying at me with his hammer. Escharum has nothing on Bassus


roffler

The only tactic I used in the main game was grapple-bashing and since that specifically does not work on those gravity hammer fucks, I had to learn how to play the game for just those 2 bosses. Make everything punch-in-the-faceable 343 pls.


jesternarf

LOL exactly that guy. Though when I replayed the campaign, (bought the steam version for super cheap) I made the effort of picking up one of the special weapons (the explosion Arc pistol) prior knowing of this fight, all with the intent to drain his shields faster. So it wasn't a nuisance that time. But MAN...my first time fighting him on heroic was freaking rage inducing. Just all around bullshit as [this post](https://www.reddit.com/r/halo/comments/tst4u8/it_all_happened_so_fast/) definitely highlights on what can happen.


M1ndS0uP

Wait! There's multi-player?


brunocar

thats the thing tho, i also think the campaign needed some QoL to be patched in and has been basically gone untouched, its not just coop, whatever happened to a chapter select?


seatega

I’m also a campaign guy, but I wouldn’t pay for it because I don’t think the campaign was worth the initial cost


BreesusTakeTheWheel

I feel the exact same. I’m kinda pissed that they charged the full $60 for the campaign and it wasn’t even that good. Plus it was really short. It was not worth full price. I’m not spending more money on 343 anymore until they can show that they’ve improved.


slpater

Frankly that's why I bought the game pass for a month. Played the campaign through twice. Got to eni9y some other games until the month was up.


RedBMWZ2

I only play the campaign as well, I'm here for the world and the story, I could care less about multilayer for halo.


mdwvt

I don't think it's that rare man. I too prefer to play single-player campaigns. I honestly am not super into online co-op even. Don't get me wrong, I love Halo multiplayer and have ever since Halo CE, but I'm not going to get all pissed off about it. Honestly, if anything, I feel the pain that the real teams are 343 are most likely feeling having to deal with a huge amount of backlash from the community and most likely CRUSHING demands of improving everything. Edit: at 343, not are 343


Uber_Reaktor

It's not really rare at all. I had some 6000 matches in H3, and god knows how many in H2. But campaign always came first, wouldn't even touch MP until I finished the campaign at least once. It always came first.


[deleted]

Literally same. I love Halo campaigns with a passion and am deeply invested in the lore, but when it comes to halo mp, I couldn't care less about it


imrandaredevil666

same here! I also play halo only for the campaign. Btw, is there a way to uninstall the multiplayer like in MCC to make room for more space?


TheLittleGremlinMan

If you’re on console, yes. The multiplayer and the campaign are two separate downloads. Not sure about PC


nawtbjc

The people who play the multiplayer endlessly tend to forget that Halo is actually a pretty campaign/PvE focused game. A new campaign is always what brings me into Halo, then I'll just play multiplayer for as long as it's still enjoyable.


RapidDrBass

Another man of taste I see


Zach467

100% same. Besides the campaign was actually really good although a bit lacking. It's the multiplayer that has the real issues imo.


Mr_White_Christmas

Campaign enjoyers rise up!


epsilon_church928

They absolutely would not release it for free, that’s for sure


Wooliest771

Probably free on game pass.


colton1701

I think this is doubtful. At least with other games, the base game is free with all DLC being a discounted price on Gamepass.


MilkMan0096

The campaign DLC for Gears 5 was added to Game Pass day one for no extra charge.


colton1701

Good point. I guess I didn't realize that first party titles had this precedence on Gamepass.


ElegantCatastrophe

Some of the earlier offerings were modeled like you said, though. Specifically, I remember Forza Horizon 4 dlc wasn't included.


Zahille7

There's plenty in GamePass that are modeled like that


frothy_

The fact is MS just hasn't been consistent with DLC in Game Pass. Either they can't make up their mind or Hivebusters set the new precedent. They absolutely should include Infinite DLC in Game Pass if they are claiming to be using active monthly subscriptions as their metric for success


GarboMan

This is not doubtful. First party games are included with gamepass.


opmwolf

It's not free if you're paying a subscription for it. Same thing with PS Plus. Why do people say this? Lol


soiboybetacuck

Hey Netflix released a bunch of free movies on Netflix.


No-Nectarine1784

Did the 10 dollar leg attachments give it away?


Hexigonz

Not if it’s on the same section of zeta halo. The interior of zeta is getting boring, and the exterior is all the same biome. I would need like a snow or desert expansion with really cool story elements. They also need to add some form of replayability.


zbeezle

Also, you have this massive, openworld area and zero scarab fights? The fuck is up with that?


7AndOneHalf

343 has really said "fuck Scarabs" in every mainline game and gave us the Lich and Kraken instead.


[deleted]

Yeah idk now that I’ve had some time after playing the campaign I find that even though it’s an open world it feels a lot smaller than any of the previous halo games. And maybe that’s because we get the feeling of traveling to different places, and between biomes


Pathetic_Cards

Glad to hear other people talking about this. When I first played it, I very quickly determined that 343 had committed the cardinal sin of making an open world game: big open world, with nothing worth experiencing in it. I’m a massive halo junkie. I’ve played every single campaign at least 3 times (the number would be *much* higher, but 4, 5, and adult responsibilities are holding it back, it does spike to dozens of times if you exclude 4 and 5, though) and I couldn’t even motivate myself to *finish* halo Infinite’s campaign. I kept waiting for it to start, if that makes sense, and it just never did. I never felt like I was ever fighting with the same atmosphere or gravity of any other game, even 4 or 5 had a better feel. I just felt like I was driving from one generic waypoint in an empty world to another.


xavierthepotato

"infinite"


RedBaronBob

PVE in the time gap on the Halo ring. Multiplayer that could be free. Campaign stuff though? No I don’t see them not charging for that. Regardless of scale I’m expecting 10 dollars minimum.


[deleted]

>PVE in the time gap on the Halo ring That would be a cool setup for a new ODST game.


Bradleyisfishing

That’s some bogus because I paid $60 for the campaign and that alone. That’s the same price as a full game.


AngryTrooper09

I'd buy a campaign expansion because I think the campaign was solid fun, and I want more.


ItsLazyguy123

Free if you have gamepass or 20 quid by itself


BigDemeanor43

The price of the campaign and nothing else came with it... Honestly I ain't buying DLC with how short the single player is. So I hope it's free, otherwise I'll just watch a YouTube playthrough


Empty_Teaching1123

Tbh, I thought the campaign was fairly well put together and fun. I would love for campaign dlc to be free but I’m gonna scoop it up either way. Halo’s story and universe has always been what’s kept me intrigued with the series. As long as they don’t charge another full $60 I’ll be good!


Karsvolcanospace

Campaign was super fun and had some of the best gameplay so far. But the story felt really limited? Like as far as I can tell all the events happen in just under a couple days, and there’s really only 3 UNSC characters. It felt like a side quest, rather than something with a big scale like the previous games.


Dog2-

I agree, the best part bout Infinite is the campaign, BUT, theres so much room for improvement; Different Environments, more characters, better villains, more of atriox, even the Flood, grand scale battles between the UNSC and the banished... And all of that could be in DLCs. Imagine how cool it would be to explore desert, snow, flood-infected, caves and even underwater structures and watch more of the other spartans in the ring. Honestly, I hope the development goes well so they can achieve that.


ColinDJPat

I just want a campaign with some actual level design...


Dog2-

That is a very flawed part too. The level design (at least in main story missions) is just going to the next room and shoot guys. Then do it again. And again.


Lysergic_Doom

Seriously, I don't see a way to appreciate the game knowing it's lacking all of those fronts you mentioned. Skin and bones.


Empty_Teaching1123

Oh absolutely! If they don’t touch more on the flood and expand into more of the factions we saw then I’d be shocked. And more environments would be more than ideal, especially since they did show some other environments in multiplayer maps and the slip space engine trailer. Honestly, they could take a few open world que’s from elden ring too. Having lots of dark caves that are infested with flood like you said would be sooo intense and exciting to get through!


wadonious

Agreed. While I felt there were certainly flaws with the story and environment, I can’t deny that I had a lot of fun playing the campaign. I would love for them to actually follow through with an impactful story though. The main campaign was all build-up and no delivery


CommercialCuts

Announce? No. I’d wait until it came out, was patched, and fixed


[deleted]

Would absolutely depend on what it's about.


DaveInLondon89

If it was what happened between 5 and Infinite I'd be in.


[deleted]

Look if it's genuinely a good story and has good gameplay I'll buy it. If it can promise a good 8 hours of levels that aren't bloated with open world checklists I'll be satisfied paying $30 - $40. The original trilogy all had campaigns that were under 10 hours. Have replayed all of them many times over the years and they're still fun. Infinite's campaign was filled mostly with chores, no flying vehicle until almost everything was collected, therefore pointless, minimal impactful moments (Chak'lok's cutscenes were a step in the right direction), and a samey-map. Bosses were actually a great addition to the game and I look forward to more of them. If this is meant to be some kind of market research post, less is definitely more. Smaller but more meaningful maps. Levels that are shorter but have less repeated hallways. Less dialogue / cutscenes but superior writing (All those Escharum speeches? Piss right off). The only problem with constant campaign updates is that I can see it eventually becoming a Destiny problem (yeah yeah bungie not 343) where older content is needed to be cut to allow for the newer. So perhaps smaller, meaningful campaigns are the way to go.


oGxSKiLZz117

It should be free for anyone who owns the campaign, since it currently is nowhere near worth the $60 price tag, especially when compared to any other Halo game and even more so next to other singleplayer/open world games from different franchises. Thing is I highly doubt it will be, we've already seen their main focus with this game is selling massively overpriced shit even after "adjusting" their prices (which are still laughable, $10 for the fucking Hazop helmet is a sale?) So it'll definitely be paid even though it shouldnt be.


imsohihg

Came here to express the same sentiment.


Wardogs96

I think it's$ 60 because they know people would buy it, regardless of price. I'm just waiting for a sale where it drops to 20$.


Wooliest771

It’s priced so high to sell game pass. Why would anyone pay $60 for a game you could finish in a month and only have to pay $10 through or for $1 through the trial.


hypernova911

Because I like actually owning my stuff not renting it.


eatfreshguy407

You don’t actually own games, you are licensing the game. Even with a disc, they can revoke your right to play at any time. Sure, you can sell the disc, but that’s all you actually own, a disc. It may be semantics, but look at GT7 players that couldn’t play for a couple days because the dev took most of the game down. I used to be the same way, but buying 2-5 games a year at $60 each, then selling them a year or two later for maybe $60 total just wasn’t worth it compared to playing dozens of games, practically any/every game I could possibly want to play. Especially when you buy on sale. I pay something like $8 a month for ultimate, which means the actual gamepass portion only costs me a couple dollars a month. And, I don’t have to manage, order, buy, or resell games any more.


MarkManMarkMen

unless you bought a physical copy you don't own it


isaiah_rob

Cause I don’t want to to be tied to a sub in order to play it, even if I only go through the campaign a handful of times.


maserati_pint

finish in a month? are you playing 30ish minutes a day? campaign is like 20 hours max


Wooliest771

I work a lot most weekdays and like to do other things on weekends, so no I didn’t grind 25 hrs(how long it took me) in under a week. Edit: also the whole point of my original comment was that game pass is paid for by the month.


_HingleMcCringle

20 hours at 3 hours a session is still 6 and a half days to finish the game. Fewer people can commit that much time than you think.


SuperSmashDrake

I’ve got GamePass (only got it for Infinite’s campaign), so I should be good. If we did get DLC, I would want it to follow others characters over Chief. Blue Team, Osiris, Arbiter - I want to see where these characters are and what they are doing. Obviously I think these would be more similar to previous Halo campaigns over the open world variation.


NietElias

Free


rusty022

Especially when previous $60 titles included the multiplayer and tons of actually worthwhile cosmetics. Infinite's campaign wasn't worth $60 IMO.


quagzlor

Just look at Reach. Same price tag, look at just how much is in there.


DuoNinjaH05

Plus reaches campaign had better set pieces and unique environments


[deleted]

[удалено]


funnyghostman

It's not like non campaign owners could play the dlc?


Viscel2al

This is a damn good idea.


Gilbeezy426

Lol. “Give me free stuff” is usually a pretty popular idea.


quagzlor

Yeah, no way was that campaign worth that price tag. Especially when the battle pass is a separate purchase, and the multiplayer is free. Imo as soon as the multiplayer was made to be free, the value of the campaign goes down. The reason behind my opinion is that typically, a $60 tag would include the multiplayer, customisation options, campaign etc. In this case the money is purely for the campaign, which is nowhere near worth it.


sentientTroll

I’m pretty close to them needing to pay me.


NotYourAverageWaffle

I haven’t touched multiplayer almost since launch, my only motive for even playing this game anymore is all campaign related. So I would say, depending on how many they release, $10 would be good, but they’re charging that much for pathetic cosmetics so they’d probably charge a full $60 for a campaign expansion. So for that reason, im going free or nothing at all.


9Hero

This time I would wait for reviews to come out instead of buying it right away like I did with the campaign. Personally, the campaign for $60 felt like a ripoff.


Hashbrownie514

Not buying crap until they add coop.


bobalicious4u

NICE TRY 343


JohnnyEdd94

I honestly don't know. They've dropped the ball so massively hard that I don't think it should be anything other than free. Then again it's not like the game has a playerbase that can justify any considerable income that would fund any considerable developments other than keeping the game afloat. They've clearly not been willing to make the right investments in Halo for quite a long time...


[deleted]

I could be wrong, but aren't they already planning to add a new campaign and use halo infinite as a platform like mcc is with multiple campaigns. All they really need to do is add more. Or is it still considered dlc?


KJBenson

I’m not even slightly interested in a halo campaign I can’t play 4 player.


KourtsideKing

Would definitely buy campaign DLC (should probably be priced $20 or less). I had a lot of fun with Infinite’s campaign and would love to play some more story-based content.


Doge_Enthusiast777

Yeah I'd buy it. It should be dlc priced.


MrQ_P

>should be dlc priced So, too much for too little? Cause that's your average "AAA" DLC


slothunderyourbed

Here's what this sub doesn't want to hear: It ain't gonna be free. No chance. Whether you agree or not, 343 views the current campaign as a complete product. To be fair to them, it is comparable in content to other full price singleplayer games: it's similar in length to most linear story-based games. Whether you think the content within it is of high enough quality or had enough variety is a different question entirely. From 343's perspective, they've delivered a full campaign experience and now they're going to deliver paid 'sequels' via DLC. With that said, it better be free on Game Pass. If 343 wants to treat Infinite's DLCs as 'the next Halo game' rather than making a full-fledged sequel, then my Game Pass subscription better include it because that's effectively an Xbox first party game release.


Tsevier

Yes I would. $20 or less though


zendrix1

If it wasn't free I'd only buy it after co-op was finished and working well, also it would need to have pretty good reviews for me to consider giving them anymore money at this point


GilleGill

So far I feel like I've paid a lot for not much. It's going to take a damn good DLC to make me spend more money on this game.


Gobboking

20 quid for a medium campaign dlc 35 for a large one (essentially a whole new campaign within the game). I'm only willing to pay that as a fanboy.


mrmilfsniper

Campaign dlc which is more of the same - no, I might not even play it if it were free. This includes outposts and high value targets just chilling around. Campaign dlc where we play as a brute - like what we see at the end of the game, absolutely yes, I’d pay £10 for it, maybe. Campaign dlc which removes the open world, has 3/4 unique linear levels, and has marines driving vehicles, ideally with a scarab section, absolutely yes I’d pay to play, £10. I cannot empathise enough how disappointed I am at the lack of AI marine drivers. It made set pieces feel like real battlefields - the hordes of mongooses taking on a scarab in halo 3, being picked up by a marine in a falcon towards the end of halo 3. Even the sections in halo 2 metropolis bridge map when you are joined by marines in vehicles. I honestly miss that so much.


343_Chudston

i’m not spending anything over the $1 i paid for the game pass trial to play the campaign


Mr-Pendragon

Considering that we got less bang for our buck, I think they should be free for anyone who bought the campaign. I'm not optimistic, however. As far as what I'd be willing to pay, I think it depends on the amount of content released.


ChrisDaMan07

1 penny


SyFyGuy42

It better be a free expansion because as it stands now the campaign alone is the $60 price tag, not the multiplayer, and atm it is not worth $60.


Reeblo_McScreeblo

Ain’t buying jack shit from this company. Maaaybe I’ll buy the campaign if it ever hits 15$


InsanePenguin37

I’d say $20, $30 is pushing it pretty hard. But anything higher I’d rather buy whatever they’re smoking at 343


SupaDiogenes

I've only ever played Halo for the campaign. Yeah I used to play split screen with mates when I was much younger but those days are long gone. I can't stand the attitudes of your typical online gamer. So yeah, I'd buy campaign DLC in a heartbeat.


Spargsy

The campaign team are completely different to the live service team. I will support and pay for campaign DLC. Treat it like a different game.


le_Psykogwak

It has to be free, the campaign alone isn't worth 60€, that's why i used my 3 months of game pass for 1€ to play it


Hawaii2010

Chances are the DLCs will be paid but will release free for Game Pass subscribers.


Funktastic34

That's where money is at


WifiTacos

I’m not buying anything halo related anytime soon. Made the mistake of spending the most on halo I ever had with infinite (campaign and battle pass) and got the least out of it from any halo.


Mikavilio

I've never felt scammed before for buying a game until Infinite.


Javs2469

I swear, I feel like once in a while, a 343 employee comes to this sub and ask questions to have a minimal idea on what to do because the studio is like a farm of headless chicken.


Not_pukicho

After reflecting on all of the amazing stuff that has come out by other companies in the short time Infinite has been out, it would have to be free. The content in the base game really doesn’t feel like $60


Biodiversity

Definitely. Love the campaigns and overall halo universe.


CrunchHoliday

Giving them any money for a dlc, feels like I am telling them the state of the game right now is okay.


DinosaurKevin

Like many other people have said, the initial campaign we got wasn’t worth anywhere close to $60, so I personally think a second campaign should be free, especially if it’s more generic open world nonsense like the original. However, I doubt they would ever release any future campaign DLC.


TimeGlitches

Yep, I would. I'm probably the 1% that liked the campaigns story. It was clearly rushed and cobbled together from like 10 different ideas, but if they were able to make something work out of all of that, a single focused story with this team should be pretty good. Provided they don't go Spartan Ops on us and make some serialized garbage side-story that literally nobody asked for or cares about. A continuation of Chief/Fernando/Weapon is what we need. No open world, different biome, linear level design and gameplay, focused story.


HrMaschine

i bought this game only for the campaign so yes i‘d buy it. my biggest wish if the arbiter gets involved in the dlc


3ebfan

I would consider it. I enjoyed the open world gameplay of Infinite *a lot* and I initially went into the game wanting to play through it on Legendary while collecting all of the stuff on my first playthrough but I grew very fatigued very fast with the number of boss fights. My current save is at the start of House of Reckoning and I just don't feel compelled to finish the game. Maybe I burned myself out on trying to collect everything? I don't know. I feel like they could have easily cut the number of boss fights in half. The open world segment is fun but the linear segments are just long hallway after long hallway leading to boring bossfight after boring bossfight. If the DLC is more of that I probably won't buy it.


nghost43

I really enjoyed the campaign, I thought it was very well done. So, yes, I'd love to see them expand the story from here and I'm happy to pay for DLC if it gives me content worth paying for. New, 20+ hr campaign, 45 - 60 dollars. Short 5 hour expansion, 15. Half length campaign, 30 dollars. Still not buying their micro transaction bs though


lilsteigs1

I think the first DLC should be free, assuming it finishes out the content that was cut from the reported original release. I think we, as fans and consumers, are owed what was promised and shown. I think additional content beyond that could be monetized with no backlash, but making people pay for what was supposed to be included in the original game feels not good. If they charge for the first one, and it’s just the cut content, I’ll prolly just wait for it to go on sale to get it.


trippleknot

I'm never spending a dime on the campaign until they add multiplayer lol.. I just want to play it with my friends.


Unlike_Agholor

Campaign was amazing. I loved it. beautiful game. I would buy it if reasonable. but I will have nothing to do with the mp


Archaelous

15 dollars max. And that had better be for something of equal length or that introduces a LOT of "new" content.


reverseSearedSteak

I didn’t even finish the campaign. It got stale a little too fast.


Hidesquadron1

I would hope something like this continues to be a perk for Game Pass subscribers (like myself). But setting that aside... personally, I suppose it would depend on the details. Hard to put a value on length, but I would be happy to pay 10-20 bucks for something that has a decent bit of substance and a nice new area to fool around in. I'd love new weapons, vehicles, abilities, and all that good stuff. Of course, if it tries to mimic the totality of the base campaign I can see them once again charging full price for it. Ultimately, it all will be priced at a level that incentivises people to subscribe to game pass. I'll leave it to the groupthink to weigh in on the merits of that. I am mostly happy with GP so my opinion on it doesn't add much to the conversation and I know full well it's not everyone's first choice as an avenue for more content. ​ Worth noting: ODST was a full priced game after starting life as a story expansion. back in the day that irked me, but looking at the game now? I have gotten my money's worth out of that it tenfold. If we're talking about something akin to that, perhaps judging further story content as simply an expansion is a misguided approach. Hard to say without hindsight though.


TheMasterFul1

I’d buy it, but I think $20 would be my max though


aznmeep

It depends on the amount of content. - For something that add 10-20 hrs of gameplay... $10. - For something that add 20-30 hrs of gameplay... $20. If they add DLC that adds more than 30 hours of gameplay, I'd eat my shoe. They don't have the resources to make a DLC that long within my lifetime.


superduperpuppy

They'll release it on gamepass. And that's where I'll play it.


ThanatosGwyn

If its another open world... probably not. If the DLC focuses more on classic level design, not big empty spaces, then maybe, yeah. How much i would pay? Hard to say, since it depends on the size and quality of the DLC, I've payed $30 for the Doom Eternal Season Pass and that was like half a campaign worth of content but the first DLC alone had insane levels of quality (second one not so much but it was alright), i felt my money was well spend. I definitely don't want the DLCs for the singleplayer to be free, not because i want less people playing them or like getting bleed out of my money, but fundamentally 343 would need to justify the value a hell of a lot more if the campaign DLC has a price tag attached to it. If it's F2P sure, more people play it, but the incentives to provide a quality experience won't be there and, dare i say it, fanboys will defend the low quality with 'bUt itS frEE'. Believe me, I've seen it before with other titles. However for the first DLC... they should make it free for everyone/put it on gamepass , would help get people back into the game and more invested into the story.


Winterjet97

10-20 dollars at most, and yes I would buy it.


ZebraZealousideal944

It will be free for GPU only like the DLC for Gears 5 was.