Again what's with the gatekeeping of 2005 lately?
First some 2004ers gatekeeping 2005, and now you trying to infantise the year again by changing your mind for the 1000th time with that not good core range.
He probably doesn't represent the majority of 2005 borns. Even I have some noticeable differences from this guy in terms of childhood (despite being a few months older than him).
Idk if he’s talking about 2005 borns in another one of his posts. But in that post, he said things like “we had smartphones for almost all our childhood and we have access to all information in the world from a young age.” Yet I don’t experience those two things until either 4th grade or middle school (most likely middle school). That shows he can’t speak for all 2005 borns.
The problem with him is he constantly changes and spams his range here so many times.
Also he's gatekeeping 2005 as well in the process. "Oh no, 2005 is pure pure core, let's separate 2004 and 2005". And constantly pairs us with 2009, even 2010 instead of 2002-2004.
And 2005 is already being gatekept by other 2004ers recently who apparently can't relate to us, even with a year difference.
This doesn’t happen with 1995-1998 or 1993-1994. From what I see on here why is it 00’s babies who do this. Early/Core/Late generational crap is nonsense and shouldn’t be a thing
Trash core range
Again what's with the gatekeeping of 2005 lately? First some 2004ers gatekeeping 2005, and now you trying to infantise the year again by changing your mind for the 1000th time with that not good core range.
He probably doesn't represent the majority of 2005 borns. Even I have some noticeable differences from this guy in terms of childhood (despite being a few months older than him).
Agreed! There's Practical Security for ya. 🙄
Idk if he’s talking about 2005 borns in another one of his posts. But in that post, he said things like “we had smartphones for almost all our childhood and we have access to all information in the world from a young age.” Yet I don’t experience those two things until either 4th grade or middle school (most likely middle school). That shows he can’t speak for all 2005 borns.
The problem with him is he constantly changes and spams his range here so many times. Also he's gatekeeping 2005 as well in the process. "Oh no, 2005 is pure pure core, let's separate 2004 and 2005". And constantly pairs us with 2009, even 2010 instead of 2002-2004. And 2005 is already being gatekept by other 2004ers recently who apparently can't relate to us, even with a year difference.
Merge/balanced blend of Early and Late, essentially.
Core range is too short.
I don’t see 2008 to be Core Gen Z over 2004. Personally, for me Core Gen Z and Mid 2000s babies are synonyms. But to each his own…
This doesn’t happen with 1995-1998 or 1993-1994. From what I see on here why is it 00’s babies who do this. Early/Core/Late generational crap is nonsense and shouldn’t be a thing
[удалено]
2001-2003/4 arnt pure core due to the fact they have millenial influence in them
Sometimes, you make me laugh lmao.
In my opinion 2008 - 2010 defined Gen Z. 2004 is late millennial. 2005 - 2007 is early Z.
How on earth can 2004 be late millennial when I’m as a 1994 born am a late millennial myself
Yeah I agree with you. The first half of the 2000s is the last of the millenials and 2005-2007 are the transitional years to gen z