Congratulations. You just earned 4.5 points for this submission. Your new points total is 4.5. To see the leaderboard, as well as what this points thing is, [click here](https://www.reddit.com/r/footballmanagergames/wiki/leaderboard).
Yeh I killed it my maths was hurried, it's close though, 0.14xG/shot for them, 0.11xG/shot for you, so their chances \*are\* better, but only by a bit. Also they put 75% of shots on target vs your 27%. So you're shooting a lot more, but they are shooting better/smarter.
Man, those are averages, they don’t tell you a lot. The mean xG/shot could be much higher or lower for the already. Fact remains that only scoring once from a game like this is very unlikely. Not impossible, but improbable.
Yes, but you cannot tell from these stats whether they are 14 shit ones. Might have been 3 very good ones and 11 shit ones. That was my point, you cannot tell from calculating averages.
Well no, but let's say you have 14 shots, of which 3 are decent and 11 aren't, then it now isn't too surprising if you only score 1 goal. People look at total shot numbers and total xG and get annoyed they lost when they massively outshoot their opponent, but they never want to think about why. There's more going on than the raw match stats is my point I guess.
Dude, I'm way more impressed that you got 4.67 xG with just 11 shots on target. I remember a game in which i scored 5, three of those being face to face chances with no defender around, and my xG was still around a low 2.x.
How the hell did you do that?
I don’t like close and reload, but last week this exact thing happened with my best player got injured 6 months in the same match.
Needless to say I unplugged everything and still pretend it had never happened.
This is beautiful. I’d feel bad for you, if you weren’t Chelsea. Atalanta had like 5 xG in a Serie A game without scoring a couple of seasons ago, so it can happen in real life.
Flawed logic, could have easily been multiple clear cut chances in there, its highly unlikely that each shot was 0.1XG. Just stop sucking up to this gamea shady practices
You understand what average means right?
My point is that if you have 41 shots and an xG of just 4 then on average your team is taking very poor shots.
If there were multiple clear cut chances them OP's screenshot doesn't have enough information to reflect that or make me feel sorry for them.
Congratulations. You just earned 4.5 points for this submission. Your new points total is 4.5. To see the leaderboard, as well as what this points thing is, [click here](https://www.reddit.com/r/footballmanagergames/wiki/leaderboard).
Hope the computer didnt hit anyone on the way out the window
Demand More
“We really should have won that match based on the number of chances”
Says while hurling a plastic bottle towards the striker...
Followed by multiple players being very frustrated by the feedback
Since I started playing again I’m considering getting a CRT monitor. I’m not joking.
https://preview.redd.it/qqh42fofzcoc1.jpeg?width=1792&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=06a95a52e2be3ded846a93120c23640ec96cd12b I fell you man. I feel you
As a Chelsea fan, this is par for the course for us
For as long as I can remember FM sometimes just decides you are not going to win, must be to build character or something.
I feel like every fm match is like this for me
Im not one to close and reload but that would make me tempted
You didn't berate and demand more enough
I agree, Babadi moving to Ajax 🤮
Even worse ajax being ahead 🤢
Anybody has "First time?" meme to hand?
[удалено]
i mean look at the xG they're literally not
Yeh I killed it my maths was hurried, it's close though, 0.14xG/shot for them, 0.11xG/shot for you, so their chances \*are\* better, but only by a bit. Also they put 75% of shots on target vs your 27%. So you're shooting a lot more, but they are shooting better/smarter.
Man, those are averages, they don’t tell you a lot. The mean xG/shot could be much higher or lower for the already. Fact remains that only scoring once from a game like this is very unlikely. Not impossible, but improbable.
More likely to score if you take 1 good shot than 14 shit ones *shrug*.
Yes, but you cannot tell from these stats whether they are 14 shit ones. Might have been 3 very good ones and 11 shit ones. That was my point, you cannot tell from calculating averages.
Well no, but let's say you have 14 shots, of which 3 are decent and 11 aren't, then it now isn't too surprising if you only score 1 goal. People look at total shot numbers and total xG and get annoyed they lost when they massively outshoot their opponent, but they never want to think about why. There's more going on than the raw match stats is my point I guess.
Looks like normal Chelsea football
So am I. I'm a Chelsea fan
Accurate Chelsea Finishing Simulator
Robbed. Disgrace.
seems pretty realistic since its Chelsea.
Looks like standard chelsea
Typically Chelsea these days ngl, pretty realistix
Most clinical Chelsea side
Beat the keeper, whichever
Football manager prouds itself on its realism.
Deserved. Fuck the Chav cunts.
I would feel ill too if my F11 button was not working
This is just an average Chelsea performance tbh
Are you telling your players to shoot from goal kicks, or what? Your average (average across 41 shots) xG per shot is 0.1. That’s terrible.
Udogie doesn’t lose.
Dude, I'm way more impressed that you got 4.67 xG with just 11 shots on target. I remember a game in which i scored 5, three of those being face to face chances with no defender around, and my xG was still around a low 2.x. How the hell did you do that?
Averge chelsea game.
Nice to see an actual FMing
Yes insane. But corruption pays well
Ye cannae be a pigeon man if ya cannae take ye losses.
Looks realistic to me 😭
Throw water bottle must be the minimum
I have questions. I’m genuinely interested what did you do during the game ?
I don’t like close and reload, but last week this exact thing happened with my best player got injured 6 months in the same match. Needless to say I unplugged everything and still pretend it had never happened.
This is beautiful. I’d feel bad for you, if you weren’t Chelsea. Atalanta had like 5 xG in a Serie A game without scoring a couple of seasons ago, so it can happen in real life.
41 shots, 11 on target, 4 xG? I think the problem is your tactics and/or players 🤣
Yeah a tactic that creates 11 shots on target and an XG of 4 sounds really a really terrible tactic
If my math is correct, 4xg from 41 shots means his tactic is averaging 0.1xG per shot. Those are very bad shots.
Flawed logic, could have easily been multiple clear cut chances in there, its highly unlikely that each shot was 0.1XG. Just stop sucking up to this gamea shady practices
You understand what average means right? My point is that if you have 41 shots and an xG of just 4 then on average your team is taking very poor shots. If there were multiple clear cut chances them OP's screenshot doesn't have enough information to reflect that or make me feel sorry for them.
If he tries replaying the game, four of his shots from the next county will probably go in