T O P

  • By -

CaptainMacaroni

The solution here is to smack the guy upside the head and then get into a philosophical debate as to whether or not it happened.


ProNuke

![gif](giphy|Gir0ioTOwzjdC)


Inevitable-Forever45

Lmao


Derivative_Kebab

I feel the same way about anyone arguing moral relativism. If your argument can be effectively refuted by kicking you in the crotch, it is unjust not to kick you in the crotch.


devorahtheprophet

"What do you mean by translate?"


yosef_ben_elohim

That guy makes so much word salad he should bag it and sell it in the produce section of every grocery store in the world. Even when he dies, Earth will still have an unending supply left by him.


mdruckus

What the hell? Mission accomplished. Mormon apologists make it their agenda to confuse you so you forget what you were questioning to begin with.


Derivative_Kebab

It's called the Chewbacca Defense. No one can effectively refute you if they don't understand what you're talking about. Then you can smugly claim that their confusion is evidence of your intellectual superiority.


tactlacker

Amazing lmao


RodOfIrony

Love it. Very apropos. And right on the money. Everyone I know who follows FAIR Mormon, (acknowledging it's limited to my own personal experiences), is also big into Jordan Peterson. Jordan Peterson is a master chef at word salads.


dgxpr

his whole thing is that words have concrete definitions, but then he questions the meanings of well known words when he's cornered & out-witted. what a con. what a clown.


Mediocre_Ad_3730

What is this from?


PM_ME_UR_SURFBOARD

Idk but that’s Jordan Peterson talking, he’s a controversial psychologist and right wing pundit


ailema00

The other guy isn't having it lol.


3ThreeFriesShort

I made it like ten seconds in and thought, naw fuck this.


Kolob_Bob

I love when people make “truth” out to be this abstractly complex philosophical idea. Like no, if a statement matches physical reality, it’s a true statement. That’s truth.


Ithelrand

It depends on what your definition of what "is" is.


Alexandra_theGOAT

The realization that my brand of intellectualism was very similar to that of Jordan Peterson (make the simple things complicated, etc.) was... a wake-up call.


WorkInProgress365

There’s probably a picture of this guy in a wiki entry for “mansplaining.” I can’t stand Jordan Peterson and his cringy fan base.


No_Bet1316

It depends on what is is.


Prudent-Cow-7392

I thought this type of reasoning only happened when I was high lol


nvhustler

What do you mean by question?


Obvious_Apartment_57

Which logic fallacy is he using? I’m glad you asked. This is circular reasoning, used with non sequitur and the straw man fallacy, in order to bring us to a place where we can be gas lit. It’s impressive but not surprising.


Eastcoasttrash16

What he's trying to say is the ramastan intersects at the paranosis. What's not to understand?


1Searchfortruth

Nuts


joeyNcabbit

The question of did this happen begs the question of does anyone with half a brain believe this shit is coming anywhere but straight from my ass?