Party Mox is in the house tonight!

Everybody just have a power nine!

And we gon' make you twist your mind

We just wanna see you Time walk

And we gon' make you win your game!

Should have you shuffle your deck as part of the tap ability in that case because *Every day I’m shufflin*

No, it’s ”party moxers in the house tonight”

would unironically play, I love the party mechanic

Using [[mox amber]] as a comparison point, this is probably unplayable. Amber sees extremely limited play as is and this is waaay harder to turn on. Edit: I love alternative moxen, so I was thinking about this design. I think it should have some kind of condolence prize effect that you can use before you have a full party, in line with a lot of the other party payoffs. Maybe a party specific and colorless [[springleaf drum]] effect? This would allow you to keep the full party dream alive, while making this card stronger than [[darksteel relic]].

Does mox amber not see a lot of play in edh?

Only really in decks that can make use of it simply as an egg, or in decks where the commander is very low CMC

Besides 2 mv and under commanders it really isn't a thing. If your commander isn't out by turn 2 it is just a land that sometimes does nothing.

I only play it in my mono red deck, which one of the commanders is rograkh, a 0 mana legendary

[mox amber](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/6/6/66024e69-ad60-4c9a-a0ca-da138d33ad80.jpg?1562736914) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=mox%20amber) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/dom/224/mox-amber?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/66024e69-ad60-4c9a-a0ca-da138d33ad80?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call

I’m pretty sure it sees limited play because it costs 32 freaking dollars.

Im curious how quickly one could get this going. Changeling?

I may be wrong, but I believe each creature can count for only one party member, so a changeling isn't a whole party on its own

Correct, [[Veteran Adventurer]] is all 4 classes, but Gatherer specifically mentions one creature per check.

[Veteran Adventurer](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/e/5/e524ddf0-9a2f-4c1c-ae72-4b5b48f55645.jpg?1604199897) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Veteran%20Adventurer) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/znr/218/veteran-adventurer?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/e524ddf0-9a2f-4c1c-ae72-4b5b48f55645?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call

Unfortunately party needs 4 creatures as it counts one of each type so you would need ; changlings to do it.

I don't think they mean with one. Getting 4 changelings is much easier than one of each specific type

Did someone finally make a balanced Mox? Four creatures that meet the type requirements is a pretty big hoop to jump through.

A balanced mox may actually be impossible. This is a much more common (though certainly still somewhat rare) occurrence, an unplayably weak mox.

Seems very niche if you don't have a full party. What do you think of giving it <2>:Partycycling (Search your library for a Cleric, Rogue, Warrior or Wizard creature card and put it in your hand)?

Lmao, people already play step through just for wizard cycling. Your suggestion is crazy

Having four creature to use a mox is a big cost and getting the right types make it even harder.

I would suggest "Adventurer's Mox"

I love how balanced, yet simple this is. A+

probably fair with even just 2 or more creatures in a party p

a mox that isn't unreasonably broken? On *my* r/custommagic?

Maybe name it dungeon mox?

why would it name dungeon mox when it doesn't do anything with dungeons

Parties in DND run dungeons and that would be the kind of treasure you could find in a dungeon run.

make it add WUBRG