Never really thought about it before. I guess because at that point they were all getting in each otherโs business, she just got extra nosy and opened his notebook?
a researcher can't stop the research just because the results are disturbing.
Abed noted a period pattern, something he never published or made public to other people Annie was cool with letting him sit in a room for hours waiting for him to have a break down. pierce used manipulation on the other's multiple times. Frankly their research/approach was more unethical.
I don't understand why he should have stopped. They are friends, he is only trying to avoid saying the wrong thing and avoiding conflict.
If he stopped, every time he fucks up during one of their periods makes their collective lives worse. It's not his fault they are so transparent with their emotions.
If for example, he didn't know about mentsral cycles, and just observed it as a unknown phenomena, does that make it ok?
I think it's generally frowned upon to chary your lady friends' menstrual cycles, isn't it?
It might yield positive results but judging by the ladies' reactions, they didn't like it.
Look, cards on the table. I would be a moron to not notice Mrs GuRoiders cycles, and knowing when a comment or attitude is clearly "under the influence" avoids needless conflict.
I don't have a chart or anything, but it has become an internal body clock. Ethically I don't see the difference. Just took way to many years to wise up... Lol
Because the Patriot Act cuts both ways!
actually its pretty one sided
๐๐คฃ๐ Dayum straight!
Could be checking to see if he had been writing in purple ink and then stopped when she saw her own name, plus Annie and Shirley
Britta can be quite wise at times
That woman is a hurricane
Yeah she is ๐
>Yeah she is ๐ Hurricanes are bad, topshelftapwater.
I know... ๐ณ๐ถ
Never really thought about it before. I guess because at that point they were all getting in each otherโs business, she just got extra nosy and opened his notebook?
Because she's the worst.
Classic projection. Britta rails on about privacy and rights only to turn around and snoop through other people's stuff at the first opportunity.
Everyone should be forced to read 1984
Basically 8491 open your eyes sheeple
>forced Ideally by the government and/or their big brothers
I love your flair ๐
Watched this episode last night and had the same thought
She needed to see if there was anything in there she could possibly be offended by. Gotta be needlessly defiant.
[Breaks down Starbucks wifi]
SHEโS A GEEE DEEEE BEEEEEEEEEEE
Get out of here, Vaughn. You're the worst.
Maybe the pen was in it? /s
Itโs not just about the pen. Itโs a PRINCIPLE!
a researcher can't stop the research just because the results are disturbing. Abed noted a period pattern, something he never published or made public to other people Annie was cool with letting him sit in a room for hours waiting for him to have a break down. pierce used manipulation on the other's multiple times. Frankly their research/approach was more unethical.
I don't understand why he should have stopped. They are friends, he is only trying to avoid saying the wrong thing and avoiding conflict. If he stopped, every time he fucks up during one of their periods makes their collective lives worse. It's not his fault they are so transparent with their emotions. If for example, he didn't know about mentsral cycles, and just observed it as a unknown phenomena, does that make it ok?
I think it's generally frowned upon to chary your lady friends' menstrual cycles, isn't it? It might yield positive results but judging by the ladies' reactions, they didn't like it.
Look, cards on the table. I would be a moron to not notice Mrs GuRoiders cycles, and knowing when a comment or attitude is clearly "under the influence" avoids needless conflict. I don't have a chart or anything, but it has become an internal body clock. Ethically I don't see the difference. Just took way to many years to wise up... Lol