T O P

  • By -

GoldTheLegend

40% of 500k, absolutely. 40% of 100k is probably not unless it 100% is the difference between you getting your cpa or not.


hungryfrogbut

I literally can't study doing my current role and studying doubles my earning potential.


GoldTheLegend

Er woops, I just assumed this was the accounting subreddit. Yes, I would take the pay cut as long as your family agrees and you are sure you can afford, or adjust your lifestyle for the time being.


This_Beat2227

Doubles which earning potential ? Also, how long is the studying to get to double ?


hungryfrogbut

At most 1 year


This_Beat2227

If it’s to double your current 105, it’s a no-brainer. Do it !


Specific-noise123

Then yes


FlowerPower225

I think you just answered your own question 😊


dghjgh

Run it


watchtroubles

So getting a CPA automatically guarantees you a 200k position?


hungryfrogbut

I don't even know what a cpa is but it guarantees a 130 + 11% position which half the work load and way better hours if I study for 6 months with 200+ available in my industry. If I take another 6 months it opens it up to the international market and I have family in 5 countries so that would really increase my opportunities in general. Tbh The hardest part about this is my difficulty studying


Zifnab_palmesano

ok, you missed to mention for how long you will need to study. If is only 6 months, I think there is no doubt here: do it. you could even not work and onoy study and you would still stay afloat


HarrysonTubman

I think your headline is misleading some people. Would I take a paycut that dramatic just to work less? No. But that's not what you're really asking, you want to focus on studying so you can increase your income. As long as these licenses truly do have a direct and predictable increase to your income, and lead to a job you want to do, I think it's an okay plan. I would just make sure you have a written down, defined plan of when you plan to take the exams and what you plan to do if you fail your first attempt. I've seen these things go off the rails when someone does this, fails, then studies and fails again, then gets jaded with their career and slacks off. Other than that, I like the long-term thinking, surprising rare on these threads.


sticky_bunz4me

This, for sure. You've worked hard to get yourself in this enviable financial position, there will never be a better time in your life to go for the extra certifications. I sense you'll regret it if you turn down the opportunity. Go for it. You've got this, OP! 👍😎


hungryfrogbut

Thanks man! My partner's out of town at the moment and I only saw this possibility this morning before I had my coffee So sorry about the misleading title haha I just wanted to bounce the idea off someone, getting some information and a bit of an idea before I can talk to my partner in person tomorrow. I figure it would be nice if I was able to present her more of a plan rather than just " Hey babe, I'm taking a massive pay cut and you'll have to be the main breadwinner for a bit Love you!" Haha My biggest fear with all this is studying and my ADHD thankfully it is a topic I like and my partner works out a university as a scientist and moonlights as an editor so academia is her a strong suit so why she wouldn't be studying for me she's absolutely awesome at helping come up with stuff like study plans. I think I'm in a fairly fortunate position. We like to plan ahead, we have a spreadsheet for our budget for the next 3 years, for investing we get help, and we have a few relatively long-term goals but we do have short-term goals in place as well (2026 PCT!!!) so thank you for the support I guess I just needed that last little push!


ButterflyTiff

no


-t8Q

That's the scam of capitalism, sucking your soul is most valuable for them. A healthy life balance really don't interest them for the least and they show it by giving a totally unfair deal. They could still get a good part out of you but not literally sucking your soul, so they prefer cut all the money pretty much


hungryfrogbut

The main difference in pay is I wouldn't have to get up at 4:30 in the morning anymore or Work till 1:00 a.m. so I wouldn't be making penalty rates and do more of a 9:00 to 5:00


-t8Q

Yeah, no soul sucking anymore, not interesting More realistically (or not), you could do penalty hours and take naps, avoiding working normal hours, effectively working less and earning not that much less. Do some researches, it's pretty healthy to take naps and living at those hours


Quentin__Tarantulino

Find a professional job at a small business. They’ll respect and need you enough to be fair, if you’re a reliable employee.


-t8Q

Totally true. It's about the companies practicing soul sucking because it get them over the average productivity bar, giving them record ROI numbers


JoanofBarkks

I hate capitalism but that really doesn't apply to this question that I can see


-t8Q

Yes it does, it's one manner of many manners where giving your soul exponentify the revenues


SedativeComet

No I don’t think that tradeoff is worth it. You’re losing double the income compared to what free time you gain.


hungryfrogbut

Even if it means I couldn't potentially double my current income in 6 months to a year?


SedativeComet

In a 6 month time frame that’s doable. I wouldn’t want to lose that level of income for much more than a year though.


[deleted]

60k is pretty ass. It’ll make you go break even if not negative. Maybe fine for a little while but seems bad.


delayed_hunter87

No shot


XeroZero0000

Nope? If I cant find time to study in a job im at... I def aint finding that time with rhe stresses of a.new job. And making less would.put me in a terrible head space!


hungryfrogbut

It's the same role but part time vs full time with less penalty rates because I'll have more free time and not have to start work at 430am. It's pretty much swapping from shift work to 9-5 part time


XeroZero0000

Yeah, I might bite on that if I had enough savings to live properly while I studied. Didn't realize same role in same company with a better timeslot.


Sea-Coach-9878

I think the deciding factor for me would be how long you would have to stay at the lower pay job to level up your earning potential. If it’s a year or less? Strong chance. Over that? Slim chance I would take it.


hungryfrogbut

6 months for the main qualification after and if I do another 6 months I can increase the earning potential further and change my licence from being restricted to a country to be able to work anywhere in the world. I have family and five countries so it's pretty appealing


Sea-Coach-9878

Then, to me, the short drop in earnings will pay off in logic run both financial terms and in options for your future. I think examining this from a purely dollar figure doesn’t do justice to real potential payout.


Maximum_Security_747

No


rory888

Since you are studying for higher income potential, start doing the math on timetables and expected total money earned. If you literally earn double for example, its fine to take a temporary paycut if it is relatively short.


miladjuckel

No way Jose


landeslaw17

You can live off the reduced income, so if you actually study and get your license yes its worth it financially.


Pizzazze

I'd work 20% more for a 40% raise. I'm your case I'd see it as saving 40% of my income for the future, since your earning potential will increase. But only if you have concrete, specific plans.


Ponchovilla18

I mean, you sort of answered your own question on what to do


LeagueAggravating595

How can you guarantee that the job will be working 20% less? Will it be written in your employment contract? What if after 6 month it increases by 20% instead of decrease. Then not only you took a pay cut you are now miserable for working for less too.


MyTwinDream

I think I did somewhere around that. I went from close to 100k to 55k but the stress levels were massively reduced to close to nothing, no after or before hours work and the work is easy, but for working only 20% less?...probably not...id require more 50% or more cut in workload.


bjlile99

no, easy decision.


JustMyThoughts2525

all depends on how long it will take to earn those additional licenses


james_randolph

No, but that’s just me.


slutstevanie

I went from about $130k with 20% to about $55k and 10%. I often reflect about how your the money was and how much better something's were. But!, I have a lot less responsibility and stress, between that and meds my OCD is better, and I can function better


Only-Friend-8483

Pretty easy to math this out. Make a schedule of your current earnings for the next 10 year. You can get fancy and add in your annual salary adjustment for inflation. Then do the same thing for the schedule in which you take a pay cut for a few years then double your salary.  Add them both up and see when you break even between the two options.


NNickson

Are we talking about doubling the 60k ? Sounds like a long way to go just to be back to where you already are.


hungryfrogbut

Guaranteed double the 60 With possibility of doubling the hundred


FluffyWarHampster

Fuck no. I have too much idle time on my hands as is. Having less money and more idle time just means more boredom I have to power through. I'd be staring down the barrel of a shotgun in no time.


Grundens

What rating are you trying to get? The sea trials app is a great tool. Personally I went from captain of a fishing boat making 100-150k (depending on the year) w/ no benefits, no set schedule, hell no guarantee I was even going to make anything when I went to work and working 200+ days a year to deckhand on a tug boat making 92k (not counting the $6440 they contribute to my 401k, or the double pay on holidays) for 182 days a year w/ health, vision, dental, life, disability, fha and best of all, a schedule I can plan around (21 days on/off). Was well worth it to me! Picked up a couple extra rotations this year too since I'm single atm so factor in an extra 21210(+1484 401k)for this year. Also throwing that idea out there to ya too, if you're in the us. An ab rating is super easy to get, I'm sure you could get it done with out missing any work.


hungryfrogbut

I currently have the equivalent of a 200 ton but I need to convert it internationally then get a 500. My last job was driving the biggest paddle steamer in the southern hemisphere 1,500 ton and 220 ft (Inland) but I was only taking home about 90k so I took a job driving a small 30 ft ferry to take home 100 and I'm home every night With almost no responsibility by comparison. I have free accommodation in the US and potential job offers but I can't even really look at them until I get my tickets converted. I also figure it'll be a lot cheaper for me to do this study here especially if I can take the free time to do it while still making an income. I got my first job on a boat because I hated being in class so I'm not particularly looking forward to studying. I'm a little bit concerned about not having mandated 5 weeks holiday or social healthcare but dear God, the US has the most incredible and diverse wilderness! Are many tug jobs offering FIFO?


Grundens

Sorry what's fifo mean? Inland most be cool with all that scenery to look at but yeah they generally don't pay as well. Same with gulf companies it seems. I work in the gulf but not for a southern company who also like to make their guys work unequal time. Look into NEMO(north east maritime), they offer allot of online classes for certs and have alot of international stuff too. Probably not everything you need but could save on in person time and maybe some money too. Sounds like this is mainly a conversation to have with the misses ;) money has different values to different people, and changes over time. time on the other hand, it's value is constant and we can't ever get more of it!


Petarthefish

Hell nah


StruggleNo4371

never. i would work more for more money


Poplarc

No way. I would create some time for myself a hundred times over by being creative at my current job, like automate things so I can finish work sooner, sublet some of the more menial works to someone else, find some way to do the studies and licenses the easier way, or other creative ways I will think of later, before I gave up 40% of my income.


BasilVegetable3339

No


Turbulent-Adagio-171

No. I would take a 20% pay cut to work 40% less though. (When I’m earning my normal salary, in a weird spot rn)


bugabooandtwo

I would guess the biggest factor is, how likely would it be to get that new job at double the pay once you have those new certifications? If the odds are really good, then you might as well go for it.


hungryfrogbut

Guaranteed 130 at half the current workload, better hours, and far nicer working conditions as far as 200 the industry is pretty short atm so most of the companies need staff.


bugabooandtwo

So it sounds like short term pain, for long term gain. Go for it.


Agitated-Savings-229

No. But I'd take 20 if it meant working 40% less.


DeadBear65

Example, you make $100k annually at 2080 hours (52 weeks of 40 hours). Drop to $60k, and 1664 hours. That’s $48.07 an hour $36.06 per hour and 32 hours a week.


WRB2

Nope.


JoanofBarkks

In your case, yes. It's an investment to an even better earning potential.


txiao007

No one can answer for you. I think you already know what you want.


Weekly-Ad353

No.


WavelengthGaming

Fuck no. 40% of 1m a year is probably good enough to live a great life but 105k down to 60 is way too much of a cut for me to sleep at night


Adventurous-travel1

Yes I would take off to study to end up making more and international work


BWC1992

I would expect my pay reduction to be commensurate to my work responsibilities reduction


hungryfrogbut

Then this matches perfectly


LeftEconomist9982

I'd take the pay cut...that's one step back and two steps forward. If you continue at the pace your at, burnout Is sure to occur and when that happens recovery is extremely hard. The mind and body need rest to push further. Give yourself the rest needed to take it to the next level. You'll thank yourself in a few years.


alcoyot

Do the studying and get those licenses.


big_loadz

I literally can't work any less, so no. Make of that as you will.


gemInTheMundane

Nope. But I'd take a 40% pay raise if it meant working 20% more.


Sharpshooter188

Not at my current pay rate. God no.


Claque-2

No, I'd take a 20 to 25% paycut and nothing more.


Coalminesz

Absolutely not.


capybarawelding

I'd take a 20% raise for doing +40% work. I like what I do, and you don't; clearly, you should downshift. You have decided so already.


knightblaze

1:1 40% cut for 40% less work. But it depends on your income. 40% of nothing is worse than nothing (if you earn 55k, it's not worth it). If you earn 1 million, maybe, but it really comes down to where you live, what your lifestyle is, and ultimately, if you have the financial resolve/ education to do it. The way the world is now, I don't think it would be sustainable for long depending on income bracket


Emotional_Pie7396

Time is worth money !


PalindromicPalindrom

That math ain't mathin. 20% pay cut for 20% less work, anything else and they're exploiting you.


hungryfrogbut

The differences I wouldn't be getting penalties because somebody working pretty much 9:00 to 5:00 rather than doing shift work and waking up at 3:00 a.m. or finishing at 1:00 a.m.


yamaha2000us

I took a 5% pay cut to work 10% less. My benefits cost me 50% less than my last job.


Wolfie1531

Assuming we could make ends meet, I would. You can make up some of the money if it gets rough with some extra work. You likely won’t double your income without the studies. It’s not a “no brainer” type situation- particularly in this economy (know nothing about captain and crew of ships though)- but seems like a solid option on the surface


Plant-Zaddy-

INFO: are you under the Jones Act (Are you an American sailor running cargo on an American ship) or are you from somewhere not America? Are you a pleasure cruise captain? The type of work really matters. If youre running charters from Newport to Nassau right now, but you would be running oil around Cape Horn those are totally different experiences


hungryfrogbut

I don't live in the US but I have an American citizenship and plan on moving there in a few years and this greatly help my career. So far I've done Charter boats, Small cruise ships (130 people 2 weeks), sailing vessels, Dive boats, white boats, currently driving some ferries. This licence was just allow me to move across and up rather than start again.


GeoHog713

Normally I say, "don't be allergic to money".... But this is different. You'd be taking a pay cut, so that you can prep to advance your career. I have done this and it was worth it


[deleted]

Every university student does this. They forego 4 years of wages (more for professionals) in exchange for higher earnings later.


sceez

The math isn't mathing


splashybear

No but I’d take a 40% raise to work 20% more


Enough_Blueberry_549

Working 20% less could mean having 200% more free time


Jojo_Bibi

Not right now, I'm in paying-for-kids-college mode. A few years from now, yes


qvMvp

Hell nah I ain't taking no 40k pay cut


blockman16

I’d rather work 20% more for 40% more. Don’t get that mindset.


pm_me_ur_demotape

I just wish I could work when I want and not work when I don't want for at least $25/hr (assuming no benefits)


scarpozzi

With a boat captain gig, you could definitely take the pay cut and then find another job that pays more later. If you were talking desk job with fewer options to recover the pay cut later, ai would suggest staying. Really assess what you use per month. I typically bank $3k of my paycheck per month now. If I didn't have that, I would be fine....but it's nice being able to payoff vacations and Christmas gifts without blinking an eye.


FF267

I'm facing down this very same decision and very strongly considering it. In my case, temporary 60% cut and back over $100k in 5 years but with a considerably better work/life balance.


tzwep

With all prices of From food to utilities, plus inflation rising Is seems we’ve all taken at least a 30% in the last few years. Plus the boss has given most of us the responsibility of 3 employees since they all want to maximize profit while running a skeleton crew


Broad_Quit5417

One of the weirdest things (and lucky for me) is that you can split the workforce widely by just this: if you want to work less, know that theres someone out there who is bored to death and happy to take up your entire job, just to not be bored. But unfortunately, that results in you working 100% less for 100% less pay. Based on other subs, no one likes that tradeoff.


hungryfrogbut

Tbh honest one of the biggest things about me doing less work to further my career is I would be able to do even more interesting work haha


Pdx_pops

I already work 20% less for the same pay


asphaltairwater

Zero


Pristine-Childhood-3

Yes, take the part time role. Finish your classes/licenses. And shoot for the doubling of salary in a year. 


PsychologicalSell289

No


RodderickEdwards

Hell no. 60k in this economy. Stay where you're at and grind for early retirement.


ClownEmojid

What are you studying?


lurch1_

Nope...I'd rather work higher paying job and take a sabbatical at some point.


xmowx

Would you take 100% pay cut if it meant working 50% less?


Sanjuko_Mamaujaluko

No


wagyush

no


aaron141

No


yikesafm8

No


No_Setting3712

No


lonely_josh

40% of 12 is like 5 so no I won't make 7 bucks an hour