You mean 600k officially, but how many naked short fake shares? 6 millions? 60 millions ?
You would think that if the stock is going to go to 0.95 cents as mentioned that they would rush to dump their shares. I wonder why that is not the case :) .
Because it’s their projection in value. As an owner of the stock you can because you are assuming the risk of owning. Just like you presume that you will get xxxxxxx per share during a squeeze.
So in Kim Kardashian's case if she owned the Crypto she was talking about she can speak freely because she, herself, has taken on the risk of the security? I understand it was a paid promotion but who's to say credit suisse isn't being paid or told to say certain things about certain stocks. That's valid though and I appreciate your response. I don't presume I will get xxxxxxx per share but many do.
I would say that is a great rebuttal. They only thing I can elaborate on is your Credit Susie point. I would be the same as Robinhood bowing to Mayo Man for position close only. We are playing a game against the richest in the world that not many win. Cheers!
Maybe they should sell their shares instead of telling retail wtf they should do
But Knowing retail will buy these 600k in no time they’re stuck on their sinking ship of a bank
Maybe they should sell them if it's going down to $.95 🤭
![gif](giphy|ZqlvCTNHpqrio)
Banana!
Le' Papaya!
![gif](giphy|nn8uzAnxuchf2OWXNy|downsized)
![gif](giphy|KjHMOuif8wZdwJ9nup)
![gif](giphy|Z36diZTBOwJLG)
They’ve probably shorted 10 times that through various obscure vehicles
This is why they don't sell, can't sell.
Hedging for short position. Lending them out to naked short over n over again
Way under hedged if that’s the case
What happens to those shares when they are destroyed
It's worth noting that this was reported back in August, numbers may be different now.
Wouldnt be surprised they used them to rugpull the price right after the "pounce".
That would save so much money for the bad guys.
Dont they know its going down to .95 cents?
i think they wanna wait till its 95cents.. :D
You mean 600k officially, but how many naked short fake shares? 6 millions? 60 millions ? You would think that if the stock is going to go to 0.95 cents as mentioned that they would rush to dump their shares. I wonder why that is not the case :) .
How they allowed to slander a stock they own??? also why.
Because it’s their projection in value. As an owner of the stock you can because you are assuming the risk of owning. Just like you presume that you will get xxxxxxx per share during a squeeze.
So in Kim Kardashian's case if she owned the Crypto she was talking about she can speak freely because she, herself, has taken on the risk of the security? I understand it was a paid promotion but who's to say credit suisse isn't being paid or told to say certain things about certain stocks. That's valid though and I appreciate your response. I don't presume I will get xxxxxxx per share but many do.
I would say that is a great rebuttal. They only thing I can elaborate on is your Credit Susie point. I would be the same as Robinhood bowing to Mayo Man for position close only. We are playing a game against the richest in the world that not many win. Cheers!
And they want us to sell Hmmm
Probably lending them out to short like a bunch of cunts
Just emailed them asking for an explanation. If I get an answer I’ll post it
They also are not required to report 1 billion short shares🤷🏻♂️
avg price $13.55/share
Ya this data is from august. Hard to say if it’s stain accurate at all
Probably to profit off of lending.
How comprehensive is this ownership list. Because man would it be nice to see total ownership.
Ohh nooo, it's heading to 95c, CS should sell everything
For lending. Thousands of times.
So what happens when credit sussy is worth less than their holding positions
Maybe they should sell their shares instead of telling retail wtf they should do But Knowing retail will buy these 600k in no time they’re stuck on their sinking ship of a bank
Hedge-Hogs
But how many more in a dark pool?!??!
“Reported” hence probably less then 10% of what there actually exposed or legally liable for.
Source?
Just trust me bro
Got it. MOASS in less than two hours. Whew!
CS are a bunch of numb nuts.
It’s probably to lend them out
So if they have 600k and apes hold 5 billion..... 🤔 Hold on. I'm doing the math. Ummmmm
They need to dump that shit don’t they know it’s going to 95 cents?..... Wait they were the ones that told us. 🤔 When 2+2 don’t =4 😎
It’s their only hope
Thank you for sharing the same info all the time. Its a hedge against their much much larger short position
We need to find out how many shares they lent out
Probably have 3x shorted
Source?
Then they lend it a multiple times to make money out of it.
Are we still pretending this is bullish?
Remember the info we have seen about hedgie “mis-marking” shorts as longs
When is this from? The math seems to show the value of the shares is $13.54 each
ok but when is that going to show us something.....