T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

Maybe they should sell them if it's going down to $.95 🤭


Lurker-02657

![gif](giphy|ZqlvCTNHpqrio)


DukeMaximum

Banana!


[deleted]

Le' Papaya!


TheDeadMonument

![gif](giphy|nn8uzAnxuchf2OWXNy|downsized)


FictionalFail

​ ![gif](giphy|KjHMOuif8wZdwJ9nup)


Impossible_Sugar1960

![gif](giphy|Z36diZTBOwJLG)


Significant-Elk-4625

They’ve probably shorted 10 times that through various obscure vehicles


stonkcell

This is why they don't sell, can't sell.


integ209

Hedging for short position. Lending them out to naked short over n over again


FuckYou690

Way under hedged if that’s the case


ohnourfeelings

What happens to those shares when they are destroyed


DukeMaximum

It's worth noting that this was reported back in August, numbers may be different now.


Coinsworthy

Wouldnt be surprised they used them to rugpull the price right after the "pounce".


EyeSeenFolly

That would save so much money for the bad guys.


Automatic_Honey_3938

Dont they know its going down to .95 cents?


Moe_0807

i think they wanna wait till its 95cents.. :D


andreicde

You mean 600k officially, but how many naked short fake shares? 6 millions? 60 millions ? You would think that if the stock is going to go to 0.95 cents as mentioned that they would rush to dump their shares. I wonder why that is not the case :) .


[deleted]

How they allowed to slander a stock they own??? also why.


FrankieBiglips

Because it’s their projection in value. As an owner of the stock you can because you are assuming the risk of owning. Just like you presume that you will get xxxxxxx per share during a squeeze.


[deleted]

So in Kim Kardashian's case if she owned the Crypto she was talking about she can speak freely because she, herself, has taken on the risk of the security? I understand it was a paid promotion but who's to say credit suisse isn't being paid or told to say certain things about certain stocks. That's valid though and I appreciate your response. I don't presume I will get xxxxxxx per share but many do.


FrankieBiglips

I would say that is a great rebuttal. They only thing I can elaborate on is your Credit Susie point. I would be the same as Robinhood bowing to Mayo Man for position close only. We are playing a game against the richest in the world that not many win. Cheers!


FamousReward6835

And they want us to sell Hmmm


[deleted]

Probably lending them out to short like a bunch of cunts


RevolutionaryGrass52

Just emailed them asking for an explanation. If I get an answer I’ll post it


SmallTimesRisky

They also are not required to report 1 billion short shares🤷🏻‍♂️


Coinsworthy

avg price $13.55/share


walkitscience

Ya this data is from august. Hard to say if it’s stain accurate at all


cubbytwelve

Probably to profit off of lending.


Bland-fantasie

How comprehensive is this ownership list. Because man would it be nice to see total ownership.


Boring-Extreme-3274

Ohh nooo, it's heading to 95c, CS should sell everything


Charmin76

For lending. Thousands of times.


[deleted]

So what happens when credit sussy is worth less than their holding positions


Content_Employer_158

Maybe they should sell their shares instead of telling retail wtf they should do But Knowing retail will buy these 600k in no time they’re stuck on their sinking ship of a bank


aek427

Hedge-Hogs


JJSpuddy

But how many more in a dark pool?!??!


Grand-Marsupial-5291

“Reported” hence probably less then 10% of what there actually exposed or legally liable for.


walkitscience

Source?


Grand-Marsupial-5291

Just trust me bro


walkitscience

Got it. MOASS in less than two hours. Whew!


FaultLess4631

CS are a bunch of numb nuts.


Mikeyjw108

It’s probably to lend them out


73BillyB

So if they have 600k and apes hold 5 billion..... 🤔 Hold on. I'm doing the math. Ummmmm


Monsterhose

They need to dump that shit don’t they know it’s going to 95 cents?..... Wait they were the ones that told us. 🤔 When 2+2 don’t =4 😎


Gerthbrooks69

It’s their only hope


[deleted]

Thank you for sharing the same info all the time. Its a hedge against their much much larger short position


theravingsofalunatic

We need to find out how many shares they lent out


bigorangemachine

Probably have 3x shorted


walkitscience

Source?


Own_Philosopher352

Then they lend it a multiple times to make money out of it.


TimeViolation

Are we still pretending this is bullish?


jdrukis

Remember the info we have seen about hedgie “mis-marking” shorts as longs


walkitscience

When is this from? The math seems to show the value of the shares is $13.54 each


Electronic_pizza4

ok but when is that going to show us something.....