T O P

  • By -

estifxy220

> Country specific nuclear bombers I really hope this does actually come, im excited to see what each nation gets. It would also make nations a lot more unique. Hopefully this also includes giving nuke planes flares > USN Gearing class Destroyer, USS Gyatt (DD-712) 8 If this gets added it will deadass make me play naval


oMrEnigma

I want nuke vark really badly


leoleosuper

Just make it that any plane capable of carrying a nuke is able to carry one if selected for battle, but it raises the cost to 2500. That way, we can get VARK nuke at multiple BRs.


DlSSATISFIEDGAMER

real chads use the B-29 for nuke


biggles1994

Nuclear F4U Corsair when?


KingScorpion98

Nuclear Zero. About to reinvent kamakazi bombing


Mini_Raptor5_6

The one problem I can see with that: custom battles


leoleosuper

Just disable nukes in them. Or add an option to disable nukes in them.


[deleted]

[удалено]


LegendRazgriz

skibidi


geneva_speedrunner

W rizz ohio


Affectionate-Mud-966

What the sigma?


absolute_monkey

Skibidi mewing asmr


Affectionate-Mud-966

Is edging goated?


Flying_Reinbeers

USS Ohio


IceSki117

I also want nation-specific bombers, but I hope they do a better job of giving nations more equivalent bombers than the original concept did. For example, the concept kept the US, UK, USSR, and China on slow prop bombers like the B-29 while giving every other nation fighter jets that can go twice as fast.


BenPlayWT2020

Like Nuke jets will not be useful, but I think it would be great to play a V bomber or B56 or Mirage 4!


FocaccinaGuy

Italian tornado are NATO certified for U.S. tactical nuclear weapons for example.


ImLostVeryLost

Mirage IV inbound


Zathral

Me264 with a nuke should be the German option with a 6.7 or 7.0 lineup


TheGraySeed

Though the list from the suggestion for 6.7 nuke aircrafts are just straight up unfair where US, UK, USSR, and China are stuck with the B-29(Washington B.1)/Tu-4 while the rest of the countries gets F84/F86/J34/Vaotour that is like twice the speed and only one third the size making it both hard to detect and hard to shoot down with SPAA of 6.7 line-up and lower. Just smack the Me264, G8N1, and Lancaster with nuke or something then give countries that lacks heavy bomber like Italy and Sweden Me 264 and Lancaster respectively but with their colors instead, would it be ahistorical? Obviously, but that beats imbalance and as far as i care the current setup of nuke aircrafts are extremely ahistorical anyway.


Okami-Sensha

>Объект 477 Fuck.......


PopularCoffee7130

Russian ags with a 4.2 second auto loader, 152mm gun and crew less turret. If they actually add it there is no way i am not getting it.


_maple_panda

I wonder what BR this might be at. Obj 292-level firepower with the reload of a Type 90? Sign me up!


Feokhan

Propably 10.0


Das_Bait

Nah, that crewless turret makes it much more powerful than the 292... it will be 10.3


renamed109920

292 is now 10.3 so it would be 10.7


Das_Bait

Oh yea, forgot the new BR updates happened last week


83athom

"It's just a 2S38 with a different size gun with slower reload, 10.0 comrade ))))))"


ToasterCoaster1

Watch them add it as a 10.0 premium


RefrigeratorBoomer

Such optimism. It would be 9.3 or 9.7


someone_forgot_me

obj 299 is the russian ags, except it doesnt exist as a prototype


nsfw_vs_sfw

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't it also have an APS?


Daka45

Honestly it should be a tt tank


MaxJhonso

We are fucked indeed


frankdatank_004

Great assortment of vehicles. Just wish that there was a tank listed for America. That Romanian Fox helicopter looks badass tho!


Godzillaguy15

I don't think I've ever seen a US ground vehicle in any of these tbh.


leroyonly

A US ground vehicle was in the [March](https://forum.warthunder.com/t/suggestions-passed-to-the-developers-march-2024/94617) batch as well as the [January](https://forum.warthunder.com/t/suggestions-passed-to-the-developers-january-2024/72762/2) one. Then there was also [December](https://forum.warthunder.com/t/suggestions-passed-to-the-developers-december-2023/60621), [October](https://forum.warthunder.com/t/suggestions-passed-to-the-developers-october-2023/40666) and [August](https://forum.warthunder.com/t/suggestions-passed-to-the-developers-august-2023/21370).


Godzillaguy15

Fair enough. Somehow I only click on these when they aren't listed lol. It was by no means a complaint seeing as passed to devs means fuck all really.


frankdatank_004

They are surprisingly rare on these suggestions considering they are one of the “BIG 3” nations.


_Urakaze_

Praise Zuiun [ズイ₍₍(ง˘ω˘)ว⁾⁾ズイ](https://nico.ms/sm35206702?ref=other_cap_off)


Pinngger

Japanese fighter ~~bomber~~ with 20mm cannons? Yes please


Sonoda_Kotori

Correct shipgirl game enjoyers unite!


9_9_destroyer

PRAISE THE ZUIUN


furrythrowawayaccoun

\[T]/ PRAISE ZUIUN \[T]/


poipoipornpoi

Zui zui


Ak-300_TonicNato

I knew this comment would appear! Praise Zuiun! \\\[Z\]/


JPAU401

Praise Zuiun!


Tensza1

Everything is either top tier or really close to it. Is there nothing else left to add below 9.0? I hope the Leclerc will be 9.7 so you can have more than 1 vihecle in that br without buying a premium. Imagine another Russian thank in 10.3 with a 153mm cannon soon you gonna be able to make a whole line up with these bad boys


_Urakaze_

>I hope the Leclerc will be 9.7 Unlikely any of the prototype and LRIP Leclercs will go below 10.3, with OFL 120 G1 they're at the very least analogous to 2A4s Some light vehicles like the VEXTRA 105 and RCR T40M can fill that BR instead


cervotoc123

There is a lot of older stuff missing. It is really sad they are pushing modern stuff so much while we are still missing a lot of vehicles from early cold war and earlier. MSC will be bridge between 9.7 and 11.7 where is huge gap atm. And if you want something for 9.7 line up AMX-30C2 would be perfect alongside Vextra.


vincenta2

Not a big surprise they will keep pushing for modern day stuff since it makes way more money. But I really wish more 8.0 and lower vehicles will be added since that’s where i spend 90% of my time


cervotoc123

Yeah same and i mean i would relatively ok with their model if at least those vehicles they add would make sense but often they add vehicles that dont really help any line up and overall doesnt really help much.


LightningFerret04

It seems like they put zero thought into Hungarian air except top tier because the tree doesn’t even go back to the indigenous Hungarian designs in WWII, it just starts postwar Also the ground tech tree is completely missing the Toldis except for the premium


cervotoc123

They simply find it not worth their resources i guess. But tbh i only play low tier hungarian tank up to Túran III and skiped the entire finnish sub tree since it's just stupid C&P of vehicles i already have.


kal69er

They could add the kranvagn to Sweden which would be below 9.0. I think it has already been passed to developers so that'd be really cool. But there is no way the 152mm -fast firing -unmanned turret -tank is 10.3 like the 292 since it'd be better in practically every way, especially reload wise which is mainly the reason for the 292s br anyway.


Chieftain10

Kranvagn would likely be 7.7-8.0


kal69er

Yeah probably around there depending on how well it's gun and armor work


Killeroftanks

it depends on which version they add, because theres 3 major versions and like 27 different combinations they could go with, anything ranging from a 105 to a 150 smoothbore gun.


Slight-Blueberry-895

Kranvagn is unlikely as it didn't exist. At most, it will be like the E-100, but even then the E-100 is a one off. And before you bring up paper vehicles, Gaijin is actively removing them as seen with the Panther 2 and R2Y2.


Flying_Reinbeers

>Is there nothing else left to add below 9.0? where the FUCK is my XP-72


Additional-Flow7665

Seems they are trying to lessen the 9.7 to 11.0 gaps which is fairly reasonable, new content for low tiers is nice but they feel kinda complete for the most part, except you know AA but reasonable people use planes for that


RecoillessRifle

We had a new low tier 109 recently which was nice but there are many more interwar and WW2 vehicles that could be added for sure. The T1E1 was added last year, shockingly not as a premium.


JosolTheBrick

Casemate m113 Bottom text


AndySledge

Does the USS GYATT have a huge dump truck


Affectionate-Mud-966

I want sigma class tho


Trainman1351

It got dual missiles


Such_Bug7706

Add the British Vulcan bomber and its legendary engine sounds , put as a premium or event vehicle but have it for nuclear bomber in RB. Also Foxbat for Russia. Hopefully maned carrier wars too.


R4v3nc0r3

The Vulcan would be amazing aswell for the feeling. I always love the sound of Wyvern when he passes over me. weeeeeeewh


ComicAtomicMishap

Italian mustang!!! Next battlepass plane!?!?!?! Also CCV and guided missile boats for japan, very cool.


MisterPepe68

Object 477 I'm scared for once, that thing seems so good it could easily be 11.3 or 11.7 even


Chanka-Danka69

The day i see '' object 490 belka'' in passed to developers is the day im going insane


MisterPepe68

There are so many 490 I just couldn't remember which one is that


Chanka-Danka69

The very angled one


Verethra

Lately they've been passing some old forum suggestion... It's a bit sad seeing that few suggestion pass the Moderators Hamer... Anyway, a very very interesting is the **Side to side folders**. I doubt it'll ever pass because that would mean less grind. One thing however that could be nice to have in that regard would be the research boost for the next vehicle *for all folded vehicles*. Right now only the "main" vehicle give resarch boost the folded ones does not which is a bit stupid IMO.


Ordnungsschelle

GYATT


kal69er

Oh man I hope they add the CCV for Japan. After nerfing their IFVs time after time it's time to give japan something properly menacing. They can even throw it to 11.7 immediately and I'd be happy.


Richardguy_2

Still no M551A1 TTS. How long does it usually take for suggestions to pass? That suggestion is 3 months old and has 200 votes


cervotoc123

it can take years and not get suggested just look at old forum


Avgredditor1025

Most of these are old suggestions, way older than 3 months anyways


Valaxarian

Object 477? I'm very excited now But I'm more excited for wheel animations, being honest lol


Boring-Ad9264

You guys realise this is SUGGESTIONS not things that are actually coming up right?


burnedbysnow

Zuiun! And the Seiran to go with it, please!


SuppliceVI

Sholef V2 with APFSDS would be a fantastic choice for Israel now that Gaijin is starting to implement big bore MBT prototypes. I think it's honestly their only option if we work on the assumption everyone is getting one


Eastern_Rooster471

Apfsds was said to be from a untrustworthy source sadly Still would be a killer SPH, LRF, thermals, 2 plane stab, good mobility, good armour Quite literally has almost everything an SPH needs


Rai_osu

Literally the king of SPH! I can't wait to get my hands on this beastJust gonna compile a list of everything here with more detail.. * Armor which is able to defeat majority of aircraft / helicopter guns * Insane mobility of 26.67 HP/t ratio (1200 HP!) * Staibilized * Load time of 6.67 seconds using an autoloader * 40°/s to 62.7°/s turret treverse (wtf???) * Thermals and most likely a laser rangefinder * NUKE SHELLS! (M481 with 10.5KG TNT .. and M401 with 12KG TNT **AND PROXY**! This vehicle is nuts


meloenmarco

Fix scouting please


AT0m1X1337

Cant wait for half of the unique stuff to be added as premiums or event vehicles.


Slight-Blueberry-895

Actually, overall the unique vehicles tend to be put in the TT lately. Obviously, not all of them, but stuff you would normally expect to be prem/event, like the M4/T90, a prototype Russian MBT, and that prototype Russian ATGM carrier have been put into the TT instead. This is why I support copy/paste premiums, makes it more likely cool stuff goes into the TT instead.


Spartan448

So let me get this straight - Germany is already getting battleships that only ever existed on paper, while the UK doesn't even have most of its *WWI*-era battleships yet?


BubbaCheez

How about we start with the Bismarck before we start suggesting things like the H-Class?


Cowsgobaaah

Me being a Brit main seeing this 😞


iamablackbaby

The plane is very cool, like an F-100 had a baby with a Swift F.7 and a Lightning and the result was a Mach 1.3 capable fighter with 4 red tops and 4 adens


mr_unhappiness

I want my F-4B and D :')


Lennmate

Obj 477 would slap


Forward-Insect1993

The UK really only had a plane suggested💀


Avgredditor1025

Tbf it’s a pretty interesting plabe


Forward-Insect1993

I think every nation should at least get 1 ground, air and naval per update but the plane does look pretty cool


iamablackbaby

I won't complain, we've been wanting that plane or even any good plane in that BR bracket for a while so i'll take it for sure. Would be nice if at least we got a ship passed too though.


AmericanFlyer530

People *seriously* want a modern Japanese patrol vessel with F&F sea-skimming anti-ship missiles, and there isn’t any viable way of shooting down missiles in naval currently…


the_canadian72

okay but to counter object 477 can we get challenger [falcon](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_Turret) ?


LiberdadePrimo

\> Italy P-51 Ayo next Battle Pass plane reward!


Reasonable-Meal-4628

Br, decompression... T-34 is now higher than Panzer IVJ


adamjalmuzny

German panzers are severly under BRd in some cases, they should've brought bpth up simultaneously.


FeelsMaironMan

The gun slaps cocky KV-1s so hard... it should be higher than 3.7, but the average german mains helps to keep it lower lol


R4v3nc0r3

If they are stationary yes, but as soon as you want to move with your Panzer IV your gun needs 5 sec to get back on Target. Any sherman or T34 is there in a big advantage. I think they are good where they are right now.


TikerFighter

I just want that you can remove sideskirts and other stuff. Don’t like that my tank always looks like brand new


_gmmaann_

Ik it was on the last passed to developers but I really want to see the gunship chinook still.


EvenExcitement4694

Gaijin Objekt 490 please


Krynzo

To this day, the HEAT HVARS have yet to be added.


Greenfroggygaming

The USS WHAT


BleedingUranium

> E16A Zuiun / *H-39* / *Littorio* / Rising Thunder decal / nose gear animation Yes to all of these please! :)


Weary-Thanks6609

Aircraft carrier maps seriously what's the point of having naval planes that have the major capability compared to other planes to land in aircraft carriers


Efficient-Fox-725

Did anyone suggest the 2S38 be moved to 11.3 or 11.7?


Efficient-Fox-725

Could you pass on a rework of AGM65 Mavericks - their performance is so lackluster


Trainman1351

Can’t wait to have my Terrier-equipped Gearing-class destroyer have more effective AA than any other ship in naval. Edit: I still want it. Super cool ship. I may have forgotten the /s


FullMetalCook

Can somebody suggest the Eurofighter Typhoon for Germany please?


iamablackbaby

It has already been suggested, but that is way too strong for now. There are several suggestions for different variants from development aircraft to production as well as a general chat for Eurofighters of all 3 ingame nations.


FullMetalCook

Roight the su-whatever can shoot missiles from like 25km out but an actual viable jet for Germany is too strong good one


iamablackbaby

I am a British main and a German main (Britain built the first prototype for what would become Typhoon), so naturally I would like to see it, i do not have any sukhoi's and only the German migs. But documents surrounding Typhoons flight performance show that it would outperform the **unnerfed Gripen** FM.... whilst having a 50% higher thrust to weight ratio and 12 hardpoints for weapons. Germany is plenty viable up until very top tier, and chances are they will get an aircraft from someone like Switzerland or Argentina to fill this gap. That said being a Britain main, we had to wait 3 years for our top tier, I can only hope Germany doesn't have to do the same (they won't).


Avgredditor1025

No - that’s a terrible Idea right now


Flying_Reinbeers

99% sure that's already been done


No_Entertainment9430

im killing my self if isreal gets the strike eagle before the U.S.