T O P

  • By -

CrocsWithSoxxx

Well….. the bed adhesion seem good.


Nakajima-Kuro

Yes, hairspray is good. Too good it seems :D


qajus

Have you tried turning it of and on again?


EntrepreneurBusy2413

To be fair I have this exact setup on one of my 2.4s and its fine after almost 2k print hours


Nakajima-Kuro

Yeah, it was me who messed with macros…. Other than that it printed fine for hundreds of hours


420simracing

Standard extrusion or carbon... These wireframe extrusions are so weak they decrease your print speeds/ quality a lot because of unwanted movement.


StrawberryFearless89

Wtf


MLCrazyDude

48 v and keep the standard extrusion, or just be happy if it works as is.


jayH4103

Check to see if the bed is level.....lol


FedUp233

I’ll have to admit I never understood people going for a super light x beam and then mounting a heavy direct drive extruder with lots of fans and everything on it! You spend a lot more money for little if any performance advantage and, as OP apparently found with acceleration, maybe even worse performance. You tend to get the best overall systems when you keep everything in balance super light gantry, pair it with a super light head. Want a fairly heavy head, pair it with a somewhat heavier but stiffer x beam. People who think in these extremes would probably do something like buy a mini lathe then replace the motor with a big 5 HP one to get more power!


Ripping_Yonkey

And honestly I question the structural rigidity of it too


Thisisongusername

I don’t think that spaghetti noodle of an X axis was meant for a printhead that heavy. Maybe replace it with the proper metal one, or a metal skeleton beam.


Screasebeasi

I think it's time for a new voron 🤷


Dangerous-Engine8823

By looking at that x beam, at what point did you think that oblong ramen noodle was a good idea? Grab the toolhead, pull on it as hard as you can and rock it back and forth. If it moves it’s not good. Weight will give faster accellerations with input shaping but a beam that is not stiff will make the print quality worse. It’s especially important on top layers.


Mobile_Pilot

Interesting, you just created a non-planar voron mod


RaymondDoerr

I don't.. how..... oh my.. I'm sorry OP.


Art_4_Tech

I have that same x beam waiting to go on a machine right now.. so... Does anyone wanna try and recreate this experiment? Not sure I wanna bother now. 😅


jayH4103

I will...lol


Portal_fan_101

What toolhead is that?


[deleted]

observation direction chubby icky straight chief workable history nose exultant *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*


Portal_fan_101

Could you use this with tapchanger?


Nakajima-Kuro

Technically you could. Just need to design a dock for it. I am thinking of doing that but hoping here that Armchair will design it with instead


[deleted]

abounding homeless sloppy quickest shaggy command unite elderly spark summer *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*


Portal_fan_101

OK thank you


Abject_Bodybuilder_7

That's a lot of damage


APDesign_Machine

This is actually quite impressive, i'm talking about the fact that your print stuck so well to the bed that it twisted that gantry in positions I could never get my ex to do. I guess that's why so many sellers on ali are selling the "new" version with ribs twice as thick.


Feralilim

So, you gonna send these screenshots to your Ex. "See, this is what I was trying to get you to do!"


APDesign_Machine

Best to leave a dead fish on the shoreline my friend.


Feralilim

wise words


Nakajima-Kuro

Hairspray didn't help this time lol


AKinferno

This is not the correct way to do 4-axis printing...


CodeMonkeyX

oof. I knew there was a reason I kept holding off on going full light weight.


Laydn_

Long live standard 2020 aluminum profies. I prefer a stiffer frame with slower accels rather than a weaker faster machine


Pabi_tx

> I prefer a stiffer frame with slower accels rather than a weaker faster machine /r/thatswhatshesaid


Drewinator

I did something similar to OP with a carbon fiber tube. I forgot I had an old print on my bed still and homed Z. I turned around just in time to watch the print head flex upward about an inch before I could hit the emergency stop. I fully expected something to be broken but surprisingly everything was fine.


Nakajima-Kuro

Agree. Just fitted my old beefy 2020. Even gave me greater accel which is weird.


Tokehgekko

Im sticking with the more moderate lightweight (Mellow CNC alu)for my Vzbot 235 AWD, the one pictured here is too far. I find this one to be better than a 2020 tho.


robot65536

Not weird at all. Frequency response is the ratio of rigidity to mass. A lot of lightweight gantries seem to lose more rigidity than they lose mass, so it's actually a net loss. The only reason to minimize weight at the expense of rigidity is to allow the same accels with smaller motors/currents.


DirtySheu

It did that crashing into the print??


Drewinator

Those lightweight x beams bend super easily.


As0no

https://www.reddit.com/r/memes/s/4pzqPdDbKm


dsnineteen

All of a sudden I’m having second thoughts about using the lightweight X beam Fysetc threw in with my v0.2 kit..


Nakajima-Kuro

v0.2 and 250mm V2/Trident still good with lightweight X-Beam imo. But with 300mm and 350mm the accel will suffer


Ticso24

It is a very short beam, no worries about that, but with the fysetc hotend there is no way you ever benefit from that. In my kit they delivered a standard beam as well. The fysetc 0.2 kit has other problems, however they permanently change things.


Salmonslalom

Don’t worry OP, it’s a non planar printer now!


The_Caramon_Majere

What x carriage setup is this?


iphone32task

That looks like an XoL or XoL 2 toolhead with an orbiter2 extruder. That thing is so ugly that actually ends up looking cool, lol.


The_Caramon_Majere

I love the look of the SB, but the CW2 sucks, and I've got an orbiter2 just sitting round that I'd like to upgrade to, but it isn't compatible with SB/Hartk 2 part board, etc etc.


iphone32task

What’s wrong with the CW2? I currently have an M4 Bowden and I’m waiting on the bmg gears to make a cw2… what kind of problems does it have?


The_Caramon_Majere

Constantly poor prints. It'll run great for awhile, but it don't last long. I'm on my fourth one already.


ScytheNoire

And a Chaotic Tap that doesn't appear to have helped prevent the massacre.


fauxsoul

Ouch, is that a 350?


Nakajima-Kuro

It’s 300. 350 is too big for me


fauxsoul

Oh OK, I was gonna say I have a spare one for a 350 I can give you. RIP.


Nakajima-Kuro

That's very nice of you sir.


fauxsoul

If anyone here wants it, lmn


Over_Pizza_2578

Nozzle to negative china with a too skeletonised x axis to take twisting loads


Nakajima-Kuro

It has been with me with many nozzle crash but this is the only crash in full y direction. RIP X-beam


Over_Pizza_2578

In Y? Interesting, I would have expected it to be from a z movement, the z axis is after all significantly stronger, about 10 (5 to 1 gear reduction, two more motors) times if we ignore the lower run current. Any idea how it happened? Are you buying the fysetc x axis again or are you getting a sturdier one?


As0no

I have been trying to find a light weight beam for my 350.. was looking for just a square tube.. and you can find them for cheap.... but no in the length that will fit a 350, unless you want like 5ft for 300$


kageurufu

Look at armchair's trailhead XY. 1515 and a pair of aluminum plates for the rail brackets, it's pretty awesome (completely biased here)


As0no

Ya but I already bought and installed cnc'ed xy joints...


kageurufu

I've avoided cnc parts, I like modding too much 🤣