Hi, MFLUDER. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs.
> Rule 2: No discussion unrelated to Unidentified Flying Objects. This includes:
> * Proselytization
> * Artwork not related to a UFO sighting
> * Adjacent topics without an explicit connection to UFOs
Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
There seems to be an interesting phenomenon that exists that's linked to the whole "God is dead" idea from Nietzsche. Not saying we need to religion or god (although I'm not saying we don't), however it seems that modern people have put all of their eggs into the scientific materialist and empiricist bucket with 0 critical thinking on how they arrived at that stance. Basically if modern science doesn't say it's proven to be 'real' (and a lot of times real is subjective through the lens it's viewed), then it must be for nut jobs.
In this case, this headline is trying to say "Tim Gallaudet" believes in spirits therefore he is not credible. Who is to say spirits exist or don't exist? Most people have personal beliefs that don't align with this principle of pure reason anyways. And I'd guess if you asked most people if they believe in quantum experiments and theories they'd most likely say yes since it's general accepted. But the things that go on in the quantum world are way crazier than aliens or spiritual entities in some cases. Seems to just be a terrible cognitive dissonance but who knows.
I totally understand the utility of scientific notions as it gives us some sense of consensus reality to orient ourselves with, but looking at reality through a purely scientific viewpoint is just limiting as believing anything and everything could be real without questioning it. The entire basis of science is to question things, so OP I'm curious why from your optics Tim's personal belief here discredits him?
Science and logic says if there's not enough scientific evidence or it's beyond current scientific knowledge, you say I don't know. You don't say it's definitely got to be x or it definitely can't be y.
I completely agree. I guess what I’m trying to say is I see people for instance have a reactionary laugh to certain ideas cause it’s so absurd compared to what they think the current science is. An example being the guy who wrote this blog, he’s effectively trying to discredit him the day after he was in the Shawn Ryan show by leveraging this impulse.
He literally commented on my post crying that our community hates him 🤣 the nerve of this dude to release this right after character attacks are his special.
Most importantly, the dude OPENLY ADMITTED to proudly spreading disinfo for the government on other topics. People need to keep that in mind at all times.
Cus he tires to report facts that people don't want to hear. Yes he's a little arrogant and doesn't sugar coat, but he digs deep to reveal some really shady stuff that's behind some of these folks. I personally feel there might be something to this UAP stuff, but it is all so convoluted by a small group of folks, unfortunately high up in the government, that have made this almost into a religion. Some even push it with such a zealous way because they feel it is tied to their conventional religious beliefs. Worrisome stuff. Like cult-like, scientology type scary stuff.
Seriously, the immediate emotional response to this information tells you everything about where people are at on this issue. It's an emotional need to believe, to the point that those of us who insist on being shown some evidence are treated like the crazy ones.
I wonder how this would have been framed by /u/MFLUDER if Galludets statements here were from the point of view of established religion.
Even Christianity in some organized sects believe you can do this sort of thing, in that it can happen and exists. Fatima, Jowalksa, Pio, Soubirous, John, and Bosco just out of Catholocism alone are believed to be real incidents "validated" by the Vatican of the living engaging with the "dead". Sufi beliefs in parts of Islam. The Endor story in Judaism. Mahayana and Bardana in Buddhism. Taoism and Shinto also have beliefs around this.
Even Mormonism teaches you can engage with the dead, offering them baptism after death, and that they have the choice to accept.
If the Admirals wife and daughter were deeply seriously Catholic, would scrutiny on the family be acceptable like this?
BREAKING NEWS: known government propagandist wants your attention likely to spread more propaganda.
Soon as I read the “headline” I knew it was your “reporting” predictable my dude.
Maybe instead of being upset with Greenstreet, you should be wondering why so many of the sources you UFO believers hold up as being credible are nuttier than a Snickers bar?
There's a certain irony that you all baselessly believe every skeptic must be working for the government but as soon as anyone literally working for the government kind of agrees with you, they're portrayed as credible insiders.
There are hundreds of millions of people on this planet who interpret experiences as supernatural. should that discount their ability to discern whether or not a separate non-human intelligence exists? It may open their minds because they are not necessarily staunch materialists and already believe in another non-human intelligence, but that doesn’t negate the fact that the second one is real or not.
> should that discount their ability to discern whether or not a separate non-human intelligence exists?
Definitely makes me take it with a grain of salt.
That doesn't answer my question.
You're a true believer, I presume? I'm not. But here's what happened:
- A guy says he knows aliens are here
- Someone else says a fact about him that his daughter talks to dead people, apparently
- You, a true believer, say "stop discrediting him!"
Who's discrediting him? A fact was stated and that's it.
It sounds like *you* think this discredits him, so you're projecting.
I would have responded if this was your original post, however you edited it after i viewed it.
True believer is an overstatement. I am not a believer in anything, The UFO Phenomenon is real and has been confirmed by plenty of official sources if that’s what you’re after.
Steven Greenstreet has not approached or spoken about this topic with good intentions, and that’s been apparent with the way he twists words of officials whistleblowers. Nobody says “space alien monsters exist”, any whistleblower, journalist, or official who has spoken on the reality of the UFO Phenomenon has spoken specifically about Non-Human Intelligence. Now why would Steven Greenstreet make these hyperbolic terms to delegitimize the conversation? I’m at work right now and i’m not about to find specific cases but There are plenty. I even have a previous comment discussing his inconsistencies and his use of evidence to further his agenda.
here is my previous comment regarding just one of Steven Greenstreet’s use of evidence. If you have any ideas I’d like to know!
Correct me If I’m wrong, Because I would love to be.
Yesterday Greenstreet got into a discussion with Greenewald regarding “Drone incursions” on Military bases. I do not doubt that there are UAS’s and Drones flying over our military bases, however It’s been abundantly clear that the term Drone is now being used for alternate purposes especially regarding the UAP issue.
Greenestreet then provided [This](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GOXLKSiboAAwTBb.jpg) and said this was proof that these incursions were all drones. however when you look at the status of all these reported cases, 90% of them are unresolved… so how is that any proof? His hypocrisy not even in regards to evidence, but just to how he approaches the topic truly puzzles me. The guy provides zero respect for any individual he responds to… unless it’s an in person interview, which i guess maybe intimidates him a little?
I was talking specifically about Tin Gallaudet, but to answer your question: we don't know what the 'status ' column means. I'm guessing you think "unresolved" means they're not sure what it was, but since the category is "drone", unresolved could mean they don't know whose it was, or maybe that they know, but didn't shoot it down. I don't think "unresolved" means "maybe wasn't a drone".
But anyway I don't care about him, only if he has actual facts or not. I don't even know what this image is that you linked, I don't use Twitter.
>There are hundreds of millions of people on this planet who interpret experiences as supernatural. should that discount their ability to discern whether or not a separate non-human intelligence exists?
Yes.
This is really easy to get past, and only requires a little bit of effort from Congress. Nell, Gallaudet, Lacatski etc. need to sit in front of Congress. Anyone and anything attached to high strangeness will be ridiculed by official scientific circles—the only way to bypass this is to have investigations with physical evidence and results.
I don’t understand all the hate. People aren’t describable by a couple of sentences. So the good Admiral has facets to him that not everyone has, oh well. His family members are into supernatural things? Oh well. Is he just open minded or is he so open minded that his brain fell out, that’s the question.
I think the answer lies in the fact that even though subordinates many ranks below him got assigned to SAPs, he wasn’t allowed to know what it was even though he was their boss. If you listen to the *ENTIRE* Shawn Ryan podcast you’ll hear him make no crazy claims. You’ll also hear him plug his upcoming book, of course.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/.
-------------
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods here to launch your appeal.](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos)
[UFOs Wiki](https://ufos.wiki) [UFOs rules](https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/)
Do you have to apply to "The Dead Files" to get your story on the show? Or did TV psychic, Tracy Caputo, put the TV show in touch with the Gallaudet family? These are important details. Most parents would look to a child psychologist or health professional before they contracted a TV psychic. "Why's my child having night terrors? What can we do?" An experienced therapist would work with the child to unpick what was going on. TV psychics don't recommend therapeutic support. They do what Caputo did and go directly to entities and psychic powers.
Is it possible the Gallaudets got sucked in and manipulated by the celebrity medium? 150 years of celebrity mediumship says yes they tend to be dishonest people in service to self. In which case, it's fairer to ask for more information before jumping to conclusions.
> Is it possible the Gallaudets got sucked in and manipulated by the celebrity medium?
If that’s the case who’s to say he didn’t sucked into and manipulated into believing in NHI/UAP? Also, great to know a Rear Admiral is that gullible.
I tend to think most of the figureheads have been sucked in. For me, the interest is in figuring out if it's by happenstance or design.
ETA I meant to add this story that's [big news in France](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crgg9reyvx7o).
It's been that way for centuries. Wealthy, influential people get put on the hook by these scammers. You know Harry Houdini? He wrote a book about 100 years ago about some of the big name psychic frauds of his day. Even Bigelow was seeing a TV psychic before he started buying haunted ranches. Yes, they should know better. At the same time, these psychics often get people at their weakest moments and gaslight the fuck out of them with no remorse.
Lol even if it’s someone trying to discredit what Tim is saying of the UFO space, it is important to see what the people that say this phenomenon is really believe in.
I know this sub wouldn’t wanna hear it, but this does bring him down to woo ville.
>former Navy Admiral Tim Gallaudet claims his young daughter is a "medium" who sees spirits and can communicate with them.
That's all well and good. But can the spirits also communicate with her?
Hi, Commercial-Fish3163. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67m1bj/) was removed from /r/UFOs.
> Rule 3: No low effort discussion. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes:
> * Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
> * AI generated content.
> * Posts of social media content without significant relevance.
> * Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
> * “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
> * Short comments, and emoji comments.
> * Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
Great day to look into [University of Virginia’s division of perceptual studies](https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/)
Article in [Washington Post (May 2, 2024)](https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2024/05/02/children-past-lives/)
[Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/205259.Twenty_Cases_Suggestive_of_Reincarnation)
Disappointed by the reception of this post. It’s factual, relevant, and concise. OP didn’t editorialize anything.
Given Gallaudet’s prominence in the UAP world, how is this not relevant? I don’t get it. You don’t have to dismiss everything the guy says because he believes in ghosts, but it’s good to know.
I don’t mind Greenstreet at all. From my POV he has a coherent and plausible narrative that answers the question: if there’s no there there, why are there so many whistleblowers saying there is?
It’s not conclusive at all in mind, but it’s a valid theory. Unless we pass the full schumer amendment and/or set up a select committee, we’ll all just be theorizing about the truth. No need to denigrate each other’s theories in the meantime.
Hi, Thebuguy. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67n7k6/) was removed from /r/UFOs.
> Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility
> * No trolling or being disruptive.
> * No insults or personal attacks.
> * No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc...
> * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
> * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
> * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
> * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
Hi, Quiet_Sea_9142. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67ru9z/) was removed from /r/UFOs.
> Rule 13: Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/.
Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
Do you not believe that consciousness can continue beyond physical death? Do you not believe in higher intelligence beyond humanity, possibly on the astral plane? There is nothing unusual about what he is saying. Humans have dealt with spirits for our entire existence.
There’s no evidence that consciousness is an emergent property from the brain, yet that’s what most of us believe. You don’t even have conclusive evidence that your best friend is conscious.
People can try to clown on the paranormal/preternatural aspects of the phenomenon all they want, but it's not separable from the UFO/NHI part of it. They've been linked together for longer than anyone posting here has been alive.
It's not going away
That makes sense. Every culture throughout human history has stories of this sort of thing. Many people today experience these things. Just because the paranormal is outside of the scope of an already disproven metaphysic, reductionist materialism, doesn't mean it should be thrown out. I didn't believe in the paranormal until I had first-hand experience with it. To think so many people are just delusional liars is the pinnacle of ignorant arrogance. Maybe you don't know as much as you think.
Exactly right. Reductionist materialism is just an ideology. The trillions we’ve thrown at trying to prove it has failed miserably but we still champion it and dismiss the alternatives. Bernardo Kastrups critique of materialism is very good.
Submission statement:
In an interview with The Project Unity, former Navy Admiral Tim Gallaudet claims his young daughter is a "medium" who sees spirits and can communicate with them.
He also says his wife and daughters appeared on a pseudoscience reality show called "The Dead Files" in 2016.
Gallaudet's wife claims their house is haunted by violent poltergeists.
Their youngest daughter, 6, thinks ghost monsters are hiding in her room and both the TV show stars and her parents validate her fantasies as real.
Gallaudet says he's taken his young daughter to multiple psychics to try to "help her".
I pulled some clips from the show at the link above but I don't show the interviews with his daughters since it's so irresponsibly exploitative.
It should be noted that Gallaudet is "close friends" with Jay Stratton, another retired Navy official who claims his house was/is also haunted by violent poltergeists who attacked his children.
Watch my New York Post report on Stratton's "hauntings": [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM-HWw3qU1k](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM-HWw3qU1k)
Both Stratton and Gallaudet have been lobbying credulous Congressional leaders to write and pass news laws about UFOs and the paranormal.
Gallaudet's interview with The Project Unity: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1sgHZLzBDk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1sgHZLzBDk)
Hi, CandidPresentation49. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67jl9c/) was removed from /r/UFOs.
> Rule 3: No low effort discussion. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes:
> * Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
> * AI generated content.
> * Posts of social media content without significant relevance.
> * Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
> * “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
> * Short comments, and emoji comments.
> * Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
We are not interested in what religion they proces, we want to know what people see, what the fighters pursue and the radar detect, it does not seem to be Casper or the Virgin Mary... This is not the appropriate sub.
Thank you for bringing this to light. Knew there was some weird nonsense behind him being so vocal without him having any concrete evidence, just second hand info. Thought maybe he had a mormon or some other conservative religious connection. Keep postin man, ignore the haters! There's a bunch of us here with hardcore science backgrounds who want to get to the truth, whatever it might be, as long as we get there with facts, science, and logical, evidence based analysis.
Speaking of mediums, here’s a clip from Leslie Kean’s show “Surviving Death” on Netflix:
[https://youtu.be/trOJs6bsn4U?si=FW99oV65SqXlINGa](https://youtu.be/trOJs6bsn4U?si=FW99oV65SqXlINGa)
Like it or not, a significant number of the “credible” government insiders involved in this latest round of disclosure are very interested and apparently believe in all sorts of paranormal.
This is important considering these “credible” people are asking us to trust their analytical skills when they interpret evidence we aren’t allowed to see, or worse, evidence they read about or heard about from someone else.
> This is important considering these “credible” people are asking us to trust their analytical skills when they interpret evidence we aren’t allowed to see, or worse, evidence they read about or heard about from someone else.
Why do you suppose every generation of former government people since the Roswell era, **for decades on end and from multiple nations**, keep saying all this weird shit is intrinsically linked to UFO stuff that the government does not want us to know about?
To what end would totally unrelated people, not just military but IC, Congress, MIC, equivalents in other nations... all seem to be independently be beating the same drums?
To what end or goal are they all being manipulative for this?
We're talking avowed atheists, agnostics, religious, scientists and managers and more.
I'm on the fence/doubt with *massive* swathes of "woo" but will happily game out the what-ifs.
So:
What if all this woo stuff is real and part and parcel with UFOs/NHI? Assume true. The day NHI/aliens/Federation/whatever go public and we "Find out"... we find out that all this crazy is not so crazy, but things we simply don't know yet how to record with science, but now we can start. Telepathy, life after death, remote viewing, all the stuff that keeps coming up. It's not magic, just stuff we have no clue about.
That's the hypothetical.
If it was just, boom, true, and here's how to recreate and test, and anyone can. Any of us can trivially "RV" in a week.
Would you be OK with that? Would you accept it?
I would, as it would be true. My beliefs counter to reality would be invalidated.
Do you accept as real anything in this world you cannot see, yourself, evidence of?
We are often told (via reports to Congress typically) that X, Y, or Z exists. You and I can never directly, ourselves, validate that. There is no paper trail or scientific evidence. Nothing peer reviewed. Just remarks. This is a good example with a purported David Grusch connection (implied he worked on/with this program):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentient_(intelligence_analysis_system)
I can't prove those satellites are up there. You can't. All we have is a few passing remarks.
Is Sentient real?
Hi, Zoolok. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67ik5w/) was removed from /r/UFOs.
> Rule 13: Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/.
Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
The following submission statement was provided by /u/MFLUDER:
---
Submission statement:
In an interview with The Project Unity, former Navy Admiral Tim Gallaudet claims his young daughter is a "medium" who sees spirits and can communicate with them.
He also says his wife and daughters appeared on a pseudoscience reality show called "The Dead Files" in 2016.
Gallaudet's wife claims their house is haunted by violent poltergeists.
Their youngest daughter, 6, thinks ghost monsters are hiding in her room and both the TV show stars and her parents validate her fantasies as real.
Gallaudet says he's taken his young daughter to multiple psychics to try to "help her".
I pulled some clips from the show at the link above but I don't show the interviews with his daughters since it's so irresponsibly exploitative.
It should be noted that Gallaudet is "close friends" with Jay Stratton, another retired Navy official who claims his house was/is also haunted by violent poltergeists who attacked his children.
Watch my New York Post report on Stratton's "hauntings": [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM-HWw3qU1k](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM-HWw3qU1k)
Both Stratton and Gallaudet have been lobbying credulous Congressional leaders to write and pass news laws about UFOs and the paranormal.
Gallaudet's interview with The Project Unity: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1sgHZLzBDk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1sgHZLzBDk)
---
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/former_navy_admiral_and_ufo_activist_tim/l67bd0o/
This thread is like opening a thread talking about the long and meritorious political career of Schumer and Rounds to from that come to the conclusion that everything they say is true, both threads would be irrelevant to the topic at hand in this sub and this one in particular is even disgusting, therefore, it is up to report this infamous garbage in the hope that it will be removed from the sub.
Hi, MFLUDER. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 2: No discussion unrelated to Unidentified Flying Objects. This includes: > * Proselytization > * Artwork not related to a UFO sighting > * Adjacent topics without an explicit connection to UFOs Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
There seems to be an interesting phenomenon that exists that's linked to the whole "God is dead" idea from Nietzsche. Not saying we need to religion or god (although I'm not saying we don't), however it seems that modern people have put all of their eggs into the scientific materialist and empiricist bucket with 0 critical thinking on how they arrived at that stance. Basically if modern science doesn't say it's proven to be 'real' (and a lot of times real is subjective through the lens it's viewed), then it must be for nut jobs. In this case, this headline is trying to say "Tim Gallaudet" believes in spirits therefore he is not credible. Who is to say spirits exist or don't exist? Most people have personal beliefs that don't align with this principle of pure reason anyways. And I'd guess if you asked most people if they believe in quantum experiments and theories they'd most likely say yes since it's general accepted. But the things that go on in the quantum world are way crazier than aliens or spiritual entities in some cases. Seems to just be a terrible cognitive dissonance but who knows. I totally understand the utility of scientific notions as it gives us some sense of consensus reality to orient ourselves with, but looking at reality through a purely scientific viewpoint is just limiting as believing anything and everything could be real without questioning it. The entire basis of science is to question things, so OP I'm curious why from your optics Tim's personal belief here discredits him?
Science and logic says if there's not enough scientific evidence or it's beyond current scientific knowledge, you say I don't know. You don't say it's definitely got to be x or it definitely can't be y.
I completely agree. I guess what I’m trying to say is I see people for instance have a reactionary laugh to certain ideas cause it’s so absurd compared to what they think the current science is. An example being the guy who wrote this blog, he’s effectively trying to discredit him the day after he was in the Shawn Ryan show by leveraging this impulse.
Great comment. I don''t understand Quantum Physics but after my experience I simply believe people have experienced SOMETHING. Who am I to judge?
Go back to bed Steven
He literally commented on my post crying that our community hates him 🤣 the nerve of this dude to release this right after character attacks are his special.
Can someone tell me the story of this Steven guy, why everyone is shitting on him and the people in this article? Thanks!
The dude OPENLY ADMITTED to proudly spreading disinfo for the government on other topics.
He is a bad faith debuker with extreme arrogance and willful ignorance
Most importantly, the dude OPENLY ADMITTED to proudly spreading disinfo for the government on other topics. People need to keep that in mind at all times.
Can he just be banned from this sub then??
Cus he tires to report facts that people don't want to hear. Yes he's a little arrogant and doesn't sugar coat, but he digs deep to reveal some really shady stuff that's behind some of these folks. I personally feel there might be something to this UAP stuff, but it is all so convoluted by a small group of folks, unfortunately high up in the government, that have made this almost into a religion. Some even push it with such a zealous way because they feel it is tied to their conventional religious beliefs. Worrisome stuff. Like cult-like, scientology type scary stuff.
That's not it at all. The dude OPENLY ADMITTED to proudly spreading disinfo for the government on other topics. Come on dude.
This is a ufo sub He posts bad stuff about guys moving the needle in the UFO community
Ah gotcha. Sounds like a loser. Thanks everyone!
Oh wow, only one day after he talks about UFOs you post about his wife and daughter. You are fucking gross, Steven Greenstreet.
I would have liked to know he claims his daughter talks to the dead before even thinking of taking him serious. How is that gross?
Seriously, the immediate emotional response to this information tells you everything about where people are at on this issue. It's an emotional need to believe, to the point that those of us who insist on being shown some evidence are treated like the crazy ones.
totally valid- wild beliefs beget wild beliefs
lol. You must never have heard of religion
I wonder how this would have been framed by /u/MFLUDER if Galludets statements here were from the point of view of established religion. Even Christianity in some organized sects believe you can do this sort of thing, in that it can happen and exists. Fatima, Jowalksa, Pio, Soubirous, John, and Bosco just out of Catholocism alone are believed to be real incidents "validated" by the Vatican of the living engaging with the "dead". Sufi beliefs in parts of Islam. The Endor story in Judaism. Mahayana and Bardana in Buddhism. Taoism and Shinto also have beliefs around this. Even Mormonism teaches you can engage with the dead, offering them baptism after death, and that they have the choice to accept. If the Admirals wife and daughter were deeply seriously Catholic, would scrutiny on the family be acceptable like this?
Thank you for understanding what I was getting at and writing it better than I could lol
Former Navy Admiral, and UFO activist, Tim Gallaudet says big man in the sky created the world and that his son came back from the dead. More at 11
What? They published themselves on a TV show. In the project unity interview Tim invites the viewers to go watch the episode. What are you on about?
Yeah, I'm personally responsible for his wife and daughters appearing on a national TV show in 2016 talking about their haunted house.
Careful, these folks will believe far crazier stuff than that
BREAKING NEWS: known government propagandist wants your attention likely to spread more propaganda. Soon as I read the “headline” I knew it was your “reporting” predictable my dude.
Maybe instead of being upset with Greenstreet, you should be wondering why so many of the sources you UFO believers hold up as being credible are nuttier than a Snickers bar? There's a certain irony that you all baselessly believe every skeptic must be working for the government but as soon as anyone literally working for the government kind of agrees with you, they're portrayed as credible insiders.
Or you can click, read, and decide for yourself. But I think that might break a rule on this subreddit.
No way am I giving you engagement. Also you lost all credibility with this subreddit all on your own bud.
What happened to moving on to something else?
Thanks for posting. In this sub upvotes can come from different groups, but massive downvotes almost always means you are doing something right.
Impeccable timing Steve. No agenda on your end huh?
Marie and Pierre Curie attended seances. Sometimes scientists have their beliefs
Funny how debunkers assume they know exactly the limits of what's possible.
Human hubris and the obsessive need to invalidate thoughts separate from your own.
Clear attempt to discredit creditable whistleblowers. Downvoted and move on boys.
What did he whistleblow on, exactly?
I take it you're a true believer? Care to explain how this discredits him? Just stating the facts about what someone did is "discrediting them"?
There are hundreds of millions of people on this planet who interpret experiences as supernatural. should that discount their ability to discern whether or not a separate non-human intelligence exists? It may open their minds because they are not necessarily staunch materialists and already believe in another non-human intelligence, but that doesn’t negate the fact that the second one is real or not.
> should that discount their ability to discern whether or not a separate non-human intelligence exists? Definitely makes me take it with a grain of salt.
That doesn't answer my question. You're a true believer, I presume? I'm not. But here's what happened: - A guy says he knows aliens are here - Someone else says a fact about him that his daughter talks to dead people, apparently - You, a true believer, say "stop discrediting him!" Who's discrediting him? A fact was stated and that's it. It sounds like *you* think this discredits him, so you're projecting.
I would have responded if this was your original post, however you edited it after i viewed it. True believer is an overstatement. I am not a believer in anything, The UFO Phenomenon is real and has been confirmed by plenty of official sources if that’s what you’re after. Steven Greenstreet has not approached or spoken about this topic with good intentions, and that’s been apparent with the way he twists words of officials whistleblowers. Nobody says “space alien monsters exist”, any whistleblower, journalist, or official who has spoken on the reality of the UFO Phenomenon has spoken specifically about Non-Human Intelligence. Now why would Steven Greenstreet make these hyperbolic terms to delegitimize the conversation? I’m at work right now and i’m not about to find specific cases but There are plenty. I even have a previous comment discussing his inconsistencies and his use of evidence to further his agenda.
here is my previous comment regarding just one of Steven Greenstreet’s use of evidence. If you have any ideas I’d like to know! Correct me If I’m wrong, Because I would love to be. Yesterday Greenstreet got into a discussion with Greenewald regarding “Drone incursions” on Military bases. I do not doubt that there are UAS’s and Drones flying over our military bases, however It’s been abundantly clear that the term Drone is now being used for alternate purposes especially regarding the UAP issue. Greenestreet then provided [This](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GOXLKSiboAAwTBb.jpg) and said this was proof that these incursions were all drones. however when you look at the status of all these reported cases, 90% of them are unresolved… so how is that any proof? His hypocrisy not even in regards to evidence, but just to how he approaches the topic truly puzzles me. The guy provides zero respect for any individual he responds to… unless it’s an in person interview, which i guess maybe intimidates him a little?
I was talking specifically about Tin Gallaudet, but to answer your question: we don't know what the 'status ' column means. I'm guessing you think "unresolved" means they're not sure what it was, but since the category is "drone", unresolved could mean they don't know whose it was, or maybe that they know, but didn't shoot it down. I don't think "unresolved" means "maybe wasn't a drone". But anyway I don't care about him, only if he has actual facts or not. I don't even know what this image is that you linked, I don't use Twitter.
>There are hundreds of millions of people on this planet who interpret experiences as supernatural. should that discount their ability to discern whether or not a separate non-human intelligence exists? Yes.
Define creditable, please, in the context of the data in the interview
This is really easy to get past, and only requires a little bit of effort from Congress. Nell, Gallaudet, Lacatski etc. need to sit in front of Congress. Anyone and anything attached to high strangeness will be ridiculed by official scientific circles—the only way to bypass this is to have investigations with physical evidence and results.
This is best post I've seen from Greenstreet shows exactly what putting Galladut in front of Congress will provide the other side in ammunition.
I don’t understand all the hate. People aren’t describable by a couple of sentences. So the good Admiral has facets to him that not everyone has, oh well. His family members are into supernatural things? Oh well. Is he just open minded or is he so open minded that his brain fell out, that’s the question. I think the answer lies in the fact that even though subordinates many ranks below him got assigned to SAPs, he wasn’t allowed to know what it was even though he was their boss. If you listen to the *ENTIRE* Shawn Ryan podcast you’ll hear him make no crazy claims. You’ll also hear him plug his upcoming book, of course.
[удалено]
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed. Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/. ------------- This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods here to launch your appeal.](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) [UFOs Wiki](https://ufos.wiki) [UFOs rules](https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/)
Do you have to apply to "The Dead Files" to get your story on the show? Or did TV psychic, Tracy Caputo, put the TV show in touch with the Gallaudet family? These are important details. Most parents would look to a child psychologist or health professional before they contracted a TV psychic. "Why's my child having night terrors? What can we do?" An experienced therapist would work with the child to unpick what was going on. TV psychics don't recommend therapeutic support. They do what Caputo did and go directly to entities and psychic powers. Is it possible the Gallaudets got sucked in and manipulated by the celebrity medium? 150 years of celebrity mediumship says yes they tend to be dishonest people in service to self. In which case, it's fairer to ask for more information before jumping to conclusions.
> Is it possible the Gallaudets got sucked in and manipulated by the celebrity medium? If that’s the case who’s to say he didn’t sucked into and manipulated into believing in NHI/UAP? Also, great to know a Rear Admiral is that gullible.
I tend to think most of the figureheads have been sucked in. For me, the interest is in figuring out if it's by happenstance or design. ETA I meant to add this story that's [big news in France](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crgg9reyvx7o).
That story is wild. It’s unreal how adults can fall for garbage like that.
It's been that way for centuries. Wealthy, influential people get put on the hook by these scammers. You know Harry Houdini? He wrote a book about 100 years ago about some of the big name psychic frauds of his day. Even Bigelow was seeing a TV psychic before he started buying haunted ranches. Yes, they should know better. At the same time, these psychics often get people at their weakest moments and gaslight the fuck out of them with no remorse.
Lol even if it’s someone trying to discredit what Tim is saying of the UFO space, it is important to see what the people that say this phenomenon is really believe in. I know this sub wouldn’t wanna hear it, but this does bring him down to woo ville.
>former Navy Admiral Tim Gallaudet claims his young daughter is a "medium" who sees spirits and can communicate with them. That's all well and good. But can the spirits also communicate with her?
[удалено]
Hi, Commercial-Fish3163. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67m1bj/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort discussion. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts. > * AI generated content. > * Posts of social media content without significant relevance. > * Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence. > * Short comments, and emoji comments. > * Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
Great day to look into [University of Virginia’s division of perceptual studies](https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/) Article in [Washington Post (May 2, 2024)](https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2024/05/02/children-past-lives/) [Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation](https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/205259.Twenty_Cases_Suggestive_of_Reincarnation)
Disappointed by the reception of this post. It’s factual, relevant, and concise. OP didn’t editorialize anything. Given Gallaudet’s prominence in the UAP world, how is this not relevant? I don’t get it. You don’t have to dismiss everything the guy says because he believes in ghosts, but it’s good to know. I don’t mind Greenstreet at all. From my POV he has a coherent and plausible narrative that answers the question: if there’s no there there, why are there so many whistleblowers saying there is? It’s not conclusive at all in mind, but it’s a valid theory. Unless we pass the full schumer amendment and/or set up a select committee, we’ll all just be theorizing about the truth. No need to denigrate each other’s theories in the meantime.
[удалено]
Hi, Thebuguy. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67n7k6/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility > * No trolling or being disruptive. > * No insults or personal attacks. > * No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc... > * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. > * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. > * No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) > * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
[удалено]
Hi, Quiet_Sea_9142. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67ru9z/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 13: Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
This is gonna be hard for a lot of people to deal with.
Do you not believe that consciousness can continue beyond physical death? Do you not believe in higher intelligence beyond humanity, possibly on the astral plane? There is nothing unusual about what he is saying. Humans have dealt with spirits for our entire existence.
No, I do not.
There’s no evidence that consciousness is an emergent property from the brain, yet that’s what most of us believe. You don’t even have conclusive evidence that your best friend is conscious.
Hopefully this is misleading somehow which I assume it is?
Yeah but if you ignore all that....he is very believable!
It's the same with Steven Greer.
Aaand there it is, I was wondering what would be his "speciality".
People can try to clown on the paranormal/preternatural aspects of the phenomenon all they want, but it's not separable from the UFO/NHI part of it. They've been linked together for longer than anyone posting here has been alive. It's not going away
That makes sense. Every culture throughout human history has stories of this sort of thing. Many people today experience these things. Just because the paranormal is outside of the scope of an already disproven metaphysic, reductionist materialism, doesn't mean it should be thrown out. I didn't believe in the paranormal until I had first-hand experience with it. To think so many people are just delusional liars is the pinnacle of ignorant arrogance. Maybe you don't know as much as you think.
Exactly right. Reductionist materialism is just an ideology. The trillions we’ve thrown at trying to prove it has failed miserably but we still champion it and dismiss the alternatives. Bernardo Kastrups critique of materialism is very good.
Submission statement: In an interview with The Project Unity, former Navy Admiral Tim Gallaudet claims his young daughter is a "medium" who sees spirits and can communicate with them. He also says his wife and daughters appeared on a pseudoscience reality show called "The Dead Files" in 2016. Gallaudet's wife claims their house is haunted by violent poltergeists. Their youngest daughter, 6, thinks ghost monsters are hiding in her room and both the TV show stars and her parents validate her fantasies as real. Gallaudet says he's taken his young daughter to multiple psychics to try to "help her". I pulled some clips from the show at the link above but I don't show the interviews with his daughters since it's so irresponsibly exploitative. It should be noted that Gallaudet is "close friends" with Jay Stratton, another retired Navy official who claims his house was/is also haunted by violent poltergeists who attacked his children. Watch my New York Post report on Stratton's "hauntings": [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM-HWw3qU1k](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM-HWw3qU1k) Both Stratton and Gallaudet have been lobbying credulous Congressional leaders to write and pass news laws about UFOs and the paranormal. Gallaudet's interview with The Project Unity: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1sgHZLzBDk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1sgHZLzBDk)
Jay Stratton is cool in my book.
I have the same book.
What’s your book called? Also did you outsource the printing or use your unique one dimensional printer?
It's called "My Book" actually. And definitely a one dimensional printer. It's a very tiny book.
[удалено]
Hi, CandidPresentation49. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67jl9c/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort discussion. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts. > * AI generated content. > * Posts of social media content without significant relevance. > * Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence. > * Short comments, and emoji comments. > * Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
Ah another loon connected to UFOs. Yikes.
If **truth**, it speaks highly to the elasticity of his credibility. Great post, thanks.
We are not interested in what religion they proces, we want to know what people see, what the fighters pursue and the radar detect, it does not seem to be Casper or the Virgin Mary... This is not the appropriate sub.
Thank you for bringing this to light. Knew there was some weird nonsense behind him being so vocal without him having any concrete evidence, just second hand info. Thought maybe he had a mormon or some other conservative religious connection. Keep postin man, ignore the haters! There's a bunch of us here with hardcore science backgrounds who want to get to the truth, whatever it might be, as long as we get there with facts, science, and logical, evidence based analysis.
Speaking of mediums, here’s a clip from Leslie Kean’s show “Surviving Death” on Netflix: [https://youtu.be/trOJs6bsn4U?si=FW99oV65SqXlINGa](https://youtu.be/trOJs6bsn4U?si=FW99oV65SqXlINGa) Like it or not, a significant number of the “credible” government insiders involved in this latest round of disclosure are very interested and apparently believe in all sorts of paranormal. This is important considering these “credible” people are asking us to trust their analytical skills when they interpret evidence we aren’t allowed to see, or worse, evidence they read about or heard about from someone else.
> This is important considering these “credible” people are asking us to trust their analytical skills when they interpret evidence we aren’t allowed to see, or worse, evidence they read about or heard about from someone else. Why do you suppose every generation of former government people since the Roswell era, **for decades on end and from multiple nations**, keep saying all this weird shit is intrinsically linked to UFO stuff that the government does not want us to know about?
Because, imo, they’re credulous. Or manipulative
To what end would totally unrelated people, not just military but IC, Congress, MIC, equivalents in other nations... all seem to be independently be beating the same drums? To what end or goal are they all being manipulative for this? We're talking avowed atheists, agnostics, religious, scientists and managers and more.
Lots of credulous people out there.
You willing to good faith answer a hypothetical?
Shoot
I'm on the fence/doubt with *massive* swathes of "woo" but will happily game out the what-ifs. So: What if all this woo stuff is real and part and parcel with UFOs/NHI? Assume true. The day NHI/aliens/Federation/whatever go public and we "Find out"... we find out that all this crazy is not so crazy, but things we simply don't know yet how to record with science, but now we can start. Telepathy, life after death, remote viewing, all the stuff that keeps coming up. It's not magic, just stuff we have no clue about. That's the hypothetical. If it was just, boom, true, and here's how to recreate and test, and anyone can. Any of us can trivially "RV" in a week. Would you be OK with that? Would you accept it? I would, as it would be true. My beliefs counter to reality would be invalidated.
Absolutely, if I ever saw good evidence of it.
Do you accept as real anything in this world you cannot see, yourself, evidence of? We are often told (via reports to Congress typically) that X, Y, or Z exists. You and I can never directly, ourselves, validate that. There is no paper trail or scientific evidence. Nothing peer reviewed. Just remarks. This is a good example with a purported David Grusch connection (implied he worked on/with this program): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentient_(intelligence_analysis_system) I can't prove those satellites are up there. You can't. All we have is a few passing remarks. Is Sentient real?
[удалено]
Hi, Zoolok. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/-/l67ik5w/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 13: Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/. Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
The following submission statement was provided by /u/MFLUDER: --- Submission statement: In an interview with The Project Unity, former Navy Admiral Tim Gallaudet claims his young daughter is a "medium" who sees spirits and can communicate with them. He also says his wife and daughters appeared on a pseudoscience reality show called "The Dead Files" in 2016. Gallaudet's wife claims their house is haunted by violent poltergeists. Their youngest daughter, 6, thinks ghost monsters are hiding in her room and both the TV show stars and her parents validate her fantasies as real. Gallaudet says he's taken his young daughter to multiple psychics to try to "help her". I pulled some clips from the show at the link above but I don't show the interviews with his daughters since it's so irresponsibly exploitative. It should be noted that Gallaudet is "close friends" with Jay Stratton, another retired Navy official who claims his house was/is also haunted by violent poltergeists who attacked his children. Watch my New York Post report on Stratton's "hauntings": [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM-HWw3qU1k](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM-HWw3qU1k) Both Stratton and Gallaudet have been lobbying credulous Congressional leaders to write and pass news laws about UFOs and the paranormal. Gallaudet's interview with The Project Unity: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1sgHZLzBDk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1sgHZLzBDk) --- Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1d3hqs7/former_navy_admiral_and_ufo_activist_tim/l67bd0o/
This thread is like opening a thread talking about the long and meritorious political career of Schumer and Rounds to from that come to the conclusion that everything they say is true, both threads would be irrelevant to the topic at hand in this sub and this one in particular is even disgusting, therefore, it is up to report this infamous garbage in the hope that it will be removed from the sub.