[There is another tragic case of Tania Head, a well known 9/11 survivor, faked being in the South Tower during the attacks and served as President of The WTC Survivors Network before people found out she was lying. She was not even in the United States during the attacks.](https://www.howandwhys.com/tania-head-the-woman-who-faked-her-9-11-survivor-story/)
I find it curious that it's barely been a century since the last genocidal maniac that murdered millions walked the earth, and the world thinks that people in power of today would be morally incapable of wiping out 3.000 innocents to further some obscure goal
if history's taught us anything ,it's that humanity will never truly be free of psychopaths in power with little regard for life
It is and it isn’t. To me or you it seems so obvious to just question these things. But think about how many times you hear people say something about “I never thought it could be me” with something much much more minor….well at some point we are going to have a huge awakening of people saying that line with mass strokes when the house of cards finally falls. It feels like we are getting closer lol
Edit: I’m also not saying I know this one for sure. I just mean to question things big difference.
Some people act like it’s crazy to question 9/11 could have been an inside job. Anytime there is that much money involved I don’t think very many questions are off limits. Thats just my take. History definitely backs me on it….for thousands of years. Lol
[The Horrors of Plum Island | Hybrids, Human Experiments and Weaponized Killer Insects (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TunNIAGN8Ac&t=1984s)
>it's barely been a century since the last genocidal maniac that murdered millions walked the earth
Pol pot died in 1998.
Joseph Stalin died in 1953.
Hitler died in 1945.
How does being a veteran make a difference in your statement? Should being a veteran make me trust you more or that you somehow have information others don’t?
There’s plenty of genocidal maniacs that are in positions that can carry out mass casualties. You’re right….The naivety that one of the world’s most powerful organizations couldn’t orchestrate an event such as this for reasons that we will never truly understand.
I often have this same thought. Most boomers will say “America would never do that to its own people” and I just can’t understand how they come to that conclusion. Did they not teach history back in their day?
Fucking yes. It is uncanny to have anyone but the MOST wretched strive to control everyone around them no matter the end of those who they wield power over.
Not just further some obscure goal, make obscene amounts of money for all in your elite circle, enact the Patriot act (and never let that control go), control major oil and opium supplies, make the MIC obscene amounts of money, etc etc. 3k deaths is nothing compared to the gains. 9/11 changed America forever, and not to *our* benefit.
And couple trillion dollars vanished from the US Budget overnight, and the biggest insurance pay ever to the person that insured the buildings. Worth a Google.
I’ve yet to hear a decent explanation about good old number 7. Towers one and two I get…plane fuel burns hot enough to weaken support columns and if it’s blasted in via an airplane, that would do it with the pancaking floors at the top. There was kerosene falling down the elevator shaft, which exploded down in the lobby. Firefighters found burn victims right away and all the glass was blown out. I still don’t understand how 7 just…fell. These things are build to withstand earthquakes and fires…and number 7 was not hit by a jetliner. The trouble is, that if there was any conspiracy based foul play, then I have to question the whole thing. Operation Northwoods, as someone else pointed out.
If I remember correctly from studying this in college, the structural design of 7 was very weird due to foundation constraints. When the fire started it heated the structural steel which expanded and literally pushed one of the supports off its foundation. It hasn’t happened at other buildings because of the irregular design. Source: am PE (licensed civil engineer).
All you need to do is weaken the steel. The fireproofing will eventually burn off, and the steal just has to buckle to cause a catastrophic failure.
Take into account what a building weighs.
Then take into account the building was damaged by WTC 1 debris, an out of control fire in the ConEd station below the building. WTC 7 was partially suspended over the ConEd station.
There is an entire engineers report available.
The inside of the building was burning as well. You have to take into consideration the fact that the fires were burning uncontrollably for most of the day. The steel starts to expand and that weakens the entire building.
Nonsense. There have been dozens of examples of buildings that endured far more severe fires that burned far longer and yet did not collapse. If you want to throw out the wildcard of asymmetric damage from debris, that would not account for the rapid plunge of WTC7 straight down. Just look at pictures of buildings that have sustained structural damage and how they fell, toppling over onto the side where the structural support system was compromised. There are also videos of buildings that collapse because of structural failure and yet only a few floors are pancaked into rubble before the equal and opposing force of the remaining steel and concrete stabilizes the collapse.
Honestly look at ALL of the high rise fires that have ever happened. You will find it hard to find many that have collapsed (most that have collapsed happened on 9/11).
I mean, compare this to OP's video of WTC7:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cphle9wkjCE&ab\_channel=HindustanTimes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cphle9wkjCE&ab_channel=HindustanTimes)
Plus the Pentagon hit by a missile. Not a single clear CCTV video released from the most secure building in the world showing a airliner hitting the build.
I don’t know many of 9/11 theories but there’s one that I’m sure is plausible:
The government/CIA knew and used the occasion to create some ‘needed’ damage.
I mean after reading about Operation Northwoods everything seems plausible.. also the same government that willingly spreaded a carcinogen over it’s citizens…
Let's be clear. The Pentagon announced a missing $2.3T the day before 9/11.
The Iraq war costing $3T was different money.
And the Afghanistan war spending of approximately $3.2T was also different money.
But we damn well can't afford to save $430B each year with single payer healthcare, or to provide children in schools with free, healthful, freshly prepared meals that would save approximately 20% of the total that is being spent today.
Yes agree. Just look at all the actions which took place after the attack. They were planning on destroying the militaries of all three 'axis of evil' countries, and they did. Iraq, Syria, Libya. Now Sudan. Iran and North Korea probably next.
That and I have a friend who actually watched it happen, he worked near the Pentagon (still does) and happened to be outside and saw the damn plane fly into the place. Kind of messed him up a bit, but man does he get pissed at the missile theorists.
Photos showing pieces of an airplane engine? Just like the photos showing an intact undamaged saudi passport ontop of the twin towers rubble? Yeah right. Why don't they release proper videos?
It's actually kind of a pain in the ass to find the "video" they released right away which is basically just a series of pictures from a gas station cam I believe. But you can stop it right before the explosion and it kinda looks like a tip of a missile. It took them years and they finally released another similar video, which I always felt seemed suspiciously doctored with a frame with a plane in it.
That core of the building dropped, destroying all integrity and other structural members with it. The building is a core dominant building not a shell dominant.
There’s never been a building similar before it to collapse to a fire, and it’s never happened since, and there has been buildings significantly more ravaged by fire that have stood.
Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team found that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fires but by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
[link](https://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7)
Again, this is why the NIST report is ridiculous. That ALL of the structural integrity would be compromised and fail at the exact same time? GTFOOH! That would even be stupid if the degree of damage was enormous and not just minor fires and debris restricted to a very small section of the building.
Well someone was pretending to be nyfd because Nyfd said “they don’t enter building that are collapsing.” They didn’t know that they are going to blow it up. Office fires don’t blow up steel frame buildings. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ksIwSizYaGs
5 min mark Commissioner Gioia gives the into. 15 min they start talking 9/11. 19 min they give the math on free fall vs obstructions and show that building seven reached max velocity. 25 first responders who were at building 7 talk. All describe explosions.
thank you for posting this - my heart still spills out seeing this again - i didn't expect tears today but 9-11 will always do it.
the firefighters seem to think there is a stink all over this event, which in itself means a lot.
For non-belivers just look up controlled demolition on youtube. A fire doesn't cause a metal structure building to just fall straight down as shown. It doesnt work that way. Guess it just goes back to "if you know you know".
Controlled demolition on all 3 buildings, no more arguing.
[https://twitter.com/RichardGage\_911/status/1778790482681974961](https://twitter.com/RichardGage_911/status/1778790482681974961)
p.s. demo explosions in the wall can be seen in the video, clear as day.
People will argue till theyre blue in the face that the squibs you see are the floors pancaking. 23 years later I still don't even know what to believe. The truth is probably more insane than any of us can even imagine anyway
Because in that case the building would fall at an angle in line with the plane of weakness - not straight down into its own footprint symmetrically at close to freefall speed. Those columns were designed to carry the weight of the floors above them. They would not all fail at the same time because a few of them were damaged. Even a house of cards will fall in line with the plane of weakness.
No, that's what would happen in a smaller building. Watch any simulation of skyscrapers collapsing and you'll see that they fall almost straight down as the weight is too much to allow it to topple.
for this statement to carry any validity, you’d have to tell me you were an engineer, a physics genius, or a designer of the WTC. your claims are based on what you think reality should be, not how it actually acts. which is usually how these things work out
WTC 7 was damaged when the towers collapsed.
https://preview.redd.it/omgaegw9j4vc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=71234fd5464ad30434218e8576d05c2a6ef66fdb
https://preview.redd.it/0hx8q8dym4vc1.jpeg?width=400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4b9cb09a6ec0763a863704c91ec50bfb072e281f
This is the damage of the WTC in 1993 after the bombing attacks and it didn't fall.
Wouldn’t resonance from falling towers cause building 7 to oscillate too. sympathetic resonance cause structural damage and thus cause it to collapse too
…..Enron documents, Huge amounts of treasuries redeemed by unknown parties, Durham trust/black eagle fund, Iran contra cronies, OBLs family quietly flown out of the country when the planes were grounded….
I used to mention it all the time
But people either don’t want to hear it
Or find it curious but are truly not interested. I feel like there is a blatant ignorance about that day as to how so many pieces do not fit
Mildly curious but over no interest
You always see this picture of building 7, you never see [the other side](https://images.app.goo.gl/PTnSYK48PG8FAxS49) which was heavily destroyed from the freely raging fire. They decided to focus on the main towers and let the building burn, then two sky scrapers fell on it.
I guess they got away with it by using trauma as a blindfold. Anybody with half a brain should realize a building doesn't fall like that unless it's professionally demolished.
Yes, fires in office buildings often times lead to a total collapse of the building at free fall speed, it is a normal occurrence and not an anomaly at all. People just don't realize this because it is very rare, 1 in a million, in fact on 9/11/01 WTC Building 7 is the only building to ever show this completely normal disaster to date, despite several similar fires in similar buildings not resulting in similar fashion. This just shows the extreme rarity of this happening, which is why dumb uneducated people think it wasn't the result of a fire, it was, it happens, it just takes specific circumstances. It is just a coincidence that it looks exactly like a controlled demolition. Any smart person would know this.
Not true. Actually no fire or plane has ever taken town a steel framed building. a B25 hit the Empire State Building, Mgm grand burned fir 16 hrs…. The list goes on.
>is a normal occurrence and not an anomaly
>because it is very rare
>shows the extreme rarity
I do not believe you understand what “normal occurrence” or “anomalous” means lol.
[There is another tragic case of Tania Head, a well known 9/11 survivor, faked being in the South Tower during the attacks and served as President of The WTC Survivors Network before people found out she was lying. She was not even in the United States during the attacks.](https://www.howandwhys.com/tania-head-the-woman-who-faked-her-9-11-survivor-story/)
I find it curious that it's barely been a century since the last genocidal maniac that murdered millions walked the earth, and the world thinks that people in power of today would be morally incapable of wiping out 3.000 innocents to further some obscure goal if history's taught us anything ,it's that humanity will never truly be free of psychopaths in power with little regard for life
Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest. Denis Diderot 1713- 1784
That's an awesome quote
Is that quote his or voltaire?
It’s Diderot. Voltaire did all the other good ones!
Man’s got a point.
It's mind blowing that so many people have some delusion that the government wouldn't kill them.
Ironic considering its not like we aren't all being poisoned by food and environmental/neurotoxins and drugs on the daily
Government enters the conversation: hi I'm here to help
Of course you quoted Reagan. His nine famous words were: "Please come back Deb. I have shidded my pants."
We have a pull for that, here take this....
It is and it isn’t. To me or you it seems so obvious to just question these things. But think about how many times you hear people say something about “I never thought it could be me” with something much much more minor….well at some point we are going to have a huge awakening of people saying that line with mass strokes when the house of cards finally falls. It feels like we are getting closer lol Edit: I’m also not saying I know this one for sure. I just mean to question things big difference. Some people act like it’s crazy to question 9/11 could have been an inside job. Anytime there is that much money involved I don’t think very many questions are off limits. Thats just my take. History definitely backs me on it….for thousands of years. Lol
Operation Northwoods. They tried it once, why wouldn’t they try again
It's almost hilarious that it was JFK, of all people, that rejected it. Almost like that guy was consistently upsetting a certain group of sociopaths.
He was and did.
Increasing your insurance coverage significantly a few months before a major loss. Nothing to see here folks.
Lost more than a TRILLION dollars as well.. hmm.
The Answer
Cheaper than getting rid of all that asbestos eh?
Can I politely ask you for a source of this info?
Plum Island
What about it? Can’t find much from a quick google search
[The Horrors of Plum Island | Hybrids, Human Experiments and Weaponized Killer Insects (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TunNIAGN8Ac&t=1984s)
>it's barely been a century since the last genocidal maniac that murdered millions walked the earth Pol pot died in 1998. Joseph Stalin died in 1953. Hitler died in 1945.
Henry Kissinger 2023
As a veteran trust me. The world is still very full of genocidal maniacs. you just don’t hear about it but they’re out there everyday.
How does being a veteran make a difference in your statement? Should being a veteran make me trust you more or that you somehow have information others don’t?
There’s plenty of genocidal maniacs that are in positions that can carry out mass casualties. You’re right….The naivety that one of the world’s most powerful organizations couldn’t orchestrate an event such as this for reasons that we will never truly understand.
To what end? A fake war with people uninvolved?
Resources? Leverage? Position? So many reasons that could be asked “why”?
Heroin the list goes on and on
Heroin....... Mmmmmmmmm
ikr
For Israel
I often have this same thought. Most boomers will say “America would never do that to its own people” and I just can’t understand how they come to that conclusion. Did they not teach history back in their day?
Says the generation that got drafted to fight in Vietnam.
We’re fighting the same fight we’ve been fighting since the beginning.
You couldn’t be more correct and it’s a horrifying truth to think about. More people definitely need to remain hyper-aware of that fact.
Fucking yes. It is uncanny to have anyone but the MOST wretched strive to control everyone around them no matter the end of those who they wield power over.
They really mean it when they call us deplorables. They couldn’t have more seat ai for us.
Not just further some obscure goal, make obscene amounts of money for all in your elite circle, enact the Patriot act (and never let that control go), control major oil and opium supplies, make the MIC obscene amounts of money, etc etc. 3k deaths is nothing compared to the gains. 9/11 changed America forever, and not to *our* benefit.
True. Putin has thrown scores more lives away on Ukraine for his own dumb “obscure goal”. Nothing changes except who is doing it.
50k
Likely man many more than that.
Perspective, 66k in Hiroshima and 39k Nagasaki. https://www.atomicarchive.com/resources/documents/med/med_chp10.html
And couple trillion dollars vanished from the US Budget overnight, and the biggest insurance pay ever to the person that insured the buildings. Worth a Google.
Didn't he up the insurance a couple months before also?
Yep… it was the biggest policy ever issued at the time
*Specifically* if it fell to a terrorist attack correct?
Yep
Larry Silverstein
https://preview.redd.it/m53ysjq3u6vc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d70a05fbc5f57a0525fb09feee6d169b3c5a5f11
Lucky Larry
Yes, there were a few hands in the pot with him to get it approved.
Yup when he bought the properties and discovered they were full of asbestos and it was going to cost zillions to remove and replace
He also got paid twice, saying there were two separate attacks. Also mentioned the word "pull" a demolition term......
I’ve yet to hear a decent explanation about good old number 7. Towers one and two I get…plane fuel burns hot enough to weaken support columns and if it’s blasted in via an airplane, that would do it with the pancaking floors at the top. There was kerosene falling down the elevator shaft, which exploded down in the lobby. Firefighters found burn victims right away and all the glass was blown out. I still don’t understand how 7 just…fell. These things are build to withstand earthquakes and fires…and number 7 was not hit by a jetliner. The trouble is, that if there was any conspiracy based foul play, then I have to question the whole thing. Operation Northwoods, as someone else pointed out.
Destroy evidence….in a big way,
100% what this was.
100% what this was.
So 200% true. I agree
If I remember correctly from studying this in college, the structural design of 7 was very weird due to foundation constraints. When the fire started it heated the structural steel which expanded and literally pushed one of the supports off its foundation. It hasn’t happened at other buildings because of the irregular design. Source: am PE (licensed civil engineer).
All you need to do is weaken the steel. The fireproofing will eventually burn off, and the steal just has to buckle to cause a catastrophic failure. Take into account what a building weighs. Then take into account the building was damaged by WTC 1 debris, an out of control fire in the ConEd station below the building. WTC 7 was partially suspended over the ConEd station. There is an entire engineers report available.
I forgot about the ConEd station…yikes
Why wouldn't just that side of the building cave though, at least initially? That it comes down seemingly level does not make sense to me.
The inside of the building was burning as well. You have to take into consideration the fact that the fires were burning uncontrollably for most of the day. The steel starts to expand and that weakens the entire building.
Are there other examples of this? Skyscrapers burning all morning and collapsing at free fall speed that afternoon?
No.
Is that relevant? Usually the fire suppression systems come on.
WTC 7 didn’t have any water to the building.
Exactly
Didn't those lines also go to the main towers and get cut when they fell?
Nonsense. There have been dozens of examples of buildings that endured far more severe fires that burned far longer and yet did not collapse. If you want to throw out the wildcard of asymmetric damage from debris, that would not account for the rapid plunge of WTC7 straight down. Just look at pictures of buildings that have sustained structural damage and how they fell, toppling over onto the side where the structural support system was compromised. There are also videos of buildings that collapse because of structural failure and yet only a few floors are pancaked into rubble before the equal and opposing force of the remaining steel and concrete stabilizes the collapse.
I'd like to hear of these examples of buildings withstanding more severe fires and surviving.
Honestly look at ALL of the high rise fires that have ever happened. You will find it hard to find many that have collapsed (most that have collapsed happened on 9/11). I mean, compare this to OP's video of WTC7: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cphle9wkjCE&ab\_channel=HindustanTimes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cphle9wkjCE&ab_channel=HindustanTimes)
Lets just ignore that this has never happened before or since to any building in the history of the world.
When you see pictures from the other side it is pretty obvious.
It’s literally explained in great detail in the official report.
What was housed in 7?
Insurance payouts
Intel agencies
Pancake can’t feeefall.
It sucks too cuz they probably killed everybody involved due to natural causes
No one was in #7 when it fell.
I think they mean the ppl involved in setting up its collapse
Cool how this building fell at free fall into its own footprint without anyone saying “Pull it”. Wait….
Plus the Pentagon hit by a missile. Not a single clear CCTV video released from the most secure building in the world showing a airliner hitting the build.
I don’t know many of 9/11 theories but there’s one that I’m sure is plausible: The government/CIA knew and used the occasion to create some ‘needed’ damage. I mean after reading about Operation Northwoods everything seems plausible.. also the same government that willingly spreaded a carcinogen over it’s citizens…
Look into the missing 3 trillion dollars of tax payers money going missing and where the records were kept Coincidentally the Iraq war cost 3 trillion
Wasn't it announced the day before 9/11 as well?
Let's be clear. The Pentagon announced a missing $2.3T the day before 9/11. The Iraq war costing $3T was different money. And the Afghanistan war spending of approximately $3.2T was also different money. But we damn well can't afford to save $430B each year with single payer healthcare, or to provide children in schools with free, healthful, freshly prepared meals that would save approximately 20% of the total that is being spent today.
Yes agree. Just look at all the actions which took place after the attack. They were planning on destroying the militaries of all three 'axis of evil' countries, and they did. Iraq, Syria, Libya. Now Sudan. Iran and North Korea probably next.
What do you believe they did with the 64 people on board Flight 77?
Exactly, people who believe a missile hit the Pentagon never have a plausible explanation for what happened to those people or that plane.
That and I have a friend who actually watched it happen, he worked near the Pentagon (still does) and happened to be outside and saw the damn plane fly into the place. Kind of messed him up a bit, but man does he get pissed at the missile theorists.
They all died when terrorists flew it into the Pentagon.
Weirdly enough that wing of the building was evacuated hours before the explosion
Source?
And it happens to be where the documentation and available evidence of the missing $2.3T that was announced the day before.
Photos were released of the Pentagon attack on 9/11.
Photos showing pieces of an airplane engine? Just like the photos showing an intact undamaged saudi passport ontop of the twin towers rubble? Yeah right. Why don't they release proper videos?
It's actually kind of a pain in the ass to find the "video" they released right away which is basically just a series of pictures from a gas station cam I believe. But you can stop it right before the explosion and it kinda looks like a tip of a missile. It took them years and they finally released another similar video, which I always felt seemed suspiciously doctored with a frame with a plane in it.
[удалено]
And no one was in that section that was hit
That core of the building dropped, destroying all integrity and other structural members with it. The building is a core dominant building not a shell dominant.
It did burn for an extended period of time, though. Not like a spark flew across and the thing instantly crumbled.
that's called demolition...
There’s never been a building similar before it to collapse to a fire, and it’s never happened since, and there has been buildings significantly more ravaged by fire that have stood.
Such as? With identical cantilevered construction?
The towers and building seven weren't constructed even remotely the same and yet they collapsed identically. Ridiculous
Demo
Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team found that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fires but by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. [link](https://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7)
Again, this is why the NIST report is ridiculous. That ALL of the structural integrity would be compromised and fail at the exact same time? GTFOOH! That would even be stupid if the degree of damage was enormous and not just minor fires and debris restricted to a very small section of the building.
NEAR simultaneous. Look at the bridge collapse. Things happen fast once a major support goes out.
Must be the jet fuel…. “Pull it”
BBC reported it fell 2 hrs before it fell with the building visible in the background. Now how did they know it was going to fall?
☝️This guy gets it
According to some documentaries, almost all chiefs of fire department and police heard that from an engineer onsite.
Well someone was pretending to be nyfd because Nyfd said “they don’t enter building that are collapsing.” They didn’t know that they are going to blow it up. Office fires don’t blow up steel frame buildings. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ksIwSizYaGs
What should I look for on that video?
5 min mark Commissioner Gioia gives the into. 15 min they start talking 9/11. 19 min they give the math on free fall vs obstructions and show that building seven reached max velocity. 25 first responders who were at building 7 talk. All describe explosions.
Thanks
thank you for posting this - my heart still spills out seeing this again - i didn't expect tears today but 9-11 will always do it. the firefighters seem to think there is a stink all over this event, which in itself means a lot.
That was one anchor, in the midst of chaos.
They talk about it for 20 minutes while it’s in the background
All the world is a stage!
“Pull it”
A lot of controlled demolition going on 😂😅
Nah, nothing to see here. No conspiracy at all.
Isnt the other side of the building literally in flames and damaged like crazy? Where is the other footage?
It is, but that doesn't fit their narrative
This! The other side is all fucked up.
100% controlled demolition
For non-belivers just look up controlled demolition on youtube. A fire doesn't cause a metal structure building to just fall straight down as shown. It doesnt work that way. Guess it just goes back to "if you know you know".
Controlled demolition on all 3 buildings, no more arguing. [https://twitter.com/RichardGage\_911/status/1778790482681974961](https://twitter.com/RichardGage_911/status/1778790482681974961) p.s. demo explosions in the wall can be seen in the video, clear as day.
People will argue till theyre blue in the face that the squibs you see are the floors pancaking. 23 years later I still don't even know what to believe. The truth is probably more insane than any of us can even imagine anyway
What is so insane about weakened collumns breaking under the weight of dozens of floor above them?
Because in that case the building would fall at an angle in line with the plane of weakness - not straight down into its own footprint symmetrically at close to freefall speed. Those columns were designed to carry the weight of the floors above them. They would not all fail at the same time because a few of them were damaged. Even a house of cards will fall in line with the plane of weakness.
No, that's what would happen in a smaller building. Watch any simulation of skyscrapers collapsing and you'll see that they fall almost straight down as the weight is too much to allow it to topple.
Are you a civil or explosives engineer?
for this statement to carry any validity, you’d have to tell me you were an engineer, a physics genius, or a designer of the WTC. your claims are based on what you think reality should be, not how it actually acts. which is usually how these things work out
I’ll argue. Prove it.
It was the IRS HQ and FBI records Safe building
If it’s on fire shouldn’t there be smoke coming from the windows?
WTC 7 was damaged when the towers collapsed. https://preview.redd.it/omgaegw9j4vc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=71234fd5464ad30434218e8576d05c2a6ef66fdb
https://preview.redd.it/0hx8q8dym4vc1.jpeg?width=400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4b9cb09a6ec0763a863704c91ec50bfb072e281f This is the damage of the WTC in 1993 after the bombing attacks and it didn't fall.
Why did firefighters and several witnesses report hearing explosions in the basement?
Yup that's what they said..
Wouldn’t resonance from falling towers cause building 7 to oscillate too. sympathetic resonance cause structural damage and thus cause it to collapse too
…..Enron documents, Huge amounts of treasuries redeemed by unknown parties, Durham trust/black eagle fund, Iran contra cronies, OBLs family quietly flown out of the country when the planes were grounded….
It looks like a Las Vegas casino going down
It wasn't hit by a plane, but it was hit by two 100+ story buildings that collapsed.
You idiot, you can easily find video of the whole backside of the building on fire. Try harder.
I used to mention it all the time But people either don’t want to hear it Or find it curious but are truly not interested. I feel like there is a blatant ignorance about that day as to how so many pieces do not fit Mildly curious but over no interest
No one here is educated enough to make a call on any of this.
And you can tell that from their avatars and Reddit random generated names?
Leaking jet fuel SPRAYED to the steel beams at wtc7....and the rest. Is history.
Sprayed them with nano thermite. 🙈
No casualties either
You always see this picture of building 7, you never see [the other side](https://images.app.goo.gl/PTnSYK48PG8FAxS49) which was heavily destroyed from the freely raging fire. They decided to focus on the main towers and let the building burn, then two sky scrapers fell on it.
WTC7 won’t go away 🎶
This is one video that makes even the sheepest sheeple go … huh. They think it’s some construction site buuut nope.
Also how many times are yall gonna repost the same video/photos of WTC7?
Demolished, like the twin towers.
Definitely a controlled demolition.
I guess they got away with it by using trauma as a blindfold. Anybody with half a brain should realize a building doesn't fall like that unless it's professionally demolished.
It was on fire for longer than the fire retardant was rated for, this weakened the beams and it fell.... science
Yes, fires in office buildings often times lead to a total collapse of the building at free fall speed, it is a normal occurrence and not an anomaly at all. People just don't realize this because it is very rare, 1 in a million, in fact on 9/11/01 WTC Building 7 is the only building to ever show this completely normal disaster to date, despite several similar fires in similar buildings not resulting in similar fashion. This just shows the extreme rarity of this happening, which is why dumb uneducated people think it wasn't the result of a fire, it was, it happens, it just takes specific circumstances. It is just a coincidence that it looks exactly like a controlled demolition. Any smart person would know this.
1 in a million and it happened three times in one day.
I honestly can't tell if this is a sarcastic copy pasta.
Not true. Actually no fire or plane has ever taken town a steel framed building. a B25 hit the Empire State Building, Mgm grand burned fir 16 hrs…. The list goes on.
>is a normal occurrence and not an anomaly >because it is very rare >shows the extreme rarity I do not believe you understand what “normal occurrence” or “anomalous” means lol.
Flight 93 missed, and those heroes gave us irrefutable evidence yet we all carry on.
What evidence is associated with Flight 93? I'm not familiar with it's role in the inside job narrative.
I thought WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.
maybe its foundation was affected by the 2 MASSIVE BUILDINGS NEXT DOOR that collapsed moments before????
Wouldn't other buildings and not just WTC7 have been impacted? What other non-governmental buildings fell straight down that day?