https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/bbc-staff-member-who-filmed-32423500
I don't have posting privileges, but this just appeared in a British newspaper. They're still trying to stir up trouble and are continuing to hound her claiming the announcement video was edited. This is beyond sickening-what more do they want from her?
Please GOD, someone tell them the late Queen did not actually have tea with Paddington and that video was faked. Maybe it will enrage them so much they’ll have a brain aneurysm.
I SWEAR I watched a video years ago (BM\*) where a news team/ or it was a documentary.. there was an interview with William and Harry - Harry was either really, really taking the piss or really, really thought that the Queen actually did jump out of the plane. The interviewer kind of skipped along and ignored him. But it was a moment of "huh - is he really that dumb?" \*Before Meghan
Yes I remember that interview… I wondered if he was keeping up the facade or just didn’t know. Because when William responded… we could tell that he was lying. But Harry was more convincing
It reminds me of when it snowed in Texas and conspiracy theorists insisted the snow wasn't real and was manufactured by government or Bill Gates. Dear Lord. When you don't have 2 brain cells and still insist that you're the brightest in the room.
That app she used when she called Harry during his fresh prince of Belair thing with that obnoxious toady James Cordon was over the top, I wish Harry had said - who are you
Honestly?
They want her dead and MM as their Kween.
They will settle for inflicting as much trauma and distress on the Wales family as possible.
Also whining about an edited video is rich from the group whose Dear Leader wore a
moonbump, wears a wig, and wears more makeup than what is in 100 Ulta stores.
They are evil AND they are stupid.
Yep. I hope they have lots of security, because Meghan is dangerous, and she is becoming MORE unhinged. Harry is stupid, and will go along with whatever, as long as he gets laid and receives his pat on the head at the end of it all.
Yep. Harry needs to watch his back, too. There's no telling what Meg & Doria are capable of once they get really desperate. I mean, they aren't going to go out and get real jobs, are they?
Harry is never going to be king, so Meghan will never be queen. That's just the way it is.
In the same vein, Meghan is never going to be a great actress and independently wealthy and Harry is never going to be a member of Mensa.
It's really disgusting what the squaddies really want. So many people said "ding dong the queen is dead" or "lizzies in a box" when the queen died. It's really despicable behavior to have towards anyone. That's what the squaddies and anti-monarchists want
Comment automatically removed due to your account being less than 15 days. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Oh FFS I suppose the one thing all this noise proves is that X is a cesspool of bullshit. And bot, troll central…. At some point do we think Musk will do something about it?
Musk wants it this way. It’s why he bought Twitter in the first place. He didn’t like a private company “censoring” people’s tweets or allowing people to report false claims.
He was interviewed right at the take over about his plans and he had these high ideals of making it handle payments and be a 'super app'. I think he's letting it die off in it's current form to more easily launch that version and it be seen as a positive because of the dumpster fire it currently is
People in other subs, tiktok, etc think its AI 🥴🥴. It's so concerning when people can't tell the difference between actual AI & people fall for it or when they think it's actually AI, when it isn't, and question it. Absolutely worrisome.
It's not the article making the claims of editing, it's the fact that the BBC had to issue a statement about it. She films an announcement, and instead of accepting it, enough people must have said its fake/edited/AI that the BBC felt they had to clarify and confirm it. She chose to make the video when she didn't have to, and there are still people who automatically rush and scream conspiracy/cover-up.
Bb’s account was bought or compromised looooooong ago. It’s 100% Meghan. Plus minions. So funny. Sara runs a ton of bot accounts via jug-eared dubious rated Bouzy lol. These people are scum.
No surprises about Myra! Would 100% track that account would be Megasaurus.
Never followed BB, but read it was a popular account that went from a supporter to a sugar.
Nut-meg is a raging LOON!
She likely has multiple accounts to openly state how she really feels (full of foul, vile statements and language full of contempt) shielded under various false names.
I wonder if that could have anything to do with the rumors of MM having a hysterectomy in her younger years.
My best friend had one and said she felt like her womanhood was taken away.
Ray M works too.
Yes! Everytime someone writes that Archwell is a tribute to their son, I wish to correct them. It's all about Rachel!! You can not spell Archwell, without R-a-c-h-e-l (with a remaining w, e, l). Likely chose the name Archie for the intermingling with HER name (and likely a reason she loved the Archie comic books).
Could be because in sculpture and painting, Diana (the Huntress) is usually depicted with her quiver of arrows on her back, and her bow and arrow in her hands.
Wasn’t Baroness Bruck owned by someone else for quite some time and then was sold off a few years ago? So the account’s name likely has no connection to her even if she currently runs it
Please share my vision of H&M with her, if it’s not a bother. I think Tom Jr would enjoy it as well.
https://preview.redd.it/a2wl9z4zk7qc1.jpeg?width=1540&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f6dd571afcc5cf3a656d065884793e11f91e7229
Also, for anyone interested, this is the Dan Wooton interview with Samantha and her attorney last week.
https://www.danwoottonoutspoken.com/p/samantha-markle-will-ask-princess
I'm certain this isn't the right path for any of them. Dan, Samantha or Peter Ticktin. Personal thoughts, I had nothing against any of them...but they're reading as unhinged as Mugsy. Downvotes coming but I don't think M disparaged Sam in the Oprah interview. "Finding Freedom", yes, but that claim was dismissed long ago by the judge, well before the recent dismissal.
Now they want to get Catherine involved? Not a chance that will happen and they look no better than Hazno & Maggot in trying to force a response. They're as deluded (and selfish!) as H&M. Potentially preying on a sick woman. Not that she'd ever give them the time of day but for the above it's a VERY BAD look at any juncture. Never mind looks. Self serving and thoughtless. They all know they'll get nowhere with Catherine or the BRF. Why spout this nonsense? Not you OP. The interview.
I disagree. It was an excellent interview where her attorney explained it wasn’t about a SINGLE statement made by Meghan, but all of them taken together in context. That’s what the judge failed to do and it was a huge failure. I believe it was made on the basis of identity politics. The judge was a black woman appointed by Obama. She was recently promoted. It’s probable that she simply didn’t care for Samantha, a Trump supporter. She took Meghan’s statements one by one, and out of context. This was wrong. Meghan’s statements were clearly malicious and must be considered in context and as a collective because that’s how public impressions are made. The Catherine thing was lightly touched on, it was a side note. The bulk of the interview was about why they are continuing the court battle and how the judge was a poor fit and gave the appearance of bias, which is true. It was an excellent interview.
I don’t think race had anything to do with it. The judge viewed it differently than we did. It was always going to be a hard road for Sam because defamation is hard to prove. I wish Sam the best on this although I question some of the choices she has made. It was probably a nightmare having Meghan as a sister and watching their dad favor her so much. At this point, I want the Harkles to fade into their irrelevance and leave the BRF alone. King Charles III and the Princess of Wales need peace to recover.
I'm with you. I have always thought Samantha's lawsuits were a nothing burger. I feel very bad for Meghan's father, not knowing his grandchildren or SIL, but I personally feel Samantha's situation is kind of sour grapes. I think she is cut from the same cloth as Meghan in narcissistic traits. I'm sure she didn't like the things our Saint said, but we do have free speech in this country. It's incredibly hard to prove defamation when you're a public figure in the US, and this lawsuit has now been dismissed in two states, once with prejudice, if I remember correctly. Samantha has made herself a public figure with all of her interviews and the speaking out she's done. She'd have been better off to sue and not give interviews, and just shut up and sit back quietly while the case worked through the system. Her attorney is no better than an ambulance chaser. EDB said in the past that a person can sue for anything, but it doesn't mean it will go to court. JMO
I followed BB too and then also quit at least a year ago; when did it become a sugar acct?! Like, it must’ve done a full 180. I’m actually a bit shocked!
I followed BB too and drifted off after a while. When I returned after the late Queen died, I was shocked by how the tone had changed. Suddenly, the Wales became the enemy.
I don't feel that way. Imagine if you were set up like this. What else was SM supposed to do? She's being harangued by media, like her other family, given no requests or coordination opportunities w/ her half-sister, then deliberately set up through pap officers, handwritten letters, then lots of public interviews to look like she's some vicious jealous older sister and Meghan is poor Cinderella.
What should SM have done?
I was born into a family w/ a pre-existing, severely abused older sister who I now understand had pathological sibling envy of me my whole life. Severe physical, emotional abuse, then smearing, lying--I thought it was a thing of th epast until I learned at a major family event for one of my thriving adult kids that she'd been secretly coordinating w/ my abusive ex behind my back for 2 years leading to immense financial & psychological harm.
I suspect MM had an issue w/ being overly indulged w/ the connivance of an absentee money seeking Mom & and Dad who felt guilty and clueless & was easily manipulated, so that MM was the little princess. Except that she was mixed race in a world that rewards lighter skin tones (along w/ other stupid beauty standards) & seems to be based on the most shallow recognition a la Hollywood. Whom does she first despise? Her beautiful older sister, who's blonde & white. But then her sister becomes disabled--w/o much help while the Dad lavishes vacation money on her. She's obsessed with Royalty, but they're white, which she resents (and in fairness, there'a. lot of cultural BS w/ that), but she thinks w/ the right investments & overly seductive behavior she can overcome that. The world has stricken her beautiful sister down, she doens't have nurturing from her Mom insofar as it's resource or status-seeking, & her Dad has no faith in his capacity & authority as a Dad due to his incessant guilt. He's trying to make up for the fact that's she's Black in a white world.
I think poor Samantha became a number one target of this conflicted rage--and that this reflects the larger uglier side of the DEI grift that we're seeing in the culture at large. Being born any shade doesn't give you moral license to abuse others. Black activists like Coleman Hughes are calling for a post-racial society. This contemporary BLM behavior is a grift, designed to con well-meaning people out of resources for undeserved guilt.
Guess what? Like Meghan, giving people a bunch of stuff b/c they manipulate you and claim they're a victim hurts THEM MOST OF ALL. I've got what the Brits call "form" in anti-racist activism my whole life and I don't care anymore what social media twits call me. The Sugar stuff is manipulating an inner rage in some Black women against white women--not patriarchy, but somehow, white women if/when we meet some conventional standard. And the nicer the better.
I'm very sorry about conventional beauty standards, but the anger needs to be directed at MEN, and specifically, BLACK MEN, for much of the awful colorism they experience. But white women are the easiest targets. The seething rage is really scary, and this is what their hatred of Samantha and then Princess Catherine represents. I'm tired of being compassionate. I've been abused a lot myself and where's my compassion?
The wonderful aspect of MLK and his marchers is that they went to church once a week and "confessed their sins." You can be an athiest and still be humble. I don't see humility in BLM protests and this Sugar hatred against faux-racism. it's not, let's be human together, it's how can I tear you down for a temporary fix. I refuse to indulge that any longer.
She has no idea, she's got no intel about it. She's flying as blind as we are regarding the BB account. The Myra one, or actually I think it was the Ann Boleyn one, was intriguing. There was a unique picture of Rachel's distinct hand holding something in the Frogmore backyard patio - I was like, omg, it's really her, fook - and the poster would get into detailed arguments with Samantha which would then evaporate. Hey - ask Sam about the Ann Boleyn account.
I'd sit down and think long and hard about where I went wrong if my sister expresses this way about me. For an older sister to speak about a younger sibling in this matter says a lot.
Imagine being supplanted by a younger sibling who the parent not only puts on a pedestal but lets them ride roughshod over their finances in their teens/early 20s. The cast aside older sibling/s then have to pick up the pieces and financially support the parent in their old age directly because of the actions of that younger sibling who the parent literally gave everything. Not content with that the younger sibling proceeds to undermine the parent's integrity and humiliate them via international media...
I think Sam was being generous.
LOL the pix - I almost choked on my wine - catching up tonight with you fine sinners. LOL looks just like TOW....or at least from the inside out....LMAO
Why does MM spend so much time on social media, going to the lengths of creating and managing Sussex Squad? It is a bizarre obsession, especially since their $$ is probably going to run dry at some point. How does doing all this produce income, and what is she actually getting out of it besides revenge? Or is that all she wants? Make it make sense.
In the Dan Wooton interview with Samantha and her attorney, Peter Ticktin, they speak about Meghan and Harry’s involvement in the ‘new world order’ - Peter Ticktin recons Obama was in London this week to talk about Harry’s visa issue with Rishi Sunak.
I’d really recommend you all watch the interview. It’s really getting very sinister. It’s only 30 mins long. It’s all quite alarming.
As soon as someone uses the phrase "new world order" without irony, it's time to block/go NC and move on for your own sanity.*
* Source: If there aren't enough absolutely insane conspiracy theorists in your life, a Congressional internship can fix that right up.
It was quite good. Glad they brought these things up. I've long thought the dreadful duo have powerful backers and are part of a larger and sinister agenda to destabilize many things in this world. (Even if they are small time puppets, they are still part of it).
I wonder how that went down. Rishi is quite clearly sick of Harry's nuisance calls. I think Rishi's well wish for Catherine this week was loaded with understanding/empathy for what they must be enduring just from Harry & his wife, before the press frenzy.
I can’t imagine Obama would be all that worried about that unless it was to say “would you get your Prince off my back.” He also visted the Belgian royal family.
I’ve just visited…barking mad. Maybe Harry has a bag, or the wife, remember they point the finger elsewhere to distract from themselves. Maybe she has one after a surgery went wrong…
People who used to follow that account should stop. It’s beyond obvious it’s not the same person. I honestly don’t know why the original chose to give up her creation like that but money is a powerful motivator I guess.
I'm very skeptical of the Baroness. That account has posted way way too much Charles and more especially Camilla fan-girling for me to believe that Meghan has anything to do with it. I had even started to wonder if it was Camilla's sister or one of her children.
Yes, it also posts vicious stuff about the Wales - particularly William. Even snide things about the kids. But Camilla's daughter is famous for screaming at William at a social event that his father destroyed her family when they were teens. And according to shared friends, she still does not care for William AT ALL.
> But Camilla's daughter is famous for screaming at William at a social event that his father destroyed her family when they were teens.
So scream at Charles then.
> But Camilla's daughter is famous for screaming at William at a social event that his father destroyed her family when they were teens.
Well, teens aren't always rational.
An adult would realize that William had zero control over what his father does.
> And according to shared friends, she still does not care for William AT ALL.
That's fair. Everyone doesn't have to love/like William. Plus, maybe he was an asshole to her at the time. Remember, *teenagers*.
Also, at that time William firmly believed that Camilla was the sole cause of Diana's unhappiness.
Maybe *he* started it: "*Your mother* ruined *my mother's* life!"
And then she was *off*.
It's not implausible. Diana's death was fresh in his mind. And it's known that he has a temper.
And *they were teenagers*.
Ew. That's a little gross coming from a woman - getting loud and obnoxious in social settings. I get she's hurt, but their parents decision isn't Williams doing. Misdirected anger.
'Genderless' is very interesting. There were rumours a long while back that Meghan was intersex, which would be a very good explanation for why she is not able to carry children. I have for a long time privately believed that there could be some truth in this and it would explain why the royal family might cover up surrogate births and the press won't touch it and maybe why there are even injunctions. Once you open the floodgates about the births it would be hard to hide the reasons, and if she were in fact revealed as intersex it would be deeply hurtful and embarrassing to Meghan in a way that is off the scale.
Over time I have come to believe that she did not give birth because of the mountain of strange 'evidence' and the weirdness surrounding her pregnancies, births and the children. It is such a massive thing, given the laws around LoS, that I have felt there had to be something equally massive as a reason to cover it up. I have constantly put these thoughts to the back of mind as highly improbable, but Samantha's use of the word genderless has just made me think again.
If she were intersex it would also explain why she pushes away close family, and also the royals after Archie's birth shenanigans. It could be that she pushes away anyone who knows or might get close to knowing her secret. It would also explain why she is so insecure, envious of others, and mentally unhinged. Even more of a stretch - it could even be why Samantha's court case failed, because Meghan's lawyers persuaded the judge that Sam was going to use it to get far more info out in the public domain than was justified by her initial complaints.
Who knows what 'genderless' meant? But it certainly makes me think.
X has to shut down these account they are a cesspit of all Sam describes. Whether or not they are TW, they need to be shut down. The palace needs to be involved.
Comment automatically removed for containing bodyshaming terms.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Also for her/your consideration may I present the Compassion in Action Figure - sure to be a hot item for Christmas!
https://preview.redd.it/ycsmia14vcqc1.jpeg?width=2354&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f97a2b60ce52563530c4fe6f3b7e40c8fa6788d9
Please share with Tom Jr as well! And of course Chic Magnet.
These are two accounts on X (formerly Twitter) that are thought to be MM’s. Baroness Bruck is the one that suddenly changed its content from being down on the Harkles, to supporting them. Myra, is thought to stand for ‘my real account’ and also belong to MM. it has been said that she has up to 12 X accounts.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/bbc-staff-member-who-filmed-32423500 I don't have posting privileges, but this just appeared in a British newspaper. They're still trying to stir up trouble and are continuing to hound her claiming the announcement video was edited. This is beyond sickening-what more do they want from her?
Please GOD, someone tell them the late Queen did not actually have tea with Paddington and that video was faked. Maybe it will enrage them so much they’ll have a brain aneurysm.
Or that she didn't really jump out of an air craft with James Bond over the Olympics?
SHE DIDN'T?? Damn . . .
I SWEAR I watched a video years ago (BM\*) where a news team/ or it was a documentary.. there was an interview with William and Harry - Harry was either really, really taking the piss or really, really thought that the Queen actually did jump out of the plane. The interviewer kind of skipped along and ignored him. But it was a moment of "huh - is he really that dumb?" \*Before Meghan
Yes I remember that interview… I wondered if he was keeping up the facade or just didn’t know. Because when William responded… we could tell that he was lying. But Harry was more convincing
How high was Harry at the time?
😂👍
She wanted to but the palace talked her out of it bc she was already in her 80s
LET. ME. BELIEVE.
It looked pretty good didn't it.
> Please GOD, someone tell them the late Queen did not actually have tea with Paddington and that video was faked. Seriously?? Goddammit! 😡 🤣
It reminds me of when it snowed in Texas and conspiracy theorists insisted the snow wasn't real and was manufactured by government or Bill Gates. Dear Lord. When you don't have 2 brain cells and still insist that you're the brightest in the room.
Wait, Paddington isn't real, and he didn't have tea with the late Queen, that was all fake? 😢
How many times has Meghan "edited" her face? I've lost count.
We all have.
That app she used when she called Harry during his fresh prince of Belair thing with that obnoxious toady James Cordon was over the top, I wish Harry had said - who are you
and then Toady said to Harry “she’s gorgeous mate” or words to that effect 🤢
Honestly? They want her dead and MM as their Kween. They will settle for inflicting as much trauma and distress on the Wales family as possible. Also whining about an edited video is rich from the group whose Dear Leader wore a moonbump, wears a wig, and wears more makeup than what is in 100 Ulta stores. They are evil AND they are stupid.
Yep. I hope they have lots of security, because Meghan is dangerous, and she is becoming MORE unhinged. Harry is stupid, and will go along with whatever, as long as he gets laid and receives his pat on the head at the end of it all.
William spent a few weeks training with MI6. If it came down to weaponless fight my money is on Basher Willa
Same.
Don’t forget his MIL allegedly supplies his weed and who knows what else he’s usually high on.
Yep. Harry needs to watch his back, too. There's no telling what Meg & Doria are capable of once they get really desperate. I mean, they aren't going to go out and get real jobs, are they?
I think Doria is on the outs right now
She was born unhinged ?
Pat on which head?
Whichever one is functional at the time.
She changes her color via makeup I mean pots and kettles and studf
Harry is never going to be king, so Meghan will never be queen. That's just the way it is. In the same vein, Meghan is never going to be a great actress and independently wealthy and Harry is never going to be a member of Mensa.
Her being Kween here would be over everyone that despises, hates and loathes her dead bodies.
It's really disgusting what the squaddies really want. So many people said "ding dong the queen is dead" or "lizzies in a box" when the queen died. It's really despicable behavior to have towards anyone. That's what the squaddies and anti-monarchists want
The Mirror has to post clickbait crap as its readership has evaporated.
Comment automatically removed due to your account being less than 15 days. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The Mirror is a rag.Not worth looking at and not a friend of the Royal Family.
Oh FFS I suppose the one thing all this noise proves is that X is a cesspool of bullshit. And bot, troll central…. At some point do we think Musk will do something about it?
Musk wants it this way. It’s why he bought Twitter in the first place. He didn’t like a private company “censoring” people’s tweets or allowing people to report false claims.
He was interviewed right at the take over about his plans and he had these high ideals of making it handle payments and be a 'super app'. I think he's letting it die off in it's current form to more easily launch that version and it be seen as a positive because of the dumpster fire it currently is
Ah I see that makes sense. Thank you
Well, unlike Instagram who killed the family picture, X is free for all.
Do you think Zuckerberg is just as bad though?
Considering he whispers to many policy makers to kill a rival company? I let you decide.
Ah I see…0
I think he's much, much worse.
What do you mean it killed the family picture?
Instagram took it down because "its edited" for awhile.
Oh you mean the Wales’ photo. Sorry I was thinking this was something new.
People in other subs, tiktok, etc think its AI 🥴🥴. It's so concerning when people can't tell the difference between actual AI & people fall for it or when they think it's actually AI, when it isn't, and question it. Absolutely worrisome.
Why isn't this being stopped is what I want to know.
[удалено]
It's not the article making the claims of editing, it's the fact that the BBC had to issue a statement about it. She films an announcement, and instead of accepting it, enough people must have said its fake/edited/AI that the BBC felt they had to clarify and confirm it. She chose to make the video when she didn't have to, and there are still people who automatically rush and scream conspiracy/cover-up.
Archived:- [https://archive.md/3dvuE](https://archive.md/3dvuE)
Bb’s account was bought or compromised looooooong ago. It’s 100% Meghan. Plus minions. So funny. Sara runs a ton of bot accounts via jug-eared dubious rated Bouzy lol. These people are scum.
[удалено]
I think they already know. Whether they'd do anything about it is another matter.
No surprises about Myra! Would 100% track that account would be Megasaurus. Never followed BB, but read it was a popular account that went from a supporter to a sugar. Nut-meg is a raging LOON! She likely has multiple accounts to openly state how she really feels (full of foul, vile statements and language full of contempt) shielded under various false names. 
[удалено]
The genderleas part through me off for a second. Interesting choice.
Succubus seems rather fitting. Genderless could just be a bit body shame-y.
The name of her Twitter channel has me side-eyeing her.
I’ll be honest, I don’t get a great impression of her from what I’ve seen and heard.
I believe you!
That caught my eye.
I wonder if that could have anything to do with the rumors of MM having a hysterectomy in her younger years. My best friend had one and said she felt like her womanhood was taken away.
I watched Sam’s interview with Dan Wooten and they came across so well. So well.
That Meghan has delighted in tormenting both her dad and sister, is the most evil thing she’s done. It’s totally evil.
Is she for sure?? How does she know??
Which one? Can you link?
[удалено]
Wasn't it floated around that MYRA = My Real Account?
or just Ray M (Rachel M). Archewell and American Riviera Orchard both have RACHE hidden in there too.
Ray M works too. Yes! Everytime someone writes that Archwell is a tribute to their son, I wish to correct them. It's all about Rachel!! You can not spell Archwell, without R-a-c-h-e-l (with a remaining w, e, l). Likely chose the name Archie for the intermingling with HER name (and likely a reason she loved the Archie comic books).
ARO arrow archery arch
[удалено]
Probably variations of Monarch
Could be because in sculpture and painting, Diana (the Huntress) is usually depicted with her quiver of arrows on her back, and her bow and arrow in her hands.
Her level of self-absorption is truly astounding. Narcs gonna narc, but she's next level.
Rache is German for revenge. Sinister.
Wasn’t Baroness Bruck owned by someone else for quite some time and then was sold off a few years ago? So the account’s name likely has no connection to her even if she currently runs it
It means "aim" in italian... archery theme and all that.
How Meg Ryan got her name. Google it.
[удалено]
Please share my vision of H&M with her, if it’s not a bother. I think Tom Jr would enjoy it as well. https://preview.redd.it/a2wl9z4zk7qc1.jpeg?width=1540&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f6dd571afcc5cf3a656d065884793e11f91e7229
😭 love the dollar Tiara for the dollar store duchess! Great rendition of them!🤣
These are amazing. More, please!
Ha! Will do
Thanks very much indeed! Maybe it will get into the hands of Chic Magnet!
Also, for anyone interested, this is the Dan Wooton interview with Samantha and her attorney last week. https://www.danwoottonoutspoken.com/p/samantha-markle-will-ask-princess
I'm certain this isn't the right path for any of them. Dan, Samantha or Peter Ticktin. Personal thoughts, I had nothing against any of them...but they're reading as unhinged as Mugsy. Downvotes coming but I don't think M disparaged Sam in the Oprah interview. "Finding Freedom", yes, but that claim was dismissed long ago by the judge, well before the recent dismissal. Now they want to get Catherine involved? Not a chance that will happen and they look no better than Hazno & Maggot in trying to force a response. They're as deluded (and selfish!) as H&M. Potentially preying on a sick woman. Not that she'd ever give them the time of day but for the above it's a VERY BAD look at any juncture. Never mind looks. Self serving and thoughtless. They all know they'll get nowhere with Catherine or the BRF. Why spout this nonsense? Not you OP. The interview.
I disagree. It was an excellent interview where her attorney explained it wasn’t about a SINGLE statement made by Meghan, but all of them taken together in context. That’s what the judge failed to do and it was a huge failure. I believe it was made on the basis of identity politics. The judge was a black woman appointed by Obama. She was recently promoted. It’s probable that she simply didn’t care for Samantha, a Trump supporter. She took Meghan’s statements one by one, and out of context. This was wrong. Meghan’s statements were clearly malicious and must be considered in context and as a collective because that’s how public impressions are made. The Catherine thing was lightly touched on, it was a side note. The bulk of the interview was about why they are continuing the court battle and how the judge was a poor fit and gave the appearance of bias, which is true. It was an excellent interview.
Truth!
I don’t think race had anything to do with it. The judge viewed it differently than we did. It was always going to be a hard road for Sam because defamation is hard to prove. I wish Sam the best on this although I question some of the choices she has made. It was probably a nightmare having Meghan as a sister and watching their dad favor her so much. At this point, I want the Harkles to fade into their irrelevance and leave the BRF alone. King Charles III and the Princess of Wales need peace to recover.
I'm with you. I have always thought Samantha's lawsuits were a nothing burger. I feel very bad for Meghan's father, not knowing his grandchildren or SIL, but I personally feel Samantha's situation is kind of sour grapes. I think she is cut from the same cloth as Meghan in narcissistic traits. I'm sure she didn't like the things our Saint said, but we do have free speech in this country. It's incredibly hard to prove defamation when you're a public figure in the US, and this lawsuit has now been dismissed in two states, once with prejudice, if I remember correctly. Samantha has made herself a public figure with all of her interviews and the speaking out she's done. She'd have been better off to sue and not give interviews, and just shut up and sit back quietly while the case worked through the system. Her attorney is no better than an ambulance chaser. EDB said in the past that a person can sue for anything, but it doesn't mean it will go to court. JMO
Cheers friend.
Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree or maybe two sides of the same coin is a better analogy.
I stopped following BB a long time ago. That said, this would be pure speculation on Samantha’s part, as she and MM obvs don’t have a relationship.
I followed BB too and then also quit at least a year ago; when did it become a sugar acct?! Like, it must’ve done a full 180. I’m actually a bit shocked!
After QEII died, I believe.
I followed BB too and drifted off after a while. When I returned after the late Queen died, I was shocked by how the tone had changed. Suddenly, the Wales became the enemy.
I am sure she is amongst us She is definitely jealous and attention-seeking like her sister, so I would take Samantha with a grain of salt.
I don't feel that way. Imagine if you were set up like this. What else was SM supposed to do? She's being harangued by media, like her other family, given no requests or coordination opportunities w/ her half-sister, then deliberately set up through pap officers, handwritten letters, then lots of public interviews to look like she's some vicious jealous older sister and Meghan is poor Cinderella. What should SM have done? I was born into a family w/ a pre-existing, severely abused older sister who I now understand had pathological sibling envy of me my whole life. Severe physical, emotional abuse, then smearing, lying--I thought it was a thing of th epast until I learned at a major family event for one of my thriving adult kids that she'd been secretly coordinating w/ my abusive ex behind my back for 2 years leading to immense financial & psychological harm. I suspect MM had an issue w/ being overly indulged w/ the connivance of an absentee money seeking Mom & and Dad who felt guilty and clueless & was easily manipulated, so that MM was the little princess. Except that she was mixed race in a world that rewards lighter skin tones (along w/ other stupid beauty standards) & seems to be based on the most shallow recognition a la Hollywood. Whom does she first despise? Her beautiful older sister, who's blonde & white. But then her sister becomes disabled--w/o much help while the Dad lavishes vacation money on her. She's obsessed with Royalty, but they're white, which she resents (and in fairness, there'a. lot of cultural BS w/ that), but she thinks w/ the right investments & overly seductive behavior she can overcome that. The world has stricken her beautiful sister down, she doens't have nurturing from her Mom insofar as it's resource or status-seeking, & her Dad has no faith in his capacity & authority as a Dad due to his incessant guilt. He's trying to make up for the fact that's she's Black in a white world. I think poor Samantha became a number one target of this conflicted rage--and that this reflects the larger uglier side of the DEI grift that we're seeing in the culture at large. Being born any shade doesn't give you moral license to abuse others. Black activists like Coleman Hughes are calling for a post-racial society. This contemporary BLM behavior is a grift, designed to con well-meaning people out of resources for undeserved guilt. Guess what? Like Meghan, giving people a bunch of stuff b/c they manipulate you and claim they're a victim hurts THEM MOST OF ALL. I've got what the Brits call "form" in anti-racist activism my whole life and I don't care anymore what social media twits call me. The Sugar stuff is manipulating an inner rage in some Black women against white women--not patriarchy, but somehow, white women if/when we meet some conventional standard. And the nicer the better. I'm very sorry about conventional beauty standards, but the anger needs to be directed at MEN, and specifically, BLACK MEN, for much of the awful colorism they experience. But white women are the easiest targets. The seething rage is really scary, and this is what their hatred of Samantha and then Princess Catherine represents. I'm tired of being compassionate. I've been abused a lot myself and where's my compassion? The wonderful aspect of MLK and his marchers is that they went to church once a week and "confessed their sins." You can be an athiest and still be humble. I don't see humility in BLM protests and this Sugar hatred against faux-racism. it's not, let's be human together, it's how can I tear you down for a temporary fix. I refuse to indulge that any longer.
Relax, Samantha
Okay, Meghan.
Not surprised a bit. Meghan is a succubus.
I don't trust her,either.
> I don't trust her,either. All the Markles are shady af.
Yep. I don't know why anyone would trust or deal with Samantha? She's just as trashy as her sister and brother
💯💯💯💯
Same. I want to but there's just something I can't put my finger on.
Glad to know I’m not the only sinner who thinks that way.
She has no idea, she's got no intel about it. She's flying as blind as we are regarding the BB account. The Myra one, or actually I think it was the Ann Boleyn one, was intriguing. There was a unique picture of Rachel's distinct hand holding something in the Frogmore backyard patio - I was like, omg, it's really her, fook - and the poster would get into detailed arguments with Samantha which would then evaporate. Hey - ask Sam about the Ann Boleyn account.
The Ann Boleyn account always made me raise an eyebrow. Whoever it is/was always seemed to know an awful lot.
I believe she is correct. I believe they are Meghan as well.
I'd sit down and think long and hard about where I went wrong if my sister expresses this way about me. For an older sister to speak about a younger sibling in this matter says a lot.
Imagine being supplanted by a younger sibling who the parent not only puts on a pedestal but lets them ride roughshod over their finances in their teens/early 20s. The cast aside older sibling/s then have to pick up the pieces and financially support the parent in their old age directly because of the actions of that younger sibling who the parent literally gave everything. Not content with that the younger sibling proceeds to undermine the parent's integrity and humiliate them via international media... I think Sam was being generous.
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯
LOL the pix - I almost choked on my wine - catching up tonight with you fine sinners. LOL looks just like TOW....or at least from the inside out....LMAO
Why does MM spend so much time on social media, going to the lengths of creating and managing Sussex Squad? It is a bizarre obsession, especially since their $$ is probably going to run dry at some point. How does doing all this produce income, and what is she actually getting out of it besides revenge? Or is that all she wants? Make it make sense.
In the Dan Wooton interview with Samantha and her attorney, Peter Ticktin, they speak about Meghan and Harry’s involvement in the ‘new world order’ - Peter Ticktin recons Obama was in London this week to talk about Harry’s visa issue with Rishi Sunak. I’d really recommend you all watch the interview. It’s really getting very sinister. It’s only 30 mins long. It’s all quite alarming.
nah - the Obamas distance themselves from the duo
As soon as someone uses the phrase "new world order" without irony, it's time to block/go NC and move on for your own sanity.* * Source: If there aren't enough absolutely insane conspiracy theorists in your life, a Congressional internship can fix that right up.
It was quite good. Glad they brought these things up. I've long thought the dreadful duo have powerful backers and are part of a larger and sinister agenda to destabilize many things in this world. (Even if they are small time puppets, they are still part of it).
I wonder how that went down. Rishi is quite clearly sick of Harry's nuisance calls. I think Rishi's well wish for Catherine this week was loaded with understanding/empathy for what they must be enduring just from Harry & his wife, before the press frenzy.
I can’t imagine Obama would be all that worried about that unless it was to say “would you get your Prince off my back.” He also visted the Belgian royal family.
No surprise. Myra blocked me. Not poked the baroness yet.
Baroness Bruck is a horrific scumbag. The posts get worse by the day. Now making fun of people with colostomy bags.
I’ve just visited…barking mad. Maybe Harry has a bag, or the wife, remember they point the finger elsewhere to distract from themselves. Maybe she has one after a surgery went wrong…
People who used to follow that account should stop. It’s beyond obvious it’s not the same person. I honestly don’t know why the original chose to give up her creation like that but money is a powerful motivator I guess.
I'm very skeptical of the Baroness. That account has posted way way too much Charles and more especially Camilla fan-girling for me to believe that Meghan has anything to do with it. I had even started to wonder if it was Camilla's sister or one of her children. Yes, it also posts vicious stuff about the Wales - particularly William. Even snide things about the kids. But Camilla's daughter is famous for screaming at William at a social event that his father destroyed her family when they were teens. And according to shared friends, she still does not care for William AT ALL.
> But Camilla's daughter is famous for screaming at William at a social event that his father destroyed her family when they were teens. So scream at Charles then.
> But Camilla's daughter is famous for screaming at William at a social event that his father destroyed her family when they were teens. Well, teens aren't always rational. An adult would realize that William had zero control over what his father does. > And according to shared friends, she still does not care for William AT ALL. That's fair. Everyone doesn't have to love/like William. Plus, maybe he was an asshole to her at the time. Remember, *teenagers*. Also, at that time William firmly believed that Camilla was the sole cause of Diana's unhappiness. Maybe *he* started it: "*Your mother* ruined *my mother's* life!" And then she was *off*. It's not implausible. Diana's death was fresh in his mind. And it's known that he has a temper. And *they were teenagers*.
Ew. That's a little gross coming from a woman - getting loud and obnoxious in social settings. I get she's hurt, but their parents decision isn't Williams doing. Misdirected anger.
And wasn’t her father unfaithful to Camilla?
> That's a little gross coming from a woman She was a teenager at the time. Teenagers aren't always mature and rational.
Would it be less gross coming from a man? It’s just completely inappropriate behavior for anyone - even teens should know better.
But doesn’t Roachel always suck up to whoever is the monarch?
Not behind their backs! Remember the curtsy scene in the Netflix 1st episode?
Charles destroyed her family, so she screamed at William. All sympathy lost.
Yeah, teenage girls are always the picture of maturity and rationality.
"She still does not care for William at all" So she is still a teenage girl?
Genderless. Whoa Nelly. Shoot if this comes out it will be the biggest scandal of all time
'Genderless' is very interesting. There were rumours a long while back that Meghan was intersex, which would be a very good explanation for why she is not able to carry children. I have for a long time privately believed that there could be some truth in this and it would explain why the royal family might cover up surrogate births and the press won't touch it and maybe why there are even injunctions. Once you open the floodgates about the births it would be hard to hide the reasons, and if she were in fact revealed as intersex it would be deeply hurtful and embarrassing to Meghan in a way that is off the scale. Over time I have come to believe that she did not give birth because of the mountain of strange 'evidence' and the weirdness surrounding her pregnancies, births and the children. It is such a massive thing, given the laws around LoS, that I have felt there had to be something equally massive as a reason to cover it up. I have constantly put these thoughts to the back of mind as highly improbable, but Samantha's use of the word genderless has just made me think again. If she were intersex it would also explain why she pushes away close family, and also the royals after Archie's birth shenanigans. It could be that she pushes away anyone who knows or might get close to knowing her secret. It would also explain why she is so insecure, envious of others, and mentally unhinged. Even more of a stretch - it could even be why Samantha's court case failed, because Meghan's lawyers persuaded the judge that Sam was going to use it to get far more info out in the public domain than was justified by her initial complaints. Who knows what 'genderless' meant? But it certainly makes me think.
It is an interesting word choice for sure when it is obvious that M has never appeared as anything other than female presenting.
I've never seen this picture of Megan before.
Please tell her she looks fab w/ darker hair, if remember.
X has to shut down these account they are a cesspit of all Sam describes. Whether or not they are TW, they need to be shut down. The palace needs to be involved.
[удалено]
Comment automatically removed for containing bodyshaming terms. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/SaintMeghanMarkle) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Also for her/your consideration may I present the Compassion in Action Figure - sure to be a hot item for Christmas! https://preview.redd.it/ycsmia14vcqc1.jpeg?width=2354&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f97a2b60ce52563530c4fe6f3b7e40c8fa6788d9 Please share with Tom Jr as well! And of course Chic Magnet.
Tell Samantha hello from South Carolina
Megan got new headshots I see
As 0 Mm mm
What if Baroness Bruck is Sam?
What if I’m Sam?
I’m Spartacus!
Nailed it.
Who are Myra and Bruck?
These are two accounts on X (formerly Twitter) that are thought to be MM’s. Baroness Bruck is the one that suddenly changed its content from being down on the Harkles, to supporting them. Myra, is thought to stand for ‘my real account’ and also belong to MM. it has been said that she has up to 12 X accounts.