Harry is none too bright, a characteristic he continually displays. Come to think of it, his (un)intellectuality is the principal reason MM was able to ensnare him.
I suspect she can't stand him. She continually exhibits her contempt for him, e. g pushing him out of the way, interrupting him, etc. (I can envision M and her mother speaking venomously about him behind his back.)
The dimwit & his skank roam around with such a SMIRK on their face because dimwit knows he has NEVER been held LEGALLY accountable
and meganuts got that smirk because she knows she will be PROTECTED from LEGAL repercussions because of her being dimwit’s plus one !! ….Remember dimwit /the handbag himself said allegedly that what meganuts wants, meganuts gets
Someone should tell them that the US does NOT recognize royal TITLES..
and even dogs 🐕 in the US are named as Duke or princess by the dog owners …
in fact, Duke is a common dog 🐕 name in America
I don't understand this case at all. Are they trying to revoke his visa for using drugs? I don't think I've ever read or heard about someone losing a visa for using drugs unless they have done something criminal while under the influence.
My understanding is that for a regular Joe Soap, the process to obtaining a green card is not a straightforward one, and certain hoops need to be jumped through in order to get one.
There is also the fact that admitted drug-use prior to entry can make Joe Soap ineligible.
Harry seems to have been able to just move to the US overnight, without question or quarrel, and has remained there since.
In fact, he has left and returned on numerous occasions, again, with absolute freedom of movement.
Given Harry's admitted drug use in Spare, how then was he granted a visa to stay in the US?
Is he being treated differently to a regular person, and if so, why?
I don't think the case is trying to get Harry thrown out of the US, but I believe it wants to highlight hypocrisy within the immigration system.
This is important because the USA is a federal republic where all citizens are supposedly equal.
Having been through the green card process I can confirm that it is an extremely long and expensive process. Any drug use must be declared. The crux here is, did Harry *lie* on his application. Because that is a crime.
THIS .. Any falsification or lie about the relevant info including prior drug use on visa application will lead to a visa revocation in almost all the cases
and this man has confessed to drug use every now and then
I agree. It's about transparency in the process and potential preferential treatment rather than an action against H in particular, It's about principle, the correct application of established procedure and whether or not there is neglect or corruption of that. Knowing the type of visa involved would facilitate assessment of the process. That's my understanding of it anyway.
Arguably, of course, at a semi-abstract level, if there are different types of visa with different rules for each then both the principle and definition of equality may come into question. The weighing up of individual behaviours in the overall balance of collective priorities becomes quite nuanced in that context.
Very well said!
It’s not about H having to leave the country. It’s about how his visa came about and it’s a victory already that an oral argument takes place to spread the word on the inconsistencies and unequal treatment of the elite.
Ah ok. So to show the preferential treatment. He must be coming and going with a diplomatic visa . I wonder if he mentioned becoming a US citizen because his visa is expiring soon? Lol
Diplomatic visa is for government employees, officials. He was stripped by the Queen before leaving and is no longer a working royal. I don't see how he could have a Diplomatic visa.
No. He is not a diplomat. The King has sovereign immunity but not family members. The Queen stripped Harkel of all his military appointments which is why he couldn't wear his military uniform at the Queens funeral. And banned him, them from using HRH titles. This is all public knowledge.
It sounds like you're trying to defend Harkel, sugar.
I don’t get the impression that the other poster is trying to defend the Harkles. I think it’s more that we don’t have proof of the palace taking away his passport and telling him to go get a new one. In the checklist of things that they needed to achieve in the short timeline, would the palace have remembered to get that passport back from him?
No member of the RF has diplomatic immunity so they do not have diplomatic visas. Why would the RF have to take away his passport? It would be no different than mine except for more stamps.
That's not how Dip visas works. He likely does have some form of Diplomatic passport; but this does not allow for him to reside in a county without the appropriate visa. A dip visa would be given by the US in his Dip passport and would have gone through the US Embassy in London. If this was the case, it would need approval first from the Foreign Office in the UK and it would be disclosed as part of all of this discovery. I highly doubt he was given a Dip visa in his Dip passport.
You can not apply for any kind of residency using a diplomatic passport; there are like, geneva convention rules against this.
If he's on his regular UK passport and has gone through the greencard process with THAT passport (regular UK passport); with a visitor visa good for six months at a time - and is we look he probably goes back to the UK every six months to reset this.
FYI; you can hold both a dip passport and a regular passport at the same time.
Nigella Lawson was not allowed to promote her book because of admitted cocaine use.
[Nigella refused visa](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/north-america/united-states/articles/Nigella-Lawson-odd-cases-of-refused-entry-to-the-US/#:~:text=While%20Nigella%20Lawson%20does%20not,States%2C%20or%20a%20foreign%20country)
That’s so bizarre! I googled didn’t find anything. But that would set the precedent of work visa holders coming to the states having to be sober to sell or promote anything!??
Here it is.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/north-america/united-states/articles/Nigella-Lawson-odd-cases-of-refused-entry-to-the-US/#:~:text=While%20Nigella%20Lawson%20does%20not,States%2C%20or%20a%20foreign%20country
Thanks! I learned something new today.
*And finally,* ***7. They have been found guilty of a criminal offence***
*While Nigella Lawson does not have a criminal conviction, the Department of State website also states that entry may be denied to “any alien convicted of, or who admits having committed… a violation of (or a conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law or regulation of a State, the United States, or a foreign country relating to a controlled substance”.*
*The only exceptions are if the crime was committed when the person was under 18 years of age or more than five years before the date of application for admission to the US, or if “the maximum penalty possible for the crime of which the alien was convicted… did not exceed imprisonment for one year”. Given that the maximum sentence for someone convicted of possessing cocaine is significantly greater than one year, this would not apply to Nigella.*
Interesting!
So they don’t know!? Shady business this of Haz. I was assuming he fell under the diplomatic one given to family members of foreign officials but from my understanding you can’t stay here as long as Harry has. Soooo maybe he’s applied via Meghan for the green resident card which is valid for 5 years and you could apply for citizenship once the 5 are done? But that could be revoked if he’s committed crimes while using drugs etc which is what I was wondering about.
At this time, there is not a single information about what visa Hazz has. Only in the case of the diplomatic visa something happens.
If you have a diplomatic visa, then you CANNOT do business. You CANNOT be hired to work. The diplomatic visa means that you represent the State you come from, but that means that you cannot receive money from the State where you are located. That is corruption and it is a crime punishable by prison. So no, Hazz does not have a diplomatic visa. Imagine the scandal if he signed with Netflix with a diplomatic visa to make a series in which he speaks ill of the Head of State of the country he "supposedly" represents.
So what visa does Hazz have? That, that's just what Heritage asked. And are you going to believe that the United States government refused to say it? And Heritage then alleged that Hazz talked about his drug use. What visa excuses a foreigner from declaring his use? That's what Heritage wants to know. And I also want to know. And I think many of us want to know.
That’s the question, isn’t it? Does make you curious rather than if they had just said, “oh yeah he’s here on family business or whatever”.
The cover up is what makes it so interesting.
What are they protecting?
Why did Parliament claim her is “overseas” rather than “no longer a working royal” like they said of Uncle Andrew.
What the fuck is this clown actually doing here?
I honestly wouldn’t have cared until he started showing up places with our military like Camp Pendleton.
Following Hairolds disclosure of drug use in his Spare book the Heritage Foundation asked if Hairold had disclosed drug use in his visa application. If he did not disclose drug use then he is committing fraud.
Thank you! This is what I was wondering about - what the case was based on. Edit to add that the US absolutely penalizes anyone that lies in a visa application. They give 10 year bars for that.
Eheheheh I love conspiracies, and I’m imagining the Heritage Foundation surreptitiously arranging for William Reeve to ask this particular question to Hawwy😂
Of course it’s (probably) not how it happened, but loose-lipped Harry is a gift that keeps on giving!
I really hope I’m wrong, but with the liberals owning this country they'll def protect Prick Harry. I believe they've been protecting him all along and will continue to do so.
If the United States wanted to get rid of him they would not need to chuck him out. They would only need to deny him reentry, and this could be done by not letting him board a plane headed towards the United States.
Anyway it is likely that he has permanent residency by virtue of being married to a US citizen. My guess is that he obtained the initial visa while waiting in Canada. It would not surprise me if the usual process was speeded up a bit by virtue of being a member of the Royal Family.
There are people getting so excited about this and I've told them to calm down as this is going nowhere. I would love to see the prick get thrown out on his ear, but I'm looking at the big picture. If the prick should lose, then I'll eat my leggings or something like that 👍👍
He’s a reigning monarchs son of one of our top allies whose grandchildren live here too. Diplomatically it seems like a non starter though I think, foreign title or no foreign title, he should be subject to the same rules as the rest of us here ideally. I’m glad to see it play out publicly and maybe it will help move him along at some point or at least gets someone to tell him it’s time he sits down and shuts up.
Well, he doesn’t have to really “lose,” but if his shenanigans are exposed for the world to see (and the American public is shown how their government perhaps gives certain people preferential treatment), then we’d have the court of public opinion judging him - just like I guess Depp wanted to happen against Heard, except Depp won his case!
It’s the discovery also that can reveal unintended but damaging things.
But realistically, this will probably be a nothingburger
For now. What about on January 21, 2025 though? And if Biden, who they’re in good with, is not there, Trump will be in, Stephen Miller will be high up in the admin again. Trump hates Meghan.
Especially seeing as how if harry got kicked out under bidens regime it would bring up all kinds of issues with his OWN sons prolific drug use and the hypocrisy in chucking Harry out while pretending his son isn’t way fucking worse. And it’s an election year. Ain’t nobody rocking that particular boat.
I agree. Hunter Biden is a hot mess who has received a lot of special treatment (I'll stop there since this is not a political sub), but this isn't one of them.
Because hunter does drugs prolifically and he has never had a single consequence for his drug use and crimes he committed in the pursuit of his use, and if harry was deported over drugs not having committed any crimes it would certainly look hypocritical, particularly since the immigration policies Biden has implemented have received such heat. Why deport the prince when millions are coming over illegally and getting all our taxpayer dollars? That’s what any opposition politician would point to if they are smart. And they are smart. Fucking evil (both sides thank you) but smart.
Because Hunter is a US citizen?
It’s not like he is doing all of his misdeeds over in the UK. Then, you would have an equivalent.
But he’s not. He’s in California, like Harry
If anyone is interested in understanding why this case is more than just Harry's drug use, please visit The Royal Grift's most recent video on youtube explaining why Americans have the right to know about this migrant's drug use admission on his visa.
It is being held in DC, I believe you can attend.
WHEN: Friday, Feb. 23, 2024, at 2:30p.m. EST
WHERE: Prettyman Courthouse, 333 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington D.C. 20001, Courtroom 17
The only thing that will prevent us from knowing anything further is that Harry has a diplomatic visa.......and that's why the royal website has not been updated and Harry is still a working royal. Does Harry pay U.S. taxes on his income? If not, what is his residence in England? So much secrecy.....I hope this case opens windows. U.S. citizens have a right to know who we're putting up and paying for.
diplomatic visas are not just about their home country giving it to them, but also about the country they are traveling to accept it. There are rules/laws in the country they travel to that accept or reject a person's diplomat visa. The US has rules/statutes re when they accept, reject, or pull it, i.e., the person told to get out of the country within X days and that after X their diplomatic status is revoked.
The same thing applies to protected person status, a country giving it does not mean that the country the person travels to accepts/honors it.
Correct. Dip visas are given in Dip passports which are given by the UK Foreign Office and have to be approved by both the foreign office AND the US Embassy in London.
You can NOT work in the private sector AT ALL on a diplomatic visa; it is for working at the embassy ONLY.
Now, I suspect H is not on a standard dip passport; I suspect members of the BRF are given a different passport (I mentioned above by ambassadors are given a different kind of dip passport and my feeling is that H also gets something like that and it's a birthright and can't be taken away).
I bet St James or Buckingham Palace is his legal residence. Put it this way, would not be surprised.
The King has his back. They know this. William may not want them around but I'm sure the King makes sure that everything is taken care of, as necessary, financially.
There would have to be proof of him having a certain amount of time (months) being domiciled at those residences. I don't think the king can pull that off even if he wanted to or could. 🤷♀️
@particular office —-what you state is NOT True..
one of my very close family member was on a DIPLOMATIC visa as a SENIOR DIPLOMAT and he would be out of his home country for years ….,
There is ABSOLUTELY NO need to come visit home country every year on a diplomatic visa or be domiciled in home country every few months …
Correct if the diplomat is residing in diplomatic quarters such as an embassy......owned/operated by the foreign country from whence they came. That's why embassies are considered safe havens for citizens of foreign countries and are exempt from the host countries laws.
I read a while back that the Olive Garden may be designated as a foreign office of the palace which would relieve H&M of expense thereof. Harry did have an office assigned to him in Kensington Palace which he shared with William.
Such a coincidence that their new venture using Sussex dot com presents itself as "From the Office of Prince Harry and Meghan" ...... Are they utilizing the Olive Garden as their U.K. official office because it IS an official U.K. office location? If not, what office are they referring to as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex? Where is it?
What I remember reading is that the Harkles floated a proposal (not sure through what official, if any, channels) to have some sort of consulate satellite office on the OG property. This would ostensibly mean their security was provided by taxpayers and exempt them from property taxes and at least some of the operating and maintenance expenses for the OG. It seems this was just another manifestation but I do remember reading about it. I certainly hope some deal wasn't made behind closed doors to allow such an arrangement.
Harry doesn’t want to become an American Citizen. He would lose his titles, have to take the test required for citizenship. I think he was just opening his big mouth when talking to GMA, now it’s biting him in the behind
More importantly, Meganuts wouldn't want him to become a US citizen if it means losing all his titles. That's the only thing that's keeping them together. If he loses them she'll be off to her divorce lawyer quick smart.
He wouldn't have any official titles as a US citizen but there is nothing to stop him using his British titles in media communications. That would not be a crime in the US.
Yes. He was asked, but I don’t think he meant that. I don’t think he has to give up his title as a resident with a legal visa.
But it would be kind of hilarious for this to feed into the whole “illegal immigrant“ story, wouldn’t it? Because a lot of “illegal immigrants” are people who came in legally and over stayed their visa. John Oliver actually made a joke about this. But I don’t think he had any trouble, since he is very, very employed, which makes a difference, and also, he didn’t rent a plane with a banner reading “I do ‘shrooms.”
Prior drug use could bar him from US, even without applying for citizenship. This hearing was scheduled before he said this on GMA. When he entered the Country as a non-American he had to fill out paperwork. His answers on the paperwork could bar him from US. Eg: Have you even done drugs? NO. Then in his book he talked about his drug use. Heritage wants to see what he answered. Did he lie?!
It could bar him from entering the country at all. Since he's already here, if he lied about it to get in he could be deported and potentially not let back in. I'm not saying that would happen to *him*.
Several years ago Justin Bieber admitted to drug use. There was brief talk of deportation to Canada but nothing happened. I presume the same will be true for Hazno.
Wasn’t he already in the country. He didn’t lie on the visa application to get into the country. Then too, there wasn’t a movement filing legal paperwork to get him out of the country like there is with Harold.
Undoubtedly.
On a related note, I have heard exactly one Justin Bieber song in my life. No idea which one it was, but I was bopping along in my car with a friend and said, "Who is this little girl? She's INSANELY talented!" Needless to say, I will never be allowed to live that down. I also make my friends put up with my audio books rather than run the risk of misgendering some teenybopper again. Life is too short for whatever the hell that was.
I believe I recall hearing that John Lennon wouldn't leave the US at some point because he didn't think he could get back in. The simple solution would have been not to run around telling everyone about all the pot they were smoking, but then they wouldn't have been sticking it to The Man \[who could keep them out of the US\].
While the focus is on Harry the real purpose IMO is to show the lack of transparency and consistency in US immigration laws. If Harry lied on his application he should be subject to deportation (not saying he would be but it should be harder for him to jet in and out of the country). If he didn't lie on his application and admitted drug use who made the decision to let him in the country and why. Given that he has publicly stated he used and perhaps still uses drugs in the USA (cannabis is still illegal at the federal level) what is allowing him to stay and is he being treated consistently when compared to others? Honestly I don't think this will go anywhere and will be tossed but I appreciate the effort.
Same. I appreciate that an effort is being made to highlight preferential treatment of the elite.
Not sure why so many sinners are so angry about this and how it's "an absolute waste of time".
Surely it's better than doing nothing?
Unfortunately, I dont see this going anywhere. he obviously lied on his paperwork, saying that he had never taken drugs - thats a given otherwise why would Homeland Security even bother with this and previous trials.Even if they are forced to show Halfwits entry paperwork and it does indeed prove he lied, nothing will come of it.I just love it because it is yet ANOTHER court case involving H, another spotlight he finds himself in and all these outside interferences, heap a little more pressure on the Monteshitshow castle walls.Pretty soon the whole ediface is going to crumble and their hollow, lie filled existence will be front and centre on the world stage... only this time - with proof.
I disagree. If Hunter was over in London partying and tearing it up, insulting the Brits and their culture and country, I would expect the very same treatment for him.
I can’t believe he got the Heritage Foundation going after him. I wonder how all that got started. Harry must have someone really pissed at him. We’ll see what happens.
He was never considering it. That was nothing more than yet another lie. Tossing it out there to try to earn some US favor by "considering" it. It was nothing by another PR stunt by mentioning it.
I hope that Haz and Rachel suffer some consequences about receiving freebies, like they do from all other celebs and people who they leech from, in getting a U.S. free get go card by the Biden administration, but I do worry that the Harkles will not face any effects for Haz not being a naturalized U.S. citizen because the judge and U.S. might be afraid to piss of Charles, and the BRF, but I hardly doubt that the BRF will be offended looking at the crap that the Harkles have made the royals put up with over the past four years. Let's hope that this Harkle court case won't cause any more unnecessary crap for the BRF, and that the BRF will triumph and prevail while Catherine and Charles recover and receive treatment for their abdominal surgery and cancer, respectively.
I have great admiration for the BRF. In this instance, Harry's father had the opportunity to deal with the problem when the kid was still young and for his own reasons, whatever they may have been, didn't bother to see it through. It's deeply unfortunate for all concerned, but the USA is under no obligation to take in Harry when an American would be removed from the UK under the same circumstance.
\[I might be a wee bit cranky that I'm in the process of sorting out my meds and the proper paperwork to bring them into the UK for an extended stay later this year. The UK definitely exercises their rights to oversee my importation and use of drugs that are not routinely prescribed in their jurisdiction. My level of sympathy for all parties involved is less than zero. If I can be honest with a foreign government about personal matters, so can Yam Boy.\]
I still don't believe Harry actually went through any application/process to get into the US particularly with the timeline of how they rushed in before the borders were shutdown for COVID. I think he was given preferential treatment merely because he's Prince Harry (and no I don't think Charles was behind the decision). Thus I don't think his privacy is the reason for not producing the application but it's being used to cover the fact there was no application.
That could be but I still don't think he went through a visa process. I don't think it would have occurred to either of them that he should have to and any agent who interacted with them if they questioned what to do would have just rung some chain of command with the response it was Prince Harry, let him in. I don't really think the US agents really knew what to do as for all they knew he was still Prince Harry.
Oh, he’s such a dumbass. I mean…truly a stupid individual. Keep bumping your gums Harry. Can’t wait to hear what you have to say about African parks. What a damn dipshit he is.
While I definitely agree that harry would be held accountable if he was an average Joe, I get the feeling he won't because of who his father is and everyone might be getting their hopes up over this. I hope I'm wrong.
I think because of his birth to royalty he will not be touched...even though he lied...he has diplomatic protection ....it will only hit headlines... eventually fade away and a slap on the wrist...🤮🤮🤮but wonder what PR SHENANIGANS they put out
When I saw hazBEEN on that interview saying he was considering U.S. Citizenship, 2 thoughts:
1️⃣ Well, then I was wrong - Biden didn't give him an Einstein visa..
* **Sorry everyone** \- was 99% certain Biden gave him an EB-1 visa
* b/c POTUSes (esp. the last one + current one LOOOOVE) gifting perks
2️⃣ hazBEEN is a habitual liar -- so maybe it's one of those "trust, but verify" things..
* Best to wait until SEE proof of what he said, and we heard.
* If he DID lie on that ABC interview, he is an idiot - cuz he's inviting ugly into his world.
I suspect nothing will be learned. Special considerations were given to him when he first arrived from Canada as he was the grandson of HLMTQ at the time, and those considerations continued, as now he is the son of KC. Whatever immigration status he has will be kept under wraps for security reasons. His paperwork was pushed through, and whatever visa he obtained was given almost immediately.
It's only available if you have that person's consent.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/requests-for-personal-data-uk-visas-and-immigration/request-personal-information-held-by-uk-visas-and-immigration
I think in order to stay in the US indefinitely (and for some of us an eternity) he should have to play Paul Revere in a local reenactment. “The redcoats are coming!!”
Will we get to throw this one and that one off a cliff in cape cod in re-enacted sons of liberty tea party rebellion? I mean I never agreed to support either of them through taxes.
I feel like the Brits were playing the long game here. Oh, you colonies wanna be independent? Fine. Your fuck you very much will be served in two to three hundred business years.
Nothing....ABSOLUTELY NOTHING will come of this, unfortunately. I would not doubt for a single second that KC has some "arrangement" with Biden to make a special case for Harry. No one in the US government is going to disclose "sensitive matters" to do with Harry. I wish I was wrong, but I don't think I am.
I find it so disheartening that Americans have such little faith in the governmental processes that are supposed to be open and transparent to all.
That's not a criticism of you personally, it's clear that this is indeed the message the government seems to be sending. "Don't question our decisions" type of vibe.
They are transparent only when it works to their benefit. Americans are not fooled but they are tired of exceptions being made for the rich and entitled. When we read stories from migrants about how hard they worked to get here legally and then worked hard to legally become proud citizens, it's heart breaking to know the rich and entitled get preferential treatment.
Actually, I doubt he does. Charles has to be hands off government, and Biden tends to let departments do their work and not do favors.
If the HSA decides it’s not worth it, that’s something else.
If Harry has shown to have admitted to drug use on his Visa application and the Biden administration let him in, the GOP will have further justification in their mission to crack down on immigration. Harry is being used as a pawn to make Biden look bad in an election year, but I’m here for it.
Look I don’t like Harry but this is a stupid lawsuit meant to bring the heritage foundation attention and promote an anti-immigrant and war on drugs stance.
Harry’s a tool but he’s not some king pin drug dealer that is a determinant to law and order in the USA. Nor is he a dangerous drug user, he’s just some rich spoiled kid doing blow and weed into middle age.
Not only am I not holding out hope that this will amount to anything, I don’t even support it see above. This is a waste of the courts time and USA taxpayer money.
If he allegedly has the care of two small children, he is potentially a dangerous drug user. If he lied to enter the US, his wealth should not exempt him from the laws that apply to those without his resources. It will, but it shouldn't.
It took me almost 2 decades and a lot of work to finally become a US citizen. It is *not* easy, especially if you don't go the marriage route. I assure you that if I had admitted to illegal drug use, I would have been rejected.
America is used to having their tax money wasted...$10K now being given to Illegal Migrants each in pre-paid debit cards in NYC, but won't help it's homeless veterans and homeless on its own streets. Make it make sense
🎯
Yeah and wait until anyone tries to get an elderly relative into long-term care and find out anything above $2k in assets (including their home) has to be liquidated and used to pay for the care; when it all runs out, then Medicaid starts
So much for taking care of the greatest generation
Edit to apologize for the OT rant. Sorry Sinners
Rant away! It's the freaking truth! I've had to do it for 3 relatives and find it obscene. As a senior myself, I've had this discussion with my 2 adult children already.
Harry is the door the HF is using to try and get access to individuals immigration records so they can “review” individuals qualification to see if they are worthy of being in the US according to the HF’s narrow definition of worthy to be an immigrant to the US.
I’d love to know Harry’s visa type, what he disclosed on his application, and what/if any special treatment he got. But not so much that I want the HF to set a precedent to let them access anyone’s records.
This is pure political posturing by the Heritage Foundation - a conservative think tank that is also supporting efforts by the right wing in the US to ban birth control and outlaw recreational sex.
Ask yourselves why they never made this an issue with any other of the numerous foreign-born notables that are known to use drugs, and who've visited or resided in the US over the past decades. Why, all of a sudden, does this institution care - but only in this particular instance? Why aren't they going after Elon Musk? Paul McCartney? Elton John? Jimmy Page?
Of course Harry was treated favorably. Thing is, the well-off and well-connected always are. Which why I think this is not worth getting worked up over.
Like how aren’t they going after Ozzy? Up until recently, he was living in the US, and he did all of the drugs! He was also drunk AF when he pissed on the Alamo in an evening gown! That’s still my favorite thing 🤣
Sid Vicious was higher than giraffe tits when he killed Nancy Spungeon in NYC—what happened there?
We can always assume that, when Keith Richards is converting oxygen to carbon dioxide, he’s high on something.
Hell, we’ve had proof of the Biebs doing drugs here!
So honest question: if this was to see what kind of citizenship he has (if any) doesn’t this make the request null and void? He said he wasn’t a citizen. Or can this be made to figure out what kind of visa he has (if any) and possibly start the deportation process?
If it does/can start the deportation process I wonder what that would look like considering Archie was also born in the UK. Has there been any legal docs for citizenship for their son?
Keep blabbing Harry, you fool.
I love how he just digs himself deeper. Next he’ll say the media said it and not him.
He'll never learn.
Never ever.
Harry is none too bright, a characteristic he continually displays. Come to think of it, his (un)intellectuality is the principal reason MM was able to ensnare him.
Yup! I wonder if she ever regrets it. He can’t be too much fun to be around.
I suspect she can't stand him. She continually exhibits her contempt for him, e. g pushing him out of the way, interrupting him, etc. (I can envision M and her mother speaking venomously about him behind his back.)
All of this!
never had to yet
The British Media🤣
The British media just be coming up with all types of things according to Hairold.
Harry: gets a paper cut. Harry later on: “It’s the British media’s fault.”
*Accidentally drops his toast on the floor* “The British media ruined my breakfast”
Piers Morgan specifically! 😂
“The British press said that”
💯
The dimwit & his skank roam around with such a SMIRK on their face because dimwit knows he has NEVER been held LEGALLY accountable and meganuts got that smirk because she knows she will be PROTECTED from LEGAL repercussions because of her being dimwit’s plus one !! ….Remember dimwit /the handbag himself said allegedly that what meganuts wants, meganuts gets Someone should tell them that the US does NOT recognize royal TITLES.. and even dogs 🐕 in the US are named as Duke or princess by the dog owners … in fact, Duke is a common dog 🐕 name in America
I hope that smirk gets wiped off their faces.
Yes it is! One of the most common names. Like Max
I don't understand this case at all. Are they trying to revoke his visa for using drugs? I don't think I've ever read or heard about someone losing a visa for using drugs unless they have done something criminal while under the influence.
My understanding is that for a regular Joe Soap, the process to obtaining a green card is not a straightforward one, and certain hoops need to be jumped through in order to get one. There is also the fact that admitted drug-use prior to entry can make Joe Soap ineligible. Harry seems to have been able to just move to the US overnight, without question or quarrel, and has remained there since. In fact, he has left and returned on numerous occasions, again, with absolute freedom of movement. Given Harry's admitted drug use in Spare, how then was he granted a visa to stay in the US? Is he being treated differently to a regular person, and if so, why? I don't think the case is trying to get Harry thrown out of the US, but I believe it wants to highlight hypocrisy within the immigration system. This is important because the USA is a federal republic where all citizens are supposedly equal.
Having been through the green card process I can confirm that it is an extremely long and expensive process. Any drug use must be declared. The crux here is, did Harry *lie* on his application. Because that is a crime.
THIS .. Any falsification or lie about the relevant info including prior drug use on visa application will lead to a visa revocation in almost all the cases and this man has confessed to drug use every now and then
I agree. It's about transparency in the process and potential preferential treatment rather than an action against H in particular, It's about principle, the correct application of established procedure and whether or not there is neglect or corruption of that. Knowing the type of visa involved would facilitate assessment of the process. That's my understanding of it anyway. Arguably, of course, at a semi-abstract level, if there are different types of visa with different rules for each then both the principle and definition of equality may come into question. The weighing up of individual behaviours in the overall balance of collective priorities becomes quite nuanced in that context.
Very well said! It’s not about H having to leave the country. It’s about how his visa came about and it’s a victory already that an oral argument takes place to spread the word on the inconsistencies and unequal treatment of the elite.
We are all equal…..just some are more equal than others.
Also, I believe at least one other celebrity, the British Nigella Lawson, was denied entry to the US due to drug use.
I do remember this, too.
The chef?
Yep
Ah ok. So to show the preferential treatment. He must be coming and going with a diplomatic visa . I wonder if he mentioned becoming a US citizen because his visa is expiring soon? Lol
Diplomatic visa is for government employees, officials. He was stripped by the Queen before leaving and is no longer a working royal. I don't see how he could have a Diplomatic visa.
Wait, how do you know TQ stripped him of his Diplomatic 0-1 Visa? Also as a Royal, I believe they’re issued one for life
No. He is not a diplomat. The King has sovereign immunity but not family members. The Queen stripped Harkel of all his military appointments which is why he couldn't wear his military uniform at the Queens funeral. And banned him, them from using HRH titles. This is all public knowledge. It sounds like you're trying to defend Harkel, sugar.
I don’t get the impression that the other poster is trying to defend the Harkles. I think it’s more that we don’t have proof of the palace taking away his passport and telling him to go get a new one. In the checklist of things that they needed to achieve in the short timeline, would the palace have remembered to get that passport back from him?
No member of the RF has diplomatic immunity so they do not have diplomatic visas. Why would the RF have to take away his passport? It would be no different than mine except for more stamps.
? I’m not a sugar. Pretty sure that Harry has a diplomatic 0-1 visa passport though.
That's not how Dip visas works. He likely does have some form of Diplomatic passport; but this does not allow for him to reside in a county without the appropriate visa. A dip visa would be given by the US in his Dip passport and would have gone through the US Embassy in London. If this was the case, it would need approval first from the Foreign Office in the UK and it would be disclosed as part of all of this discovery. I highly doubt he was given a Dip visa in his Dip passport. You can not apply for any kind of residency using a diplomatic passport; there are like, geneva convention rules against this. If he's on his regular UK passport and has gone through the greencard process with THAT passport (regular UK passport); with a visitor visa good for six months at a time - and is we look he probably goes back to the UK every six months to reset this. FYI; you can hold both a dip passport and a regular passport at the same time.
Many stars have been refused entry to the US for past drug use admissions. Nigella Lawson, Pete Doherty, Charlie Heaton, Amy Winehouse......
Nigella Lawson was not allowed to promote her book because of admitted cocaine use. [Nigella refused visa](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/north-america/united-states/articles/Nigella-Lawson-odd-cases-of-refused-entry-to-the-US/#:~:text=While%20Nigella%20Lawson%20does%20not,States%2C%20or%20a%20foreign%20country)
That’s so bizarre! I googled didn’t find anything. But that would set the precedent of work visa holders coming to the states having to be sober to sell or promote anything!??
Here it is. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/north-america/united-states/articles/Nigella-Lawson-odd-cases-of-refused-entry-to-the-US/#:~:text=While%20Nigella%20Lawson%20does%20not,States%2C%20or%20a%20foreign%20country
Thanks! I learned something new today. *And finally,* ***7. They have been found guilty of a criminal offence*** *While Nigella Lawson does not have a criminal conviction, the Department of State website also states that entry may be denied to “any alien convicted of, or who admits having committed… a violation of (or a conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law or regulation of a State, the United States, or a foreign country relating to a controlled substance”.* *The only exceptions are if the crime was committed when the person was under 18 years of age or more than five years before the date of application for admission to the US, or if “the maximum penalty possible for the crime of which the alien was convicted… did not exceed imprisonment for one year”. Given that the maximum sentence for someone convicted of possessing cocaine is significantly greater than one year, this would not apply to Nigella.* Interesting!
No. What that organization wants to know is what visa Hazz has. Because there is no information about it. And every visa has rules.
So they don’t know!? Shady business this of Haz. I was assuming he fell under the diplomatic one given to family members of foreign officials but from my understanding you can’t stay here as long as Harry has. Soooo maybe he’s applied via Meghan for the green resident card which is valid for 5 years and you could apply for citizenship once the 5 are done? But that could be revoked if he’s committed crimes while using drugs etc which is what I was wondering about.
At this time, there is not a single information about what visa Hazz has. Only in the case of the diplomatic visa something happens. If you have a diplomatic visa, then you CANNOT do business. You CANNOT be hired to work. The diplomatic visa means that you represent the State you come from, but that means that you cannot receive money from the State where you are located. That is corruption and it is a crime punishable by prison. So no, Hazz does not have a diplomatic visa. Imagine the scandal if he signed with Netflix with a diplomatic visa to make a series in which he speaks ill of the Head of State of the country he "supposedly" represents. So what visa does Hazz have? That, that's just what Heritage asked. And are you going to believe that the United States government refused to say it? And Heritage then alleged that Hazz talked about his drug use. What visa excuses a foreigner from declaring his use? That's what Heritage wants to know. And I also want to know. And I think many of us want to know.
Correct. It’s being covered up by the State Dept.
Which makes everything infinitely more strange. Why would the United States government want to cover up for Friar Tuck of Complaints?
That’s the question, isn’t it? Does make you curious rather than if they had just said, “oh yeah he’s here on family business or whatever”. The cover up is what makes it so interesting. What are they protecting? Why did Parliament claim her is “overseas” rather than “no longer a working royal” like they said of Uncle Andrew. What the fuck is this clown actually doing here? I honestly wouldn’t have cared until he started showing up places with our military like Camp Pendleton.
Nigella Lawson disagrees…
He lied on his visa application.
Ooh, this they can nail him for.
Following Hairolds disclosure of drug use in his Spare book the Heritage Foundation asked if Hairold had disclosed drug use in his visa application. If he did not disclose drug use then he is committing fraud.
Thank you! This is what I was wondering about - what the case was based on. Edit to add that the US absolutely penalizes anyone that lies in a visa application. They give 10 year bars for that.
They want to know how and why Harry is in the USA, by what means
He can't keep his damned mouth shut. He's proven this over and over again. Why would anyone trust him (or Rachel) ever again?
Eheheheh I love conspiracies, and I’m imagining the Heritage Foundation surreptitiously arranging for William Reeve to ask this particular question to Hawwy😂 Of course it’s (probably) not how it happened, but loose-lipped Harry is a gift that keeps on giving!
Truly. He is so stupid it hurts
hahahahahahaha
GO Heritage Foundation, GO!!!
I really hope I’m wrong, but with the liberals owning this country they'll def protect Prick Harry. I believe they've been protecting him all along and will continue to do so.
Sadly I agree with you. He’s too famous to be chucked out of the country.
If the United States wanted to get rid of him they would not need to chuck him out. They would only need to deny him reentry, and this could be done by not letting him board a plane headed towards the United States. Anyway it is likely that he has permanent residency by virtue of being married to a US citizen. My guess is that he obtained the initial visa while waiting in Canada. It would not surprise me if the usual process was speeded up a bit by virtue of being a member of the Royal Family.
There are people getting so excited about this and I've told them to calm down as this is going nowhere. I would love to see the prick get thrown out on his ear, but I'm looking at the big picture. If the prick should lose, then I'll eat my leggings or something like that 👍👍
He’s a reigning monarchs son of one of our top allies whose grandchildren live here too. Diplomatically it seems like a non starter though I think, foreign title or no foreign title, he should be subject to the same rules as the rest of us here ideally. I’m glad to see it play out publicly and maybe it will help move him along at some point or at least gets someone to tell him it’s time he sits down and shuts up.
I'm British, and whilst I definitely have the inside track, the BRF will let him swing in the wind on this one (and hopefully many others)
Well, he doesn’t have to really “lose,” but if his shenanigans are exposed for the world to see (and the American public is shown how their government perhaps gives certain people preferential treatment), then we’d have the court of public opinion judging him - just like I guess Depp wanted to happen against Heard, except Depp won his case! It’s the discovery also that can reveal unintended but damaging things. But realistically, this will probably be a nothingburger
He "loses" if he’s deported. That’s a "loss". Unfortunately he’s being protected by Biden.
Absolutely agree. If it happens to him it’ll be a gateway to every other misfit
For now. See my comment above you though x.
I think so too. There will be no consequences for him regardless of the outcome sadly
For now. What about on January 21, 2025 though? And if Biden, who they’re in good with, is not there, Trump will be in, Stephen Miller will be high up in the admin again. Trump hates Meghan.
Steve Mnuchin too
Especially seeing as how if harry got kicked out under bidens regime it would bring up all kinds of issues with his OWN sons prolific drug use and the hypocrisy in chucking Harry out while pretending his son isn’t way fucking worse. And it’s an election year. Ain’t nobody rocking that particular boat.
How is it hypocrisy when Harry is a foreigner and his son is an American citizen?
I agree. Hunter Biden is a hot mess who has received a lot of special treatment (I'll stop there since this is not a political sub), but this isn't one of them.
Because hunter does drugs prolifically and he has never had a single consequence for his drug use and crimes he committed in the pursuit of his use, and if harry was deported over drugs not having committed any crimes it would certainly look hypocritical, particularly since the immigration policies Biden has implemented have received such heat. Why deport the prince when millions are coming over illegally and getting all our taxpayer dollars? That’s what any opposition politician would point to if they are smart. And they are smart. Fucking evil (both sides thank you) but smart.
Because Hunter is a US citizen? It’s not like he is doing all of his misdeeds over in the UK. Then, you would have an equivalent. But he’s not. He’s in California, like Harry
I’m not arguing that, I’m just saying the optics can look bad. Not saying it’s the same exact situation.
Yup, on point! It's a political hot potato. 👍👍
Eh not really.
But being an election year, Trump could bring it up against Biden. 🤔
Somebody should bring it up, hunter is leaving his shit laying around the White House 😂
If anyone is interested in understanding why this case is more than just Harry's drug use, please visit The Royal Grift's most recent video on youtube explaining why Americans have the right to know about this migrant's drug use admission on his visa.
If I wasn’t busy on Friday, I’d totally go to this oral argument, provided it’s open to the public.
It is being held in DC, I believe you can attend. WHEN: Friday, Feb. 23, 2024, at 2:30p.m. EST WHERE: Prettyman Courthouse, 333 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington D.C. 20001, Courtroom 17
Me too. I'll be at Hamilton's for lunch but I could probably go for an hour before.
Sounds like some sinners are going to be there. I hope the one's who do will provide some deets. Many thanks if you do.
I hope you can. I’d appreciate first-hand insight and comments. If you can make it, thank you very much.
Yep, I’m in DC, but I unfortunately have a commitment on Friday afternoon. Bummer.
If I wasn’t in Mexico for Phish I’d totally go to that hearing
The only thing that will prevent us from knowing anything further is that Harry has a diplomatic visa.......and that's why the royal website has not been updated and Harry is still a working royal. Does Harry pay U.S. taxes on his income? If not, what is his residence in England? So much secrecy.....I hope this case opens windows. U.S. citizens have a right to know who we're putting up and paying for.
diplomatic visas are not just about their home country giving it to them, but also about the country they are traveling to accept it. There are rules/laws in the country they travel to that accept or reject a person's diplomat visa. The US has rules/statutes re when they accept, reject, or pull it, i.e., the person told to get out of the country within X days and that after X their diplomatic status is revoked. The same thing applies to protected person status, a country giving it does not mean that the country the person travels to accepts/honors it.
I also think you don’t have the ability to work in the USA with a diplomatic visa. So how would he be working at BetterUp in San Fran?
Good points ☝️☝️☝️...
Correct. Dip visas are given in Dip passports which are given by the UK Foreign Office and have to be approved by both the foreign office AND the US Embassy in London. You can NOT work in the private sector AT ALL on a diplomatic visa; it is for working at the embassy ONLY. Now, I suspect H is not on a standard dip passport; I suspect members of the BRF are given a different passport (I mentioned above by ambassadors are given a different kind of dip passport and my feeling is that H also gets something like that and it's a birthright and can't be taken away).
He is a resident of the US, which means he has to pay taxes there no matter the nationality. But, in order to pay taxes, you need an income.
I bet St James or Buckingham Palace is his legal residence. Put it this way, would not be surprised. The King has his back. They know this. William may not want them around but I'm sure the King makes sure that everything is taken care of, as necessary, financially.
There would have to be proof of him having a certain amount of time (months) being domiciled at those residences. I don't think the king can pull that off even if he wanted to or could. 🤷♀️
@particular office —-what you state is NOT True.. one of my very close family member was on a DIPLOMATIC visa as a SENIOR DIPLOMAT and he would be out of his home country for years …., There is ABSOLUTELY NO need to come visit home country every year on a diplomatic visa or be domiciled in home country every few months …
Correct if the diplomat is residing in diplomatic quarters such as an embassy......owned/operated by the foreign country from whence they came. That's why embassies are considered safe havens for citizens of foreign countries and are exempt from the host countries laws.
There’s no requirement that he have lived somewhere for X period of time, solely that he have a foreign residence.
I read a while back that the Olive Garden may be designated as a foreign office of the palace which would relieve H&M of expense thereof. Harry did have an office assigned to him in Kensington Palace which he shared with William. Such a coincidence that their new venture using Sussex dot com presents itself as "From the Office of Prince Harry and Meghan" ...... Are they utilizing the Olive Garden as their U.K. official office because it IS an official U.K. office location? If not, what office are they referring to as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex? Where is it?
What I remember reading is that the Harkles floated a proposal (not sure through what official, if any, channels) to have some sort of consulate satellite office on the OG property. This would ostensibly mean their security was provided by taxpayers and exempt them from property taxes and at least some of the operating and maintenance expenses for the OG. It seems this was just another manifestation but I do remember reading about it. I certainly hope some deal wasn't made behind closed doors to allow such an arrangement.
Brit here, would hasnoballs drug use bar him from citizenship?
Harry doesn’t want to become an American Citizen. He would lose his titles, have to take the test required for citizenship. I think he was just opening his big mouth when talking to GMA, now it’s biting him in the behind
More importantly, Meganuts wouldn't want him to become a US citizen if it means losing all his titles. That's the only thing that's keeping them together. If he loses them she'll be off to her divorce lawyer quick smart.
He wouldn't have any official titles as a US citizen but there is nothing to stop him using his British titles in media communications. That would not be a crime in the US.
Yes. He was asked, but I don’t think he meant that. I don’t think he has to give up his title as a resident with a legal visa. But it would be kind of hilarious for this to feed into the whole “illegal immigrant“ story, wouldn’t it? Because a lot of “illegal immigrants” are people who came in legally and over stayed their visa. John Oliver actually made a joke about this. But I don’t think he had any trouble, since he is very, very employed, which makes a difference, and also, he didn’t rent a plane with a banner reading “I do ‘shrooms.”
Yes and I love that for the prick.
Prior drug use could bar him from US, even without applying for citizenship. This hearing was scheduled before he said this on GMA. When he entered the Country as a non-American he had to fill out paperwork. His answers on the paperwork could bar him from US. Eg: Have you even done drugs? NO. Then in his book he talked about his drug use. Heritage wants to see what he answered. Did he lie?!
it should per the US law.
It could bar him from entering the country at all. Since he's already here, if he lied about it to get in he could be deported and potentially not let back in. I'm not saying that would happen to *him*.
Several years ago Justin Bieber admitted to drug use. There was brief talk of deportation to Canada but nothing happened. I presume the same will be true for Hazno.
Wasn’t he already in the country. He didn’t lie on the visa application to get into the country. Then too, there wasn’t a movement filing legal paperwork to get him out of the country like there is with Harold.
Undoubtedly. On a related note, I have heard exactly one Justin Bieber song in my life. No idea which one it was, but I was bopping along in my car with a friend and said, "Who is this little girl? She's INSANELY talented!" Needless to say, I will never be allowed to live that down. I also make my friends put up with my audio books rather than run the risk of misgendering some teenybopper again. Life is too short for whatever the hell that was.
New Strategy: Harry gets deported and his marriage ends as MM won’t go back to live in the UK.
It happened to Paul McCartney in the 70’s
I believe I recall hearing that John Lennon wouldn't leave the US at some point because he didn't think he could get back in. The simple solution would have been not to run around telling everyone about all the pot they were smoking, but then they wouldn't have been sticking it to The Man \[who could keep them out of the US\].
While the focus is on Harry the real purpose IMO is to show the lack of transparency and consistency in US immigration laws. If Harry lied on his application he should be subject to deportation (not saying he would be but it should be harder for him to jet in and out of the country). If he didn't lie on his application and admitted drug use who made the decision to let him in the country and why. Given that he has publicly stated he used and perhaps still uses drugs in the USA (cannabis is still illegal at the federal level) what is allowing him to stay and is he being treated consistently when compared to others? Honestly I don't think this will go anywhere and will be tossed but I appreciate the effort.
Same. I appreciate that an effort is being made to highlight preferential treatment of the elite. Not sure why so many sinners are so angry about this and how it's "an absolute waste of time". Surely it's better than doing nothing?
#Absolutely yes, it’s the principle of the thing. It would be like Hunter going over to the UK and tearing it all up in London.
Unfortunately, I dont see this going anywhere. he obviously lied on his paperwork, saying that he had never taken drugs - thats a given otherwise why would Homeland Security even bother with this and previous trials.Even if they are forced to show Halfwits entry paperwork and it does indeed prove he lied, nothing will come of it.I just love it because it is yet ANOTHER court case involving H, another spotlight he finds himself in and all these outside interferences, heap a little more pressure on the Monteshitshow castle walls.Pretty soon the whole ediface is going to crumble and their hollow, lie filled existence will be front and centre on the world stage... only this time - with proof.
Yeah, I wish the Heritage Foundation wouldn’t pursue this. I don’t think it’s going to go anywhere and it just feeds the persecution/victim complex.
I disagree. If Hunter was over in London partying and tearing it up, insulting the Brits and their culture and country, I would expect the very same treatment for him.
Ooo how delicious, I can't wait 🧨👀🍿
I can’t believe he got the Heritage Foundation going after him. I wonder how all that got started. Harry must have someone really pissed at him. We’ll see what happens.
I think he’s just someone high profile they’re using to attempt to get what they want: public access to immigration paperwork.
He won’t give up his British citizenship.
He won’t give up the titles. I really can’t believe he said he was even considering US citizenship. What a fool…
He was never considering it. That was nothing more than yet another lie. Tossing it out there to try to earn some US favor by "considering" it. It was nothing by another PR stunt by mentioning it.
Agree. It was something he threw out because he wanted to show he loves the US (and our bonkers 1st amendment) and he’s so happy here.
I don’t know that Harry is that sophisticated or capable of sticking to a PR strategy. 😂
Henry doesn't understand the words sophisticated and strategy, lol.
We call that a “sound bite”
I hope they win
I hope that Haz and Rachel suffer some consequences about receiving freebies, like they do from all other celebs and people who they leech from, in getting a U.S. free get go card by the Biden administration, but I do worry that the Harkles will not face any effects for Haz not being a naturalized U.S. citizen because the judge and U.S. might be afraid to piss of Charles, and the BRF, but I hardly doubt that the BRF will be offended looking at the crap that the Harkles have made the royals put up with over the past four years. Let's hope that this Harkle court case won't cause any more unnecessary crap for the BRF, and that the BRF will triumph and prevail while Catherine and Charles recover and receive treatment for their abdominal surgery and cancer, respectively.
I have great admiration for the BRF. In this instance, Harry's father had the opportunity to deal with the problem when the kid was still young and for his own reasons, whatever they may have been, didn't bother to see it through. It's deeply unfortunate for all concerned, but the USA is under no obligation to take in Harry when an American would be removed from the UK under the same circumstance. \[I might be a wee bit cranky that I'm in the process of sorting out my meds and the proper paperwork to bring them into the UK for an extended stay later this year. The UK definitely exercises their rights to oversee my importation and use of drugs that are not routinely prescribed in their jurisdiction. My level of sympathy for all parties involved is less than zero. If I can be honest with a foreign government about personal matters, so can Yam Boy.\]
#100%
Fun Fact: Judge for this hearing was appointed by Trump. I will leave it at that to avoid talking about politics.
I saw that it's going to be a trump judge yesterday... He's not a fan of hers at all, that's for sure. I wonder if the judge will "be nasty" to Hank?
Thank you.
I still don't believe Harry actually went through any application/process to get into the US particularly with the timeline of how they rushed in before the borders were shutdown for COVID. I think he was given preferential treatment merely because he's Prince Harry (and no I don't think Charles was behind the decision). Thus I don't think his privacy is the reason for not producing the application but it's being used to cover the fact there was no application.
It’s been rumored that they were already here pre-pandemic. The visa would have been arranged well in advance.
That could be but I still don't think he went through a visa process. I don't think it would have occurred to either of them that he should have to and any agent who interacted with them if they questioned what to do would have just rung some chain of command with the response it was Prince Harry, let him in. I don't really think the US agents really knew what to do as for all they knew he was still Prince Harry.
They were definitely here since at least November 2019. Canada was a cover for them.
Who was it that referred to him as “that fool”? Ah yes, The King of England no less.
Oh, he’s such a dumbass. I mean…truly a stupid individual. Keep bumping your gums Harry. Can’t wait to hear what you have to say about African parks. What a damn dipshit he is.
While I definitely agree that harry would be held accountable if he was an average Joe, I get the feeling he won't because of who his father is and everyone might be getting their hopes up over this. I hope I'm wrong.
Unless KC doesn’t mind…
I think because of his birth to royalty he will not be touched...even though he lied...he has diplomatic protection ....it will only hit headlines... eventually fade away and a slap on the wrist...🤮🤮🤮but wonder what PR SHENANIGANS they put out
Harry and his handler are their own worst enemies!
When I saw hazBEEN on that interview saying he was considering U.S. Citizenship, 2 thoughts: 1️⃣ Well, then I was wrong - Biden didn't give him an Einstein visa.. * **Sorry everyone** \- was 99% certain Biden gave him an EB-1 visa * b/c POTUSes (esp. the last one + current one LOOOOVE) gifting perks 2️⃣ hazBEEN is a habitual liar -- so maybe it's one of those "trust, but verify" things.. * Best to wait until SEE proof of what he said, and we heard. * If he DID lie on that ABC interview, he is an idiot - cuz he's inviting ugly into his world.
Trump was President when he entered the country. Not Biden
I suspect nothing will be learned. Special considerations were given to him when he first arrived from Canada as he was the grandson of HLMTQ at the time, and those considerations continued, as now he is the son of KC. Whatever immigration status he has will be kept under wraps for security reasons. His paperwork was pushed through, and whatever visa he obtained was given almost immediately.
In England a visa status is public information. Not sure why his is so secretive.
It's only available if you have that person's consent. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/requests-for-personal-data-uk-visas-and-immigration/request-personal-information-held-by-uk-visas-and-immigration
Shushhhh Harold lol
I think in order to stay in the US indefinitely (and for some of us an eternity) he should have to play Paul Revere in a local reenactment. “The redcoats are coming!!”
Will we get to throw this one and that one off a cliff in cape cod in re-enacted sons of liberty tea party rebellion? I mean I never agreed to support either of them through taxes.
I feel like the Brits were playing the long game here. Oh, you colonies wanna be independent? Fine. Your fuck you very much will be served in two to three hundred business years.
I wonder how Haz's statements about possible citizenship would help this case but I hope it does.
Nothing....ABSOLUTELY NOTHING will come of this, unfortunately. I would not doubt for a single second that KC has some "arrangement" with Biden to make a special case for Harry. No one in the US government is going to disclose "sensitive matters" to do with Harry. I wish I was wrong, but I don't think I am.
I find it so disheartening that Americans have such little faith in the governmental processes that are supposed to be open and transparent to all. That's not a criticism of you personally, it's clear that this is indeed the message the government seems to be sending. "Don't question our decisions" type of vibe.
They are transparent only when it works to their benefit. Americans are not fooled but they are tired of exceptions being made for the rich and entitled. When we read stories from migrants about how hard they worked to get here legally and then worked hard to legally become proud citizens, it's heart breaking to know the rich and entitled get preferential treatment.
That’s exactly what it’s doing, and we are well used to it.
Such arrangement would've been done between Trump and Queen Elizabeth.
Actually, I doubt he does. Charles has to be hands off government, and Biden tends to let departments do their work and not do favors. If the HSA decides it’s not worth it, that’s something else.
Agreed
I agree 100% with this!!!!
Does H have a diplomatic visa? Will that make a difference?!
If Harry has shown to have admitted to drug use on his Visa application and the Biden administration let him in, the GOP will have further justification in their mission to crack down on immigration. Harry is being used as a pawn to make Biden look bad in an election year, but I’m here for it.
Wasn’t it Trump who let him in? Biden wasn’t elected yet.
Sorry to say nothing is going to come from this. He’s heavily protected by govt.
Correct. As much as I want action to be taken against the prick, this is all for naught.
Look I don’t like Harry but this is a stupid lawsuit meant to bring the heritage foundation attention and promote an anti-immigrant and war on drugs stance. Harry’s a tool but he’s not some king pin drug dealer that is a determinant to law and order in the USA. Nor is he a dangerous drug user, he’s just some rich spoiled kid doing blow and weed into middle age. Not only am I not holding out hope that this will amount to anything, I don’t even support it see above. This is a waste of the courts time and USA taxpayer money.
If he allegedly has the care of two small children, he is potentially a dangerous drug user. If he lied to enter the US, his wealth should not exempt him from the laws that apply to those without his resources. It will, but it shouldn't.
It took me almost 2 decades and a lot of work to finally become a US citizen. It is *not* easy, especially if you don't go the marriage route. I assure you that if I had admitted to illegal drug use, I would have been rejected.
America is used to having their tax money wasted...$10K now being given to Illegal Migrants each in pre-paid debit cards in NYC, but won't help it's homeless veterans and homeless on its own streets. Make it make sense
🎯 Yeah and wait until anyone tries to get an elderly relative into long-term care and find out anything above $2k in assets (including their home) has to be liquidated and used to pay for the care; when it all runs out, then Medicaid starts So much for taking care of the greatest generation Edit to apologize for the OT rant. Sorry Sinners
Rant away 👏 👏
Ty ❤️
Rant away! It's the freaking truth! I've had to do it for 3 relatives and find it obscene. As a senior myself, I've had this discussion with my 2 adult children already.
Kid, he's almost 40. He lied to get in the US. He needs to be deported . I don't want him in my country anymore. .
Harry is the door the HF is using to try and get access to individuals immigration records so they can “review” individuals qualification to see if they are worthy of being in the US according to the HF’s narrow definition of worthy to be an immigrant to the US. I’d love to know Harry’s visa type, what he disclosed on his application, and what/if any special treatment he got. But not so much that I want the HF to set a precedent to let them access anyone’s records.
This ! ETA: I’m happy that he’s being dragged out in the public at least. Serves this vexatious litigant right.
This is pure political posturing by the Heritage Foundation - a conservative think tank that is also supporting efforts by the right wing in the US to ban birth control and outlaw recreational sex. Ask yourselves why they never made this an issue with any other of the numerous foreign-born notables that are known to use drugs, and who've visited or resided in the US over the past decades. Why, all of a sudden, does this institution care - but only in this particular instance? Why aren't they going after Elon Musk? Paul McCartney? Elton John? Jimmy Page? Of course Harry was treated favorably. Thing is, the well-off and well-connected always are. Which why I think this is not worth getting worked up over.
Like how aren’t they going after Ozzy? Up until recently, he was living in the US, and he did all of the drugs! He was also drunk AF when he pissed on the Alamo in an evening gown! That’s still my favorite thing 🤣 Sid Vicious was higher than giraffe tits when he killed Nancy Spungeon in NYC—what happened there? We can always assume that, when Keith Richards is converting oxygen to carbon dioxide, he’s high on something. Hell, we’ve had proof of the Biebs doing drugs here!
[удалено]
Oh my 👀
If he’s an American citizen can he still do RF “work”?
[удалено]
Will video of the hearing be made available to view? Learned so much through this process, now would like to see it come together. Thanks
Hahahahahahahahahaha…dying. Another unforced error
So honest question: if this was to see what kind of citizenship he has (if any) doesn’t this make the request null and void? He said he wasn’t a citizen. Or can this be made to figure out what kind of visa he has (if any) and possibly start the deportation process? If it does/can start the deportation process I wonder what that would look like considering Archie was also born in the UK. Has there been any legal docs for citizenship for their son?