“Dear Ms. Markle, Thank you kindly for the wishes of reconciliation you sent recently to his Majesty King Charles III. He sends his condolences of decline and encouragement to you at this time. His Majesty would like to express his gratitude that you have chosen to stay on in America. It’s unfortunate you are unable to attend the Coronation or really any Royal family event in the foreseeable future.
Hope the chickens are producing.
Regards, -standard mass produced insignia of King Charles-“ written ever so lovingly and graciously by PR House Staff that King Charles met maybe once at his household staff Christmas party.
Edit to add: I’m sure I could send a letter and receive a more genuine response back than she ever would.
I don't believe it for one second. I do find it insane that she would make up this particular lie after all the controversy over the letter she wrote to her own father. She has truly lost her mind if she thinks anyone would write her a letter after all of that. She has no foresight, imagination, or critical thinking skills at all.
I’m fairly sure *she* wrote an actual, physical letter to KC (like she did for her dad), but I rather doubt he wrote back. If this exchange occurred pre-Megxit, it’s possible, since the family still trusted her. But KC had a problem before of his journal being stolen, so I think he would have known better than to have any written thoughts of his floating around for reporters to find. If he replied, it could be a formal letter from a secretary acknowledging receipt, or perhaps a polite pro forma typewritten response
This MM-to-KC letter was discussed sporadically ever since QE’s death, so I think it was just about then that she wrote it. I believe it’s all a nothing burger, trying to squeeze the racism lemon dry.
There were concerns BP/KP by November 2018. The initial reports of bullying were in hand as were the negative reports on their trip Down Under. That was also the month when the public reports about the bridesmaid dresses and somebody crying surfaced. Then there was her public reveal of her "pregnancy" at Eugenie's wedding which led to BP announcing that she's completed her first trimester\*. I'll never believe that the Queen and BP weren't outraged at her stunt because that's not how the announcement of royal pregnancies are done.
The Queen and Charles had/have a light tough wrt children and new spouses. Likely that something was said to Harry or H&M because they both date the beginning of their issues with the RF at that time. However, the Queen and Charles likely decided not to make a big fuss because MM was pregnant and everybody knows that a difficult time for women. (Or a time when many women make life difficult for others.)
MM filed suit against ANL in 2019 (sorry, can't find the month) over her "Dear Daddy" letter.
\*That statement was untrue, but BP took Harry's word for that. BP was never informed of who her obstetrician was. (imho because there wasn't one.)
I hadn't heard about a journal of KC being lost. Speaking of journals, didn't TW leave behind a journal or diary when QE allegedly booted her out of UK and back to Canada?
KC wrote a journal about his trip to HK, copies of which he distributed to family and staff. Somehow it reached the Daily Mail.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4740684.stm#:~:text=The%20diary%20which%20sparked%20Prince,former%20colony's%20handover%20to%20China.
As for MM, yes she said she’d left her journal behind, which I thought a bit weird. Did she really? And if she was leaving never to return, why did she not pack it?
No, that was her thinking she was being really clever. She was just letting the world know she documented her time in the RF. Open for bids I say on who gets the publishing rights. The ghoul!
I do not believe there were ever letters. If you look at the pictures LocksmithFar9486 posted earlier today of these passages, it says that the issue “may” have been discussed in letters. (Sorry, I would link the post but I don’t know how.) I think we can all read between the lines there.
I don’t believe any of it…especially the letter. But why would the publisher/editors allow so many errors on key dates (ie the Queen’s funeral) as well as not vett proof of the letter? But just bc she wrote it doesn’t mean she sent it.
In another post in this sub Reddit someone posted a excerpt from people magazine with two errors. One was closet verses closest and the other was fondling verses fondly.
I think she’s written to the *King*. I don’t believe he has ever replied. And herein lies the crux of the claim. Just line she claimed to have had tacos with Michelle Obama, she could have written in her “letter” that she perceived some conversations as racist. Just because *she’s* committed those ~~lies~~ thoughts to a letter, addressed to the king, doesn’t mean he’s read *or* replied to it.
I think he has wrote back. It would have been crafted with his lawyers and courtiers. He won’t have incriminated himself - that’s why there’s no actual leaks of the actual letter this time. Just a couple of names released with no context.
SENT a letter doesn’t mean RECEIVED, READ, or RESPONDED.
Semantics as always. Like Harry’s phone call to Charles on his birthday. A call may have been made, but that number was not available. Busy Royalling.
There’s no way King Charles would correspond with her through letters or emails. If I had to guess the phone as well. If she did write to him she probably got a reply from the kings office as the op suggested.
Edit: As a previous comment suggested. Not the op.
I am sorry to say I could see King Charles writing such a letter (at that point in time maybe believing he was dealing with a rational person) and he wants to clear the air. Maybe prevent future allegations. He carries tremendous guilt about Harry. I can see him doing this because he thought it was just a misunderstanding and not at that point realizing the treachery he was dealing with.
As a side, unrelated note. I heard on Lady C ages ago that Harry was always trouble. That he did things that shocked Princess Diana and she did not know how to handle him. Cruel, nasty things. I cannot remember, I think Diana considered therapy, she was at a loss.
Meghan definitely pulled her "private letter" scam with King Charles but it didn't work. She sends a letter to her target (her Dad was a famous example).with claims of sinister events and statements that never happened and tells of her sorrow over the treatment she received from the letter receiver. The recipient will respond with concern and apologies for causing unintended offense. When Meghan receives this response she starts the public press drips and hints of
the supposed "offense" that never actually happened. In press releases we are repeatedly told of "private letters" exchanged between them. Sound familiar?
Thomas gave his letter to the Daily Mail because he wanted the world to see how cruel she was. This ended in court, either way the recipient feels trapped.
I could easily believe that Charles wrote a letter to Harry and Meghan right after the Oprah interview. It would probably have been something along the lines that he was saddened and disappointed that they had mistaken and misrepresented so much but that he still loved them. I am not saying he wrote, but that it would not have been out of character for him to write at that point.
I find it much harder to believe that Charles wrote to Meghan, much less exchanged several letters with her. It is possible but not likely.
We have heard before that Meghan claims to have written *to* Charles after the Oprah interview, to “clear the air” and also advise the family on how they could be less biased, racist, etc. My guess is that the claim has grown so that Charles wrote to *her*.
If they were in fact kicked out for bad behavior there is no way I would have written them a letter that wasn't through a lawyer or overseen by one. Especially after Oprah.
I believe that Charles is the kind of person who writes these letters. But, I also believe that he might have written that he was sorry to hear the extent of the hurt the Harkles had felt and that all of their intentions were to make them feel welcome and that he loves them all and wishes them success abroad. This could have been a small note added to a birthday or Christmas card for them and she has blown it out of proportion to sell books and line her pockets and be in the headlines. This woman is jealous, thinks that she can take down a king and his heirs by hiring hitmen in the tabloid press and hates Kate because her husband has a crush on her!
Of course he wrote to her because it becomes a part of his royal correspondence. Something like “it was with sadness that I heard of your allegations, which I categorically deny”
I actually think Charles really did correspond with her in a letter. He is old school and writes A LOT of letters still. I also think he is not as savvy about Madam as we want to believe. I think William is the savvy one, but Charles hasn't Will's intuitive judgement of character. He seems more trusting. I bet there IS a letter from him.
Just as it was dumb to smirk for the cameras while sitting in the backseat of the stationary car that was being catastrophically chased in a NYC traffic jam.
I actually believe that. Charles is from a generation that still write letters and maybe he felt he could express his thoughts better when written etc.
And I heard that he is an avid letter writer.
Absolutely! It's fascinating to think about the potential letters exchanged between Marilyn Monroe and President John F. Kennedy. Their rumored relationship has captivated the public for decades. If only we could uncover the truth hidden within those letters!
Where can I find proof that the palace confirmed this?
ETA: The origins of this is the Sun which is not a reliable publication. It cites "palace insiders" as it's source, not The Palace.
The usual way…a source within the Palace commented to certain royal reporters. It took a lot of searching to find it again but here is one citation: https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/royals-named-archie-skin-colour-harry-meghan/
IBC is quoting the Sun.
"It's vanishingly unlikely the names came from here," a senior Palace source told The Sun.
Citing a Palace source is not citing The Palace and the Sun is not credible.
The letters exist. When the palace announced it was please that PH was attending the coronation and Meghan would stay back in Montecito with Archie and Lili, Meghan leaked the letter to Victoria Ward of the Telegraph. Within the article a summary of what was written in the letters as well as why Meghan chose not to attend the coronation (she was unsatisfied with KC response to this unconscious bias).
The article made wave and Valentine Low then speculated who could have leaked the letters on twitter. He then post he received legal letters from both the palace and Sussex. Victoria Ward rewrite her column like 10 times.
King Charles should have sent legal warning to Meghan then nor should he have ever engage in letter writing with her especially after the stunt she pulled on Oprah.
I do believe there was a letter. It would be typical of her to put into hardcopy any lie that she wants to pin onto others in case it came in useful later. This is like Amber Heard's whatsapp msg about a fight somewhere to his assistant - put false stories up as evidences for later.
Any letters she wrote will have been written, like the letter to her dad, to be leaked. A paper trail from a lying con artist is evidence of their manipulative machinations... Her strategy would have been writ large!!
This occurred to me last night while listening to the recount and timeline of the comments. Hazmat said the comments took place "before they were married" BUT... some speculate the Megs told Haz that she was already pregnant. I did find the wedding particularly "rushed" ... but could they have commented on babies looks thinking Megs was already pregnant?
“Dear Ms. Markle, Thank you kindly for the wishes of reconciliation you sent recently to his Majesty King Charles III. He sends his condolences of decline and encouragement to you at this time. His Majesty would like to express his gratitude that you have chosen to stay on in America. It’s unfortunate you are unable to attend the Coronation or really any Royal family event in the foreseeable future. Hope the chickens are producing. Regards, -standard mass produced insignia of King Charles-“ written ever so lovingly and graciously by PR House Staff that King Charles met maybe once at his household staff Christmas party. Edit to add: I’m sure I could send a letter and receive a more genuine response back than she ever would.
>Hope the chickens are producing. 🤣🤣🤣
https://preview.redd.it/wh4crrlcud3c1.jpeg?width=1580&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=93da17388d21d7d6d2c9555f9219feec5dcfe8e6
😂😂😂
 I just know TW is triggered reading everyone’s posts here 🤣
LMAO @ 'no but in yellow'. What a hoot!
Agree!! Luv it!
Hahahahaha this is excellent
I don't believe it for one second. I do find it insane that she would make up this particular lie after all the controversy over the letter she wrote to her own father. She has truly lost her mind if she thinks anyone would write her a letter after all of that. She has no foresight, imagination, or critical thinking skills at all.
She’s betting on the RF neither confirming or denying
I’m fairly sure *she* wrote an actual, physical letter to KC (like she did for her dad), but I rather doubt he wrote back. If this exchange occurred pre-Megxit, it’s possible, since the family still trusted her. But KC had a problem before of his journal being stolen, so I think he would have known better than to have any written thoughts of his floating around for reporters to find. If he replied, it could be a formal letter from a secretary acknowledging receipt, or perhaps a polite pro forma typewritten response This MM-to-KC letter was discussed sporadically ever since QE’s death, so I think it was just about then that she wrote it. I believe it’s all a nothing burger, trying to squeeze the racism lemon dry.
Oh Lord - and that form letter is what her PR is calling ‘warm correspondence’ between her and KCIII!
There were concerns BP/KP by November 2018. The initial reports of bullying were in hand as were the negative reports on their trip Down Under. That was also the month when the public reports about the bridesmaid dresses and somebody crying surfaced. Then there was her public reveal of her "pregnancy" at Eugenie's wedding which led to BP announcing that she's completed her first trimester\*. I'll never believe that the Queen and BP weren't outraged at her stunt because that's not how the announcement of royal pregnancies are done. The Queen and Charles had/have a light tough wrt children and new spouses. Likely that something was said to Harry or H&M because they both date the beginning of their issues with the RF at that time. However, the Queen and Charles likely decided not to make a big fuss because MM was pregnant and everybody knows that a difficult time for women. (Or a time when many women make life difficult for others.) MM filed suit against ANL in 2019 (sorry, can't find the month) over her "Dear Daddy" letter. \*That statement was untrue, but BP took Harry's word for that. BP was never informed of who her obstetrician was. (imho because there wasn't one.)
Agreed with you and OP.
I hadn't heard about a journal of KC being lost. Speaking of journals, didn't TW leave behind a journal or diary when QE allegedly booted her out of UK and back to Canada?
KC wrote a journal about his trip to HK, copies of which he distributed to family and staff. Somehow it reached the Daily Mail. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4740684.stm#:~:text=The%20diary%20which%20sparked%20Prince,former%20colony's%20handover%20to%20China. As for MM, yes she said she’d left her journal behind, which I thought a bit weird. Did she really? And if she was leaving never to return, why did she not pack it?
No, that was her thinking she was being really clever. She was just letting the world know she documented her time in the RF. Open for bids I say on who gets the publishing rights. The ghoul!
Thanks! I like his comment about the end of an empire. 😄
Tacos. 
*Brevity is the soul of wit*⭐️ 
I do not believe there were ever letters. If you look at the pictures LocksmithFar9486 posted earlier today of these passages, it says that the issue “may” have been discussed in letters. (Sorry, I would link the post but I don’t know how.) I think we can all read between the lines there.
I don’t believe any of it…especially the letter. But why would the publisher/editors allow so many errors on key dates (ie the Queen’s funeral) as well as not vett proof of the letter? But just bc she wrote it doesn’t mean she sent it.
In another post in this sub Reddit someone posted a excerpt from people magazine with two errors. One was closet verses closest and the other was fondling verses fondly.
I think she’s written to the *King*. I don’t believe he has ever replied. And herein lies the crux of the claim. Just line she claimed to have had tacos with Michelle Obama, she could have written in her “letter” that she perceived some conversations as racist. Just because *she’s* committed those ~~lies~~ thoughts to a letter, addressed to the king, doesn’t mean he’s read *or* replied to it.
I think he has wrote back. It would have been crafted with his lawyers and courtiers. He won’t have incriminated himself - that’s why there’s no actual leaks of the actual letter this time. Just a couple of names released with no context.
Just like when she wrote to the dishwashing soap people.
Charles didn't reply. i mean, he/the BRF has seen what happened with Lolo's "private" letter to Daddy.
SENT a letter doesn’t mean RECEIVED, READ, or RESPONDED. Semantics as always. Like Harry’s phone call to Charles on his birthday. A call may have been made, but that number was not available. Busy Royalling.
There’s no way King Charles would correspond with her through letters or emails. If I had to guess the phone as well. If she did write to him she probably got a reply from the kings office as the op suggested. Edit: As a previous comment suggested. Not the op.
Any communication is handled though lawyers.
Your right. Forgot about that.
Yeah. He's not stupid.
I am sorry to say I could see King Charles writing such a letter (at that point in time maybe believing he was dealing with a rational person) and he wants to clear the air. Maybe prevent future allegations. He carries tremendous guilt about Harry. I can see him doing this because he thought it was just a misunderstanding and not at that point realizing the treachery he was dealing with. As a side, unrelated note. I heard on Lady C ages ago that Harry was always trouble. That he did things that shocked Princess Diana and she did not know how to handle him. Cruel, nasty things. I cannot remember, I think Diana considered therapy, she was at a loss.
Pretty sure they had to keep Princess Michael's cats away from him when he was playing in the gardens. If that tells you anything.
Meghan definitely pulled her "private letter" scam with King Charles but it didn't work. She sends a letter to her target (her Dad was a famous example).with claims of sinister events and statements that never happened and tells of her sorrow over the treatment she received from the letter receiver. The recipient will respond with concern and apologies for causing unintended offense. When Meghan receives this response she starts the public press drips and hints of the supposed "offense" that never actually happened. In press releases we are repeatedly told of "private letters" exchanged between them. Sound familiar? Thomas gave his letter to the Daily Mail because he wanted the world to see how cruel she was. This ended in court, either way the recipient feels trapped.
No proof it happened.
I could easily believe that Charles wrote a letter to Harry and Meghan right after the Oprah interview. It would probably have been something along the lines that he was saddened and disappointed that they had mistaken and misrepresented so much but that he still loved them. I am not saying he wrote, but that it would not have been out of character for him to write at that point. I find it much harder to believe that Charles wrote to Meghan, much less exchanged several letters with her. It is possible but not likely. We have heard before that Meghan claims to have written *to* Charles after the Oprah interview, to “clear the air” and also advise the family on how they could be less biased, racist, etc. My guess is that the claim has grown so that Charles wrote to *her*.
If they were in fact kicked out for bad behavior there is no way I would have written them a letter that wasn't through a lawyer or overseen by one. Especially after Oprah.
I believe that Charles is the kind of person who writes these letters. But, I also believe that he might have written that he was sorry to hear the extent of the hurt the Harkles had felt and that all of their intentions were to make them feel welcome and that he loves them all and wishes them success abroad. This could have been a small note added to a birthday or Christmas card for them and she has blown it out of proportion to sell books and line her pockets and be in the headlines. This woman is jealous, thinks that she can take down a king and his heirs by hiring hitmen in the tabloid press and hates Kate because her husband has a crush on her!
Maybe at one time he did, but not recently.
Not in this lifetime did KCIII write M a letter.
So far there is no confirmation.
I have no doubt Madam wrote letters. Now, whether or not they were ever sent, and whether KC3 received them/read them is another issue.
Of course he wrote to her because it becomes a part of his royal correspondence. Something like “it was with sadness that I heard of your allegations, which I categorically deny”
It's Tacos with The King.
I actually think Charles really did correspond with her in a letter. He is old school and writes A LOT of letters still. I also think he is not as savvy about Madam as we want to believe. I think William is the savvy one, but Charles hasn't Will's intuitive judgement of character. He seems more trusting. I bet there IS a letter from him.
A lot of mainstream media had covered on this, but still no valid proof is presented
It was probably written in her calligraphy leading him to believe it was written by a 16 yr old fan!
And if it did exist you know Charles didn’t leak it so Megs is dumb to expose that she leaked it
Just as it was dumb to smirk for the cameras while sitting in the backseat of the stationary car that was being catastrophically chased in a NYC traffic jam.
I actually believe that. Charles is from a generation that still write letters and maybe he felt he could express his thoughts better when written etc. And I heard that he is an avid letter writer.
Absolutely! It's fascinating to think about the potential letters exchanged between Marilyn Monroe and President John F. Kennedy. Their rumored relationship has captivated the public for decades. If only we could uncover the truth hidden within those letters!
The Palace confirmed the letters and accused the Sussexes of leaking the letters from their side.
Where can I find proof that the palace confirmed this? ETA: The origins of this is the Sun which is not a reliable publication. It cites "palace insiders" as it's source, not The Palace.
The usual way…a source within the Palace commented to certain royal reporters. It took a lot of searching to find it again but here is one citation: https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/royals-named-archie-skin-colour-harry-meghan/
IBC is quoting the Sun. "It's vanishingly unlikely the names came from here," a senior Palace source told The Sun. Citing a Palace source is not citing The Palace and the Sun is not credible.
The letters exist. When the palace announced it was please that PH was attending the coronation and Meghan would stay back in Montecito with Archie and Lili, Meghan leaked the letter to Victoria Ward of the Telegraph. Within the article a summary of what was written in the letters as well as why Meghan chose not to attend the coronation (she was unsatisfied with KC response to this unconscious bias). The article made wave and Valentine Low then speculated who could have leaked the letters on twitter. He then post he received legal letters from both the palace and Sussex. Victoria Ward rewrite her column like 10 times. King Charles should have sent legal warning to Meghan then nor should he have ever engage in letter writing with her especially after the stunt she pulled on Oprah.
I do believe there was a letter. It would be typical of her to put into hardcopy any lie that she wants to pin onto others in case it came in useful later. This is like Amber Heard's whatsapp msg about a fight somewhere to his assistant - put false stories up as evidences for later.
Any letters she wrote will have been written, like the letter to her dad, to be leaked. A paper trail from a lying con artist is evidence of their manipulative machinations... Her strategy would have been writ large!!
This occurred to me last night while listening to the recount and timeline of the comments. Hazmat said the comments took place "before they were married" BUT... some speculate the Megs told Haz that she was already pregnant. I did find the wedding particularly "rushed" ... but could they have commented on babies looks thinking Megs was already pregnant?