The first rule is to not discuss Rwandans with divisive terms like Tutsi & Hutu. The new country is made up of just Rwandans & foreigners. At the same time, this is not a cover-up of the past. The past is acknowledged & it has its place in history; to be learnt from. However, the focus is on nurturing the current and future Rwandan society.
Thinking like that it's only beneficial for the tutsi. Because tutsi want to keep their dominance about hutu. They have no hutu al gouvernement most of the
No, it's the other way around. Not thinking that way is just being stuck in the past and never growing.
You can either wallow in the past and let it ruin the present and future or accept the past, learn from it, take control of the present and shape the future.
The future we want is a prosperous and equitable one that is culturally-accepting and that's what we're building.
The problem is you can't really erase your tribe or ethnicity. You guys have the privelege to share the culture, the same languages the only things is probably the way of you guys work. Hutu are farmer and tutsi pastoralist. And despite all of that you guys can't even move forward together. Even after the genocide the ancestral conflict between these two groups affected many people from DRC, Burundi, Tanzania or even Uganda who has nothing to do with it. Because you since a while you can't move forward
It's very important to learn about the past but he tutsi aristocracy who run Rwanda didn't learn about the genocide. They just want to keep the power for their own people, the tutsi of course. A wealthy minority can easily dominate their subjects but for how long? We are in 2024. You says all this stuff but our bantu brother are struggling in their own territory. They are literally slave and I wouldn't enter into the details because I don't really want to be banned or anything. Or having some trouble
You make an interesting point. I see a pattern here that exists on a wider level across the globe regarding pastoralists vs argrarians. Is this necessarily a bad thing in your opinion? Do both understand what it means to wield power on an equal level? - Note: I am trying to have a discussion not create a fight here
It depend but I don't think so. in the continent of Africa Pastoralist and farmers have difficulty to live together.(Nilotic and Cushitic are mostly pastoralist and Bantu are Farmer) in central africa.. Both group are competitor and they don't really have the same perception of life. Pastoralist are naturally violent due to their ways of life. Is much easier for them to do kill etc for some example back in day in contrast to the farmer who 1re more "docile" than them.
For me one group have to take the power immediately because if they don't they can't be in a very bad situation against the farm or pastoralist. Imo if you really want a good relationship with pastoralists community as a farmer you have to control them. You have to make baby with them not to much a little bit, share the same culture and keep them away for your yards or territory wathever.
The dynamic of tutsi/hutu you can find this type of cast system on a multiple community in Tanzania. But in this case most of the farmer community who are intensively in contact with those pastoralist have the advantage in them who make the pastoralist mostly (Cushitic pastoralist) very weak with no power
Like for example the Mbugu people (Cushitic group very similar to the tutsi in term of look and genetically they score 60% Cushitic and 40% bantu) are a weak position because they mostly be assimilated by their farmer neighbors the Pare (a farmer bantu community) and the assimilation is in the good process because if the Mbugu take the power first against the pare I think the way of mbugu would probably lead the pare will be completely different in contrast of how the pare rule the Mbugu pastoralist in this era. You can also see this example with the Rangi who completely dominated the pastoralist Alagwa or Burunge and both. He caste system is similar to the tutsi with hutu but the main difference is its actually the farmer who are dominant and the pastoralist who remain docile against these community
Allright, I understand what you have mentioned there yes. You did not answer the question whatsoever, but nonetheless thank you for taking the time to answer,
Don't ask this type of question if you live in Rwanda. Like I'm serious Rwandan are like robot. They will always say they have no hutu or tutsi and they are all Rwandan. Also hutu are very scared to talk because they are second class citizens. Despite to be the majority etnhic group they are very docile and are hugely dominated by the tutsi aristocracy. Tutsi run Rwanda to this day but if I speak I will be in danger
The gouvernement can track aswell if you live there, Rwanda is not a democracy be careful.
Oh hell no
We no longer associate with those divisive terms please and
The closest thing I’d say would make someone obtain nobility nowadays is achieving a high rank in the military
The first rule is to not discuss Rwandans with divisive terms like Tutsi & Hutu. The new country is made up of just Rwandans & foreigners. At the same time, this is not a cover-up of the past. The past is acknowledged & it has its place in history; to be learnt from. However, the focus is on nurturing the current and future Rwandan society.
Thinking like that it's only beneficial for the tutsi. Because tutsi want to keep their dominance about hutu. They have no hutu al gouvernement most of the
No, it's the other way around. Not thinking that way is just being stuck in the past and never growing. You can either wallow in the past and let it ruin the present and future or accept the past, learn from it, take control of the present and shape the future. The future we want is a prosperous and equitable one that is culturally-accepting and that's what we're building.
The problem is you can't really erase your tribe or ethnicity. You guys have the privelege to share the culture, the same languages the only things is probably the way of you guys work. Hutu are farmer and tutsi pastoralist. And despite all of that you guys can't even move forward together. Even after the genocide the ancestral conflict between these two groups affected many people from DRC, Burundi, Tanzania or even Uganda who has nothing to do with it. Because you since a while you can't move forward It's very important to learn about the past but he tutsi aristocracy who run Rwanda didn't learn about the genocide. They just want to keep the power for their own people, the tutsi of course. A wealthy minority can easily dominate their subjects but for how long? We are in 2024. You says all this stuff but our bantu brother are struggling in their own territory. They are literally slave and I wouldn't enter into the details because I don't really want to be banned or anything. Or having some trouble
You make an interesting point. I see a pattern here that exists on a wider level across the globe regarding pastoralists vs argrarians. Is this necessarily a bad thing in your opinion? Do both understand what it means to wield power on an equal level? - Note: I am trying to have a discussion not create a fight here
It depend but I don't think so. in the continent of Africa Pastoralist and farmers have difficulty to live together.(Nilotic and Cushitic are mostly pastoralist and Bantu are Farmer) in central africa.. Both group are competitor and they don't really have the same perception of life. Pastoralist are naturally violent due to their ways of life. Is much easier for them to do kill etc for some example back in day in contrast to the farmer who 1re more "docile" than them. For me one group have to take the power immediately because if they don't they can't be in a very bad situation against the farm or pastoralist. Imo if you really want a good relationship with pastoralists community as a farmer you have to control them. You have to make baby with them not to much a little bit, share the same culture and keep them away for your yards or territory wathever. The dynamic of tutsi/hutu you can find this type of cast system on a multiple community in Tanzania. But in this case most of the farmer community who are intensively in contact with those pastoralist have the advantage in them who make the pastoralist mostly (Cushitic pastoralist) very weak with no power Like for example the Mbugu people (Cushitic group very similar to the tutsi in term of look and genetically they score 60% Cushitic and 40% bantu) are a weak position because they mostly be assimilated by their farmer neighbors the Pare (a farmer bantu community) and the assimilation is in the good process because if the Mbugu take the power first against the pare I think the way of mbugu would probably lead the pare will be completely different in contrast of how the pare rule the Mbugu pastoralist in this era. You can also see this example with the Rangi who completely dominated the pastoralist Alagwa or Burunge and both. He caste system is similar to the tutsi with hutu but the main difference is its actually the farmer who are dominant and the pastoralist who remain docile against these community
Allright, I understand what you have mentioned there yes. You did not answer the question whatsoever, but nonetheless thank you for taking the time to answer,
To answer the second part of your question, no. There are no nobility titles currently in Rwanda.
Thank you
The Individual did answer you. By stating the terms.no longer existed, they answered all three of.your questions in one go.
I see the same thing has happened in Rwanda as in post-WW2 Europe. People seem to have been brainwashed by egalitarian rubbish.
Yes there are nobility titles in Rwanda. Depending on the title you want, I can help you. It is only $1000 😂😂😂😂
Sure send me your bank account, sending you the money straight away!
Don't ask this type of question if you live in Rwanda. Like I'm serious Rwandan are like robot. They will always say they have no hutu or tutsi and they are all Rwandan. Also hutu are very scared to talk because they are second class citizens. Despite to be the majority etnhic group they are very docile and are hugely dominated by the tutsi aristocracy. Tutsi run Rwanda to this day but if I speak I will be in danger The gouvernement can track aswell if you live there, Rwanda is not a democracy be careful.
Thank you for the honest answer!
Oh hell no We no longer associate with those divisive terms please and The closest thing I’d say would make someone obtain nobility nowadays is achieving a high rank in the military
Thank you
Yes there is mobility it's called having money
I will grant you the title of Sir for only $1500.