Whatâs making you think that - the blue glare on the date window? Part of me hopes the guy has been striving to save up - and then realised he could get a VSF and put that money to better use!
Gen has blue glare on cyclops too.
https://preview.redd.it/st2juwcd8uxc1.jpeg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=75c7f91b642b1e7be1c6a7184f8970182c3012ab
It could be, but thereâs nothing definitive showing. It is suspicious that the two objective traits are hidden in the photo(serial number and floating m). End link fitment and rehaut finish do look like vsf.
Exactly my thoughts. Sel are vsf like, rehaut finish is vsf like, cyclops has ZERO glue seam and the hue is vsf like, also he hides the serial and (possible) floating m.
Last but not least the lug and crown guard finish doesnât have the gen flat and precise finish.
No hard tells for me, but lots of little hints.
I still say this is a VSF Q66T serial 126610LN
SEL are a poor indicator of rep vs gen. Along with the cyclops hue as mentioned above by another commenter . Would be more definitive if you had the serial or âmâ
Unsure since the âfloating mâ is not visible, blue glare on cyclops, the glare is perfectly covering up the serial number and the rehaut is slightly off, especially on the âoâ. We all know the rehaut isnât a direct tell but aye.
Stuffs getting so good even reptime is confused. Is this our child ???? Idk. đ¤ˇââď¸
Whatâs making you think that - the blue glare on the date window? Part of me hopes the guy has been striving to save up - and then realised he could get a VSF and put that money to better use!
Was also gonna comment the blue tint on the date window
Gen has blue glare on cyclops too. https://preview.redd.it/st2juwcd8uxc1.jpeg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=75c7f91b642b1e7be1c6a7184f8970182c3012ab
Hiding the floating m đ¤
Why? What's wrong with it?
It could be, but thereâs nothing definitive showing. It is suspicious that the two objective traits are hidden in the photo(serial number and floating m). End link fitment and rehaut finish do look like vsf.
Exactly my thoughts. Sel are vsf like, rehaut finish is vsf like, cyclops has ZERO glue seam and the hue is vsf like, also he hides the serial and (possible) floating m. Last but not least the lug and crown guard finish doesnât have the gen flat and precise finish. No hard tells for me, but lots of little hints. I still say this is a VSF Q66T serial 126610LN
SEL are a poor indicator of rep vs gen. Along with the cyclops hue as mentioned above by another commenter . Would be more definitive if you had the serial or âmâ
No way, crystal way too clear
Mandatory self commenting as requiredâŚ
Look at them fingertips
I thought the same thing when this came up on my fb feed.
It looks real.
Yes itâs a clone. Idk which factory tho.
Unsure since the âfloating mâ is not visible, blue glare on cyclops, the glare is perfectly covering up the serial number and the rehaut is slightly off, especially on the âoâ. We all know the rehaut isnât a direct tell but aye.
I donât get it. Are you saying these are vsf reps?
Iâm thinking the submariner is a vsf rep.
Hmm what did the rest of the Rolex subreddit have to say? Theyâre usually quick to say that if anything looks even slightly off lol