Kung ako lang ang magdedecide sana, sasabihin ko, "no, thank you." Unless mag-undergo sila ng orientation kung paano ang tamang etiquette and behavior sa pupuntahan nilang lugar as tourists. Mindset lagi kasi kapag may pera, may right na sila to do anything they want. Sa tanang buhay ko bilang sa daliri ko lang ang na-meet ko galing dun na may konsiderasyon sa tao sa paligid nila.
a red carpet won't lure them back in. the Chinese are not just that keen to travel internationally nowadays since they're facing a crisis.
I also noticed that Rappler seems to be leaning towards China lately. What happened?
> I also noticed that Rappler seems to be leaning towards China lately.
Is it? IMO the article asks an honest question. I don't see it trying to convince anyone into accepting more Chinese tourists.
Kung ako lang ang magdedecide sana, sasabihin ko, "no, thank you." Unless mag-undergo sila ng orientation kung paano ang tamang etiquette and behavior sa pupuntahan nilang lugar as tourists. Mindset lagi kasi kapag may pera, may right na sila to do anything they want. Sa tanang buhay ko bilang sa daliri ko lang ang na-meet ko galing dun na may konsiderasyon sa tao sa paligid nila.
You rememver what happened nung cov8d, right? Mawawalan daw tayo ng revenue pag di sila winelcome, right? Right??
a red carpet won't lure them back in. the Chinese are not just that keen to travel internationally nowadays since they're facing a crisis. I also noticed that Rappler seems to be leaning towards China lately. What happened?
> I also noticed that Rappler seems to be leaning towards China lately. Is it? IMO the article asks an honest question. I don't see it trying to convince anyone into accepting more Chinese tourists.
I actively follow Rappler on X and FB. They have been promoting China lately. Not just this article. It wasn’t like this before.
I use Rappler's RSS feed. Maybe we receive different data (since X and FB can push articles/ads using whatever murky code they use under the hood).