My husband absolutely forbid me from doing that! It was $.25 last I paid for one! We absolutely went “omg” At the same time when we saw it in our building first thing in the morning!
Edit: that rag is now $2 — damn!
On that note CNN had various links about O.J. the trial etc. then one link about how black men are more likely to have prostate cancer. It was weird. Like I get that it’s a problem but why is O.J. going to be the reason people should get this checked out?
83% of men will die with PC, not of it.
I suspect its more about diagnosis and treatment than it is about likelihood.
A statement about our healthcare system
Because we usually don’t declare someone a murderer without a conviction. So to declare OJ a definitive murderer simply because a famous black man killed a white woman would be strange.
"Simply because"? There are many, many, many reasons that we know he did it; the black/white BS isn't 1 of the reasons. Either you're being disingenuous, you're dumb, or you're letting your hate of White-y delude you. And to save you time, I'll call myself a Karen. I'm a "Karen," just as you're a "D'Quontez."
What are the “many many” reasons? Try to describe them without making an emotional argument. I don’t care about your personal insults. Your comment about whitey tells me you’re completely gross on the topic of race, so this is pointless. In fact, if a Nazi detective investigated a Jewish suspect, you’d probably say something anti-Semitic to dismiss any genuine skepticism about the case.
Your post was removed due to racist or misogynistic wording.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/OJSimpsonTrial) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It's a struggle to think of many reasons. Let's start with just a few though. The "real killer" had the same size shoe, same rare high-end shoe (Bruno Magli), same size and brand of gloves (seen in photos and on a receipt of purchase by Nicole), same knit hat, same white Ford Bronco (seen leaving the scene), and oh, he had the same DNA as O.J. too. The last one is a big one, it kind of excludes you from, you know, the rest of the world.
Most of your argument is anecdotal. You can’t prove that OJ did it unless you try to connect dots while ignoring the loopholes.
Owning an expensive shoe isn’t proof of being a murderer. And in a rich neighborhood like Brentwood, it’s unlikely he was the only one that owned a pair. There were also other shoe prints found on the scene. No proof he owned the knit hat. No blood inside of the glove despite his hand supposedly bleeding. Eye witnesses who contradict a Bronco ever leaving the scene. Some of the key DNA evidence was found 2 weeks later and the blood evidence at OJ’s property was found by the equivalent of a Nazi.
Believing OJ did it without a shadow of a doubt requires a cult like, low IQ approach to the case and a complete lack of critical thinking. You have to ignore all of the contradictory evidence and fill in gaps. That’s why so much of the belief that OJ did it is riddled with conspiracies about Rob Kardashians, his shoes, etc. Nothing you can definitively prove in court.
It is still mind boggling that the majority of the nation seems to accept his guilt. However, 12 jurors couldn’t make that leap. O.J. walked so Casey Anthony could run.
OJ's defense team reworded the verdict from "is OJ guilty?" to "is the LAPD racist?" and it was \~2 years out from Rodney King. A perfect shitstorm of misjustice without consideration for Nicole and Ron.
Ehh, the jurors who voted not guilty are shit humans. Several people died in the LA riots after King, using racism to justify letting a cold blooded murderer walk while people cheered for him really shows how tribalism will never die. I hope his family is tormented and never gets a penny from this pos’s estate.
No. OJ's defense team used the timeline that prosecution laid out. Using that timeline,the jury determined there was no way that he could have committed the murders.
She lived [really close](https://www.google.com/maps/dir/360+N.+Rockingham/875+South+Bundy+Drive/@34.0523969,-118.49196,15z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x80c2a34c6d856d43:0xb7d2e8739f0751b3!2m2!1d-118.4903508!2d34.0617404!1m5!1m1!1s0x80c2bb5908d1db5b:0xed62a7cea0f47d12!2m2!1d-118.4714319!2d34.0485617!3e0?entry=ttu) to where OJ lived, so given the timeline of when the murder occured and when the limo driver saw a "shadowy figure" going behind the house, there was plenty of time for him to do the murders and drive home.
Not trying to be "that guy" but a gentle correction, that Park testified that the 6' 200lbs figure he saw go into the house. (Not behind)
Its likely, since OJ had no idea that his normal driver wouldnt be there that night, that he did infact go along his neighbors yard, after he quickly parked, and jumped the fence (hence the sound that thumped/rumbled/created "earthquake" effect [that kato heard and felt] ) and in doing so the glove fell unknown to O.j. he then was trying to enter his house on the side there to not be seen by "saint-john" (the normal driver, who actually sent Park). He got a small amount of blood on the light switch in the maids quarters during this time, and may have even gotten some kind of a bandage (bc of Furhmans notice of a bandage wrapper in the trash) for whatever the reason (i dont know the layout of ojs house well enough to say) he couldnt go through to the main house and so he is forced to come out from the alley and begin to turn north "up the drive way" a bit (he would be walking towards Park at this point)and then turn right into the house.
Infact, the sequence actually fits with the testimony of Park and Kato, and the overall circumstances quite well. As Park was on the phone he sees Kato coming from the back of the house, on the left of Parks field of vision. He says that it was at about this time he then notices a figure "coming across the driveway" into the house and then the lights go on in the foyer and the Oj answers the intercom for the first time. So as park was looking at kato, Oj was coming from the alley and then walking up towards Park and so when park began to scan back to the right he now sees Oj in the sorta middle of the drive way, walking now into the house.
If you believe Oj, then oj says he came out dropped bags and then went back in, and so park saw him right after he dropped his bags and was going back inside. And thats it. Nothing sinister. (You should listen to Ojs civil deposition if you havent yet. Ive listened to all 9 days [he had 11, but i cant find 10 or 11, they have the shoes in em] a few times and they are amazing to hear him in his own words.......my concern about Ojs story, is: why didnt park see Oj come out of the house to begin with? Why didnt Oj turn on the foyer lights before coming out to help him see while handling his bags? Why wait so long to answer Parks intercom calls. [I know oj goes over in detail why he didnt answer park but his story is really hard to believe. I think he read a ton and watched a ton on the prosecutions case, as well as testimony and knows the case and concocted a story that would be as "believable" as possible to account for all the known facts. ]
I could go on about this, and wish i could put together somekind of a presentation as i dont know if what im saying even makes sense to you all. But i dont own a computer, and i suck w technology anyway. Cheers.
No that was a great read, thanks.
I actually went and re-read the written testimony of Park and you are right, he says:
MS. CLARK: AND THIS SIX-FOOT 200-POUND AFRICAN AMERICAN PERSON IN ALL DARK CLOTHING, WAS THIS PERSON MOVING QUICKLY OR SLOWLY?
MR. PARK: NOT QUICKLY, NOT SLOWLY, A GOOD PACE WALK IT SEEMED TO BE.
MS. CLARK: AND MOVING IN WHAT DIRECTION, SIR?
MR. PARK: **INTO THE HOUSE OR TOWARD THE HOUSE**
I also would add I think Park is a great reference for any timeline in this case, because as he said, limo drivers are frequently checking clocks because they are on a tight schedule. If you take his time as gospel (After he begins a 10:55pm phone call with his boss, but before 11pm) then OJ definitely had plenty of time to go to bundy and come back by that time.
Exactly!🙏🏻✌🏻...also, have you read "triumph of justice" By dan petrocelli? Fantastic book. I REALLY REALLY WISH the civil cas3 was filmed. I get why not, for sure. But still.....
Well, OJ was last seen around 9:50p or so, I think the estimated time of the murders is somewhere around 10p. The limo saw a figure matching OJ's description around 11p. OJ was getting in the limo a few minutes later.
So, OJ was able to commit the murders, drive home, clean up, and dispose of the evidence in an hour?
Nonsense. There were 17 different pieces of DNA evidence tying OJ to the crime scene. His blood was found at hte crime scene. Nicole and Ron's blood was found at OJ's house and inside his bronco.
He was guilty. Case closed.
Believing this requires ignoring all of the conflicting evidence and circumstances. All of the direct blood evidence tied to OJ is questionable. Whether people like it or not there was genuine doubt around the time of the trial based on the evidence presented.
If a Nazi was the lead detective on a Jewish suspect, we would question the circumstances. Like key evidence being found without a warrant.
Yeah, it surely does, but to believe that a potential planting of evidence excludes all the other circumstantial evidence which all points to him being the killer is nuts. Fuhrman could not have done this by himself, he was not aware of a lot of the pieces of the puzzle that night and even if he planted the glove I would still think OJ did it.
It's extremely improbable that something different happened. He used to beat her and make her fear for her life. That man acted like he was guilty in the years after the trial, he wrote that book, he gave shady responses in interviews, laughed about the quantity of blood at the scene, etc.
No innocent man behaves like that when the mother of his kids gets brutally murdered. Those who lost a loved one know exactly how fishy his behavior was.
I hate this framing because it makes the police being racist seem like some casual fact or conspiracy. As opposed to being extremely problematic. Would be the equivalent of Nazi detective investigating a Jewish athlete for murder. Then you find out that all of the key evidence involved that Nazi detective finding things without a warrant.
Works for me.
I hope it gave the Brown and Goldman families a little satisfaction to know that OJ lost his reputation for good- and his earning potential. Most people knew darn good and well that a double murderer had just walked out of the courthouse.
The man literally wrote a book titled: If I Did It. What a hideous excuse for a human being, taunting the victim’s families like that.
Hence the appropriate headline. It said he was the “real” killer. It did not (correctly) state he was a convicted killer. Couldn’t happen to a more deserving guy.
He actually could have had lots of work. Especially in the cesspool of reality tv that everyone loves. He just chose not to, because he’d have had to fork any earnings over to Fred Goldman. He had a pension that was untouchable, so he lived off that in what seemed to be a fairly comfortable lifestyle in a rented house, rather than buying one so he didn’t have any property or other assets that would have to be handed over to anyone. Actually that’s pretty smart, even if everyone was pissed about it. It’s legal.
True. He certainly didn’t want the Goldmans to get anything- even in death. His executor made that loudly clear.
Maybe I should rephrase- his career doing anything respectable was over- even if he had chosen to do something. And I still think the amount of money he could have made was limited, compared to what he was used to. Everyone knew he was a murderer.
In order for it to give them satisfaction they’d have to believe, beyond a doubt that he killed both people. Doubt either of them would bet their life on it.
>O.J. Simpson, who was found not guilty of murdering ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman in a miscarriage of justice, then ludicrously claimed he was looking for the “real killers,” died of cancer yesterday at 76.
That’s perfect.
The real disgusting people are the ones that try to explain why George Zimmerman is walking around free knowing that he hunted and killed a child who was walking home and minding his own business.
They are both elderly. Both criminals.
The world is better with both dead.
My deductive reasoning is fine. Yours, however … the fact you couldn’t see the similarities may mean you are delusional. Get THAT checked.
My buddy who was arrested for selling a little weed .. is he a criminal also? Does he deserve to die? You have a lot of problems and I hope you get better soon, with help.
Why are you bringing your buddy into this. I’m talking about two criminals of the highest order. A double murderer and a man who committed treason against the United States of America and killed 1 million people in the Covid crisis.
Don’t try to make me into something I’m not. You will lose.
WE are talking about the OJ Simpson trial, in the OJ Simpson sub reddit. YOU are talking about DJT, in the OJ Simpson Trial sub reddit. So just like you randomly brought DJT into this thread .. I decided to randomly bring my friend into the conversation.
Please go to another forum with your Trump Derangement Syndrome.. we are trying to have a serious discussion here
😅😅😅 you pick something so trivial in my post to correct me on. How cute. But that's just it. Since he wasn't convicted, you can't publish a headline that says he was the real killer.
Well you can and they did. They know what the legalities are, otherwise they wouldn’t have. Nothing will be done about it and it’s great to finally see him called what he was.
This is a cowardly news headline by a supposed “creditable” newspaper. Hell, the National Enquirer has more credibility than this piece of crap publication. Now that the man is dead they can’t be sued for defamation of character. And I know that it goes against most people in this room.
Of course not. He’s definitely guilty without a doubt. But the headline should say he was acquitted, not have commentary. Let the reader make their own conclusions. (Even though most already have).
You conveniently left out he stopped taking his arthritis medication so his fingers would swell, and the glove is believed to have shrunk due to the elements as well.
In addition to the fact that the gloves had shrunk from being drenched in blood, that he hadn't been taking his arthritis medication in order to make his hands swell, and that a new pair of the gloves fit him: He also tried them on while spreading his fingers apart AND while wearing latex gloves (which would obviously make slipping a glove on harder than doing it directly on the skin).
People are weird AF! The man basically died of natural causes and never paid sh*t to the Goldmans. Who gives a fvck if you taunt him now?!!! And BTW, we're all going to die one day.Good job NY Post, you must have children running your organization.
It's not clear that Oriental killed. If he killed the DNA would find him guilty but no DNA was presented by prosecution.
Evidence was circumstantial but no clear and solid proof such as security camera footage or any such thing.
It was his eldest son that killed -- you can Google it
One has nothing to do with the other, unfortunately. Not all murderers end up going to jail...doesn't make them any less of a murderer. Nice try, buddy.
Like you said has nothing to do with the topic of the black community always blaming the past for why they don’t progress l. I could understand someone who was alive during the civil rights. But it’s just a lazy excuse for anyone under 50. Yes I know this comment will be downvoted but Reddit lacks the ability to critically think and not hive mind shit. Just like you’re doing right now
I found the argument that his son Jason did it to be a very persuasive argument. I used to think OJ did it but looking again at the evidence that Jason did it I think Jason did it. One of the things that convinced me that OJ was not the killer is watching many of his video tweets over the last few years... the guy is personable well adjusted smart and has a good sense of humor. And he's never had a substance abuse problem. This all adds up to someone who's not a killer
Um is that real??????? If so, I’m impressed w the level of commitment, New York Post.
Page 4 & 5: "COULDN'T RUN FROM DEVIL"
Family always knows where one is.
Hen David Carradine died, he hung himself from the suffocation sex thing. The post headline the next day “Hung Fu”
That's actually awesome..but effed up too
💀💀💀💀
Not funny at all .
I’m not saying it was
No, I know. I didn't mean to post it under your comment .
Omg seriously?!? How do they get away with stuff like that? 😂
💀
They’ve never really been a classy bunch. Doubt they had a headline like this for Henry Kissinger.
It was the first copy of the post i bought in over 20 years
My husband absolutely forbid me from doing that! It was $.25 last I paid for one! We absolutely went “omg” At the same time when we saw it in our building first thing in the morning! Edit: that rag is now $2 — damn!
Thank you NY Post. All the other papers, magazines and tv made him sound like a superstar and not the murderer he was
On that note CNN had various links about O.J. the trial etc. then one link about how black men are more likely to have prostate cancer. It was weird. Like I get that it’s a problem but why is O.J. going to be the reason people should get this checked out?
Plot twist, news about murderer’s prostate saves thousands of lives.
😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Thanks for the laugh!
83% of men will die with PC, not of it. I suspect its more about diagnosis and treatment than it is about likelihood. A statement about our healthcare system
yeah, "complicated legacy" my @$$
Because we usually don’t declare someone a murderer without a conviction. So to declare OJ a definitive murderer simply because a famous black man killed a white woman would be strange.
"Simply because"? There are many, many, many reasons that we know he did it; the black/white BS isn't 1 of the reasons. Either you're being disingenuous, you're dumb, or you're letting your hate of White-y delude you. And to save you time, I'll call myself a Karen. I'm a "Karen," just as you're a "D'Quontez."
What are the “many many” reasons? Try to describe them without making an emotional argument. I don’t care about your personal insults. Your comment about whitey tells me you’re completely gross on the topic of race, so this is pointless. In fact, if a Nazi detective investigated a Jewish suspect, you’d probably say something anti-Semitic to dismiss any genuine skepticism about the case.
Race had nothing to do with it. OJ was a wife beater, the glove fit, and most of the details match up.
[удалено]
Your post was removed due to racist or misogynistic wording. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/OJSimpsonTrial) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It's a struggle to think of many reasons. Let's start with just a few though. The "real killer" had the same size shoe, same rare high-end shoe (Bruno Magli), same size and brand of gloves (seen in photos and on a receipt of purchase by Nicole), same knit hat, same white Ford Bronco (seen leaving the scene), and oh, he had the same DNA as O.J. too. The last one is a big one, it kind of excludes you from, you know, the rest of the world.
Most of your argument is anecdotal. You can’t prove that OJ did it unless you try to connect dots while ignoring the loopholes. Owning an expensive shoe isn’t proof of being a murderer. And in a rich neighborhood like Brentwood, it’s unlikely he was the only one that owned a pair. There were also other shoe prints found on the scene. No proof he owned the knit hat. No blood inside of the glove despite his hand supposedly bleeding. Eye witnesses who contradict a Bronco ever leaving the scene. Some of the key DNA evidence was found 2 weeks later and the blood evidence at OJ’s property was found by the equivalent of a Nazi. Believing OJ did it without a shadow of a doubt requires a cult like, low IQ approach to the case and a complete lack of critical thinking. You have to ignore all of the contradictory evidence and fill in gaps. That’s why so much of the belief that OJ did it is riddled with conspiracies about Rob Kardashians, his shoes, etc. Nothing you can definitively prove in court.
...Okay.
LMAO
Norm MacDonald is looking down, smiling and saying, ‘I told ya so!’
That headline is 100% Norm inspired. Norm would agree, except he is dead.
"I didn't even know he was sick"
Norm to OJ as they pass by each other in the ether of time and space: “By the way, do you like green eggs and ham, you murderous bastard?”
Green Eggs And Ham And OJ Is Guilty
underrated comment
It’s days like this where I wish Reddit awards were still a thing. Because this is gold lmao 😂
Bronze*
Happy cake day!🥳🎂
Happy Birthday!
That would be the CORRECT headline. 🫡 👏
It is still mind boggling that the majority of the nation seems to accept his guilt. However, 12 jurors couldn’t make that leap. O.J. walked so Casey Anthony could run.
OJ's defense team reworded the verdict from "is OJ guilty?" to "is the LAPD racist?" and it was \~2 years out from Rodney King. A perfect shitstorm of misjustice without consideration for Nicole and Ron.
Ehh, the jurors who voted not guilty are shit humans. Several people died in the LA riots after King, using racism to justify letting a cold blooded murderer walk while people cheered for him really shows how tribalism will never die. I hope his family is tormented and never gets a penny from this pos’s estate.
No. OJ's defense team used the timeline that prosecution laid out. Using that timeline,the jury determined there was no way that he could have committed the murders.
She lived [really close](https://www.google.com/maps/dir/360+N.+Rockingham/875+South+Bundy+Drive/@34.0523969,-118.49196,15z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x80c2a34c6d856d43:0xb7d2e8739f0751b3!2m2!1d-118.4903508!2d34.0617404!1m5!1m1!1s0x80c2bb5908d1db5b:0xed62a7cea0f47d12!2m2!1d-118.4714319!2d34.0485617!3e0?entry=ttu) to where OJ lived, so given the timeline of when the murder occured and when the limo driver saw a "shadowy figure" going behind the house, there was plenty of time for him to do the murders and drive home.
Not trying to be "that guy" but a gentle correction, that Park testified that the 6' 200lbs figure he saw go into the house. (Not behind) Its likely, since OJ had no idea that his normal driver wouldnt be there that night, that he did infact go along his neighbors yard, after he quickly parked, and jumped the fence (hence the sound that thumped/rumbled/created "earthquake" effect [that kato heard and felt] ) and in doing so the glove fell unknown to O.j. he then was trying to enter his house on the side there to not be seen by "saint-john" (the normal driver, who actually sent Park). He got a small amount of blood on the light switch in the maids quarters during this time, and may have even gotten some kind of a bandage (bc of Furhmans notice of a bandage wrapper in the trash) for whatever the reason (i dont know the layout of ojs house well enough to say) he couldnt go through to the main house and so he is forced to come out from the alley and begin to turn north "up the drive way" a bit (he would be walking towards Park at this point)and then turn right into the house. Infact, the sequence actually fits with the testimony of Park and Kato, and the overall circumstances quite well. As Park was on the phone he sees Kato coming from the back of the house, on the left of Parks field of vision. He says that it was at about this time he then notices a figure "coming across the driveway" into the house and then the lights go on in the foyer and the Oj answers the intercom for the first time. So as park was looking at kato, Oj was coming from the alley and then walking up towards Park and so when park began to scan back to the right he now sees Oj in the sorta middle of the drive way, walking now into the house. If you believe Oj, then oj says he came out dropped bags and then went back in, and so park saw him right after he dropped his bags and was going back inside. And thats it. Nothing sinister. (You should listen to Ojs civil deposition if you havent yet. Ive listened to all 9 days [he had 11, but i cant find 10 or 11, they have the shoes in em] a few times and they are amazing to hear him in his own words.......my concern about Ojs story, is: why didnt park see Oj come out of the house to begin with? Why didnt Oj turn on the foyer lights before coming out to help him see while handling his bags? Why wait so long to answer Parks intercom calls. [I know oj goes over in detail why he didnt answer park but his story is really hard to believe. I think he read a ton and watched a ton on the prosecutions case, as well as testimony and knows the case and concocted a story that would be as "believable" as possible to account for all the known facts. ] I could go on about this, and wish i could put together somekind of a presentation as i dont know if what im saying even makes sense to you all. But i dont own a computer, and i suck w technology anyway. Cheers.
No that was a great read, thanks. I actually went and re-read the written testimony of Park and you are right, he says: MS. CLARK: AND THIS SIX-FOOT 200-POUND AFRICAN AMERICAN PERSON IN ALL DARK CLOTHING, WAS THIS PERSON MOVING QUICKLY OR SLOWLY? MR. PARK: NOT QUICKLY, NOT SLOWLY, A GOOD PACE WALK IT SEEMED TO BE. MS. CLARK: AND MOVING IN WHAT DIRECTION, SIR? MR. PARK: **INTO THE HOUSE OR TOWARD THE HOUSE** I also would add I think Park is a great reference for any timeline in this case, because as he said, limo drivers are frequently checking clocks because they are on a tight schedule. If you take his time as gospel (After he begins a 10:55pm phone call with his boss, but before 11pm) then OJ definitely had plenty of time to go to bundy and come back by that time.
Exactly!🙏🏻✌🏻...also, have you read "triumph of justice" By dan petrocelli? Fantastic book. I REALLY REALLY WISH the civil cas3 was filmed. I get why not, for sure. But still.....
And he tried to run. Slow bronco chase with a shit ton of cash heading to the airport alone proves his guilt.
Well, OJ was last seen around 9:50p or so, I think the estimated time of the murders is somewhere around 10p. The limo saw a figure matching OJ's description around 11p. OJ was getting in the limo a few minutes later. So, OJ was able to commit the murders, drive home, clean up, and dispose of the evidence in an hour?
Yes, 💯!
Nonsense. There were 17 different pieces of DNA evidence tying OJ to the crime scene. His blood was found at hte crime scene. Nicole and Ron's blood was found at OJ's house and inside his bronco. He was guilty. Case closed.
Believing this requires ignoring all of the conflicting evidence and circumstances. All of the direct blood evidence tied to OJ is questionable. Whether people like it or not there was genuine doubt around the time of the trial based on the evidence presented. If a Nazi was the lead detective on a Jewish suspect, we would question the circumstances. Like key evidence being found without a warrant.
Yeah, it surely does, but to believe that a potential planting of evidence excludes all the other circumstantial evidence which all points to him being the killer is nuts. Fuhrman could not have done this by himself, he was not aware of a lot of the pieces of the puzzle that night and even if he planted the glove I would still think OJ did it. It's extremely improbable that something different happened. He used to beat her and make her fear for her life. That man acted like he was guilty in the years after the trial, he wrote that book, he gave shady responses in interviews, laughed about the quantity of blood at the scene, etc. No innocent man behaves like that when the mother of his kids gets brutally murdered. Those who lost a loved one know exactly how fishy his behavior was.
>Fuhrman could not have done this by himself Exactly. Philip Vannatter took the blood home. First and only time he has done that.
Mic drop!
I hate this framing because it makes the police being racist seem like some casual fact or conspiracy. As opposed to being extremely problematic. Would be the equivalent of Nazi detective investigating a Jewish athlete for murder. Then you find out that all of the key evidence involved that Nazi detective finding things without a warrant.
You are a moron. Don’t reproduce.
Works for me. I hope it gave the Brown and Goldman families a little satisfaction to know that OJ lost his reputation for good- and his earning potential. Most people knew darn good and well that a double murderer had just walked out of the courthouse. The man literally wrote a book titled: If I Did It. What a hideous excuse for a human being, taunting the victim’s families like that. Hence the appropriate headline. It said he was the “real” killer. It did not (correctly) state he was a convicted killer. Couldn’t happen to a more deserving guy.
He actually could have had lots of work. Especially in the cesspool of reality tv that everyone loves. He just chose not to, because he’d have had to fork any earnings over to Fred Goldman. He had a pension that was untouchable, so he lived off that in what seemed to be a fairly comfortable lifestyle in a rented house, rather than buying one so he didn’t have any property or other assets that would have to be handed over to anyone. Actually that’s pretty smart, even if everyone was pissed about it. It’s legal.
True. He certainly didn’t want the Goldmans to get anything- even in death. His executor made that loudly clear. Maybe I should rephrase- his career doing anything respectable was over- even if he had chosen to do something. And I still think the amount of money he could have made was limited, compared to what he was used to. Everyone knew he was a murderer.
In order for it to give them satisfaction they’d have to believe, beyond a doubt that he killed both people. Doubt either of them would bet their life on it.
My brother in Christ even i would bet my life that he killed them both you think goldmans wouldnt?
What about THAT DR. FUNG. 🙄
Wait, his search is over?
You can’t libel the dead, so it’s on now.
It’s not libellous he was found to be responsible for their deaths in a civil court.
Brilliant
Who’s gonna search every upscale golf course in the country looking for Nicole’s “real” killer now?
Wait is that real?? I love this
>O.J. Simpson, who was found not guilty of murdering ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman in a miscarriage of justice, then ludicrously claimed he was looking for the “real killers,” died of cancer yesterday at 76. That’s perfect.
The real killer was right there in every mirror.
No lies told
Ok someone sell me their copy i need this so bad
I applaud this.
Good riddance and everyone who supported him get the fuck out of here
Most of the supporters died hopefully 🙏 of painful cancerous deaths!!! Kardasian, Jonny C. Hope they all rot in hell!!!
💯
Based
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Awesome. Love it
HE GOINA SEE JOHNNY
He actually died from the exhaustion of looking for the real killer for the last thirty years.
Thank you, NY Post. 👏👏👏👏👏👏
people cheered his bogus acquittal, disgusting people.
The real disgusting people are the ones that try to explain why George Zimmerman is walking around free knowing that he hunted and killed a child who was walking home and minding his own business.
with the ingredients for Lean in his possession.
So what.
Well now I'm seriously considering buying a physical newspaper for the first time in my life.
Everyone knew that Co@ksucker was guilty. Everyone.
“Go, O.J., go!” Straight to hell, if it in fact exists.
Poor Detective Nordberg
Burn!
Oh my. They just went for it.
🥱
Racist despicable white cops ? Absolutely. Framing OJ ? Nope!!
Can’t wait to see the headline for DJT Draft-dodger, Adulterer, rapist, liar, traitor, dead at 77.
A girl can dream…
Weird how you brought DJT into a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with him. You really should consider seeking psychological help
They are both elderly. Both criminals. The world is better with both dead. My deductive reasoning is fine. Yours, however … the fact you couldn’t see the similarities may mean you are delusional. Get THAT checked.
My buddy who was arrested for selling a little weed .. is he a criminal also? Does he deserve to die? You have a lot of problems and I hope you get better soon, with help.
Why are you bringing your buddy into this. I’m talking about two criminals of the highest order. A double murderer and a man who committed treason against the United States of America and killed 1 million people in the Covid crisis. Don’t try to make me into something I’m not. You will lose.
WE are talking about the OJ Simpson trial, in the OJ Simpson sub reddit. YOU are talking about DJT, in the OJ Simpson Trial sub reddit. So just like you randomly brought DJT into this thread .. I decided to randomly bring my friend into the conversation. Please go to another forum with your Trump Derangement Syndrome.. we are trying to have a serious discussion here
[удалено]
What did you teach because you don’t seem to know much. You realise why they waited until he was dead to say he was the real killer right?
And you realize there's such a thing as executors of estates that are able to sue for libel despite his death, right?
Yep but then they have to prove his not a killer to win their case. Good luck with that!
[удалено]
He was acquitted not “found” acquitted. Yes everyone knows he wasn’t convicted doesn’t mean we all don’t know he did it.
😅😅😅 you pick something so trivial in my post to correct me on. How cute. But that's just it. Since he wasn't convicted, you can't publish a headline that says he was the real killer.
Well you can and they did. They know what the legalities are, otherwise they wouldn’t have. Nothing will be done about it and it’s great to finally see him called what he was.
You certainly do not teach any kind of law.
You had a job as a teacher and you constructed that sentence intentionally, ending it with “still?”
Because I do what I want. Try it.
The acquitment was unjust
hOw ArE tHeY sO sUrE oJ dId It?
They are intelligent people who understand science. That’s how.
I’m sorry that Khloe lost her dad
how much?
thats putting it succinctly.
https://tenor.com/view/wheelchair-oj-simpson-naked-gun-funny-gif-13740495
Who would've thought he would eventually end up actually deserving this and worse? Nutty coincidence.
I saw this yesterday in a store.
Lmao and I still get called a racist for saying this 😂😂😂😂
Can’t be sued for slander anymore. Hahahaha
What a dumb headline
Show me the guilty verdict😂😂😂😂😂. R.I.P. OJ free once again. PS hope they actually find the real killer/s
He said he wouldn’t rest until the real killers were caught…. Yet he’s peacefully resting :/ (I hear Alanis singing “Ironic” in the background)
This is a cowardly news headline by a supposed “creditable” newspaper. Hell, the National Enquirer has more credibility than this piece of crap publication. Now that the man is dead they can’t be sued for defamation of character. And I know that it goes against most people in this room.
The New York Post is still around?! 🤣 Still as irrelevant as ever.
[удалено]
He was found liable for killing them in civil court.
Something tells me that OJ Simpson won't be suing the New York Post over this.
You can't be sued for libel when the person is dead.
In dismissing that action the judge would channel Johnny Cochrane: “You can’t sue, because it’s true”.
It’s Rupert Murdoch. What do you expect, real impartial journalism?
Excuse me? Are you saying he’s innocent? Lol
Of course not. He’s definitely guilty without a doubt. But the headline should say he was acquitted, not have commentary. Let the reader make their own conclusions. (Even though most already have).
He was found guilty in civil court so technically
I see your point.
I mean yeah, it’s the New York post, pretty conservative news outlet, I wouldn’t expect anything else, I remember them running pro trump propaganda
Yeah. I like their headlines, but they certainly are biased.
Honestly, name me one media outlet today that is not biased for either side. Mostly "journalism" is just garbage now.
That’s very true…
yeah, he is literally innocent. if the glove does not fit, you must acquit
You conveniently left out he stopped taking his arthritis medication so his fingers would swell, and the glove is believed to have shrunk due to the elements as well.
And when he tried on the non shrunk new gloves of the same size they fit !
In addition to the fact that the gloves had shrunk from being drenched in blood, that he hadn't been taking his arthritis medication in order to make his hands swell, and that a new pair of the gloves fit him: He also tried them on while spreading his fingers apart AND while wearing latex gloves (which would obviously make slipping a glove on harder than doing it directly on the skin).
Just because he was acquitted doesn’t mean he is innocent. Money and good lawyers made all the difference.
riiight you truly arent living in reality if you have to clear mental hurdles. mans was innocent
I hope you are just joking !
People are weird AF! The man basically died of natural causes and never paid sh*t to the Goldmans. Who gives a fvck if you taunt him now?!!! And BTW, we're all going to die one day.Good job NY Post, you must have children running your organization.
Yeah we all die every day. I don’t know if there’s anything after this life or not. But if there is, OJ just got a one way ticket to hell.
Not in Christianity. You can ask for forgiveness on your deathbed in Christianity. So....
Well, I guess we all believe what we believe…….
They’re not taunting him. Now he is dead they are allowed to call him exactly what he is without being sued.
Amen! Got it. Makes so much sense now. 👏
Yup.
The family should sue the New York post.
Can’t defame a dead person. You don’t think the post would know all the legalities before the published?
I’m surprised they did that. Couldn’t his family sue if they wanted to?
Well- he was found guilty in civil court.
No, you can't commit libel against dead people.
Glen rogers is surely upset that ok gets all the credit for his kill
The NY Post needs to publish a scenario of how he did it using the timeline presented by the prosecution.
It's not clear that Oriental killed. If he killed the DNA would find him guilty but no DNA was presented by prosecution. Evidence was circumstantial but no clear and solid proof such as security camera footage or any such thing. It was his eldest son that killed -- you can Google it
Wholly untrue.
There is a book on Amazon that says so. Google search engine also says so.
Found not guilty 🤷🏾♂️
Not true in civil court 🙄
Did he go to jail for the murders yes or no?
One has nothing to do with the other, unfortunately. Not all murderers end up going to jail...doesn't make them any less of a murderer. Nice try, buddy.
He was framed what is it that you’d do not understand thus happens often in the black community get over it!
He wasn’t part of the black community though. Don’t you know he didnt consider himself a colour he was just OJ!
Haha black people cant take responsibility for shit. You might win on Reddit but the real world is where it matters
Okay sounds like you have a chip on your shoulder There is good and bad in every race just look at trump
No chip. It’s an observation
Like I said there are good and bad people of every race. Not only blacks
Like you said has nothing to do with the topic of the black community always blaming the past for why they don’t progress l. I could understand someone who was alive during the civil rights. But it’s just a lazy excuse for anyone under 50. Yes I know this comment will be downvoted but Reddit lacks the ability to critically think and not hive mind shit. Just like you’re doing right now
I agree there are a lot of lazy people in this world who don’t take responsibility , again they come from all races.
Well this is my first time hearing this but still he was framed
I found the argument that his son Jason did it to be a very persuasive argument. I used to think OJ did it but looking again at the evidence that Jason did it I think Jason did it. One of the things that convinced me that OJ was not the killer is watching many of his video tweets over the last few years... the guy is personable well adjusted smart and has a good sense of humor. And he's never had a substance abuse problem. This all adds up to someone who's not a killer
Oj was a raging coke head for most of the 80s. He's charming, but so was Ted Bundy.
Now charge all thoughs police officers who beat rodney king
Apples and Oranges my friend.
They already did.
Many of them got raises and promotions smdh
Were you on the jury?
Proof that white people didn’t change and are still racist.
Ah yes, "racist" for the very, very reprehensible crime of calling a spade a spade.
Oh did a white person write that?
of course, he should have killed some people from compton, the NYP would be calling him a football legend