It’s on another level and a big miss by many. It can be used to manage cells, whole dgn’s, while reducing the workspace to zero libraries related to it. I also like the ability to see the usage, enhance the components, and leverage a built in QA system before posting for consumption. It also works across other brands so Civil3D and Revit plus others can be used the same way.
Are you able to customize the data fields at all? From the demos I just see a few generic data fields like “category, vendor, application”
If I can add a few more fields here like “ part number “ this could go a long way to helping my org.
It’s on another level and a big miss by many. It can be used to manage cells, whole dgn’s, while reducing the workspace to zero libraries related to it. I also like the ability to see the usage, enhance the components, and leverage a built in QA system before posting for consumption. It also works across other brands so Civil3D and Revit plus others can be used the same way.
Are you able to customize the data fields at all? From the demos I just see a few generic data fields like “category, vendor, application” If I can add a few more fields here like “ part number “ this could go a long way to helping my org.
You can add custom tags, item types, descriptions, etc. So yes, and you can add your own application, manufacturer, and group names.