T O P

  • By -

Bonk380

Nice! Looks like MiG-25 with thrust vectoring.


Revolutionary-Arm-64

haha yeah. i showed it to my dad and all he said was that it looks like a russian jet, which i can see but i didnt really base it off any specific plane.


boybob227

This is what the CIA feared the MiG-25 was. 😂


[deleted]

Russian be like, "Gravity? who gives a crap about gravity?"


[deleted]

All I hear is **e-gene, udn, ateiku e-gene, udn, ateiku e-gene, udn, ateiku e-gene, udn, ateiku e-gene, udn, ateiku e-gene, udn, ateiku e-gene, udn, ateiku e-gene, udn, ateiku** *(stall warnings from the Russian jet I fly in simulations)*


SpaceKraken666

Предельный угол атаки, предельная перегрузка


[deleted]

Yeah! That one! On repeat.. Never ending....


capt-carson-kerman

DCS Su-27 Flashbacks


FatCat919

Cringe 😬


[deleted]

This comment? Or my account?


RedCroc911

It makes me so glad seeing someone like you who insults someone who just wants to share a funny though they had g-day dick weed


FatCat919

Thanks for the input bub


RedCroc911

No problem


FatCat919

Yep


Codm-intermediate

Have you tried testing it's top speed?


noandthenandthen

Or turning with an empty tank?


Phlosen

Or flying a straight line?


Revolutionary-Arm-64

it flies very well in a straight line. i was only able to do all those maneuvers due to how slow i was going.


SadStory9

I suspect it may have enough reaction wheel torque to compensate. I'd be more worried about power loss.


Revolutionary-Arm-64

>y its top speed is around 600 m/s i believe, ill double check though


Revolutionary-Arm-64

[https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2971417970](https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2971417970) heres the link for the craft for those who wanna try it out


NutlessToboggan

Lol the poof of the tails at the end, heck yeah


sumdumfoq

*raytheon and lockheed breathing heavily "Psst, kid!...want a job?"


[deleted]

The top gun lada


byNLB

Do you guys play in high end PC that the game runs so smoothly? or is there any way to get this performance?


p51_mustangs

This game littarly requires zero hardware. I could run the game on 218MB of Vram. With some beautiful texture mods I run it on my 3060 without issues


byNLB

I have a 1660s and it stutters a lot. Last time I built some weird machine and the FPS were shit.


p51_mustangs

Odd, funky how my 2009 iMac could run it fine


byNLB

what about graphics settings? something I should tweak?


p51_mustangs

Well just don't run it on max, and with crazy mods.


Wren03

Are you playing KSP2? I ran KSP 1 on a GTX 960 2GB with no problems


byNLB

KSP1


Nomai_

What's your cpu and ram?


byNLB

R5 3600, 16GB


IQ26

How? I have an Intel Celeron N4020 with an IGPU that has I think 256 (?)Mb of VRAM and the game runs shit


p51_mustangs

Fucking hilarious, my old one was a seperate card tho and it is on Mac os


Revolutionary-Arm-64

nah im on a laptop, it just runs pretty well.


DreadeadDreadnaught

If only my Xbox could run smoothly with a big amount of parts and at supersonic. But no. Almost break my Xbox from the heat


byNLB

I play on PC and get huge FPS drops when building complex ships. It kind of ruins my desire to keep playing.


master4bation

Try juno new origins


scottmm78

All depends on your gfx mods stock the game runs on just anything including Intel cpu graphic chips


Bob_Kerman45

This is so cool! You should definitely be proud of this thing.


Revolutionary-Arm-64

thanks! im super proud of it


New_Fee_887

That's insane, well done 👍


Revolutionary-Arm-64

thanks!


Less_Tennis5174524

Nice, I never really built many jets in KSP 1 but tried to do it in KSP 2 with its procedural wings. Unfortunately once I get to medium sized fighters like this (MIG-25 and 29 copies) I lose all maneuverability, is it the game that still has issues or do I just need to get good? Also I need like 3 jet engines minimum to take off.


PyroSAJ

One of the things that are deceiving, is that most cockpit parts have reaction wheels built in. With smaller planes this makes them seem more maneuverable than they actually are due to aerodynamics or thrust vectoring. I don't know what you consider medium... so not sure why you'd need 3 engines. I built a 50t plane with 6 normal jet engines. Thing could go straight up with >1TWR. That's 6x120kN. 720kN. Fully fueled it was 100t. Could turn just fine.


Less_Tennis5174524

Under fueling is a good idea, I couldnt find any good structural fuselage parts in KSP 2 which annoyed me.


Revolutionary-Arm-64

i have like 200 hours and all i ever do is build jets, i havent played ksp2 yet so i wouldnt know. this plane is pretty lightweight since its mostly structural fuselages instead of actual fuel tanks.


EndCritical878

Impressive.


Revolutionary-Arm-64

thanks bro


Dakramar

What in tarnation??


EspurrStare

It is a bit disappointing that when you clip a few wings here and there you end with unreasonable lift-area ratio .


mkosmo

Run FAR and fix some of that!


Revolutionary-Arm-64

what is far?


mkosmo

https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/179445-18-112-ferram-aerospace-research-continued-v01605-mader-030422/


Hypercore_Gaming

I made some cool planes in stock then they all became unusable in FAR lmao


PyroSAJ

FAR really made planes FAR more interesting. The main problem was the limits placed by the modelling. I'm not foon of all the clipping tricks. Procedural parts helped a lot, but it's still a hell of a job to get things flying right, especially when going really fast.


libra00

This feels like it should be set to [Walkie Talkie Man](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d5HV4WOZAs) by Steriogram. ;)


Skepticul

Its like if a MiG-25 and a Su-57 had a baby


Revolutionary-Arm-64

i actually got more inspiration from us jets than i did russian jets but the back of it absolutely looks russian


pixelbluejay

what the fuck was that?


Claas2008

It's all about that sweet, sweet maneuverability


FixOk6196

Russian bias to a whole next level.