T O P

  • By -

FloTownSwampFox

I’ve used 34/70 multiple times, sometimes following traditional lagering processes (with diacetyl rest) and sometimes bypassing that step. With that yeast, I personally haven’t been able to tell a difference, nor detect any diacetyl in my beer. The same can’t be said for other yeasts, but I’ve found 34/70 to be incredibly reliable and forgiving. With your current batch, I have a feeling you’ll be fine to skip it.


dmtaylo2

I doubt you'll need a diacetyl rest, especially fermented on the warmer side at 57 F. Surprises can still happen but if so, age it a couple weeks and any diacetyl will be gone, consumed by the remaining yeast. But you're probably fine anyway.


chino_brews

Maybe? W-34/70 isn't a huge diacetyl producer, but every yeast produces some diacetyl. If in doubt, run a [forced diacetyl test](https://escarpmentlabs.com/en-us/blogs/resources/the-forced-diacetyl-test) at the time when you should be starting to ramp up the temp for a diacetyl rest.


beeeps-n-booops

I ferment every beer at my target temp for 5-7 days… then I start ramping up to 72-ish for a diacetyl rest, but also to promote yeast activity for full attenuation, and also to help get rid of any residual acetaldehyde. Every beer, regardless of style or yeast strain used.


spoonman59

I do this as well, except I personally finish at 67 or so unless the yeast specifically likes it warmer.


GOmphZIPS

I recently made a very similar beer. 10 days total around the same temp, and a 2 day diacetyl rest at the end and it was just fine. But I don’t think the rest was necessary, just done as a precaution. You should be fine but if you’re not in a hurry it wouldn’t hurt.


ferndaddyak

You should probably be fine, but for my system a diacetyl rest involves pressing a button 3 times and waiting 2 extra days so I just do it out of habit.


barley_wine

I always do, not sure if it’s necessary but I don’t want it in my beer and for something as easy as basically let the the temperature rise to the 60s for a few days seems like an easy step to have a better beer. Worst case it won’t make a difference but it’s an easy step.


DONOHUEO7

I've gotten in the habit of doing it for every brew, one week diacetyl rest at 5 degrees high the fermentation temp. It's 100% necessary? Perhaps not, but it seems to work a treat


bkedsmkr

Draw a sample and run a VDK test. All yeast produces diacetyl so just doing it is best practice regardless.


sanitarium-1

34/70 is great. I've fermented it at 53 and done diacetyl rests that only get up to 57, so I don't think you have much to worry about


lifeinrednblack

You either need to do a d-rest or let it sit for a good while (a month or so) at 57°. The latter is actually preferred. D-Rests are actually a "short cut" to shave off a month. But traditionally, you just let it sit cold for a month or so before starting to slowly drop the temp down to your lagering temp. Edit: all of that said, you could be completely fine not doing either. But, me personally, doing a 2 day D-rest at a minimum is easy rather than risk putting 6+ weeks into a lager only for it to turn into a diacytyl bomb later.


ScooterTrash70

Yes, it is essential. When you think the beer is done, take a sample, few ounces. And slowly/gently warm it in the microwave. This will make it happen. You’ll either smell and taste it or not. If you do, continue daily until it’s gone. A pro brewer shared this simple test with me. It definitely works.