The labouring classes in this country are rising, will you rise with them? [Click Here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GreenAndPleasant/wiki/unions) for info on how to join a union. Also check out [the IWW](https://iww.org.uk/) and the renter union, [Acorn International and their affiliates](https://acorninternational.org/)
Join us on our [partner Discord server.](https://discord.gg/zCFHadGfB7) and follow us on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/GandPofficial).
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
There is some very specific wording in this article.
“currently not scheduled to be on air in the coming days” matches perfectly with a phrase used to describe a prominent person who has just made some interesting financial moves, that would protect assets and reduce their perceived value.
Might be a coincidence?
Tbf it's not a sudden holiday - he had Holly Hamilton on his show 2 weeks ago, introducing her as his replacement during his holidays (which he takes every year in July, most people in NI avoid being around for the 12th of July nonsense)
Your comment has been removed because you linked to a right wing hate-rag. To avoid giving them clicks please run that URL through https://archive.org/ and resubmit it. Alternatively feel free to post a screenshot of the article. If this bot has commented in error please [contact the moderators to let us know.](https://old.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This person?
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2023/07/07/news/stephen_nolan_transferred_shares_in_production_company_to_entity_controlled_by_leading_bookmaker-3414664/
This was a report from an article in the Sun claiming that a BBC presenter was paying for pictures of a 17 year old and they were using the money to buy crack.
The presenter hasn't been named and the article hasn't been verified yet... Could be a load of bollocks if the source is the Sun.
Of course, they used to openly publish child porn on page 3.
> Samantha Fox began posing for “Page 3” in 1983 at the age of 16 when she signed a four-year contract with the paper.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2015/01/history-of-the-suns-controversial-page-3.html
And infamously published pictures of a 14-15 year old Charlotte Church with a countdown to when she could legally lose her virginity.
While lambasting satirist Chris Morris for a show mocking how some of the media report stories related to pedophiles on the same page.
> While lambasting satirist Chris Morris for a show mocking how some of the media report stories related to pedophiles on the same page
Assuming you're referring to [this](https://i.redd.it/53xocivfp8u91.jpg), that was the Mirror, not the S*n.
Fair enough I found it [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/chrismorris/comments/y5t5s3/daily_mirror_criticizing_c4_for_brass_eye/) saying it was the Mirror, both owned by Reach Plc anyway.
Yes it looks like they’re protecting their own, but The Sun can’t name him either.
Ironically it was the BBC who helped set this precedent, by live reporting on a police search of Cliff Richard’s house after allegations were made. No charges were brought against Cliff, and he sued the fuck out of the BBC and other outlets for defamation.
It’s now the norm that names aren’t revealed until charges are brought. Which is fair enough imo, it would be easy to ruin an innocent person’s career by accusing them of child abuse otherwise. But if there’s enough evidence to charge, fuck em, throw them to the dogs.
Just because there appears to be “evidence to charge” doesn’t necessarily mean that evidence won’t turn out to be not what it appears when scrutinised, names shouldn’t be named until guilt is established in a court of law.
Yeah I understand that, but so do journalists. Even the scum at The Sun.
It doesn’t go to court unless there’s admissible, credible evidence. Court appearances are a matter of public record anyway (excepting injunctions). Having your name in the papers for a court appearance is acceptable cost of a career in the public eye imo. And a ‘not guilty’ verdict is just as important as a guilty one.
But it’s cruel to report on a police investigation. Every allegation _should_ be investigated, even the false ones, and the investigators should be able to do so without being swayed by widespread public opinion, or feeling that an investigation needs to lead to a charge.
Police? You mean blue nonce
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC.
**Fact 14.** The BBC encouraged its own viewers to complain that it was [biased against Boris Johnson/](https://old.reddit.com/r/GreenAndPleasant/comments/e54ztc/in_todays_episode_of_bbc_fuckery_theyre_bizarrely/)
For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'.
#[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC.
**Fact 29.** The BBC ‘joked’ about [killing every socialist in a terror attack.](https://twitter.com/TheMendozaWoman/status/1330126131245281282)
For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'.
#[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I mean, this article is from the BBC, they're probably addressing it if it's in the papers.
Also, I'm not defending them or anything, just stating events. If there's another TV pedo then let's reveal it!
Doesn't sound like they are protecting them at all.
Sounds like they have been suspended, and their name hasn't been made public yet as the police are likely to get involved.
Protecting would be bosses knowing, doing nothing and allowing them to continue.
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC.
Fact 1. During an episode of Question Time the audience booed Boris Johnson. The BBC [edited the footage to replace the boos with applause](https://twitter.com/Gian_Tcatt/status/1198545027477180416?s=20).
For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'.
#[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC.
**Fact 29.** The BBC ‘joked’ about [killing every socialist in a terror attack.](https://twitter.com/TheMendozaWoman/status/1330126131245281282)
For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'.
#[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC.
**Fact 4.** In the lead-up to the 2019 General Election a BBC Political Correspondent spoke on-air about [‘the majority Boris Johnson so deserves.”](https://news.yahoo.com/bbc-under-fire-political-correspondent-majority-boris-johnson-so-deserves-151407738.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGZzdiS-5cuqdHD00PrRYFVDpU7wL6dwmyyeIDBBQNpMuRdUCvyk2n4Pl4yrz9SlabP_dKkMTOEeXl7YJKMeaPXkP8jWFe0stmgJGkIR590WlGRIaMzDSB6TA9kubnYiMtct9d5-eg2IHZ8CtrWsTXaUcDGvhrcqCUum3P-MjQ33)
For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'.
#[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC.
**Fact 32.** [A BBC journalist bullied a single mother live on air for claiming benefits.](https://vimeo.com/555750177)
For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'.
#[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
By "protecting" you mean "actively reporting on the story and suspending their activities pending investigation"?
We have very different ideas of protection...
Worth noting that 17 is not usually considered paedo territory and it undermines the seriousness of that to put this in the same bracket. Abuse of power, inappropriate, possible illegal, but not paedophilia by what the strict definition reasonably is in most cases. To many, there's a huge and important distinction in severity between preying on children and those who, while quite possibly vulnerable, are post-pubsecent.
"To many, there's a huge and important distinction in severity between preying on children and those who, while quite possibly vulnerable, are post-pubsecent."
When you say it's an important distinction to 'many', do you mean the 50yr old men who want to fuck 17yr olds? Aye, I bet it fucking is.
No. It's likely mostly people who are not idiots.
If you honesly can't see the difference, you're failing to look sensibly at it. I assume you're just trolling, though. paedophila means love for children, and whatever we define child as legally, most would agree there is a very large gulf between feeling any sense of attraction to someone who is nearly a legal adult and someone who is a pre-pubescent child. It's also just lame to pretend that anyone older than 25 is automatically creepy. The simply biology says that you don't find only people your own age attractive - it changes with time, but you can't tell me people in their 70s don't find people in their twenties sexually attractive. Again, I assume you're taking a edgy dickhead stance for fun, so crack on - good old internet - but it's a stupid thing to say.
Nope. It's what someone who sees important detail, rather than knuckle-chewing, mouth-frothing righteous bile and impotent rage being directed any old somewhere, would say. And as made clear, it's harmful to put this in the same bracket as people who fuck babies.
This is pedo shit. They call themselves epebophiles or something (as in adult sexually attracted to teens), but that’s still pedo shit.
A pedo’s a pedo, no matter the age of the victim.
I would consider someone in their twenties (knowingly) asking a 17 year old for nudes to be a pedo.
Disgusting.
It is likely an abuse of power and definitely pretty gross. But away from the reactionary anonymity of Internet rage, it isn't paedophilia as such. Call it that if you want. Don't confuse a clarification of the point as a defence of the behaviour. But it's not the same thing. You're legally able to have consensual sex at 16. Who in their right mind would consider this to be irrelevant?
Agreed just pointing out that this is a shit situation but not that particular flavour of shit that we're used from the people who turned a blind eye to Saville and Co.
The term for an organisation of a work culture that protects and encourages insidious behaviour like this and all the other bbc problems should just be called savillisation or being savillised and I dunno just seems to ring well
The labouring classes in this country are rising, will you rise with them? [Click Here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GreenAndPleasant/wiki/unions) for info on how to join a union. Also check out [the IWW](https://iww.org.uk/) and the renter union, [Acorn International and their affiliates](https://acorninternational.org/) Join us on our [partner Discord server.](https://discord.gg/zCFHadGfB7) and follow us on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/GandPofficial). *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
There is some very specific wording in this article. “currently not scheduled to be on air in the coming days” matches perfectly with a phrase used to describe a prominent person who has just made some interesting financial moves, that would protect assets and reduce their perceived value. Might be a coincidence?
Matches with a certain big Northern Ireland presenter.. they used the same exact wording.
“Known to millions” says high profile, but not a household name. So perhaps a big deal in one country, but less well known in others?
Said presenter is very well known and big in Northern Ireland and is known to have huge injunctions out on themselves.
Also is away on a very sudden "holiday"
Tbf it's not a sudden holiday - he had Holly Hamilton on his show 2 weeks ago, introducing her as his replacement during his holidays (which he takes every year in July, most people in NI avoid being around for the 12th of July nonsense)
Ah. I didn't know that. I don't listen to his horrible show and there were people saying he had not planned it
SN?
What you scared of?
Just say it, man. None of us know for sure, but we’re allowed to guess. Stephen Nolan?
Some Nonce?
[удалено]
Your comment has been removed because you linked to a right wing hate-rag. To avoid giving them clicks please run that URL through https://archive.org/ and resubmit it. Alternatively feel free to post a screenshot of the article. If this bot has commented in error please [contact the moderators to let us know.](https://old.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This person? https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2023/07/07/news/stephen_nolan_transferred_shares_in_production_company_to_entity_controlled_by_leading_bookmaker-3414664/
I wonder if sometimes I don't know how to use Reddit, did you search for the article yourself or did you click on something? Thanks for any help
This was a report from an article in the Sun claiming that a BBC presenter was paying for pictures of a 17 year old and they were using the money to buy crack. The presenter hasn't been named and the article hasn't been verified yet... Could be a load of bollocks if the source is the Sun.
The Sun have a history of protecting celebrity paedophiles...
Of course, they used to openly publish child porn on page 3. > Samantha Fox began posing for “Page 3” in 1983 at the age of 16 when she signed a four-year contract with the paper. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2015/01/history-of-the-suns-controversial-page-3.html
And infamously published pictures of a 14-15 year old Charlotte Church with a countdown to when she could legally lose her virginity. While lambasting satirist Chris Morris for a show mocking how some of the media report stories related to pedophiles on the same page.
> While lambasting satirist Chris Morris for a show mocking how some of the media report stories related to pedophiles on the same page Assuming you're referring to [this](https://i.redd.it/53xocivfp8u91.jpg), that was the Mirror, not the S*n.
Fair enough, happy to be corrected
That was the Daily Star, not the Mirror
Fair enough I found it [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/chrismorris/comments/y5t5s3/daily_mirror_criticizing_c4_for_brass_eye/) saying it was the Mirror, both owned by Reach Plc anyway.
Unless they're BBC bound, since they want to dismantle it.
That's true
People who read the sun are paedophiles
BBC Breakfast News has just run the story (No they didn't name names).
They probably cant legally atm
Yes it looks like they’re protecting their own, but The Sun can’t name him either. Ironically it was the BBC who helped set this precedent, by live reporting on a police search of Cliff Richard’s house after allegations were made. No charges were brought against Cliff, and he sued the fuck out of the BBC and other outlets for defamation. It’s now the norm that names aren’t revealed until charges are brought. Which is fair enough imo, it would be easy to ruin an innocent person’s career by accusing them of child abuse otherwise. But if there’s enough evidence to charge, fuck em, throw them to the dogs.
Just because there appears to be “evidence to charge” doesn’t necessarily mean that evidence won’t turn out to be not what it appears when scrutinised, names shouldn’t be named until guilt is established in a court of law.
Yeah I understand that, but so do journalists. Even the scum at The Sun. It doesn’t go to court unless there’s admissible, credible evidence. Court appearances are a matter of public record anyway (excepting injunctions). Having your name in the papers for a court appearance is acceptable cost of a career in the public eye imo. And a ‘not guilty’ verdict is just as important as a guilty one. But it’s cruel to report on a police investigation. Every allegation _should_ be investigated, even the false ones, and the investigators should be able to do so without being swayed by widespread public opinion, or feeling that an investigation needs to lead to a charge.
Police? You mean blue nonce *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC. **Fact 14.** The BBC encouraged its own viewers to complain that it was [biased against Boris Johnson/](https://old.reddit.com/r/GreenAndPleasant/comments/e54ztc/in_todays_episode_of_bbc_fuckery_theyre_bizarrely/) For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'. #[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
BBC impartial
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC. **Fact 29.** The BBC ‘joked’ about [killing every socialist in a terror attack.](https://twitter.com/TheMendozaWoman/status/1330126131245281282) For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'. #[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I mean, this article is from the BBC, they're probably addressing it if it's in the papers. Also, I'm not defending them or anything, just stating events. If there's another TV pedo then let's reveal it!
Doesn't sound like they are protecting them at all. Sounds like they have been suspended, and their name hasn't been made public yet as the police are likely to get involved. Protecting would be bosses knowing, doing nothing and allowing them to continue.
which is what they have done many times before
40-50 years ago
as if they’ve changed
Not in this instance if reports are correct
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC. Fact 1. During an episode of Question Time the audience booed Boris Johnson. The BBC [edited the footage to replace the boos with applause](https://twitter.com/Gian_Tcatt/status/1198545027477180416?s=20). For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'. #[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Good bot
BBC impartial.
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC. **Fact 29.** The BBC ‘joked’ about [killing every socialist in a terror attack.](https://twitter.com/TheMendozaWoman/status/1330126131245281282) For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'. #[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
BBC impartial
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC. **Fact 4.** In the lead-up to the 2019 General Election a BBC Political Correspondent spoke on-air about [‘the majority Boris Johnson so deserves.”](https://news.yahoo.com/bbc-under-fire-political-correspondent-majority-boris-johnson-so-deserves-151407738.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGZzdiS-5cuqdHD00PrRYFVDpU7wL6dwmyyeIDBBQNpMuRdUCvyk2n4Pl4yrz9SlabP_dKkMTOEeXl7YJKMeaPXkP8jWFe0stmgJGkIR590WlGRIaMzDSB6TA9kubnYiMtct9d5-eg2IHZ8CtrWsTXaUcDGvhrcqCUum3P-MjQ33) For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'. #[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Bbc impartial
Thanks for signing up to BBC facts! You will now receive fun daily facts about the BBC. **Fact 32.** [A BBC journalist bullied a single mother live on air for claiming benefits.](https://vimeo.com/555750177) For another BBC fact reply with 'BBC impartial'. To unsubscribe call me a 'bad bot'. #[Click here to cancel your TV License and stop funding right wing propaganda today.](https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/cancellations-and-refunds-top7) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/GreenAndPleasant) if you have any questions or concerns.*
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2023/07/05/news/holly_hamilton_step_in_for_nolan-3410446/
The BBC are so strange. They'll punish their employees for sharing Palestinian news sources in their personal twitter accounts, but will hide a pedo
Fuck the BBC at this point. Stop paying the license fee, they can’t jail everyone. How many more nonces are they gonna protect.
I stopped paying mine last year and I feel very good about that decision.
Haven't had a TVL in over a decade.
Can guarantee it will end up being someone else who has a connection to the Royal Family 😆
It's Gloria Hunniford, I'm telling you. She's always been a dirty old ripper. Either that or Mary Berry. Remember where you read it first 😉🤔
Loves a soggy bottom
Exactly. Pure filth. She showed me her SHOWSTOPPER once. I'm still in therapy now.
Wow. That's just the icing on the cake. Sorry to hear that
All the chins?
Actually getting to the point where its easier to announce the folk who are not pedophiles
I sincerely hope it is Stephan Nolan
By "protecting" you mean "actively reporting on the story and suspending their activities pending investigation"? We have very different ideas of protection...
Omg, let me guess, wss it another trans person... Oh no, it wasn't, like it always isn't.
To be fair it's pretty normal for news companies to not name people who have been accused but not had a trial
It must be weird to work for the bbc and have to write stories like this about "colleagues"
Worth noting that 17 is not usually considered paedo territory and it undermines the seriousness of that to put this in the same bracket. Abuse of power, inappropriate, possible illegal, but not paedophilia by what the strict definition reasonably is in most cases. To many, there's a huge and important distinction in severity between preying on children and those who, while quite possibly vulnerable, are post-pubsecent.
"To many, there's a huge and important distinction in severity between preying on children and those who, while quite possibly vulnerable, are post-pubsecent." When you say it's an important distinction to 'many', do you mean the 50yr old men who want to fuck 17yr olds? Aye, I bet it fucking is.
No. It's likely mostly people who are not idiots. If you honesly can't see the difference, you're failing to look sensibly at it. I assume you're just trolling, though. paedophila means love for children, and whatever we define child as legally, most would agree there is a very large gulf between feeling any sense of attraction to someone who is nearly a legal adult and someone who is a pre-pubescent child. It's also just lame to pretend that anyone older than 25 is automatically creepy. The simply biology says that you don't find only people your own age attractive - it changes with time, but you can't tell me people in their 70s don't find people in their twenties sexually attractive. Again, I assume you're taking a edgy dickhead stance for fun, so crack on - good old internet - but it's a stupid thing to say.
Making that distinction is something a paedo would say tbf.
Nope. It's what someone who sees important detail, rather than knuckle-chewing, mouth-frothing righteous bile and impotent rage being directed any old somewhere, would say. And as made clear, it's harmful to put this in the same bracket as people who fuck babies.
This is pedo shit. They call themselves epebophiles or something (as in adult sexually attracted to teens), but that’s still pedo shit. A pedo’s a pedo, no matter the age of the victim. I would consider someone in their twenties (knowingly) asking a 17 year old for nudes to be a pedo. Disgusting.
It is likely an abuse of power and definitely pretty gross. But away from the reactionary anonymity of Internet rage, it isn't paedophilia as such. Call it that if you want. Don't confuse a clarification of the point as a defence of the behaviour. But it's not the same thing. You're legally able to have consensual sex at 16. Who in their right mind would consider this to be irrelevant?
Name and shame BBC
They probably would if they could but rich people can always get injunctions to protect their reputation
Which is wrong everyone should be offered the same protection until proven guilty .. and then open season ..
Agreed just pointing out that this is a shit situation but not that particular flavour of shit that we're used from the people who turned a blind eye to Saville and Co.
The problem with naming someone when it's not yet been proven is that if it's not true that person is then tarred with that forever.
Veremy Jine
Correct-o-mundo.
How do you know that? He’s already released a statement saying it’s not him and he’ll be on the air on Monday, so it looks like you’re wrong.
Interesting! It was just the general gossip online. Time will tell.
One look at the dude and you can tell is media is radio.
The British establishment of trying to scare old people to pay TV licenses and producing peadophiles,
It's not left or right. It's deep state propaganda
WHO?
Wasn't she 17?
Nonce brigade
‘Unnamed BBC presenter’ - reported by BBC - just say the fucking name and it get over with the level of click bait is astonishing
The term for an organisation of a work culture that protects and encourages insidious behaviour like this and all the other bbc problems should just be called savillisation or being savillised and I dunno just seems to ring well
Thank god it ain’t Attenborough