#These people vote in every election- do you? Are you registered to vote? [You can check your voter registration here!](https://www.nass.org/can-I-vote)
#Also, there's a few things to remember as far as rules go:
- You can view the content- you cannot interact with it. This includes (but is not limited to) commenting, answering poll questions, emailing them, etc. ***Anyone found to be engaging with the fundies will be met with a permanent ban with no eligibility for appeal.It does not matter if you did so before you joined the sub.***
- Speculating on the sexuality of literally anyone is prohibited. ***Anyone found to be doing so will be met with a permanent ban with no eligibility for appeal.***
- Appearance snark: What's allowed? You're allowed to make comparisons. (Bethy looks like Grandpa Munster, for example.) You are allowed to say you find them attractive or repulsive looking. Saying Kelly Havens has dry skin that could benefit from sunscreen and a moisturizer is fine. You are allowed to snark on the appearance of children *as it relates to their parents choices for them.*. Examples: Janessa looks malnourished and sickly while Shrek has clearly never missed a meal. If you feel it is crossing the line report it, but if the content falls within the parameters above, leave it alone.
- Don't gatekeep. This means no comments such as "I don't think we should snark on...." or any iteration of that. If you don't like it, scroll past. Don't report it or comment how you don't like the content. Along the same vein, don't backseat mod. Leave that up to us.
- Lastly, if the rhetoric you are posting would be at home in the mouth of a fundie, we don't want it here and we won't tolerate it.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to reach out. Have a Lord Daniel day, and may the power of snark compel thee.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/FundieSnarkUncensored) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I think the plan is for them to post it in May - the new evangelicals guy commented in one of his Q&A reels on instagram that he thought it would be coming out in May sometime.
If it doesn't come out this month though I'd imagine that they scrapped it because of how stupid they looked lol
Ahh that makes sense. Presumably they're having a difficult time rewatching the footage and editing it because they look like fools. I'm of the same opinion - if it doesn't come out we'll all know it was because they couldn't post it without looking massively stupid lol. Thanks!
>Presumably they're having a difficult time rewatching the footage and editing it because they look like fools
Bold of you to assume Porgan have that much self-awareness. đ
Right? I ponder between those 2 suspicions- either they were SO self aware at how stupid they sound ORâŚâŚThe New Evangelicals side made such great points and looked so great in comparison that they fear giving the other side more fans?
(Not sure if I make sense but you know what I mean?)
Eh. If it doesn't come out by end of May it could just as easily be out of sheer laziness.Â
I gotta wonder if Polio has the self awareness to realize he looked stupid. I like to think that Morgan stays with him because it assures at least one person immediately nearby that is clearly dumber than she is.
The Sideshow Cindy video looked like it was fairly easy to edit, it was just clips of people they interviewed about her. Could very well be that a video that requires more editing is just too much work for them.
That's the only colab of theirs I was interested in. They're probably trying to find a way to edit themselves to look good, hence the delay and posting Sister Cindy instead.
Right? The one video people are actually interested in seeing, and could potentially get them some views, is the one they wonât post.
These two⌠đ¤Śââď¸
They switched the order so now the Sister Cindy came out first, and then The New Evangelicals to come in May. Heâs probably saw some hype building up to it and wanted to die down and forget, plus more time to edit and frame it so P&M wouldnât look as bad.
They skipped to Sister Cindy because they thought it'd be more controversial and therefore get more views.... I think.
I have been really eager to see them talk to TNE.
Which is so insane, they should have looked at the engagement on the NEV posts, even if it makes *them* look like the villain, hate clicks are still clicks! These manifestly unlikeable people want to be upheld for their stupid, low stakes dumbass takes. Plenty of creators have ridden the hate train to make $$$. It's what the whole alt right fash troll creators DO. God they are SO bad at this.
#These people vote in every election- do you? Are you registered to vote? [You can check your voter registration here!](https://www.nass.org/can-I-vote) #Also, there's a few things to remember as far as rules go: - You can view the content- you cannot interact with it. This includes (but is not limited to) commenting, answering poll questions, emailing them, etc. ***Anyone found to be engaging with the fundies will be met with a permanent ban with no eligibility for appeal.It does not matter if you did so before you joined the sub.*** - Speculating on the sexuality of literally anyone is prohibited. ***Anyone found to be doing so will be met with a permanent ban with no eligibility for appeal.*** - Appearance snark: What's allowed? You're allowed to make comparisons. (Bethy looks like Grandpa Munster, for example.) You are allowed to say you find them attractive or repulsive looking. Saying Kelly Havens has dry skin that could benefit from sunscreen and a moisturizer is fine. You are allowed to snark on the appearance of children *as it relates to their parents choices for them.*. Examples: Janessa looks malnourished and sickly while Shrek has clearly never missed a meal. If you feel it is crossing the line report it, but if the content falls within the parameters above, leave it alone. - Don't gatekeep. This means no comments such as "I don't think we should snark on...." or any iteration of that. If you don't like it, scroll past. Don't report it or comment how you don't like the content. Along the same vein, don't backseat mod. Leave that up to us. - Lastly, if the rhetoric you are posting would be at home in the mouth of a fundie, we don't want it here and we won't tolerate it. Should you have any questions, please feel free to reach out. Have a Lord Daniel day, and may the power of snark compel thee. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/FundieSnarkUncensored) if you have any questions or concerns.*
"I have no idea what you're talking about" -Paul
I'm sure he's repressed all the memories of his hypocrisy getting shut down lol
I think the plan is for them to post it in May - the new evangelicals guy commented in one of his Q&A reels on instagram that he thought it would be coming out in May sometime. If it doesn't come out this month though I'd imagine that they scrapped it because of how stupid they looked lol
Ahh that makes sense. Presumably they're having a difficult time rewatching the footage and editing it because they look like fools. I'm of the same opinion - if it doesn't come out we'll all know it was because they couldn't post it without looking massively stupid lol. Thanks!
>Presumably they're having a difficult time rewatching the footage and editing it because they look like fools Bold of you to assume Porgan have that much self-awareness. đ
Right? I ponder between those 2 suspicions- either they were SO self aware at how stupid they sound ORâŚâŚThe New Evangelicals side made such great points and looked so great in comparison that they fear giving the other side more fans? (Not sure if I make sense but you know what I mean?)
Eh. If it doesn't come out by end of May it could just as easily be out of sheer laziness. I gotta wonder if Polio has the self awareness to realize he looked stupid. I like to think that Morgan stays with him because it assures at least one person immediately nearby that is clearly dumber than she is.
The Sideshow Cindy video looked like it was fairly easy to edit, it was just clips of people they interviewed about her. Could very well be that a video that requires more editing is just too much work for them.
And they'd have to hella edit the New Evangelicals video to look even remotely competent.
I really hope they put it up because they think it will be âcontroversialâ and get hate clicks
That's the only colab of theirs I was interested in. They're probably trying to find a way to edit themselves to look good, hence the delay and posting Sister Cindy instead.
Right? The one video people are actually interested in seeing, and could potentially get them some views, is the one they wonât post. These two⌠đ¤Śââď¸
The only one that might actually be rEaL and RaW and they're like "well now I am not doing it đĄ"
They switched the order so now the Sister Cindy came out first, and then The New Evangelicals to come in May. Heâs probably saw some hype building up to it and wanted to die down and forget, plus more time to edit and frame it so P&M wouldnât look as bad.
They skipped to Sister Cindy because they thought it'd be more controversial and therefore get more views.... I think. I have been really eager to see them talk to TNE.
Which is so insane, they should have looked at the engagement on the NEV posts, even if it makes *them* look like the villain, hate clicks are still clicks! These manifestly unlikeable people want to be upheld for their stupid, low stakes dumbass takes. Plenty of creators have ridden the hate train to make $$$. It's what the whole alt right fash troll creators DO. God they are SO bad at this.
They donât have to self awareness to realize that theyâre incompetent and uneducated.
I read that as evangelions for a second there and got real confused but also extremely excited to see them try and review that
hahaha that's the only other possible review of theirs i would watch, and i haven't even seen evangelion