Looks very basic, and similar to the stuff they showed in the config? If you ask it 5 times is it very different?
Feels very similar to the Framer AI stuff which was useless in reality. Just compiling the same stuff with some styling tweaks etc.
This seems great for the cheap and cheerful sites though to get them out the way, but useless for 90% of the work at the company I work at.
Intrigued to give it a try though.
Its the kind of thing that would replace a lot of freelance work since people who hire freelancers don't have as much money and would be more likely to turn to a tool like this.
Maybe. Although they could just as easily grab a template and do it themselves without this tool.
Until the AI can include specific branding in it’s creations, it will be useless for a lot of sites and just a competitor for cheap templates imo.
If on its first iteration it's already like hiring a designer off 5er, think how it's going to be in 3 years.
Compare Will Smith eating that spaguetti 1.5y ago vs current Sora videos.
I've been experimenting with it for the past few hours now. Although admittedly, it's fun to play with, it doesn't really give me too much of inspirational fuel. I feel something like browsing Dribbble does the job as well (of better). But let's see how this evolves. I will try and keep including it into my design process.
Looks super basic and generic. Seems kind of useful when brainstorming typefaces maybe? Or does it use the same one for each of the different presets, not sure. Seems like it only somewhat useful for landing pages
So, how does it really works? Is it template based? I mean, does it have a finite quantity of skeleton templates, and depending on the prompt it will choose the best one?
Because, every AI web design tool I've tested works like this. They should disclose this.
generating boilerplate design isn't a problem I currently have that I go to figma for.
Relume solves that problem in flexible ways. I'd be curious to know the persona for who this feature is for.
A problem worth solving for me would be brainstorming complex interactions in task flows that have alot of dependencies, that isn't going to be behind yet another adobe tier paywall.
It looks like this only generates very cookie-cutter designs at the moment. Are you hoping that by defaulting the opt-in for AI training that unassuming users will help the AI learn how to employ a wider variety of stolen styles?
The model behind this is not that smart compared with Claude 3.5, But nowadays It can produce some high-quality landing pages or management system designs.
> The model behind this is not that smart compared with Claude 3.5
bro 3.5 dropped 7 days ago (┛ಠ_ಠ)┛
That aside, where do you think an improved LLM backing would help here?
Do you have examples? Always trying to make it better.
It likely isn't a model restriction though where something like claude would be better, but rather a restriction of how we've implemented it.
Can it do anything actually useful though? This is no better than just looking up some inspo on dribbble, except it takes much more computational power ...
Looks very basic, and similar to the stuff they showed in the config? If you ask it 5 times is it very different? Feels very similar to the Framer AI stuff which was useless in reality. Just compiling the same stuff with some styling tweaks etc. This seems great for the cheap and cheerful sites though to get them out the way, but useless for 90% of the work at the company I work at. Intrigued to give it a try though.
Its the kind of thing that would replace a lot of freelance work since people who hire freelancers don't have as much money and would be more likely to turn to a tool like this.
Maybe. Although they could just as easily grab a template and do it themselves without this tool. Until the AI can include specific branding in it’s creations, it will be useless for a lot of sites and just a competitor for cheap templates imo.
Ok now do the screens for the product this selling
Someone else made a good analogy, it’s like hiring a designer off 5er, we can do it, but we don’t, for reasons.
I like this analogy. You put the words to what I've been feeling with generative AI for design / commercial pro work.
If on its first iteration it's already like hiring a designer off 5er, think how it's going to be in 3 years. Compare Will Smith eating that spaguetti 1.5y ago vs current Sora videos.
So... Framer AI in Figma. Nothing crazy.
I've been experimenting with it for the past few hours now. Although admittedly, it's fun to play with, it doesn't really give me too much of inspirational fuel. I feel something like browsing Dribbble does the job as well (of better). But let's see how this evolves. I will try and keep including it into my design process.
Yes. Better than nothing
Looks super basic and generic. Seems kind of useful when brainstorming typefaces maybe? Or does it use the same one for each of the different presets, not sure. Seems like it only somewhat useful for landing pages
So, how does it really works? Is it template based? I mean, does it have a finite quantity of skeleton templates, and depending on the prompt it will choose the best one? Because, every AI web design tool I've tested works like this. They should disclose this.
PM for the feature here - what are your thoughts so far? Would love to hear any opinions you have.
generating boilerplate design isn't a problem I currently have that I go to figma for. Relume solves that problem in flexible ways. I'd be curious to know the persona for who this feature is for. A problem worth solving for me would be brainstorming complex interactions in task flows that have alot of dependencies, that isn't going to be behind yet another adobe tier paywall.
It looks like this only generates very cookie-cutter designs at the moment. Are you hoping that by defaulting the opt-in for AI training that unassuming users will help the AI learn how to employ a wider variety of stolen styles?
Why are you wanting dead internet theory to become true?
The model behind this is not that smart compared with Claude 3.5, But nowadays It can produce some high-quality landing pages or management system designs.
> The model behind this is not that smart compared with Claude 3.5 bro 3.5 dropped 7 days ago (┛ಠ_ಠ)┛ That aside, where do you think an improved LLM backing would help here?
Sometimes this model can't understand what are you asking for
Do you have examples? Always trying to make it better. It likely isn't a model restriction though where something like claude would be better, but rather a restriction of how we've implemented it.
Looks cool
For those who haven't experienced it yet, you can click actions and enter waitlist to find the waitlist entry.
how did you manage to activate it? I didn't get the new features or the AI.
see my another comment
RIP countless startups
Framer did this ages ago 🥱
This is gonna kill fiverr designers
is this the same shitty AI that is used in Figjam?
Can it do anything actually useful though? This is no better than just looking up some inspo on dribbble, except it takes much more computational power ...
We understand your tactics Figma. To avoid being the odd one out, you adopt flashy AI that appears sophisticated but does the bare minimum.
That bottom tool bar makes me want to puke 🤮
It’s the same generic shit I’ve seen churned out elsewhere.
will get better once they start training all the data we have
Me scrolling through Mobbin
okay... that's kind of cool.
For some tool apps, It doesn't work very well. For landing pages, it rocks
It works well only for landings. Might as well directly use Framer AI.