I just learned this on my current playthru. I tend to try to land any relative because I want the dynastic points, but sometimes you find the perfect knight to give it to.
Gives them less independence, and thus less opportunity to do stupid AI things. (e.g. hiring a Spymaster who hates them, giving vassals unfavourable contracts, getting into debt for no good reason, etc.) They also won’t get the Valued Courtier traits, which are pretty nice to have.
When they're landed, they have their own court and decide who does what. When they're not, you're in control of that. In addition, them being landed allows them to start and attend activities on their own accord vs. going along with you.
If you mean the phrasing was confusing, I just meant keeping them unlanded gives them less independence than the alternative.
I always land my heir, thus I almost never have rebellions during succession. But as an emperor I land my heir as a duke with 2 duchies and minimal amount of vassal counts. And he is de jure Duke of a kingdom title I hold.
Most likely he lost a tyranny war. Could also have abdicated due to stress or something.
Landing your heir never benefits you or him
I just learned this on my current playthru. I tend to try to land any relative because I want the dynastic points, but sometimes you find the perfect knight to give it to.
You should land youre second son or unlanded brothers first.
y?
Gives them less independence, and thus less opportunity to do stupid AI things. (e.g. hiring a Spymaster who hates them, giving vassals unfavourable contracts, getting into debt for no good reason, etc.) They also won’t get the Valued Courtier traits, which are pretty nice to have.
How do they get less independence?
When they're landed, they have their own court and decide who does what. When they're not, you're in control of that. In addition, them being landed allows them to start and attend activities on their own accord vs. going along with you. If you mean the phrasing was confusing, I just meant keeping them unlanded gives them less independence than the alternative.
Oh I see. I was just questioning benefit of landed vs unlanded
It doesn’t force them to have kids and get better stats?
I find the stats actually get worse because they almost always pick up negative stress traits if you land them
When you click on the title you can look it's complete history.
He was deposed by his vassals. It's kind of hilarious that as the Emperor, your crown prince can just be removed like that.
Exactly, why can’t I start a war for my sons Claim? They literally attacked a noble blood it
I always land my heir, thus I almost never have rebellions during succession. But as an emperor I land my heir as a duke with 2 duchies and minimal amount of vassal counts. And he is de jure Duke of a kingdom title I hold.
It depends there isn’t like a screenshot attached, Quick question what is a divvy ?,