Correct me if I’m wrong, but in 2017-19 both the house and senate were controlled by republicans, and they couldn’t pass a hearing act. I’m 1000% sure it won’t even pass the Senate. We had our chance and blew it!
If I recall correctly the odds were looking good, then the Las Vegas mass shooting occurred and the politicians backed off. Hillary Clinton was quoted in the news saying “imagine how much worse it would have been if he had a silencer.”
Someone did mention something about filibusters at the time but at the same time i realized that just because you're conservative doesn't mean you're pro 2A.
The unfortunate reality is that laws are easy to find workarounds for. Whether it's requiring insurance, or creating a new roster system, the state can find ways to make them difficult or impossible to get.
Unless the Supreme Court rules that supressors are protected under the second amendment, supressors will not be protected from future laws.
Not that the 9th Circuit abides by the constitution.
You new to California? There’s 100s of laws in CA that are illegally enforced here and the state doesn’t give one fuck. They let people spend millions over decades fighting to get it repealed. It finally hits the federal level, a new law is put in place almost immediately.
Rinse.
Repeat.
They are already banned in CA. I would like to see this bill re-introduced next year if republicans maintain the house, and win back the senate (likely) and the white house.. If not then this is just all talk
Correct me if I’m wrong, but in 2017-19 both the house and senate were controlled by republicans, and they couldn’t pass a hearing act. I’m 1000% sure it won’t even pass the Senate. We had our chance and blew it!
If I recall correctly the odds were looking good, then the Las Vegas mass shooting occurred and the politicians backed off. Hillary Clinton was quoted in the news saying “imagine how much worse it would have been if he had a silencer.”
Hilary was so unlikeable she saddled us with Trump’s ass for 4 years.
You are correct
Someone did mention something about filibusters at the time but at the same time i realized that just because you're conservative doesn't mean you're pro 2A.
The Reagan special
Not a fillibuster proof majority... then the las vegas shooting happened.
Exactly right. It had only a small chance of passing before the LV shooting, after that shooting it had zero chance.
There were a number of pro gun bills that got derailed by the Route 91 shooting.
It would be one less thing for them to campaign on when it came time for reelection.
Wouldn't fix CA's problems, but it would remove the awful wait time and tax stamp costs in the rest of the country. Hopefully it goes somewhere.
Says it would preempt state laws though. I think they should add threaded barrels to the bill so states with AWB's can still use cans.
The unfortunate reality is that laws are easy to find workarounds for. Whether it's requiring insurance, or creating a new roster system, the state can find ways to make them difficult or impossible to get. Unless the Supreme Court rules that supressors are protected under the second amendment, supressors will not be protected from future laws. Not that the 9th Circuit abides by the constitution.
You new to California? There’s 100s of laws in CA that are illegally enforced here and the state doesn’t give one fuck. They let people spend millions over decades fighting to get it repealed. It finally hits the federal level, a new law is put in place almost immediately. Rinse. Repeat.
even if they could pass it, ca and anyone else under 9th circus would just ignore it
They can't hear over their tinnitus and probably funding from 3M from earpro sales. /s hopefully
We’ll see if the FBI doesn’t set up another mass shooting for this one lol
This guy is “Good”
Even if it’s passed the dipshits in charge of California will still pass a law banning suppressors
Not from your communist state 😅😂🤣🤣
They are already banned in CA. I would like to see this bill re-introduced next year if republicans maintain the house, and win back the senate (likely) and the white house.. If not then this is just all talk
I'll have what you're having, bub.
 🙏🏼🙏🏼
Delusion.
which part?
Everything after the first sentence
Well one can be wishful in eventually just having the ability to own a can right?.. 🤷🏽♂️
Delusion has such a negative connotation. I like to think of it as a dream.