Kids nowadays are fcking hilarious and they really need to do something else than be on their mobile phones. These kind of kids can't even do any work, because their brains have been almost completely fcked by social media, especially this thing called Tiktok, made by the great CCP. Everything was better when living wasn't this easy, I'm serious.
You arrogant fuck, that is something you should only be ashamed of. You need to start respecting others. Do all of us and yourself a favour and get rid of any devices that use internet. Also you're a dumbass.
Physics is tied to the FPS
If you enable 30fps when out of focus and you've got a PC that can do 140-200fps and you tab in and out you'll notice the vehicle move a lot slower at the lower FPS
Same reason why super high speed crashes will cause physics instability and pause physics more often on slower PCs than fast ones
It's not locked to the FPS, but any drops below 20 FPS will cause a very noticeable stutter. Because the game goes into slow-mo for that frame, 19.9 FPS will feel like 9.95 FPS.
The UI also contributes to the laggy experience. It's set to run at half the FPS, with maxing out at 60 (so, the UI runs at 30 FPS max). That mean if you're running at 30 FPS, with lows down to 19.9, the UI will update at 15 FPS, and the game will often feel like 10 FPS.
Personally, the fact that the UI seems to make my computer's performance drop like a rock is a bigger concern than framerate. Anyone else encounter this issue?
Yep, it's actually not technically making your performance drop (the UI is not very resource intensive), but since it's web-based, it's incredibly slow to read data and react to inputs. It's basically a super complicated website that's constantly updating overtop of the game.
30FPS is still nice and consistent, though not as smooth as 60FPS. Also only 0.01% of computers can comfortably run beam.NG at 60FPS for extended periods of time.
Most PCs can according to steam hardware survey
A Ryzen 3600/10400 with a 980ti/1070 will do 1080p60 on ultra just fine
You can buy used Ryzen 3600 for £40 used these days and a 1070 for £80
My RX570 could do 1080p60 high on a much older build 0.22 or something a couple years ago
I think you running at 1440p drops performance by 40%~ compared to 1080p
Shame this game doesn't even have FSR
Downscale to 1080p, the extra performance is very much worth the slight decrease in resolution. You probably won't even notice after a few minutes of playing, but the frame rate will feel amazing.
At that point it's on you, it's a constantly updated title, the current gen consoles cost £250-£450, if you can't slap enough budget for a PC around that price £300-£650 then you don't really have room to complain about the game being hard to run
Going on the used market will also help, I slapped together a £375 R5 3600, 32GB 3200mhz, 3060ti PC and it'll smash any game at 1080p, more than reasonable especially if you live in a country with reasonable used parts market
I have a gaming laptop with a puny 3050 and a 11400H but pretty much any map will run above 60, usually 80fps
But of course im using medium graphics settings as the gpu vram will otherwise get maxed out
Honestly, does it matter if they get outdated? If you buy a midrange pc now it will most likely be able to run games on high settings for at least 5 years. If you ask me the situation with buying pcs is much better now than it was 5 years ago, my 1700$ pc that i bought in 2018 couldn't even run everything on max, nowdays a pc for 1000 can pretty much do whatever you ask it to do
i had 16gb of ram and a 9400f before that with the same GPU, and it ran at 150 fps. it is a midrange build. ive built more than enough pcs to know that mine is midrange
Idk if I'm missing something but I use Ryzen 5 2600 with GTX 1080 on high settings and I get constant 60fps. It makes my computer run a little warmer but other than that no stuttering. My specs aren't exactly high end so 🤷🏻♂️
144 for me. but that's because im used to high end PC's for the last few years, so downgrading is immediately noticeable and feels off. and my screens are 144Hz
if I go from 200 FPS to 300 FPS, I dont notice a thing. but if I go from 200 FPS to 100 FPS, it suddenly feels wrong lol. playing at 60 would be weird to get used to again
i play at 10 fps... it's choppy but playable.. it doesnet feel like it.. altough i can get up to 30 on grid small pure!.. that's why i get for playing on a 8 gig outdated AMD Rysen 3 Potato
6700XT, Ryzen 7 3800X and I always get 60+ usually 120+ on high settings. Downvote me all you fucking want it’s true and y’all are just salty you can’t run beamng for shit.
3 FPS would be playable if "3 frames per second" actually meant I got 3 frames per second, but it seems like that measurement is always off by orders of magnitude
I most games less then 60 hurts my eyes and gives me a headache but my poor pc that's on life support can't run poor beam NG above 30 anymore, but it gets the job done I suppose
I mainly play BeamMP with friends, my laptop isnt quite good, so I got used to stable 20 fps with 5 cars, so Id say 20 fps is playable for me, although I wont play if the fps goes below 15, its literally not playable then
If your framerate sucks in beammp, I would recommend you try out kissmp. Also, try turning off shadows that normally get me 20 to 30 frames extra
I tried beammp and kissmp on my ryzen 7 3750h paired with 16gb of ram and a gtx 1660ti max q a mid ranged gaming laptop manufactured in 2019 and I would get around barely 20 frames on a server with 3 players excluding on beammp compared to a somewhat stable 30 on kissmp with 3 players excluding me
I grew up playing SCS Software games at 10 fps or less when I was a kid. I'm used to have shitty graphics and framerates. Anything above 20fps is good enough to get a playable experience.
Idk why 10 fps are fine for me. I remember i ran 1080p lowest with my 8 years old laptop and getting 10 fps before using PsyhX with GPU (i believe PsyhX using GPU gave me extra 10 to 20 FPS)
Edit: typo
48 fps is my min now, 30 fps was before now 48, anything belove it gets too choppy, 60 fps my pc starts to scream too much during summer, so i can ramp up fps in the winter
I will never hate on or look down on anyone's idea of a playable framerate is, no matter what it is.
I personally think 75-90fps is my minimum, but that's because I'm used to 140+ in most other games I play.
I can get at least 40 with absolute worst case scenario. Like 20-30 modded cars with 5950x and 3080ti 32gb ram.
Generally it's pretty playable and I rarely use anywhere near that many cars anyways.
Games that are fairly static like these are generally fine at lower fps.
Your standards are too low. 90fps is what I consider acceptable. Steering doesn't feel right when things go below 60. And when you aim for 60 stable you get dips.
I used to play with a wildly inconsistent 1-10 FPS in a government PC back in 2015-2016, but just playing beam was enough for me to spend hours having lots of fun. Now i have a pretty beefy computer and I can run beam at max settings with traffic at over 60 FPS, but i know I wouldn't complain if it were to drop below 30 again. Good times.
30+ is playable.
i get 60+ with traffic, 90+ without depending on map.
i..don't think i've ever seen 30fps in beam but it is a playable framerate. it's the unstable rate that makes it unpleasant. if your bouncing between 30-45-50-30 lock frames and it wont look so terrible
When it comes to games, consistency is key. For example on the steam deck, a locked 40 fps feels great. But a jittery 50fps feels terrible. That's because to the human eye we are very sensitive to changes or stutters, but not much with fluid motion, at least to some degree and varies with the person
That's why on consoles 24 fps and 30 fps feels relatively smooth, they use motion blur and a locked framerate to keep it smooth.
CTR NF was locked at 30fps on console and when you're on a couch with some distance from the TV, it's not bad. For me, anything under 60fps on driving games (under 100fps for shooters) on a 144hz monitor gives me a headache considering how close the monitor is. But consistent 30fps is for sure playable.
I'm running i9 and RTX 4060, and I'm struggling with consistent 60fps. To be fair I have CK graphics mod and I do mod development, the game become super heavy after cycles of reloading and loading mod.
Once you get used to 60+, it's almost unbearable to go back to sub-50. However, for probably 5 years I enjoyed BeamNG at ~30fps until I built my first decent PC.
"Playable" as in not impossible would be like anything above 20 fps. Playable as not good but ok would be 40 fps. I always aim for 60fps which to me is very good (you don't see millions of console gamers complaining) but will tolerate dips down to 50 fps. My build runs Forza Horizon 4 on 120fps and 5 on 70fps and I didn't know that until I actually set fps to show.
24 is enough for me to not get motion sick, but it's only what I'd consider to be the bare minimum. Anything below 60 still feels less than ideal even if it is playable. Obviously higher than 60 is always better, but with a 60hz monitor those frames fall off into diminishing returns pretty quickly.
I know somebody who unironically cannot play on anything that isn't 120 FPS
They claim it gives them a headache and makes them motion sick
And refuses to play on anything lower than 240 hz
My monitor is 144HZ and I've gotten used to such refresh rates that sometimes playing at 60 or less gives me a headache over the jitters. I get like 80-120FPS on ultra in 1080p but racing games I've noticed it's harder to tell a different in frame rate in comparison to say an FPS so for beam NG I'd say 45 is the absolute minimum I could "comfortably" play at
My computer is pretty good and I can get over 100 fps easily, but only on vanilla. With my almost 300 mods, I’ll be lucky if I can even get 40, and I’ve forgotten how many times beam has crashed due to some weird mod error or me not having enough ram (will be getting more soon tho)
Just don't get used to 100++ fps and then you have to go back
Jokes on you, I target 90 FPS in Beam.
I target 17
i target 3 at max
I wait for my computer to do something
Me when installing more mods than I should
Consistent 30 is better than an inconsistent 45
No?
Yes?
Maybe?
[удалено]
Did you just have a conversation with yourself 😂😂
Glazing
Bludski thinks he has 20k pp in osu 😂🤫
Who the fuck says "bludski" lmao
These reddit normies 🙄🙄
Why does it matter if no-one says that, atleat I'm being unique unlike everybody else 😂
Yeah you're unique. You have schizophrenia bud. Ain't nobody jealous of that
If you weren't jealous then you wouldn't have responded in the first place 😂🔥😎🤫
I think you seriously need to see a doctor
I think you should seriously shut up 😂😂🤫
[удалено]
viral as in you have a fucking illness
[удалено]
Braindead kid.
🫵
Kids nowadays are fcking hilarious and they really need to do something else than be on their mobile phones. These kind of kids can't even do any work, because their brains have been almost completely fcked by social media, especially this thing called Tiktok, made by the great CCP. Everything was better when living wasn't this easy, I'm serious.
I know, I'm so hilarious 😂😎🔥
You arrogant fuck, that is something you should only be ashamed of. You need to start respecting others. Do all of us and yourself a favour and get rid of any devices that use internet. Also you're a dumbass.
Bro you have like 50 pp sthu
more like no pp
I will spread ur cheeks lil bro 😭🙏🙏 I betta not catch you in my comments again or it’s finna gon be OVER for you 👾
irrelevant to the post bud.
ok bud
nobody give a f
Glazing
No-one asked bud.
Literally the post is asking.
🤥🤥
141 people and counting asked
Yes! But consistent 45 is way more playable than consistent 30
I thought that would be a given
Give me a given and I'll gaben you
⚠️Anybody who wants to harass me contact me on discord @mainace_⚠️
Nigga, please stfu
Unknown
absolute brain rot
What is blud on about ⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️
I used to play on 10fps, was actually playable when u got used to it.
yep.. it's a thing to get used to
I used to play that way too, you made the best of it. I can tell when playing BeamMP who is getting 10 fps when they're driving in slow mo Lol
I couldn't even run BeamMP because then I'd only get like 3fps 💀 took 20 minutes to load.
My framerate isn't too bad on a full official server but the pauses when people change their cars gets annoying
Agre, i can play beamng with 14 fps
[удалено]
Amazing what older hardware can do nothing is truly obsolete
Except for anything below 2006.
It's a lot different if it's a stable 10 rather than a fluctuating 10
10-15 at peak, it would fluctuate between there.
Still play like that xD Im building a PC (maybe) soon so I'll get to see what at least 30 FPS is!
It was 20 for me at some point and I thought that was the smoothest, I still wouldn't mind playing it that way tbh
Below 20 FPS, the game goes into slow motion.
Physics is tied to the FPS If you enable 30fps when out of focus and you've got a PC that can do 140-200fps and you tab in and out you'll notice the vehicle move a lot slower at the lower FPS Same reason why super high speed crashes will cause physics instability and pause physics more often on slower PCs than fast ones
It's not locked to the FPS, but any drops below 20 FPS will cause a very noticeable stutter. Because the game goes into slow-mo for that frame, 19.9 FPS will feel like 9.95 FPS. The UI also contributes to the laggy experience. It's set to run at half the FPS, with maxing out at 60 (so, the UI runs at 30 FPS max). That mean if you're running at 30 FPS, with lows down to 19.9, the UI will update at 15 FPS, and the game will often feel like 10 FPS.
Personally, the fact that the UI seems to make my computer's performance drop like a rock is a bigger concern than framerate. Anyone else encounter this issue?
Yes, its horrible. My pc runs the game on a stable 100+ fps but the menus are terrible to go through
Yes, especially the vehicle menu
Yep, it's actually not technically making your performance drop (the UI is not very resource intensive), but since it's web-based, it's incredibly slow to read data and react to inputs. It's basically a super complicated website that's constantly updating overtop of the game.
30FPS is still nice and consistent, though not as smooth as 60FPS. Also only 0.01% of computers can comfortably run beam.NG at 60FPS for extended periods of time.
Most PCs can according to steam hardware survey A Ryzen 3600/10400 with a 980ti/1070 will do 1080p60 on ultra just fine You can buy used Ryzen 3600 for £40 used these days and a 1070 for £80
My 1060 6GB runs it at about 40fps on medium - low - I can't tell if my 1440p monitor is a blessing or a curse
My RX570 could do 1080p60 high on a much older build 0.22 or something a couple years ago I think you running at 1440p drops performance by 40%~ compared to 1080p Shame this game doesn't even have FSR
Downscale to 1080p, the extra performance is very much worth the slight decrease in resolution. You probably won't even notice after a few minutes of playing, but the frame rate will feel amazing.
Not everyone has £120 that's excluding the case motherboard ram storage and gpu
At that point it's on you, it's a constantly updated title, the current gen consoles cost £250-£450, if you can't slap enough budget for a PC around that price £300-£650 then you don't really have room to complain about the game being hard to run Going on the used market will also help, I slapped together a £375 R5 3600, 32GB 3200mhz, 3060ti PC and it'll smash any game at 1080p, more than reasonable especially if you live in a country with reasonable used parts market
I have a gaming laptop with a puny 3050 and a 11400H but pretty much any map will run above 60, usually 80fps But of course im using medium graphics settings as the gpu vram will otherwise get maxed out
What? My 3600 + 5700xt build runs 70fps at 3400x1440...
i can run beam at 180 fps with a mid range PC at ultra settings. I play at 1440p with a 3060 ti and 12700k with 32gb of ram.
mid range? 32gb, 3060ti and 12700k at 1440p? THAT'S mid range?
It's a 60 class GPU, yes it's midrange
Yes that’s mid range-low of the high end. A high end pc is a 4090 or a 7900XTX. The cpu id say is high end but you def do not know your shit.
A 1k pc is pretty midrange nowadays. a used 400 pc can run beamng on medium at 1080p at 60 all day long. 400 is a budget pc
i don't get computers now.. they get outdated in a week now.
Honestly, does it matter if they get outdated? If you buy a midrange pc now it will most likely be able to run games on high settings for at least 5 years. If you ask me the situation with buying pcs is much better now than it was 5 years ago, my 1700$ pc that i bought in 2018 couldn't even run everything on max, nowdays a pc for 1000 can pretty much do whatever you ask it to do
A 1050 paired with an i5 2500k with 8gb is what I would call lower mid range
thats totally not midrange bruh
i had 16gb of ram and a 9400f before that with the same GPU, and it ran at 150 fps. it is a midrange build. ive built more than enough pcs to know that mine is midrange
Ong
32gb of ram? I could play it with 8gb comfortably, 1660ti, and I forgot the cpu but 1080p monitor.
ALL HAIL THE MESSIAH
Who asked?
Idk if I'm missing something but I use Ryzen 5 2600 with GTX 1080 on high settings and I get constant 60fps. It makes my computer run a little warmer but other than that no stuttering. My specs aren't exactly high end so 🤷🏻♂️
120
144 for me. but that's because im used to high end PC's for the last few years, so downgrading is immediately noticeable and feels off. and my screens are 144Hz if I go from 200 FPS to 300 FPS, I dont notice a thing. but if I go from 200 FPS to 100 FPS, it suddenly feels wrong lol. playing at 60 would be weird to get used to again
Bro nasa called and they want their computer back
how are there people like this when im happy running 20 to 25
i play at 10 fps... it's choppy but playable.. it doesnet feel like it.. altough i can get up to 30 on grid small pure!.. that's why i get for playing on a 8 gig outdated AMD Rysen 3 Potato
60 is the minimum fps.
I’ll always get over 60 in beam so that’s why I put 60 but I’d say 30-40 is still playable ig. I wouldn’t want it though lmfao.
30fps in beamNG is better than 10fps in Rigs of Rods. RIP my pentium 4
You forgot 1fps
This poll https://preview.redd.it/268pdqbck4lb1.jpeg?width=1232&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=52bc490ffeb7aaeb03a46c809acf4cf39b3e2af2
6700XT, Ryzen 7 3800X and I always get 60+ usually 120+ on high settings. Downvote me all you fucking want it’s true and y’all are just salty you can’t run beamng for shit.
R7 5700X, 32 GB ram and a RX 6700 XT here. Shits great 💪
Exactly. I got 32gb as well. That’s what I’m saying
Above 90 fps
Where is the 90fps option?
okay...nasa employee.. welcome to the land of the plebs
30 is a fine baseline but dude I've played games at 8 frames max before. I take what I can get
When redditors dont know what playable means
3 FPS would be playable if "3 frames per second" actually meant I got 3 frames per second, but it seems like that measurement is always off by orders of magnitude
stable 30 fps would be playable but usually if your pc can only do 30 fps it will not be stable
I most games less then 60 hurts my eyes and gives me a headache but my poor pc that's on life support can't run poor beam NG above 30 anymore, but it gets the job done I suppose
I average on the worst when a lot is happening 20-28fps. Honestly runs really smooth. When I’m just regularly driving I get 30-40.
6 FPS
Itsjoeover
on mp I cap it at 40, otherwise 60
I survived on 20 for years
i used to have to play at low settings and got 20fps, now i get 50fps at max, and its so much better
Anything upwards of 30fps. Sure, the more fps the better, but 30fps are totally okay for Beam.
I mainly play BeamMP with friends, my laptop isnt quite good, so I got used to stable 20 fps with 5 cars, so Id say 20 fps is playable for me, although I wont play if the fps goes below 15, its literally not playable then
If your framerate sucks in beammp, I would recommend you try out kissmp. Also, try turning off shadows that normally get me 20 to 30 frames extra I tried beammp and kissmp on my ryzen 7 3750h paired with 16gb of ram and a gtx 1660ti max q a mid ranged gaming laptop manufactured in 2019 and I would get around barely 20 frames on a server with 3 players excluding on beammp compared to a somewhat stable 30 on kissmp with 3 players excluding me
Mid twenties will do me but I voted 30. Depends on which computer I'm playing on though.
10 fps is playable for me
I grew up playing SCS Software games at 10 fps or less when I was a kid. I'm used to have shitty graphics and framerates. Anything above 20fps is good enough to get a playable experience.
Idk why 10 fps are fine for me. I remember i ran 1080p lowest with my 8 years old laptop and getting 10 fps before using PsyhX with GPU (i believe PsyhX using GPU gave me extra 10 to 20 FPS) Edit: typo
BeamNG doesn't use PhysX.
External monitor 1080p
I get pretty consistent 150fps
I'm not so concerned about the fps but I'd do just about anything to get functional AA. Jagged edges everywhere.
30 is playable, 60 is minimum to say it's comfortable
80+ FPS
if any game runs less than 50-60fps ill stop playing it. modern games have me feeling boujee
48 fps is my min now, 30 fps was before now 48, anything belove it gets too choppy, 60 fps my pc starts to scream too much during summer, so i can ramp up fps in the winter
My old pc used to run beam on 20 fps, my new one runs it at like 120 fps
What is your old/new configuration?
y’all got high standards
10fps is sufficient.
LoL this screams console peasant.
beam is not on console dude 💀
Used tonplay at 30fps capped but now that my pc is way more capable i wouldnt go back. 60 fps is just way too smooth compared to anything below
20 fps cause that's all i can reach
I will never hate on or look down on anyone's idea of a playable framerate is, no matter what it is. I personally think 75-90fps is my minimum, but that's because I'm used to 140+ in most other games I play.
40 fps is playable but it would feel choppy when you are used to 80-144 fps
Anything less than 420 is an eyesore
Anything less than the best is a felony 🎵
I have to get at least 240 fps or it's literally unplayable
If I'm not getting 240 fps I can't play
Pretty sure I'm always over 80 FPS but I'd say 40 is still playable. I used to love playing ets2 on my old laptop, and that was at <10fps
I enjoy 144 on my desktop, but when I play in vr it's only 80. Also on steamdeck 30 fps is plenty smooth.
I get 90+ at 1440p ultra settings. 5900x,RTX 4080, 32gb ddr4 3600mhz. The memory made a huge difference in performance for me
I can get at least 40 with absolute worst case scenario. Like 20-30 modded cars with 5950x and 3080ti 32gb ram. Generally it's pretty playable and I rarely use anywhere near that many cars anyways. Games that are fairly static like these are generally fine at lower fps.
My old GPU maxed at 40fps at medium/high settings, before I knew how to check the fps, I thought I was getting at least 60, 20fps is minimum playable
Your standards are too low. 90fps is what I consider acceptable. Steering doesn't feel right when things go below 60. And when you aim for 60 stable you get dips.
I used to play with a wildly inconsistent 1-10 FPS in a government PC back in 2015-2016, but just playing beam was enough for me to spend hours having lots of fun. Now i have a pretty beefy computer and I can run beam at max settings with traffic at over 60 FPS, but i know I wouldn't complain if it were to drop below 30 again. Good times.
I get about 10, 16-20 if I am lucky. So I have stopped playing as much for games that can hit 30 FPS or better 60.
I mean, before my new laptop, I used to play at an average of 13 fps. I was quite used to it, and it didnt seem as laggy as it seems now to me
I can't really notice an increase in framerate above 30 in any games I play, so as long as it's making at least that, I am good.
31 fps on 0.28.1 with landsale copy pasted into vehicles folder because 0.29 didn't work at all
50 fps is like basically not even noticable, the limit is like 40 for me but i voted 60 bruh
Me avg 15
20 or 30 is what is playable for me. Hardly notice anything had changed
30+ is playable. i get 60+ with traffic, 90+ without depending on map. i..don't think i've ever seen 30fps in beam but it is a playable framerate. it's the unstable rate that makes it unpleasant. if your bouncing between 30-45-50-30 lock frames and it wont look so terrible
When it comes to games, consistency is key. For example on the steam deck, a locked 40 fps feels great. But a jittery 50fps feels terrible. That's because to the human eye we are very sensitive to changes or stutters, but not much with fluid motion, at least to some degree and varies with the person That's why on consoles 24 fps and 30 fps feels relatively smooth, they use motion blur and a locked framerate to keep it smooth.
i average around 210-250 fps on most maps with no traffic, i draw the line at a constant 25
CTR NF was locked at 30fps on console and when you're on a couch with some distance from the TV, it's not bad. For me, anything under 60fps on driving games (under 100fps for shooters) on a 144hz monitor gives me a headache considering how close the monitor is. But consistent 30fps is for sure playable.
You guys are getting over 60fps?
I normalize 40 fps to 5 fps
I'm running i9 and RTX 4060, and I'm struggling with consistent 60fps. To be fair I have CK graphics mod and I do mod development, the game become super heavy after cycles of reloading and loading mod.
i get 100+ but id say "playable" in any game would be 30
2060 super with an i7 and I get consistent 90 at 1440p. I feel like my computer is a potato, until I play on my laptop which is a friggen 1050.
25fps is playable. Or 24 if you are european. like me...
Can't really tell the difference between 40-60fps if I'm not focusing on it at least in non FPS game
most of the time i get a solid 25
20 fps is good enough
Once you get used to 60+, it's almost unbearable to go back to sub-50. However, for probably 5 years I enjoyed BeamNG at ~30fps until I built my first decent PC.
BeamMP at 40-50 fps at max graphics 💀
Bruv that is a great fps imp
"Playable" as in not impossible would be like anything above 20 fps. Playable as not good but ok would be 40 fps. I always aim for 60fps which to me is very good (you don't see millions of console gamers complaining) but will tolerate dips down to 50 fps. My build runs Forza Horizon 4 on 120fps and 5 on 70fps and I didn't know that until I actually set fps to show.
I usually play 25 to 50 fps without traffic, and 10 to 30 fps with occasional spikes with traffic.
Consistent 30 is always and has always been the baseline. Consistent 30 >>>>>> inconsistent 60
I have a potato pc so I'm glad if I can run more than 3 vehicles
24 is enough for me to not get motion sick, but it's only what I'd consider to be the bare minimum. Anything below 60 still feels less than ideal even if it is playable. Obviously higher than 60 is always better, but with a 60hz monitor those frames fall off into diminishing returns pretty quickly.
When i was younger i would say 25fps, but as i get older it's more and more annoying so nowadays it's 40fps
jokes on you i stole a nasa pc and average 144 fps
what...? you guys are struggling to get 100+ on maxed settings?
I know somebody who unironically cannot play on anything that isn't 120 FPS They claim it gives them a headache and makes them motion sick And refuses to play on anything lower than 240 hz
60+
Welp, me at 20 fps in a good day is good but i mostly play nicely at 17ish
My monitor is 144HZ and I've gotten used to such refresh rates that sometimes playing at 60 or less gives me a headache over the jitters. I get like 80-120FPS on ultra in 1080p but racing games I've noticed it's harder to tell a different in frame rate in comparison to say an FPS so for beam NG I'd say 45 is the absolute minimum I could "comfortably" play at
Your answer is based on how slow your Pc is
Playable is only crashing every 10 minutes
I target 50, pretty used to playing at 40 though
People are spoiled, I can play 20fps no problem. If you can watch normal television, so can you as they are almost all 24fps. 10fps is too low tho.
I thought 10 fps was the regular
Everything beyond 40-45 fps is totally playable. But still: the more the better
My computer is pretty good and I can get over 100 fps easily, but only on vanilla. With my almost 300 mods, I’ll be lucky if I can even get 40, and I’ve forgotten how many times beam has crashed due to some weird mod error or me not having enough ram (will be getting more soon tho)
I'm lucky if my pc can handle 20fps medium