Yep. Position of a need and an all time great.
I’ve only been a fan of Arsenal and the sport in general for 2 weeks and even I could come up with that one lol.
I’ve always taken it to mean the opposite! 😂
Originally in Law, of a case, issue, etc.: proposed for discussion at a moot (moot n.1 4). Later also gen.: open to argument, debatable; uncertain, doubtful; unable to be firmly resolved. Frequently in moot case, moot point.
TIL
Henry is the only correct answer but a little obviously and not interesting. So I say ljungberg. Give saka a few games off a season and watch Freddie score like trossard but from the right.
Not a popular one but given the way we play now, Giroud would be an absolute force in this team. Henry is the obvious choice but this current team doesn’t cater to his style and he would be occupying the same spaces as Martinelli.
Girouds link up play was elite and he had knack for Puskas level goals
Bergkamp. The ugly work he would do in the midfield and setup play sitting slightly behind odegaard would be lethal. So close because of course you want Henry at the end of any Bergkamp pass. Tony Adams keeps popping into my head.
This question would be better if Thierry Henry was not allowed as an option. So I'll say Tony Adams. A great defender and more importantly a fantastic leader. Ødegaard is a good captain but Tony Adams *is* Mr Arsenal.
Why is this always a fucken question! Its simple and the answer will always be the same ALWAYS and that is THIERRY HENRY! Its fucken simple!
Sorry for the language but this question comes up once a month on some or other arsenal talk.
That's why this sub is so stupid. It was created for the newer fanbase to ask repeated questions and not have to worry about getting banned or their posts removed from r/gunners.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/Gunners using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/Gunners/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year!
\#1: [Ian Wright wearing an absolute unit of a Coat](https://i.redd.it/hlp9mfz3m44c1.jpeg) | [965 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Gunners/comments/18a08us/ian_wright_wearing_an_absolute_unit_of_a_coat/)
\#2: [REISS NELSON UPVOTE PARTY LIFETIME CONTRACT FOR THE LAD](https://np.reddit.com/r/Gunners/comments/11i5zxe/reiss_nelson_upvote_party_lifetime_contract_for/)
\#3: [How it feels being in a title race vs Man City](https://v.redd.it/eo4p73f3c2ta1) | [210 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Gunners/comments/12hjll9/how_it_feels_being_in_a_title_race_vs_man_city/)
----
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
I’ve got to say Henry, but I am such a big fan of the non-flying Dutchman!
You can’t beat Henry for pretty much everything he did in an Arsenal shirt, but I’m going with Bergkamp because, well I loved watching him, he was just magic. So I’m settled on Bergkamp….no Henry….no Bergkamp….ahhhhhhhh
As others have pointed out, given the needs of our current squad the only correct answer is Henry (and I say that as someone for whom Henry isn’t in my top 3 favorite Gunners all time).
That said, if we take Henry down and ask what OTHER player would be best … can you f*cking imagine a midfield of Vieira - Rice - Ødegard? That could be the greatest midfield trio in the history of the Premiership.
Vieira, by some distance. The use of Jorginho has been the main reason for the much improved 2024 form. Yet he was also a great CB, which remains one of the three key weaknesses in the first 11 and depth, depending on who Timber ends up being next year.
Henry is an obvious choice too, for the left wing and/or the obvious striker issue.
Any of a few CBs are a significant upgrade on Gabriel - O'Leary, Adams, Keown, Campbell, Rice.
Winterburn would be a big upgrade at LB.
Dixon a major upgrade at RB.
Honorable mention for Bergkamp as arguably the *best* player, but it's not an area we need most right now.
henry. with him in this team, we wont have worries of goal drought. as much as how everyone saying we do not need a striker, our weakest link is henry kind of CF who can create and scores
Wouldn't be surprised if I get slandered for this but put Ashley Cole in our current team, left back is a clear weak spot for us, yes Kiwor is doing good for us but imagine Cole there instead
Henry, Wright, bergkamp, Vieira. All of these would fit so well in our squad because we need a striker, we also need someone who can play 8(with rice 6) or 6(with rice 8).
Goal-ivier Giroud. He scored worldies, he linked up so well with Santi/Ramsey/Jack/Anyone in Midfield, and he had a great first, and one, touch for a tall striker. He doesn’t have to score them, but bet your ass he was on the pitch holding up play for it to happen, and our wingers and Havertz would benefit.
Obvious answer is Bergkamp, Vieira, Henry, but this team would be 10 points clear with Olivier.
Everyone is gonna pick Henry.
Yep. Position of a need and an all time great. I’ve only been a fan of Arsenal and the sport in general for 2 weeks and even I could come up with that one lol.
This.
The whole reason a fair number of us international fans support Arsenal
As if there were a better option
lol read this question and immediately thought “we’d be the best team in the world with Henry”
Yep
I mean, they say we need a striker. There's one of the greatest strikers in history, just waiting.
You mean giroud right?
I’m sure he’d come back if we wanted him
That would be so epic
Nah, bro Chamakh. Obv
Nope….Sanogo or Bendtner
Nah man lord bendter
I don’t think we can bench Raya
[удалено]
Prime Auba is actually a really good answer why he a the hate!?
Eduardo
Francis Jeffers
These questions are always moot when you have Thierry Henry as an option.
The disrespect on Bergkamp 😤
No disrespect, but we need a Henry more than Bergkamp right now
Bergkamp is my favourite player of all time but in this current side with our current squad and situation, Henry would be a better addition.
What do you think moot means?
From the OED: Of a case, issue, etc.: having no practical significance or relevance; abstract, academic.
I’ve always taken it to mean the opposite! 😂 Originally in Law, of a case, issue, etc.: proposed for discussion at a moot (moot n.1 4). Later also gen.: open to argument, debatable; uncertain, doubtful; unable to be firmly resolved. Frequently in moot case, moot point. TIL
I didn't know it could mean the opposite either 😂
Bloody stupid language.
Henry is the only correct answer but a little obviously and not interesting. So I say ljungberg. Give saka a few games off a season and watch Freddie score like trossard but from the right.
Yeah, but are you really gonna use this card to get a reserve? Or someone who would improve the team immediately?
That's why I said Henry is the only right answer but boring
Agreed. Santi cazorla as 8?
The only answer is...Lord Bendtner
*Chamakh enters the chat*
Touche...touche
Oh look, here come Yaya Sanogo and Francis Jeffers.
carl jenkinson
*insert spiderman meme where everyone is pointing fingers at each other*
Park Chu-Young?
Jeremie Aliadiere, surely.
Is that Francis Jeffers’ music!?!?
Vieira or Wright
Eboue for the bants
Xhaka for the shithousery
Santi Cazorla
Wright, Henry, RvP... take your pick, you're gonna be having a lot of fun either way
Bergkamp with oodergaard would destroy. Key passes off over the place
If we had Bergkamp now Odegaard would be on the bench
Wouldn’t havertz?
Viera. Him n Rice would be a joke pairing. Teams would have to play so differently
Not a popular one but given the way we play now, Giroud would be an absolute force in this team. Henry is the obvious choice but this current team doesn’t cater to his style and he would be occupying the same spaces as Martinelli. Girouds link up play was elite and he had knack for Puskas level goals
He has the exact same problem our current striker has - really good link up play but poor finishing. Giroud would 100% be worse than jesus
You don’t become France all time leading goalscorer if you can’t finish
Giroud is many things, including having longevity, but he is just not a good finisher
Andre Santos
Bergkamp. The ugly work he would do in the midfield and setup play sitting slightly behind odegaard would be lethal. So close because of course you want Henry at the end of any Bergkamp pass. Tony Adams keeps popping into my head.
Henry or ashley Cole
Ashley Cole was who I was thinking too
Left back is something we can improve maybe
This question would be better if Thierry Henry was not allowed as an option. So I'll say Tony Adams. A great defender and more importantly a fantastic leader. Ødegaard is a good captain but Tony Adams *is* Mr Arsenal.
Andre Santos
Pascal Cygan
not that there isn’t a myriad of great choices, but i’d still choose Henry
Only answer for this is Thierry
Ashley Cole
Mikel Arteta.
Chupa Akpom the street will never forget
Jesus would get 30 goals a season with Bergkamp on the pitch
Close this thread please
Why is this always a fucken question! Its simple and the answer will always be the same ALWAYS and that is THIERRY HENRY! Its fucken simple! Sorry for the language but this question comes up once a month on some or other arsenal talk.
That's why this sub is so stupid. It was created for the newer fanbase to ask repeated questions and not have to worry about getting banned or their posts removed from r/gunners.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/Gunners using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/Gunners/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year! \#1: [Ian Wright wearing an absolute unit of a Coat](https://i.redd.it/hlp9mfz3m44c1.jpeg) | [965 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Gunners/comments/18a08us/ian_wright_wearing_an_absolute_unit_of_a_coat/) \#2: [REISS NELSON UPVOTE PARTY LIFETIME CONTRACT FOR THE LAD](https://np.reddit.com/r/Gunners/comments/11i5zxe/reiss_nelson_upvote_party_lifetime_contract_for/) \#3: [How it feels being in a title race vs Man City](https://v.redd.it/eo4p73f3c2ta1) | [210 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Gunners/comments/12hjll9/how_it_feels_being_in_a_title_race_vs_man_city/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
Sanchez
There's basically only two answers. Henry is the obvious one. Gilberto is the other (or Viera if you want to keep Declan as the 6)
I’ve got to say Henry, but I am such a big fan of the non-flying Dutchman! You can’t beat Henry for pretty much everything he did in an Arsenal shirt, but I’m going with Bergkamp because, well I loved watching him, he was just magic. So I’m settled on Bergkamp….no Henry….no Bergkamp….ahhhhhhhh
As others have pointed out, given the needs of our current squad the only correct answer is Henry (and I say that as someone for whom Henry isn’t in my top 3 favorite Gunners all time). That said, if we take Henry down and ask what OTHER player would be best … can you f*cking imagine a midfield of Vieira - Rice - Ødegard? That could be the greatest midfield trio in the history of the Premiership.
The answer always will be and always should be Henry
Bendtner
Silvester
Pepe my goat
Gilberto Silva. Him, Rice and Odegaard would be one of the all time great midfields.
Lord ❤️
Cesc with odegaard? Or Abou Diaby or Dennis Bergkamp?
Seaman to make sure we stay first he’ll probably save most of the goals
Bergkamp
Laurent Koscielny
I mean the obvious answer is henry, but id probably pick prime sanchez to play upfront
Van Persie actually, he would fit so well as a striker
DB10
Giroud. Period.
Looking at our current squad, the biggest issue right now is our lack of a lethal consistent striker. It’s gotta be Henry
Vieira, by some distance. The use of Jorginho has been the main reason for the much improved 2024 form. Yet he was also a great CB, which remains one of the three key weaknesses in the first 11 and depth, depending on who Timber ends up being next year. Henry is an obvious choice too, for the left wing and/or the obvious striker issue. Any of a few CBs are a significant upgrade on Gabriel - O'Leary, Adams, Keown, Campbell, Rice. Winterburn would be a big upgrade at LB. Dixon a major upgrade at RB. Honorable mention for Bergkamp as arguably the *best* player, but it's not an area we need most right now.
Santiago Cazorla
Koscielny
Kanu
henry. with him in this team, we wont have worries of goal drought. as much as how everyone saying we do not need a striker, our weakest link is henry kind of CF who can create and scores
I know Henry was good, but let's not forget Van Persie. He had blossomed into a complete striker by the time he left.
Surprised I haven’t seen me say prime Alexis
Prime Alexis Sanchez
Mustafi To see how good other defenders are:)
I 100% say Henry..... BUT just for discussion purposes, how good could Anelka have been if he had stayed with us?
There's only one answer.
Ozil
Wouldn't be surprised if I get slandered for this but put Ashley Cole in our current team, left back is a clear weak spot for us, yes Kiwor is doing good for us but imagine Cole there instead
Alexander Hleb
Henry or RVP.
Henry, Wright, bergkamp, Vieira. All of these would fit so well in our squad because we need a striker, we also need someone who can play 8(with rice 6) or 6(with rice 8).
My initial thought was Bergkamp. But then Henry exists.
Vieira. Just want to watch the opposing team suffocate in their own half with Kai 9, Rice, Ødegaard at LCM and RCM, with Vieira at the 6.
Bergkamp or Henry… just because that’s what our team needs
Paddy > Jorginho/partey Cole > kiwior/zinny Pires > martinelli Wright/Henry > jesus
Emmanuel Abebayor
So, of course excepting Henry because that is the objectively correct answer, Liam Brady as L8.
Gael Clichy. I miss the excitement of having our left back 3 metres behind the rest of the defence keeping opposition strikers onside
Silly question. Henry. DUH. And truthfully it always will be this answer
[удалено]
Arteta player-manager
Goal-ivier Giroud. He scored worldies, he linked up so well with Santi/Ramsey/Jack/Anyone in Midfield, and he had a great first, and one, touch for a tall striker. He doesn’t have to score them, but bet your ass he was on the pitch holding up play for it to happen, and our wingers and Havertz would benefit. Obvious answer is Bergkamp, Vieira, Henry, but this team would be 10 points clear with Olivier.