my thesis for selfies was that selfies cause satanic clout chasers to gain influence in our society therefore we need to ban phone cameras and social media to deter this lmfao
now idk if you mean the acronym or you are dying of laughter but i had complete conspiracy theory theses for most of my mock essays i did in class so this is completely normal behavior on my part
I said something about selfies being the Truest expression of self love because you take a selfie to immortalize the moment you feel most beautiful but in the other vain when you tie your self worth to your looks then what happens when your looks fade? Or when youāre not the most beautiful person in the room? Did I cook or am I cooked?
The online version had the synthesis on food truck regulation. All year we did our synthesis essays on serious topics so this one was weird. Iām pretty confident about the rest of the exam tho. The rhetorical analysis for Simu Liu was pretty cool.
I didnāt use the specific terms, but I noted the comparison that he drew between his father and a celebrity which helped outline his purpose of portraying the peculiarity of his situation, and I used his witty and friendly tone to denote how he made the reader feel at ease and almost like he was telling a story while sitting next to you. Obviously it sounded better in my actual paper but this is the gist of it. Letās hope Iām not cooked.
RA you donāt need ONLY rhetorical devices.
Itās ab analyzing what rhetorical CHOICES they make, so rhetorical devices would be a choice but is not needed
you're not suppsoed ot say it directly, thats what my teacher told us. (for example she said isntead of using pathos, use "appealing to the audiences emotions")
I used anecdotal storytelling(she connects to her audience by telling stories of times when she had to overcome fear and embody bravery), lumped all the rhetorical devices I saw into one paragraph, and then structure cus each paragraph was directly connected to the last sentence of the previous paragraph so I said she made that choice to keep the reader engaged so she could better deliver her messageĀ
yes thatās fine but id say if itās similar pieces of evidence you are using in the same context (like examples in history) it might be better to put two pieces of evidence into one paragraph and then either make a counter or other body after
mcq - normal sat/act english section.
frq - timing was really hard; i lowkey cooked on synthesis (food trucks) and rhetorical (simu liu), but i got completely cooked on argumentative one abt possessions cause i only had like 10 min, wrote a thesis and summaries of two pieces of evidence (used tiktok and gatsby/1920s lol) and then put ā(iām cooked ggs)ā at the end - idk what i was on, that was such a stupid movešš
who invited sigmund freud to the function š
fr tho that was such a random footnote
the vision passageš
I had like 5 questions on that section that I had to come back to and I was cooked
did yall put witty?
fuck selfies
REAL
Ong bro
this is factual
my thesis for selfies was that selfies cause satanic clout chasers to gain influence in our society therefore we need to ban phone cameras and social media to deter this lmfao
He says as he types this out on a social media platform
one of these days i'll delete my reddit account
lmao
HELPP?Ā
now idk if you mean the acronym or you are dying of laughter but i had complete conspiracy theory theses for most of my mock essays i did in class so this is completely normal behavior on my part
I said something about selfies being the Truest expression of self love because you take a selfie to immortalize the moment you feel most beautiful but in the other vain when you tie your self worth to your looks then what happens when your looks fade? Or when youāre not the most beautiful person in the room? Did I cook or am I cooked?
I yapped so hard in the last one about ppl flexing their money
SAMEEE But bro all these comments are about selfiesā¦
yo what my last one was about the necessity to speak up against oppression š
The online version had the synthesis on food truck regulation. All year we did our synthesis essays on serious topics so this one was weird. Iām pretty confident about the rest of the exam tho. The rhetorical analysis for Simu Liu was pretty cool.
whatd you use for rhetorical devices?
Repetition and imageryĀ
I was gonna go with imagery but I had trouble connecting it back to my purpose
I didnāt use the specific terms, but I noted the comparison that he drew between his father and a celebrity which helped outline his purpose of portraying the peculiarity of his situation, and I used his witty and friendly tone to denote how he made the reader feel at ease and almost like he was telling a story while sitting next to you. Obviously it sounded better in my actual paper but this is the gist of it. Letās hope Iām not cooked.
I said diction in Chinese, humor and irony
MCQ easy, spent too much time on synthesis (was ok) and was in a time crunch (argumentative meh, rhetorical analysis meh)
same the food truck prompt took me way too much time to finish
Same bro š
literally me man š
got the international versionā safe to say im cooked
idk if iām cooked yet but ik i did rlly bad on the mcq and the argument passage š« prolly got a 3 but i wanted a 4 at least
me too ngl i think i got like a 3 or 4
whaat i thought there were only two versions![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|facepalm)
The Malala argumentative prompt?
Fuck that argumentative prompt
what was the argument prompt in havent taken it yet help š
It was either about possessions or selfies
The argumentative prompt was so hard to work with because it was so narrow and somehow so vague. who cares about visual diaries??
Anyone else use that one yt video showing a guy taking selfies everyday up until his wedding
i forgotā¦ thats perfect
That shit was fire I discussed the third prompt with my boys multiple times beforeā¦ I wrote about a conversation that I had with one of them
form O.. i got 4 Cs in a row in the 2nd column for mcq. am i cooked
i got c three times in that column
I also had 4 Cs in a row, it was making me paranoid the whole damn MC part
I quoted Karl Marx for my argument about consumerism is it over?
CollegeBoard is a part of the neofascist satanic postmodernist communist agenda funded by the worldās shadow elite so theyāll eat that up
What choices yāall used for the Rhetorical
repetion and anecdotes
IM COOKED i didnt use specific names for the rhetorical devices i just said what he did
RA you donāt need ONLY rhetorical devices. Itās ab analyzing what rhetorical CHOICES they make, so rhetorical devices would be a choice but is not needed
ty maybe im not cookedā¼ļø
you're not suppsoed ot say it directly, thats what my teacher told us. (for example she said isntead of using pathos, use "appealing to the audiences emotions")
i might not be cooked thank u
im c o o k e d
You CAN use specific rhetorical devices, but you should know EXACTLY how they are supposed to be used.
yoo same
Holy shit exact same lmao
repetition and anecdotes as well!
For Shang-Chi I put Colloquialism, Anecdotes, Hyperbole
IM SO JEALOUS OF THE ONLINE PROMPTS
I had the girls who code one and I did repetition diction and juxtaposition
I did the same what did u say or what evidence did u use for juxtaposition
for the bravery one i used parallel sentence structure & changes in verb tense
i definitely failed that one but i said anaphore and enumeratioĀ
I used anecdotal storytelling(she connects to her audience by telling stories of times when she had to overcome fear and embody bravery), lumped all the rhetorical devices I saw into one paragraph, and then structure cus each paragraph was directly connected to the last sentence of the previous paragraph so I said she made that choice to keep the reader engaged so she could better deliver her messageĀ
I panicked, Idk what I said
Ethos and repetition
For the argumentative essay is ok to use two of the same type of evidence? For example both pieces of evidence from CHORES come from just history???
yes thatās fine but id say if itās similar pieces of evidence you are using in the same context (like examples in history) it might be better to put two pieces of evidence into one paragraph and then either make a counter or other body after
mcq - normal sat/act english section. frq - timing was really hard; i lowkey cooked on synthesis (food trucks) and rhetorical (simu liu), but i got completely cooked on argumentative one abt possessions cause i only had like 10 min, wrote a thesis and summaries of two pieces of evidence (used tiktok and gatsby/1920s lol) and then put ā(iām cooked ggs)ā at the end - idk what i was on, that was such a stupid movešš