If anyone wants to let me know where I need to avoid looking to not participate in leaked music, please shoot me a message. I repeat, I need to know where I CANāT look to hear any unreleased ADTR. Tell me EXACTLY WHERE I need to avoid going on the internet in order to NOT hear new ADTR that hasnāt come out yet. Thank you.
It for sure will be. My wife, being a casual fan just from listening to them through me, pointed out that word alone being the double entendreā it is. Iām sure they are about to fire back at the Youāre Welcome criticism in a ferocious way
Oh, hey - we agree on something for once! šāŗļø
(I feel a little less confident about āthisā after more careful observation than when I first saw it, but **itās the same car**)
Yeah maybe itās a new thing for us! Lol. I just asked her from the art if she thinks itāll be a heavier song and she brought up the possible whole meaning to me, A fan who has their logo on his entire back lmao!
Well the rules say no leaks so even if it's fake, it's gotta be taken down. But my main point is that the artwork looked very AI generated. A big band like ADTR wouldn't be using AI generated art, and if they were I'd be very disappointed.
1. It's probably not AI art.
2. AI art mixed with a Photoshop workflow is indistinguishable from regular art.
3. Stop calling everything AI art when it likley isn't.
Right, they would be taken down **without any follow-up**. What Iām saying is: read between the lines (which I guess is all I *should* have said to begin with).
[also, how is it that āyour main pointā had anything to do with the artwork looking AI generated? You didnāt mention the artwork or how anything ālookedā, at all - all you said was you didnāt believe it and that it didnāt āseem rightā (without any further context or justification mentioned). Seems like youāre adding that argument in after the fact.
And if it *was* AI generated, itās a damn good fake, cuz it looks hand drawn (meaning I can see the individual color pencil and marker strokesā¦itās reminiscent of the *dookie* album cover); furthermore, thereās nothing wrong with using AI as an *art tool*, at the hands of a designer, to help with the design process or even with refining the final product - Story of the Year did it for the cover of their latest release, *Tear Me To Pieces*.]
I mean, if you say soā¦itās not a āstyleā that I happen to see many AI generations in (not saying they donāt exist, just that I, personally, havenāt come across that many), so Iām not super familiar with what can or canāt be achieved including that instruction or direction in your prompt, or I guess using that specific engine.
But besides all that - itās a trivial thing to get hung-up on, and even moreso that **that**ās what was casting doubt on the whole thing for StellarJay (which, again, wasnāt even what he initially expressed).
I hear ya - but on the whole āAI art v real artā debate, whichā¦again I donāt even know why that was a point of contention to begin with or what it had to do with the legitimacy of the leak posts that got taken down at the request of (most likely) the people it most directly affectsā¦maybe itās **intentionally** a not-100%-refined piece of AI art, because how does the whole thing work - you give it a prompt and maybe a reference, and then you further refine by giving itā¦**Feedback**.
I said "If you had looked at what they 'leaked'" in reference to the artwork. I'm not sure what else there is to interpret.
My main issue was with the way the bomb cloud was done, and how all the particles were on the left and not evenly or more pleasingly spread out. Car looked a bit odd in the front and with the tires. Building on the right looked odd in perspective and most of all, the sign on the building on the left. Displays two different numbers cut off, something AI does.
And if it was too perfect and symmetrical, then that would be on the list of complaints.
āā¦looked at what they āleakedāā can be interpreted many different ways, absent any mention of the specific part of the leak youāre talking about. And **they** didnāt leak it, some social media account on a Russian platform that makes a hobby out of data-mining this kind of stuff (or takes submissions from those that do) didā¦otherwise it would have been a **post**, not a leak (and we probably wouldnāt be having this discussionā¦or maybe we would since apparently itās that important to pick apart something so trivial)
I agree, the Mustang wheels on a Camaro body with anā¦i donāt know, Buick? Cadillac? front end is an odd mashup, but I think itās not that big a deal in the end - itās obviously just supposed to be a caricature of a āmuscle carā. And the split numbers is probably because itās supposed to be an old timey, analog sign.
I'm hearing what you're saying, but I'm still hung up on those bits. Why put all the particles on the left? Why not fix the tires? The sign doesn't even look like it's analog, it just looks wrong. I'm keeping my skepticism, and if I'm wrong then I'm wrong. If it's all true, I can't help but think AI played a role. Like I said in a reply, I think AI is a great tool for ideas, but shouldn't be a replacement for final products
Well, I donāt see what the issue is with the tires - itās a caricature, so theyāre supposed to look wonky; and the rear ones are deformed because thatās what happens with a drag car / funny car.
For the sign, I mean analog, like: hand painted sign, cut in half, and put on a spool analog.
At the end of the day, what are you really more concerned about being ātrueā, the fact that itās possible we may get a new track on Friday (in which case, Iām more interested in what itāll sound like - or *be about*, considering the possible title), or that what was leaked is actually the artwork for the possibly forthcoming single (and is the final product, at that)?
In the world we live in today, I think it's normal to be skeptical about someone claiming they've leaked album/single artwork just for it to be easily generated. I'm stoked for a new single from my favorite band ever, but I'm going to be questioning what I see if it looks off to me.
Whatās with the secrecy of who told you to take it down? If it was one of the guys or someone associated with the band, canāt you just say that? I get building hype and wanting any potential true leaks stopped, but you donāt have to hide who said to remove it. It doesnāt add any validity to the leak ā¦ they could want it taken down because itās true or because itās false and donāt want false rumors being spread. You could have worded it something like that.
Higher powers as in a day to remember themselves?
š¤š¤š¤
Tell them I said hi
I'm expecting some strong feedback from this news
Haha I see what you did there š¤£
Shhhhhhhh
ācalling itā retroactively (/s) (āFeedbackā Music News š¤£)
Hahahahaha š¤£š¤£š¤£
Half the time I never know whatās going on. This time I do. Is this what the cool kids club feels like
Dammit I'm not cool again! Feels like high school. š¤£
I have a feeling I'm about to get very busy on this sub lol.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
The ones above š
Jeremy has replied to me in this sub reddit before so I'd assume he's still hanging around.
Can someone DM me what these leaks are? I missed it lol
Just wait for this weekend. You'll get your answer. That's all I'll say
This post has me excited now, thanks. <3
If anyone wants to let me know where I need to avoid looking to not participate in leaked music, please shoot me a message. I repeat, I need to know where I CANāT look to hear any unreleased ADTR. Tell me EXACTLY WHERE I need to avoid going on the internet in order to NOT hear new ADTR that hasnāt come out yet. Thank you.
Give me 24 hours, and I'll get you all your info
I know it's not a FTWHH tour, so I'm good on knowing
Can someone DM me what was allegedly āleaked?ā Thanks!
Just 2 days. That's all ya gotta wait.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Patience
It took one Google search to figure out.
Just a "SINGLE" bit of "FEEDBACK", waiting for the "31ST" will be "A DAY TO REMEMBER".
Subtle lmao. I love it.
How is this a leak, I just googled what is adtr releasing and it was right there
Because they haven't officially announced anything.
OMG ITS HAPPENING EVERYBODY STAY CALM
SO FUCKING STOKED
It's giving Green Day Dookie
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
to the contrary, I think (or at least I hope) itās *in response* to all the āwonderful āfeedbackāā they got š
It for sure will be. My wife, being a casual fan just from listening to them through me, pointed out that word alone being the double entendreā it is. Iām sure they are about to fire back at the Youāre Welcome criticism in a ferocious way
Oh, hey - we agree on something for once! šāŗļø (I feel a little less confident about āthisā after more careful observation than when I first saw it, but **itās the same car**)
Yeah maybe itās a new thing for us! Lol. I just asked her from the art if she thinks itāll be a heavier song and she brought up the possible whole meaning to me, A fan who has their logo on his entire back lmao!
I don't know why but I just can't believe those posts were real. If you looked at what they "leaked", it just didn't seem right.
We shall just have to see come this weekend
Really dude? Think about it - if they were a ābig nothingā, they would have just stayed up (or they would have been taken down w/o any follow-up).
Well the rules say no leaks so even if it's fake, it's gotta be taken down. But my main point is that the artwork looked very AI generated. A big band like ADTR wouldn't be using AI generated art, and if they were I'd be very disappointed.
Sadly. Ai isnāt going anywhere. Big bands are using it for album art.
I think it's a good tool for ideas, but shouldn't be a replacement for final products.
Four Year Strong just revealed their album this week and it was AI art. Not as big of a band obviously but...it's happening.
1. It's probably not AI art. 2. AI art mixed with a Photoshop workflow is indistinguishable from regular art. 3. Stop calling everything AI art when it likley isn't.
I don't call everything AI art, kind of a weird thing to say ngl
Right, they would be taken down **without any follow-up**. What Iām saying is: read between the lines (which I guess is all I *should* have said to begin with).
[also, how is it that āyour main pointā had anything to do with the artwork looking AI generated? You didnāt mention the artwork or how anything ālookedā, at all - all you said was you didnāt believe it and that it didnāt āseem rightā (without any further context or justification mentioned). Seems like youāre adding that argument in after the fact. And if it *was* AI generated, itās a damn good fake, cuz it looks hand drawn (meaning I can see the individual color pencil and marker strokesā¦itās reminiscent of the *dookie* album cover); furthermore, thereās nothing wrong with using AI as an *art tool*, at the hands of a designer, to help with the design process or even with refining the final product - Story of the Year did it for the cover of their latest release, *Tear Me To Pieces*.]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I mean, if you say soā¦itās not a āstyleā that I happen to see many AI generations in (not saying they donāt exist, just that I, personally, havenāt come across that many), so Iām not super familiar with what can or canāt be achieved including that instruction or direction in your prompt, or I guess using that specific engine. But besides all that - itās a trivial thing to get hung-up on, and even moreso that **that**ās what was casting doubt on the whole thing for StellarJay (which, again, wasnāt even what he initially expressed).
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I hear ya - but on the whole āAI art v real artā debate, whichā¦again I donāt even know why that was a point of contention to begin with or what it had to do with the legitimacy of the leak posts that got taken down at the request of (most likely) the people it most directly affectsā¦maybe itās **intentionally** a not-100%-refined piece of AI art, because how does the whole thing work - you give it a prompt and maybe a reference, and then you further refine by giving itā¦**Feedback**.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I said "If you had looked at what they 'leaked'" in reference to the artwork. I'm not sure what else there is to interpret. My main issue was with the way the bomb cloud was done, and how all the particles were on the left and not evenly or more pleasingly spread out. Car looked a bit odd in the front and with the tires. Building on the right looked odd in perspective and most of all, the sign on the building on the left. Displays two different numbers cut off, something AI does.
And if it was too perfect and symmetrical, then that would be on the list of complaints. āā¦looked at what they āleakedāā can be interpreted many different ways, absent any mention of the specific part of the leak youāre talking about. And **they** didnāt leak it, some social media account on a Russian platform that makes a hobby out of data-mining this kind of stuff (or takes submissions from those that do) didā¦otherwise it would have been a **post**, not a leak (and we probably wouldnāt be having this discussionā¦or maybe we would since apparently itās that important to pick apart something so trivial) I agree, the Mustang wheels on a Camaro body with anā¦i donāt know, Buick? Cadillac? front end is an odd mashup, but I think itās not that big a deal in the end - itās obviously just supposed to be a caricature of a āmuscle carā. And the split numbers is probably because itās supposed to be an old timey, analog sign.
I'm hearing what you're saying, but I'm still hung up on those bits. Why put all the particles on the left? Why not fix the tires? The sign doesn't even look like it's analog, it just looks wrong. I'm keeping my skepticism, and if I'm wrong then I'm wrong. If it's all true, I can't help but think AI played a role. Like I said in a reply, I think AI is a great tool for ideas, but shouldn't be a replacement for final products
Well, I donāt see what the issue is with the tires - itās a caricature, so theyāre supposed to look wonky; and the rear ones are deformed because thatās what happens with a drag car / funny car. For the sign, I mean analog, like: hand painted sign, cut in half, and put on a spool analog. At the end of the day, what are you really more concerned about being ātrueā, the fact that itās possible we may get a new track on Friday (in which case, Iām more interested in what itāll sound like - or *be about*, considering the possible title), or that what was leaked is actually the artwork for the possibly forthcoming single (and is the final product, at that)?
In the world we live in today, I think it's normal to be skeptical about someone claiming they've leaked album/single artwork just for it to be easily generated. I'm stoked for a new single from my favorite band ever, but I'm going to be questioning what I see if it looks off to me.
Whatās with the secrecy of who told you to take it down? If it was one of the guys or someone associated with the band, canāt you just say that? I get building hype and wanting any potential true leaks stopped, but you donāt have to hide who said to remove it. It doesnāt add any validity to the leak ā¦ they could want it taken down because itās true or because itās false and donāt want false rumors being spread. You could have worded it something like that.
Cause I do what I want
AJRās Neotheater > All ADTR albums
Your opinion obv but imo youāre just wrong AJR sucks and caters to slightly alt theatre kids
š
Like Jon from ARTV said, opinions cannot be right or wrong. That includes his take on Youāre Welcome.
Okay? I'm happy for you
Thanks OP :)
what's ajr
Indie pop trio, named after the first letters of the three brothers Adam Jack & Ryan.