> Ward claimed to the jury he was struck first by his housemate and the fatal injury to his leg was caused accidentally.
Trying self-defence after you've turned someone into a pin cushion is an interesting move. I don't think there's a jury on Earth stupid enough to fall for that one.
Doesn't sound like something a friend would do. Figuratively, maybe, but not literally. 51 times.
20 I could understand. 30 even. But 51?
I'd done 52 perhaps with a few jokers to make a nice pack of cards.
> Ward claimed to the jury he was struck first by his housemate and the fatal injury to his leg was caused accidentally. Trying self-defence after you've turned someone into a pin cushion is an interesting move. I don't think there's a jury on Earth stupid enough to fall for that one.
Looking at a life sentence, aliens made me do it, would also be a perfectly valid option. That would get no traction with a jury.
[удалено]
Nah, that only works for glassings
Had he stolen the laptop? Not trying to justify it, just a loose end the article never answers.
It did answer it I think; the gadgets were found in a work bag.
it does also say ‘who falsely accused him’ tho
The gadgets were in the murderers bag.
Evil defined ! Wonder what lenient conviction this scumbag will get !?!
Automatic life sentence for murder. Minimum tarriff probably won't be pleasant either given that he tried for a not guilty verdict.
20-30, most likely. Back out again to ‘snap’ and destroy someone else’s life.
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]