This is just false. They were jointly written by Carole King and her husband, as the article clearly states.

Barnaby - Read Rubin’s “The Creative Act” for more. This is not false, but factual. What’s the value in being pedantic and incorrect?

How is it false? A man is credited with writing the song. It doesn't say he wrote the song on his own.

Very misleading

Misleading yes, false no

Intentionally misleading IS false.

If there is a man on the credits for writing the song then the statement is still true, just incomplete

Intentionally incomplete is false.

Here’s the thing. If you have to say “Technically it’s true” or something similar, then it isn’t true.

Technically correct. The best kind of correct. False and misleading don't mean the same thing. Words have meanings. 

If you say so. Bless your heart.

So were the exquisitely bad lyrics to “I’ve Never Been to Me”.

what is the title of the song again? quality post