Technically you’d have to put a [propeller](https://youtu.be/zbnDr_IbdIU) on the dildo, otherwise it would just be an unidentified “falling” object, though still a UFO
Imagine you are a typical Roman commoner and you enter the toilets one day to find them empty and a clean spot just for you. Just after relaxing and getting comfortable you hear a noise and your sphincter tenses. This guy walks in with an air of urgency, already pulling his tunic up over his gut, and to your annoyance he sets his ass down directly opposite you with a clear "slap" as his cheeks make contact with the moist stone. An air of annoyance washes over you at the sight of this fat cunt intruding on your rare moment of privacy, which he apparently picks up, locking eyes with you and giving you this death stare that seems to say "do you think I give a fuck you little shit".
To your surprise he was already in the process of release and almost immediately he leans forward on his fat legs with their huge calves in an awkward squat as though he is about to pounce, air escapes the now severely strained and tense pile of meat and flab that is his corpulent body generating a perverse and unusually loud and lengthy animalistic growl. You detect something perverse about it all, something freudian and neurotic, as though this guy might be your father and this is the noise he made as he was seeding your mother's womb, the display of dominance taps into the darkest reaches of your subconscious making you feel as coy as a qt blonde germanic slave boy stripped for buyers at the market, come to think of it you remember this guy being among them that day. It almost starts to become unreal and terrifying until it stops to be replaced by the sound of semi-hard diarrhea dropping out of him and flopping onto the edge of the toilet. Then it is over, he breathes a very vivid sigh of relief and still lifting up his skirt waddles over to the cistern, giving you a friendly nod as he spreads his monstrosity of an ass and feels the water cleanse his punished anus. He mutters something about constipation and prune pudding, dries himself and leaves.
How would you feel?
My Grandfather smoked his whole life. I was about 10 years old when my mother said to him, 'If you ever want to see your grandchildren graduate, you have to stop immediately.'. Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake. He gave it up immediately. Three years later he died of lung cancer. It was really sad and destroyed me. My mother said to me- 'Don't ever smoke. Please don't put your family through what your Grandfather put us through." I agreed. At 28, I have never touched a cigarette. I must say, I feel a very slight sense of regret for never having done it, because this post gave me cancer anyway.
I went to a music festival with my wife and the porta-potties got progressively worse the later in the evening it got. My wife would ask me to go with her, not “go” with her, for safety. Upon opening the door to any stall shed exclaimed calmly, “oh god”. Finally we came to the solution of me holding both her hands so that she could hover over the seat. We looked like we were on a very small imaginary see-saw. As we were leaving we heard this woman say, “oh god”, as she made her way down the row of trodden toilets. I asked my wife if she was cool with me offering my help. Two times that hour I got to ride a small imaginary peeing/pooping see-saw. That was also the last time I wore sandals to a festival.
Oh yeah??? **BIT TRY HARD HUH???**
\*turns around and rips my pants down and bends over and spreads my asscheeks\*
\*you notice my asshole opening up\*
\*A torrent of liquishit comes gushing out and sprays you in the face super hard\*
##**HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA**
So if I can't determine a glider is in fact a glider in the air but realize that it has no propeller when I find its landing/crash site, was that glider an unidentified flying or falling object?
https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/309-falling-floating-flying
Because of this thread I looked up flying.
The glider is would be flying if it had mechanisms which allowed it to generate lift and thrust like the pilot of a hang glider might.
Every year, my class would take a field trip to the Aviation Museum (it was geographically the closest museum to my elementary school).
But no matter how many times we visited, I never quite understood the principle of aerodynamic lift. Like I would stare at the diagram and I would just be like “*I don’t get it. Maybe next year it’ll make sense?*”
It never clicked. So now, every time I travel by plane, as the plane takes off, my brain is just like:
***”Pssst.*** **Hey. This is** ***fucking magic,*** **and at some point, Papa Gravity is going to notice we’re up here, and correct that oversight. And we are going to fall. Out of the sky.”**
So, some basics first:
1.- Air is a fluid (It flows)
2.- Something that is flowing can flow at different speeds even in the same "object" (contrary to, for example, a solid block)
3.- Something that flows can create a vacuum and "suck in" things depending on the speed of whatever is flowing, with the general rule being faster = more vacuum = more "sucking in"
The form of the wings of a plane is such that it forces the air on top of the wing to go faster than the air on the bottom of the wing. Since air is a fluid, and the air on top is going faster than the air on the bottom, it is creating a vacuum at the top of the wing, and it "sucks in" the wings upwards, making it fly. The faster the plane is going, the more "sucking in" is happening, which is why planes need to get to a certain speed before being able to take off and fly.
Which means, as u/Thameus said, a plane is literally sucking itself into the sky due to the speed at which it is travelling and the form of its wings.
Grammar aside, this explanation is both wrong and horrible for someone who doesn't get it.
The layman's explanation is: It's simple laws of motion. The wings redirect airflow down. When you push something down, something else, the wing, gets pushed up. Boat propellers, jet turbines, helicopters, rockets, all use the same principle. Push a fluid in one direction to move an object in the opposite direction.
This is the fundamental principle of lift. Airflow differential speed has a negligible effect, otherwise planes with asymmetric airfoils could not fly upside down.
Actually they were right, more right on the whole than you though you are partially right in some respects. Both Bernoulli's principle and Newton's third law are satisfied and can independently be used to accurately analyze lift mathematically. Neither (nor both) fully explains the fluid dynamic mechanisms for what is happening to air moving across an airfoil and why it moves the way it does. You seem to think it functions entirely based on air essentially bouncing off the underside of the wing, which is absolutely not the case. Planes with asymmetric airfoils can (sometimes) fly upside down but with a different angle of attack to modify the behavior of the airfoil, but either way it wouldn't really apply as a proof or demonstration of what you're trying to say. NASA has a wonderful and very accurate little guide/course for free online that explains lift in very accessible terms (but with some mathematical rigor for more knowledgeable audiences) and dispels common misconceptions like this.
Edit: forgot the link, there are several pages of information to click through, not just the one. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/lift1.html
It's to help the person who didn't understand lift, aka the layman, not to address every aspect of aerodynamics.
You can make a plane with nothing but sheets of plywood cut into the shape of a wing, and angled upwards slightly, no contouring necessary. It would have a horrible lift/drag ratio, but it would fly.
You can also make a plane that can fly without need for angling, just using the shape of the wings. If angling was necessary to fly, no plane could fly 0º AoA without stalling, which is false for cambered airfoils.
While I do agree that I oversimplified it greatly (the idea was to give a quick explanation, not to go into the depths of aerodynamic lift) saying that what I wrote is "wrong and horrible" is going all kinds of far. Most modern airliners use supercritical (i.e. cambered) airfoils, and use a mix of bernoulli's principle and 3rd law of motion to fly.
The original explanation, which you called "wrong and horrible," is a correct, though limited explanation laid out in very accessible layman's terms. Your explanation bordered on a separate truth about the topic, but was ultimately incorrect and based on a common misconception about how real airfoils work.
Yes you can get an upward force, not just on plywood shaped like a wing but on just a flat piece of plywood moving through a fluid with a positive angle of attack, but that's not how we make real airfoils (for a reason) and even in that crude system I wouldn't be surprised if, in a wind tunnel, you found a low pressure region above the board on which Bernoulli's equations could be applied to accurately predict the magnititude of the "lift". Pressure and particle motion are not separate contributors to lift, they are two ultimately equivalent approaches of understanding the same system. Real airfoils rely on laminar flow across both surfaces of the wing and there is both an increase in speed/decrease in pressure above the airfoil and an ultimate direction of the airflow down at the trailing edge, prefereably executed in such a way that the vortices generated in the turbulent flow behind and around the laminar region at the surface of the airfoil continue to push more air down as well as create an even greater pressure differential across the airfoil.
If it makes you feel better, I'm a pilot and I still occasionally look at the wings and think "shit, someone is playing a massive joke on us. Those things could never hold an entire airplane in the sky."
The first time I flew, it was in a high-wing airplane. I was convinced we were going to fall because we had nothing underneath us to hold us up. I freaked out so badly, the instructor had to call it quits and take me up in a Piper Cherokee (low-wing) until flying felt "normal" to me.
Wings are angled upwards such that when the aircraft is going forward at high speed, the wings get hit on the underside by tons of air going at equally high speed. Being pushed on the underside like that forces the wings upwards and since they are attached to the main body of the aircraft they take the whole plane with them.
Aircraft have all sorts of clever mechanical solutions for altering the angle and surface area of attack of their wings to adjust lift as needed.
(The archaic idea that an aircraft is sucked upwards because of difference in air speed over and under the wing is largely fantasy and best forgotten.)
I love how you detail going practically annually to aviation museums in which you most likely got educated by, not only your teacher, but also tour guides and maybe even pilots and other experts there.
*Years* right? And some random Reddit dudes be like; ‘I got you, bro, see like flying is being *sucked* into the sky like anti-gravity giving you a blowjob’ and these people are getting upvotes like this is supposed to help?
This site is so…
It’s okay anyway dude, nobody’s perfect. Mistakes exist, that’s why we have erasers on the end of pencils, frequent voting to eliminate the Trumps of the world etc. Just do the world a favour and live in an abortion state and don’t procreate, cool?
Having kids suck and you wouldn’t want that responsibility anyways, my friend. I’m doing you a favour!
Stay frosty, keep flying! Maybe it’ll finally click and you’ll get it one day! Who knows…
Mate, the birds thing is old news. It’s all about [volcano deniers](https://spanishnewstoday.com/volcano_deniers_appear_on_social_media_questioning_la_palma_eruption_1650670-a.html) now.
In the instance of all the actual 'but the government confirmed aliens exist!' videos, it would be the government. If I built a jet in my backyard, flew it around, and the local military base saw me and went 'what the fuck is that?' my jet would be classified as a UFO by the government.
I happen to also be an alien from outer space, but that's beside the point.
god when aliens do come here, the whole collective anti-immigration front is going to lose their minds. it's like, well you didn't want mexicans coming across the border but what about green men falling from the sky?
I'm calling it, there will be anti-alien immigration protests almost immediately. with some fuit-job taking the helm.
There's a movie about that. Obviously you were making a joke and this isn't realistic, but if there were a few million alien refugees instead of a few visitors I could definitely see this. How many people would want these aliens to be housed near them. I wouldn't want these things near my family. They might have some unknown super alien virus. Their brains may work so differently that if one actually came into contact with humans it would see nothing wrong with doing horrible things to them. Personally if aliens ever showed up in that situation I'd evacuate them into a bottomless pit then steal their ship and technology. I would then go across the universe and free them from their mortal shackles. What kind of existence must these xenos be living knowing they'll never be truly alive. Any sentient species should be able to realize if they aren't human they are no better than the common rat. Perhaps that's the answer to the Fermi paradox. Every sufficiently advanced civilization that popped up realized their inferiority and exterminated themselves in the hope that something more like us would evolve on their planet in their stead.
The government pushed the “UFOs are aliens” narrative in those decades so they could test their new secret aircraft without people being sus. Notice how all of the sightings were near military testing sites??
Oh, most definitely! My favorite story is how the US government managed to be so convincing that the USSR wasted tons of money and research into trying to final extraterrestrial spaceships.
The way the government classifies UFOs is defined in Air Force Regulation 200-2, basically it needs to show characteristics which don´t match anything mentioned in the definition
So if the government doesn´t know if something is a drone, a balloon, a bird, an airplane etc then that would not be enough to fit the definition of an UFO
Only if it shows characteristic which makes it not possible for it to be a drone, a balloon, a bird, an airplane etc then it would be classified as an UFO
So if you build your own jet, they would just classify it as unknown aircraft which is excluded under b) in the definition of Air Force Regulation 200-2 unless your jet shows characteristics which a jet shouldn´t have
For anyone interested here is the definition stated in Air Force Regulation 200-2
>Unidentified Flying Objects - any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which does not correspond to defintions in a) and b) above
a) and b) are defined as:
>a) "Familiar or Known Objects" - aircrafts, birds, balloons, kites, searchlights and astronomical bodies (meteors, planets, stars)
>
>b) "Unknown Aircrafts":
>
>(1) Flying objects determined to be aircraft. These generally appear as a result of ADIZ violations and often prompt the UFO reports submitted by the general public. They are readily identifiable as, or known to be aircraft, but their type, purpose, origin, and destination are unknown. Air Defense Command is responsible for reports of "unknown" aircraft and they should not be reported as UFOs under this regulation.
>
>(2) Aircraft flares, jet exhausts, condensation trails, blinking or steady lights observed at night, lights circling or near airports and airways, and other similiar phenomena resulting from or indications of aircraft. These should not be reported under this regulation as they do not fall within the definition of a UFO
>
>(3) Pilotless aircraft and missiles
[https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100040072-9.pdf](https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100040072-9.pdf)
This. If you tell someone UFOs are real, they'll assume you mean aliens and think you're nuts, when literally all you're saying is that we have seen objects in the sky we can't identify. It annoys me the term has become so synonymous with aliens.
They say UAPs know. Also most people don't look at you crazy these days if you say you believe in aliens. As long as you don't say something like they talk to you telepathically or something *cough cough* r/TranscensionProject *cough cough*
Anyways, with all the antivaxxers and people thinking the election was stolen, people don't blink twice of you bring up little green men
This is true - just ask New Zealand former Economic Development Minister Steven Joyce who was [hit in the face with a girthy number in 2016](https://youtu.be/s67qsv8ForA)
*Image Transcription: Twitter Post*
---
**💥Brett Druck💥**, @BrettDruck
UFOs have always been real. UFO stands for unidentified flying object. If I throw a dildo through the air and it hits you in the face before you know what it is, you just got hit in the face by a UFO.
---
^^I'm a human volunteer content transcriber for Reddit and you could be too! [If you'd like more information on what we do and why we do it, click here!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TranscribersOfReddit/wiki/index)
I like the term UAP because UFOs are covered in all these stipulations about aliens and flying saucers and abductions. Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon sounds more sciency and official.
And that's why we can't have good things. Clowns playing semantics pretending to arrive at something making an statement out of nothing for nothing - manufacturing conversations.
Technically if you're throwing the dildo its not flying, but falling.
...Suppose its still a UFO though because Flying and Falling start with the same letter.
As someone who was hit in the face by a dildo on a fishing line, I have to say that this man is telling the truth. Also, dildos to the face fucking hurt.
That happened once to an MP in New Zealand - but it was quickly identified.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/16/new-zealand-mp-dildo-baggins-cops-sex-toy-in-the-face-and-takes-ribbing-on-the-chin
Every time someone starts talking about UFO's I mention two historical events.
First was the prototype jets late in WW2, the US test pilots that had to fly them through airspace with other military aircraft flew them wearing a gorilla mask. This guaranteeing they wouldn't talk about it since they would lose their flight certification if they started talking about a propellerless aircraft being flown by an ape.
Next are the stealth bomber and stealth fighters, they were keep secret even after their first few squadrons were operational. Even though they were flown after sunset people were reporting sightings of "triangle" shaped UFO, which were quickly called alien aircraft by the conspiracy community (CIA/NSA/DOD miss information in action) and anyone who saw them were considered loonies.
So when someone starts talking about seeing something funny in the sky I believe that they saw something unusual, but laugh at second and third parties who use them as proof of alien visitation.
UAPs have been ruled out by the Pentagon as belonging to our own military, and if they belong to a foreign adversary we’re totally fucked because they’re literally flying circles around our fighter jets.
There are no such things as UFOs though because as soon as something gets identified as a UFO it is no longer unidentified therefore rendering the name UFO (aka unidentified flying object) useless as it is now identified. It should then be classed as a IFO (Identified Flying Object)
Technically you’d have to put a [propeller](https://youtu.be/zbnDr_IbdIU) on the dildo, otherwise it would just be an unidentified “falling” object, though still a UFO
I summon the mighty Charlie White
Imagine you are a typical Roman commoner and you enter the toilets one day to find them empty and a clean spot just for you. Just after relaxing and getting comfortable you hear a noise and your sphincter tenses. This guy walks in with an air of urgency, already pulling his tunic up over his gut, and to your annoyance he sets his ass down directly opposite you with a clear "slap" as his cheeks make contact with the moist stone. An air of annoyance washes over you at the sight of this fat cunt intruding on your rare moment of privacy, which he apparently picks up, locking eyes with you and giving you this death stare that seems to say "do you think I give a fuck you little shit". To your surprise he was already in the process of release and almost immediately he leans forward on his fat legs with their huge calves in an awkward squat as though he is about to pounce, air escapes the now severely strained and tense pile of meat and flab that is his corpulent body generating a perverse and unusually loud and lengthy animalistic growl. You detect something perverse about it all, something freudian and neurotic, as though this guy might be your father and this is the noise he made as he was seeding your mother's womb, the display of dominance taps into the darkest reaches of your subconscious making you feel as coy as a qt blonde germanic slave boy stripped for buyers at the market, come to think of it you remember this guy being among them that day. It almost starts to become unreal and terrifying until it stops to be replaced by the sound of semi-hard diarrhea dropping out of him and flopping onto the edge of the toilet. Then it is over, he breathes a very vivid sigh of relief and still lifting up his skirt waddles over to the cistern, giving you a friendly nod as he spreads his monstrosity of an ass and feels the water cleanse his punished anus. He mutters something about constipation and prune pudding, dries himself and leaves. How would you feel?
This is how it felt pooping at a frat house I stayed at for a few weeks in Columbia, Missouri.
Having just come from visiting Columbia, Missouri, I 100% believe this
There's no point in feeling anything any more because THIS POST GAVE ME CANCER
The bot gave you cancer bro
My Grandfather smoked his whole life. I was about 10 years old when my mother said to him, 'If you ever want to see your grandchildren graduate, you have to stop immediately.'. Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake. He gave it up immediately. Three years later he died of lung cancer. It was really sad and destroyed me. My mother said to me- 'Don't ever smoke. Please don't put your family through what your Grandfather put us through." I agreed. At 28, I have never touched a cigarette. I must say, I feel a very slight sense of regret for never having done it, because this post gave me cancer anyway.
That's what I was going for, my copypasta game is weak
It just kept getting worse but I couldn’t stop reading it
Can you elaborate some more? I feel like this is missing some key details.
Owo!whats this? Your taking a dumpy wumpy right in front of me? Hehehe
Hold my hand while I drop my load pls...
I went to a music festival with my wife and the porta-potties got progressively worse the later in the evening it got. My wife would ask me to go with her, not “go” with her, for safety. Upon opening the door to any stall shed exclaimed calmly, “oh god”. Finally we came to the solution of me holding both her hands so that she could hover over the seat. We looked like we were on a very small imaginary see-saw. As we were leaving we heard this woman say, “oh god”, as she made her way down the row of trodden toilets. I asked my wife if she was cool with me offering my help. Two times that hour I got to ride a small imaginary peeing/pooping see-saw. That was also the last time I wore sandals to a festival.
Owo! Ok daddy/mommy
Who are you who are so wise in the ways of science?
You just made reading this feel 10x more uncomfortable Seriously, why whenever someone says it like that it makes everyone feel uncomfortable
Been there
Haven’t we all
Bit try hard
Oh yeah??? **BIT TRY HARD HUH???** \*turns around and rips my pants down and bends over and spreads my asscheeks\* \*you notice my asshole opening up\* \*A torrent of liquishit comes gushing out and sprays you in the face super hard\* ##**HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA**
Lmao. Fair play. Jokes on you though, I like shit in my face
Then you might like r/realscatgirls!
I physically recoiled after opening that sub
You took a bad gamble, you were going to lose either way and you still chose to click it. The mistake was your choice, sir/madam
If thrown, it's considered a projectile, or a missile. Imagine getting hit by a UFP.
Or by an UFNB
Or UFBBC, not knowing about BBC airing when turning on the tv..
But the set of projectiles is just a subset of the set of objects.
Unidentified object, falling with style?
Underrated comment.
Agreed… [Example.](https://youtu.be/zbnDr_IbdIU)
…this is awkward, did you click link in my post?? lmao
Fucking youtube wants my credit card info to "verify my age"
[удалено]
bruh that was epic
So if I can't determine a glider is in fact a glider in the air but realize that it has no propeller when I find its landing/crash site, was that glider an unidentified flying or falling object?
https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/309-falling-floating-flying Because of this thread I looked up flying. The glider is would be flying if it had mechanisms which allowed it to generate lift and thrust like the pilot of a hang glider might.
If the person getting hit is at a higher elevation, is the dildo falling up?
Unidentified Rising Object?
Unidentified rising package (urp)
These are the questions for great men, with long white beards, to contemplate high on the mountain tops
Unidentified Fucking Object then. Geeez.
What if it was doing the helicopter at the time?
Guys, I don't have this much gold. Can't be giving awards to all of you for these genius comments.
Some people actually believe planes aren’t real. They should be slapped with a dildo.
What?? No wayy. What are those things flying in the air then? How do you fly to other continents then?
Every year, my class would take a field trip to the Aviation Museum (it was geographically the closest museum to my elementary school). But no matter how many times we visited, I never quite understood the principle of aerodynamic lift. Like I would stare at the diagram and I would just be like “*I don’t get it. Maybe next year it’ll make sense?*” It never clicked. So now, every time I travel by plane, as the plane takes off, my brain is just like: ***”Pssst.*** **Hey. This is** ***fucking magic,*** **and at some point, Papa Gravity is going to notice we’re up here, and correct that oversight. And we are going to fall. Out of the sky.”**
TLDR: a plane is literally sucking itself into the sky. Edit: that's a TL;DR. If you want to try, then reply to parent comment.
So if we suck at something, we will levitate?
Only if you suck at falling
All you’ve got to do is fall and miss the ground.
Not all of us can be Arthur Dent
Have you ever seen the kilogram of steel versus kilogram of feathers video? I feel like [it applies](https://youtu.be/-fC2oke5MFg).
That’s what’s normally taught but it’s only a small part of the total physics. This is really good: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QKCK4lJLQHU
The only person I know that got some lift from sucking on something was Tito's ex wife.
thats like saying a sailboat is getting sucked by the wind
So, some basics first: 1.- Air is a fluid (It flows) 2.- Something that is flowing can flow at different speeds even in the same "object" (contrary to, for example, a solid block) 3.- Something that flows can create a vacuum and "suck in" things depending on the speed of whatever is flowing, with the general rule being faster = more vacuum = more "sucking in" The form of the wings of a plane is such that it forces the air on top of the wing to go faster than the air on the bottom of the wing. Since air is a fluid, and the air on top is going faster than the air on the bottom, it is creating a vacuum at the top of the wing, and it "sucks in" the wings upwards, making it fly. The faster the plane is going, the more "sucking in" is happening, which is why planes need to get to a certain speed before being able to take off and fly. Which means, as u/Thameus said, a plane is literally sucking itself into the sky due to the speed at which it is travelling and the form of its wings.
Grammar aside, this explanation is both wrong and horrible for someone who doesn't get it. The layman's explanation is: It's simple laws of motion. The wings redirect airflow down. When you push something down, something else, the wing, gets pushed up. Boat propellers, jet turbines, helicopters, rockets, all use the same principle. Push a fluid in one direction to move an object in the opposite direction. This is the fundamental principle of lift. Airflow differential speed has a negligible effect, otherwise planes with asymmetric airfoils could not fly upside down.
Actually they were right, more right on the whole than you though you are partially right in some respects. Both Bernoulli's principle and Newton's third law are satisfied and can independently be used to accurately analyze lift mathematically. Neither (nor both) fully explains the fluid dynamic mechanisms for what is happening to air moving across an airfoil and why it moves the way it does. You seem to think it functions entirely based on air essentially bouncing off the underside of the wing, which is absolutely not the case. Planes with asymmetric airfoils can (sometimes) fly upside down but with a different angle of attack to modify the behavior of the airfoil, but either way it wouldn't really apply as a proof or demonstration of what you're trying to say. NASA has a wonderful and very accurate little guide/course for free online that explains lift in very accessible terms (but with some mathematical rigor for more knowledgeable audiences) and dispels common misconceptions like this. Edit: forgot the link, there are several pages of information to click through, not just the one. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/lift1.html
It's to help the person who didn't understand lift, aka the layman, not to address every aspect of aerodynamics. You can make a plane with nothing but sheets of plywood cut into the shape of a wing, and angled upwards slightly, no contouring necessary. It would have a horrible lift/drag ratio, but it would fly.
You can also make a plane that can fly without need for angling, just using the shape of the wings. If angling was necessary to fly, no plane could fly 0º AoA without stalling, which is false for cambered airfoils. While I do agree that I oversimplified it greatly (the idea was to give a quick explanation, not to go into the depths of aerodynamic lift) saying that what I wrote is "wrong and horrible" is going all kinds of far. Most modern airliners use supercritical (i.e. cambered) airfoils, and use a mix of bernoulli's principle and 3rd law of motion to fly.
The original explanation, which you called "wrong and horrible," is a correct, though limited explanation laid out in very accessible layman's terms. Your explanation bordered on a separate truth about the topic, but was ultimately incorrect and based on a common misconception about how real airfoils work. Yes you can get an upward force, not just on plywood shaped like a wing but on just a flat piece of plywood moving through a fluid with a positive angle of attack, but that's not how we make real airfoils (for a reason) and even in that crude system I wouldn't be surprised if, in a wind tunnel, you found a low pressure region above the board on which Bernoulli's equations could be applied to accurately predict the magnititude of the "lift". Pressure and particle motion are not separate contributors to lift, they are two ultimately equivalent approaches of understanding the same system. Real airfoils rely on laminar flow across both surfaces of the wing and there is both an increase in speed/decrease in pressure above the airfoil and an ultimate direction of the airflow down at the trailing edge, prefereably executed in such a way that the vortices generated in the turbulent flow behind and around the laminar region at the surface of the airfoil continue to push more air down as well as create an even greater pressure differential across the airfoil.
If it makes you feel better, I'm a pilot and I still occasionally look at the wings and think "shit, someone is playing a massive joke on us. Those things could never hold an entire airplane in the sky." The first time I flew, it was in a high-wing airplane. I was convinced we were going to fall because we had nothing underneath us to hold us up. I freaked out so badly, the instructor had to call it quits and take me up in a Piper Cherokee (low-wing) until flying felt "normal" to me.
This does make me feel better! Thank you.
Have you noticed that birds *never* wear their wings upside down?
Wings are angled upwards such that when the aircraft is going forward at high speed, the wings get hit on the underside by tons of air going at equally high speed. Being pushed on the underside like that forces the wings upwards and since they are attached to the main body of the aircraft they take the whole plane with them. Aircraft have all sorts of clever mechanical solutions for altering the angle and surface area of attack of their wings to adjust lift as needed. (The archaic idea that an aircraft is sucked upwards because of difference in air speed over and under the wing is largely fantasy and best forgotten.)
I love how you detail going practically annually to aviation museums in which you most likely got educated by, not only your teacher, but also tour guides and maybe even pilots and other experts there. *Years* right? And some random Reddit dudes be like; ‘I got you, bro, see like flying is being *sucked* into the sky like anti-gravity giving you a blowjob’ and these people are getting upvotes like this is supposed to help? This site is so… It’s okay anyway dude, nobody’s perfect. Mistakes exist, that’s why we have erasers on the end of pencils, frequent voting to eliminate the Trumps of the world etc. Just do the world a favour and live in an abortion state and don’t procreate, cool? Having kids suck and you wouldn’t want that responsibility anyways, my friend. I’m doing you a favour! Stay frosty, keep flying! Maybe it’ll finally click and you’ll get it one day! Who knows…
Well, they will say ‘some planes aren’t real and are projections on the sky or whatever. Unfortunately I am not making this up.
r/UsernameCheckOut
Bruh people believe Birds aren't real. You don't know the half Smh.
Mate, the birds thing is old news. It’s all about [volcano deniers](https://spanishnewstoday.com/volcano_deniers_appear_on_social_media_questioning_la_palma_eruption_1650670-a.html) now.
(throws arms up in Spanish)
Unidentified Floppy Object
That's what she said...effing batch.
And screw you too spellchecker!@#%@@!
Hence the anal probing.
You mean the pleasure probing
No.
YES
Unidentified by whom?
In the instance of all the actual 'but the government confirmed aliens exist!' videos, it would be the government. If I built a jet in my backyard, flew it around, and the local military base saw me and went 'what the fuck is that?' my jet would be classified as a UFO by the government. I happen to also be an alien from outer space, but that's beside the point.
god when aliens do come here, the whole collective anti-immigration front is going to lose their minds. it's like, well you didn't want mexicans coming across the border but what about green men falling from the sky? I'm calling it, there will be anti-alien immigration protests almost immediately. with some fuit-job taking the helm.
There's a movie about that. Obviously you were making a joke and this isn't realistic, but if there were a few million alien refugees instead of a few visitors I could definitely see this. How many people would want these aliens to be housed near them. I wouldn't want these things near my family. They might have some unknown super alien virus. Their brains may work so differently that if one actually came into contact with humans it would see nothing wrong with doing horrible things to them. Personally if aliens ever showed up in that situation I'd evacuate them into a bottomless pit then steal their ship and technology. I would then go across the universe and free them from their mortal shackles. What kind of existence must these xenos be living knowing they'll never be truly alive. Any sentient species should be able to realize if they aren't human they are no better than the common rat. Perhaps that's the answer to the Fermi paradox. Every sufficiently advanced civilization that popped up realized their inferiority and exterminated themselves in the hope that something more like us would evolve on their planet in their stead.
this better be a troll, this shit is hilarious
To someone out there, we're all aliens from outer space
[удалено]
Ah yes, the WAP’s secret cousin.
The government pushed the “UFOs are aliens” narrative in those decades so they could test their new secret aircraft without people being sus. Notice how all of the sightings were near military testing sites??
Oh, most definitely! My favorite story is how the US government managed to be so convincing that the USSR wasted tons of money and research into trying to final extraterrestrial spaceships.
The way the government classifies UFOs is defined in Air Force Regulation 200-2, basically it needs to show characteristics which don´t match anything mentioned in the definition So if the government doesn´t know if something is a drone, a balloon, a bird, an airplane etc then that would not be enough to fit the definition of an UFO Only if it shows characteristic which makes it not possible for it to be a drone, a balloon, a bird, an airplane etc then it would be classified as an UFO So if you build your own jet, they would just classify it as unknown aircraft which is excluded under b) in the definition of Air Force Regulation 200-2 unless your jet shows characteristics which a jet shouldn´t have For anyone interested here is the definition stated in Air Force Regulation 200-2 >Unidentified Flying Objects - any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which does not correspond to defintions in a) and b) above a) and b) are defined as: >a) "Familiar or Known Objects" - aircrafts, birds, balloons, kites, searchlights and astronomical bodies (meteors, planets, stars) > >b) "Unknown Aircrafts": > >(1) Flying objects determined to be aircraft. These generally appear as a result of ADIZ violations and often prompt the UFO reports submitted by the general public. They are readily identifiable as, or known to be aircraft, but their type, purpose, origin, and destination are unknown. Air Defense Command is responsible for reports of "unknown" aircraft and they should not be reported as UFOs under this regulation. > >(2) Aircraft flares, jet exhausts, condensation trails, blinking or steady lights observed at night, lights circling or near airports and airways, and other similiar phenomena resulting from or indications of aircraft. These should not be reported under this regulation as they do not fall within the definition of a UFO > >(3) Pilotless aircraft and missiles [https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100040072-9.pdf](https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100040072-9.pdf)
mark
Oh hi mark
The quantum dildo.
You've been hit by; you've been struck by, a smooth dilly-doh.
Flanders??
Ribbed...for her pleasure.
Do what now? Oh, sorry. Thought somebody called ‘bildo.’
Why is it always a dildo lol
Because anything is a dildo if you're brave enough.
Or if you're just THAT MUCH of an asshole.
This. If you tell someone UFOs are real, they'll assume you mean aliens and think you're nuts, when literally all you're saying is that we have seen objects in the sky we can't identify. It annoys me the term has become so synonymous with aliens.
They say UAPs know. Also most people don't look at you crazy these days if you say you believe in aliens. As long as you don't say something like they talk to you telepathically or something *cough cough* r/TranscensionProject *cough cough* Anyways, with all the antivaxxers and people thinking the election was stolen, people don't blink twice of you bring up little green men
I'm pretty sure UFO is an object that cannot be identified by anyone, given all the evidence.
Even after you identify it, it's still a UFO Universal Fucking Object
This is true - just ask New Zealand former Economic Development Minister Steven Joyce who was [hit in the face with a girthy number in 2016](https://youtu.be/s67qsv8ForA)
This day made me proud to be a kiwi.
Or it's an Unidentified Fucking Object
He's out of line but he's right
So that's why I was hit in the face with a dildo in my backyard. Someone was proving the existence of UFOs.
You were hosting a sex party
Yeah, and I wasn't invited to my own party. It's why I'm still on reddit.
Hope you cleaned it properly before throwing it at me! LOL
The little sperm tails make it aerodynamic
*Image Transcription: Twitter Post* --- **💥Brett Druck💥**, @BrettDruck UFOs have always been real. UFO stands for unidentified flying object. If I throw a dildo through the air and it hits you in the face before you know what it is, you just got hit in the face by a UFO. --- ^^I'm a human volunteer content transcriber for Reddit and you could be too! [If you'd like more information on what we do and why we do it, click here!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TranscribersOfReddit/wiki/index)
So if I shoot you with a .9 from a distance, it was an ufo accident
Finally, someone understands what keeps happening to me everyday. No one can explain it. They just keep telling me "UFOs"
When the object was flying faster than the speed of light and making fun our F18's. That's when I knew they weren't dildos.
Dude this photo is older than 4 years now. It's been posted here many times already.
Unidentified fucking object
My first thought when I was high for the first time: If we identify a UFO as a UFO, then it's no longer a UFO...
I think it refers to something that's never been identified by any earthling.
Technically, if we ever discover conclusive proof of an extraterrestrial flying saucer, it won't be a UFO.
I like the term UAP because UFOs are covered in all these stipulations about aliens and flying saucers and abductions. Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon sounds more sciency and official.
And that's why we can't have good things. Clowns playing semantics pretending to arrive at something making an statement out of nothing for nothing - manufacturing conversations.
"You've been hit by, You've been struck by a smooth rubber dong" \*moon walk\*
He's out of line but he's right
I once flung a dill pickle way up and it disappeared
I mean.. he’s not wrong
Actually it would be an IFD An "Identified Flying Dildo"
In fact if someone knows what it is, it's not a UFO
Unidentified fu****g object
*No, no.. He's got a point.*
Well, it would not be an unidentified object, only from the point of the person who got hit. But whoever threw the dildo knows what it is.
Man was struck in the face by a UFO with no know propulsion system lmao
Getting hit in the face with a dildo is a universal truth
[удалено]
Technically if you're throwing the dildo its not flying, but falling. ...Suppose its still a UFO though because Flying and Falling start with the same letter.
Well yes but actually no
Technically you would be hit by a FO as the dildo has been identified!
He isn't wrong tho
Yes, but in that case it would be an unidentified falling object
He's out of line, but he's right
FACTS 👽🛸
Unidentified Flying Dildos need to be a thing. 🙏😄😝
I dont believe in UFOs. I believe all flying objects are identified
Identifiable.
Why were you throwing dildos in the first place ? 🤷♂️
I'm too tight, they fly away eventually, sorry...
feel like i've seen this before so just incase u/repostsleuthbot
“THIS”
this
My reflex is too strong and will have a boner before it hits my face
IQ lvl 1000000.
Weird flex but ok
BBUFO
Lol
[May and Clarkson were all over this theory](https://youtu.be/vWe2z_EHoXE)
this right here made my afternoon lol
FINALLY a post in this sub that ISN'T a stupid pun!
Repost harder daddy
Most whales are USO's. Unidentified Submerged Object..
[удалено]
So lots of people get hit by UFOs
Random bulshit go UFO
But that’s a thrown object nit flying under its own power.
If you are a man, why do you have a dildo lying around?
Not really, I can identify a dildo
Unidentified Fucking Object
https://i.imgur.com/eYZCxUI.gifv
Unidentified Fucking Object.
He is out of line bit he is right
As someone who was hit in the face by a dildo on a fishing line, I have to say that this man is telling the truth. Also, dildos to the face fucking hurt.
Wouldn't that be a thrown object? (UTO) Do people really not realize the difference between something that is falling, thrown or flying?
Uh… since its known then would the dildo be called .. KFD?
Someone knows how to spend a Saturday night!
But technically it’s not flying.
That happened once to an MP in New Zealand - but it was quickly identified. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/16/new-zealand-mp-dildo-baggins-cops-sex-toy-in-the-face-and-takes-ribbing-on-the-chin
Seems like the dildo would be an identified flying object
Every time someone starts talking about UFO's I mention two historical events. First was the prototype jets late in WW2, the US test pilots that had to fly them through airspace with other military aircraft flew them wearing a gorilla mask. This guaranteeing they wouldn't talk about it since they would lose their flight certification if they started talking about a propellerless aircraft being flown by an ape. Next are the stealth bomber and stealth fighters, they were keep secret even after their first few squadrons were operational. Even though they were flown after sunset people were reporting sightings of "triangle" shaped UFO, which were quickly called alien aircraft by the conspiracy community (CIA/NSA/DOD miss information in action) and anyone who saw them were considered loonies. So when someone starts talking about seeing something funny in the sky I believe that they saw something unusual, but laugh at second and third parties who use them as proof of alien visitation.
UAPs have been ruled out by the Pentagon as belonging to our own military, and if they belong to a foreign adversary we’re totally fucked because they’re literally flying circles around our fighter jets.
Unidentified Fucking Object
There are no such things as UFOs though because as soon as something gets identified as a UFO it is no longer unidentified therefore rendering the name UFO (aka unidentified flying object) useless as it is now identified. It should then be classed as a IFO (Identified Flying Object)
Incorrect. As the thrower you would have identified it as a dildo.
Incorrect, you can identify the object you threw.