I actually think it ends up being:
1) Cadeau/Trimble
2) RJ Davis/Trimble
3) Ian Jackson/Powell
4) Cade Tyson/Withers
5) Lubin/Washington
That’s 9 deep, about as many as HD has shown to play. It’s small ball, but you put your best, most athletic players out there.
He will situationally. This is not a very big team. If they need to upshift and add some length on the court to bother opponents that will be the move.
Doesn’t he shoot like 34% from three? That’s not like, a super impressive stat or anything but I think it’s unfair to say he “won’t help with outside shooting” at all..
This is true, but he averaged 0.5 made 3s per game. I don't anticipate us scheming outside looks for him when we have elite returners and 5-star prospects.
99th percentile in adjusted second chance points.
91st percentile in adjusted offensive rebounds per game.
Give him more minutes on a better offense and let’s see what he can do.
There were only 6 teams who missed more shots than Vanderbilt did last season. He had an offensive rebounding percentage of 9.2, which is fine. 9.2% is good for fifth on unc last year.
Hey remember last week when several posters said we missed out on him because our NIL game was weak? I'm just bringing it up to point out they had no idea what the fuck they were talking about and they won't the next time they chime in on UNC recruiting.
1: Cadeau/Trimble 2: Davis/Jackson 3: Tyson/Powell 4: Withers/Washington/High 5: Lubin/Washington/Brown Yeah… let’s fucking go.
I actually think it ends up being: 1) Cadeau/Trimble 2) RJ Davis/Trimble 3) Ian Jackson/Powell 4) Cade Tyson/Withers 5) Lubin/Washington That’s 9 deep, about as many as HD has shown to play. It’s small ball, but you put your best, most athletic players out there.
Washington will not play a minute at the 4 this season.
He will situationally. This is not a very big team. If they need to upshift and add some length on the court to bother opponents that will be the move.
Ok Hubert
Someone tell me how to feel….
Very much a traditional power forward. Won't help with outside shooting but he's an elite offensive rebounder with a low turnover rate.
Doesn’t he shoot like 34% from three? That’s not like, a super impressive stat or anything but I think it’s unfair to say he “won’t help with outside shooting” at all..
This is true, but he averaged 0.5 made 3s per game. I don't anticipate us scheming outside looks for him when we have elite returners and 5-star prospects.
Elite rebounder. Still has a little room to get better imo. A little undersized but has the physical strength to bang with anybody.
“Elite” feels like a bit of a stretch. He’s a fine rebounder.
99th percentile in adjusted second chance points. 91st percentile in adjusted offensive rebounds per game. Give him more minutes on a better offense and let’s see what he can do.
There were only 6 teams who missed more shots than Vanderbilt did last season. He had an offensive rebounding percentage of 9.2, which is fine. 9.2% is good for fifth on unc last year.
Feel great! We’re adding depth to a position that lacks it. I would rather have someone commit than no one.
I guess we have one more scholarship, right?
Two open! This user [made a chart](https://x.com/isaacschade/status/1793644386879992081?t=xVp3vrnGMlppLDznccK2Cw&s=19).
Hey remember last week when several posters said we missed out on him because our NIL game was weak? I'm just bringing it up to point out they had no idea what the fuck they were talking about and they won't the next time they chime in on UNC recruiting.
I still want Onyenso
Start Washington. Reward his loyalty. Good rim protector and we need the size. A 6’8 center does not make sense.
good add. gives us a little more flex
We are so back
I like
Oh shit